Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

News announcements and other topics => News => Topic started by: Matt Emery on February 29, 2008, 06:13:28 PM

Title: Anti-Parallel Double Helical Electromagnetic Interaction
Post by: Matt Emery on February 29, 2008, 06:13:28 PM
See final post under topic Matt Emery
Title: Re: Matt Emery's Theory of Anti-Parallel Double Helical Electromagnetic Interact
Post by: helmut on February 29, 2008, 06:48:13 PM
Hello Matt
Welcome here.
Please do a new Video as soon as possible.I was trying to follow your presentation
but it was just impossible.
I am shure,that your message is worth to understand.So please write it down or
perhaps you know someone who is able to filter the noise.
I wait to see the next news
helmut
Title: Re: Matt Emery's Theory of Anti-Parallel Double Helical Electromagnetic Interaction
Post by: MeggerMan on February 29, 2008, 11:37:55 PM
Hi Matt,
were you told by someone to make a video that lasts 50 minutes?
I think you could have squeazed this into about 5 minutes.

Is the core metal soft iron?
Because, surely when you remove the battery the field will collapse and the keeper will be easy to remove.  It appears as if you have permanently magnetised the core metal.
Are you saying that once the keeper is removed it is no longer attracted to the U core?

Regards
Rob
Title: Re: Matt Emery's Theory of Anti-Parallel Double Helical Electromagnetic Interaction
Post by: Matt Emery on March 01, 2008, 12:09:36 AM
See final post under topic Matt Emery
Title: Re: Matt Emery's Theory of Anti-Parallel Double Helical Electromagnetic Interaction
Post by: innovation_station on March 01, 2008, 03:35:35 AM
 :)

hello matt


im just saying high   and saying  good job to u  ;)

altho i do have a question i dont think you can answer ......    but do prove me wrong


with your perpetual holder    do you know what it is and how it works and why??

dont look at me and think i have it all figured out yet cuz in fact i dont ....   but i may be close  8)

ist

Title: Re: Matt Emery's Theory of Anti-Parallel Double Helical Electromagnetic Interaction
Post by: Matt Emery on March 01, 2008, 05:25:43 AM
Thank you, although I'm not sure I understand the question. 

You may be referring to a more cryptic use entirely.  If so could you elaborate? 

Thanks, Matt
Title: Re: Matt Emery's Theory of Anti-Parallel Double Helical Electromagnetic Interact
Post by: Dansway on March 01, 2008, 06:06:06 AM
Hi Matt,

Thanks for posting your video.

One big problem for me though:

The volume level of the google video is very low and there is noise also...
I use a laptop and I can't hear you...bud.

Thanks,

~Dan
Title: Re: Matt Emery's Theory of Anti-Parallel Double Helical Electromagnetic Interaction
Post by: Matt Emery on March 01, 2008, 06:07:56 AM
See final post under topic Matt Emery
Title: Re: Matt Emery's Theory of Anti-Parallel Double Helical Electromagnetic Interaction
Post by: scotty1 on March 01, 2008, 07:58:24 AM
Hell all....
Leedkalnin.com was a combined site......MATT EMERY AND SCOTT LANG (ME)
Today i found that i have been locked out of my own website.
And here is Matt...my partner saying he has all the answers.....IS THIS A JOKE?
MATT YOU ARE WRONG.....MY NEW THEORY HAS TO DO WITH RADIANT BURSTS....IT IS A NEW PART OF THE BOOK.
You thought i was going against you, but i was waiting for you for 12 month's to get online and complete the work....YOU MISUNDERSTOOD MY POSTS ABOUT AMIT, AND NOW YOU HOLD MY WORK UNDER LOCK AND KEY.
Matt wrote on this video...."Your notes were crap and I will publish them on my website for all to see"
Yes....Scott's notes...but more so Scott's drawings.....compiled by Jon De Pew from coralcastlecode.com.....as a team effort.....
Matt was supposed to edit the notes for the publishers....but he could not do it and has now stolen all my work and keeps them on leedskalnin.com WITHOUT MY PERMISSION.
ALL MY VIDEO'S ECT MUST BE REMOVED MATT.
YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO CONTINUE TO SHOW THEM.
I TAUGHT YOU EVERYTHING, AND YOU STILL GOT IT WRONG.
You also said to me today...."We might as well lay it all on the table--Jon Depew did the illustrations for notes. The illustrations were good, but the notes sucked, thats why we couldnt get them published."
MATT...YOU HAVE A DEGREE IN CREATIVE WRITING...IT WAS YOUR JOB TO MAKE THE NOTES FLUENT......but you stole them instead....
I suppose stealing is easier than doing any real work, which you never did......
------------------------------------------------------------------------
THIS IS A NOTE TO ALL....
MATT IS WRONG....I CAN PROVE IT WITH ED'S NOTES VERY EASILY....SIMPLE.
MATT LIED IN THE VIDEO..HE HAS NEVER DONE ED'S MAGNETIC WORK AT ALL.
I DID IT VIA WEBCAM FOR HIM....AND HE STILL GOT IT WRONG.
Very angry Scotty
 >:(   we should move this to the debate thread....
Title: Re: Matt Emery's Theory of Anti-Parallel Double Helical Electromagnetic Interaction
Post by: Matt Emery on March 01, 2008, 08:19:22 AM
If I am wrong and you say I stole your notes then your notes are wrong.   But you never have been that bright

See final post under topic Matt Emery
Title: Re: Matt Emery's Theory of Anti-Parallel Double Helical Electromagnetic Interaction
Post by: Matt Emery on March 01, 2008, 08:23:17 AM
Thankfully the theory is copywrited, but why should it matter to these guys as they have already stated they have entirely different theories and that I am wrong.  I am very concerned that I have to stoop to the level of pointing  this out.  See final post under topic Matt Emery

Title: Re: Matt Emery's Theory of Anti-Parallel Double Helical Electromagnetic Interaction
Post by: scotty1 on March 01, 2008, 08:23:58 AM
You Fool......I WROTE ALL THE NOTES......I STILL HAVE ALL THE ROUGH COPIES...AND THE NEW COPIES FROM JON......HJAHAHAHAHAHA....YOU HAVE LOST YOUR MIND TO GREED.
GET IT IN YOUR HEAD......JON WROTE NOTHING......I DID IT ALL...I HAVE THE ROUGH COPIES AND CAN POST THEM HERE ......THEY ARE IN MY OWN HANDWRITING... :D .......
I HAVE THE WHOLE ROUGH DRAFT WITH THE COPYRIGHT SIGN ON IT.
COPYRIGHT 2007.
Title: Re: Matt Emery's Theory of Anti-Parallel Double Helical Electromagnetic Interaction
Post by: scotty1 on March 01, 2008, 08:33:17 AM
JUST GET ALL MY WORK OFF YOUR SITE.....I DON'T WANT THE SITE....
IT IS TARNISHED NOW......
I PRIDE MYSELF ON TELLING THE TRUTH...IT IS ALL A MAN HAS...AND I HOLD TO IT.
YOU SHOULD LEAVE THIS FORUM.
YOU WILL ONLY LEAD OTHERS