Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Plug Heater

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 508972
  • *Total Topics: 15176
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 6
  • *Guests: 9
  • *Total: 15

Author Topic: Ultimate proof for OU/RE?  (Read 10547 times)

Offline alan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 417
Re: Ultimate proof for OU/RE?
« Reply #15 on: March 09, 2008, 03:24:37 PM »
@helmut
Sorry no schematics, I hate drawing with mouse, it plays on my nerves. 

(written as comment on youtube)
Adp power supply has NOTHING on the positive. The negative is routed through the primary of the transformer (it's acting as an induction coil). Then I hook positive and negative to the cell...then motor in parallel. That's it!
These power supplies are regulated by a sensing loop....so once you "catch" resonance it will have a tendency to stay in resonance...the motor is like an auto tuning commutator! And the collapsing magnetic field is responsible for Extra energy!

Hope more people will replicate.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Ultimate proof for OU/RE?
« Reply #15 on: March 09, 2008, 03:24:37 PM »

Offline innovation_station

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5145
Re: Ultimate proof for OU/RE?
« Reply #16 on: March 09, 2008, 04:07:06 PM »
hello all

many people will not like me saying this.....

but i really dont think resonance plays as big a role as you all think ......

 ;)

ist

Offline alan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 417
Re: Ultimate proof for OU/RE?
« Reply #17 on: March 09, 2008, 04:18:18 PM »
Why should we dislike it?
Why do you think resonance is not so important?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Ultimate proof for OU/RE?
« Reply #17 on: March 09, 2008, 04:18:18 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline innovation_station

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5145
Re: Ultimate proof for OU/RE?
« Reply #18 on: March 09, 2008, 04:37:30 PM »
the general public will be delighted......

but the powers that be will NOT!!

SO FOR NOW IT REMAINS A TINY PUZZEL



like the keys to the puzzel that falls into place you could tell how we felt by the looks on our faces..


ist

Offline alan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 417
Re: Ultimate proof for OU/RE?
« Reply #19 on: March 09, 2008, 05:00:58 PM »
that makes sense  ::)

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Ultimate proof for OU/RE?
« Reply #19 on: March 09, 2008, 05:00:58 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline innovation_station

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5145
Re: Ultimate proof for OU/RE?
« Reply #20 on: March 09, 2008, 05:44:23 PM »
well

there you have it lol

thanks bro ;)   

i knew you would play your cards ......


i will say no more right now ........

play around and see what you come up with ......

ist

« Last Edit: March 09, 2008, 06:26:55 PM by innovation_station »

Offline alan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 417
Re: Ultimate proof for OU/RE?
« Reply #21 on: March 09, 2008, 09:26:57 PM »
Soon.
gonna try to make the cap pulse-charger you've made.
you sure the cap isn't charged with regular charge? because pulses created with a manual switch are long.
Please talk straight and not like yoda.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Ultimate proof for OU/RE?
« Reply #21 on: March 09, 2008, 09:26:57 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline bw

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 126
Re: Ultimate proof for OU/RE?
« Reply #22 on: March 10, 2008, 01:49:59 AM »
Innovation I'm sorry I gave credit to the wrong guy on page one.  I'm also a fan.  Thanks for sharing all your work and findings. 

Offline Frederic2k1

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 90
Re: Ultimate proof for OU/RE?
« Reply #23 on: March 10, 2008, 05:23:08 PM »
Please, can anyone explain to me, why video 1 is a proof for overunity ?

There are sparks at the connector on the not corroded side und other sparks on the corroded one. I see no difference or is it the difference in intensity ? So why should the intensity be lower at the not corroded side of the connector.

thank you

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Ultimate proof for OU/RE?
« Reply #23 on: March 10, 2008, 05:23:08 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline one

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 154
Re: Ultimate proof for OU/RE?
« Reply #24 on: March 10, 2008, 07:12:42 PM »
Please, can anyone explain to me, why video 1 is a proof for overunity ?

There are sparks at the connector on the not corroded side und other sparks on the corroded one. I see no difference or is it the difference in intensity ? So why should the intensity be lower at the not corroded side of the connector.

thank you

Frederic

In  my opinion it is not  absolute   proof of over unity ...........but it is pretty good evidence  of  OU.

In this  case it is all about the sparks .

To  really  understand  you  would have to spend a little time  making a few sparks  yourself.
I would say   that the easiest  way  that I can think of to make  a spark like  he  did on the corroded end   you could use some welding  equipment  set on the lowest settings.
Of course the  lowest settings of any welding  equipent uses MUCH more  power than he was using.

Another indication of   OU  ( radient energy )  is the color of the  sparks
The  little  sparks  on the clean metal are orange and have fairly  sharp edges .
The  sparks on the corroded end are  blue and the edges   are more diffused   


gary




Offline alan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 417
Re: Ultimate proof for OU/RE?
« Reply #25 on: March 11, 2008, 03:14:37 PM »
@one: exactly!

RF sparks are also blue right?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Ultimate proof for OU/RE?
« Reply #25 on: March 11, 2008, 03:14:37 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline martinzurix

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 58
Re: Ultimate proof for OU/RE?
« Reply #26 on: March 11, 2008, 03:33:05 PM »
hee just burnig down iron like electrods in electrowelding dewice. there no extra energy

Offline innovation_station

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5145
Re: Ultimate proof for OU/RE?
« Reply #27 on: March 11, 2008, 05:04:16 PM »
 ;) ::)

yep your right ....

nothing to see here folks .....


 :)

ist

Offline alan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 417
Re: Ultimate proof for OU/RE?
« Reply #28 on: March 11, 2008, 05:08:06 PM »
From our big friend innovation_station:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sD5xQmvb5ao

What is the (classical physics) explanation for the spark being bigger when shorted through a coil?
I don't know. Maybe it isn't excess energy.

Offline Prophmaji

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: Ultimate proof for OU/RE?
« Reply #29 on: April 04, 2008, 08:22:31 AM »
This is very straight forward, and has to do with the time constants that exist within a given coil winding, vis-a-vis the 'speed of light' time that it takes the given wire to become aligned and conduct. Remember, you will not get conduction in a piece (LENGTH!) of wire immediately on connection to any system with voltage potential, unit the time frame of the 'speed of propagation' of that length of wire has been exceeded. Placing the wire under different loading considerations, with regards to 'mass surrounding it and permeating it' will change that time constant, a common consideration in, for example, simple coaxial wire design. See any simple proper coaxial wire advert in any sales brochure for that exact 'speed of light % on a given cable specification.

What I mean is if, in audio, you take a given coil, a large one, in the henry range..and place it  parallel on  a given audio signal reproduction rail, but leave one end of the coil OPEN, attached to NOTHING, there will be an interesting result.

You will create a specific frequency consideration  in the measured sweep response. This will occur, as a high frequency  where the 'time constant' of the  LENGTH of the coil's wire, combined with the speed of propagation down the wire as a factor of the speed of light, as is normally considered in electrical conductors-due to their design that will DISALLOW 'change' in the signal due to the 'static etheric mass contained in the coil'   'time constant' (the length consideration!)

What will happen, when the open ended conductor is tied to a rail voltage that is attempting to fluctuate.... the existing coil mass loading considerations, in the static sense of that etheric component.. will fire energy INTO the connected rail, in order to stop it from exhibiting CHANGE, as inductors DO (current mass)..but like a incredibly high speed CAPACITOR, who's considerations are solely based on the coil wire length..and it's inherent speed of propagation. This is outside of and NOT related specifically to it's inductive 'current flow active-connected' so called 'normal' applications.

So, in essence, you have a high speed capacitor in this application, that is etherically powered, not an inductor.

It's pure, standard physics as application in the math and theory department, supported by commonly known working theory.

For example, Joseph Newmans motor is a variant of that. The magnetic mass slows the propagation 'time constant rates' that are related to his wire LENGTHS in his coils ONLY..and these constants BECOME the characteristics of  the CAPACITIVE volume of the large 'seeming inductor' ---this provides the extreme grunt. They are big, but they work.

Once again, the capacitive storage of etheric (merely static background load) energy appears ONLY in the 'speed of light propagation factor of the LENGTH of the coil's wire. Not in it's current mass considerations as a 'usual application (series with  the load, under AC considerations, while conducting current).

Essentially..the free electrons, in any given electrical conductor, must polarize into a conductive state, before conductive considerations can take place..and current flows. Speed of propagation is important. Polarizing, as a system of  Pre Conduction Loading, is the speed constant . However, if you take it away..the polarization will cease, and you get a collapse back to relaxed alignment. We like to call that elastic pressure of pre conduction polarization.....voltage..potential The chemical analogy? Ionic charge.

I don't know about you..but it reminds me of crystals. Like in....every aspect.

Through etheric mass loading considerations of any given material and/or shape/volume, 'speed of propagation' within those two characteristics,  will dictate the resonant aspects that need be considered for the given device to work.

For example, water has it's own particular resonance considerations concerning the psychical, dimensional, etc. Importantly, as well, so does the interface point between the given metal and the water. The creation of the oxidative compounds and separative efficiencies can be viewed as the paths for determining this particular resonance frequency consideration.
« Last Edit: April 04, 2008, 09:05:26 AM by Prophmaji »

 

OneLink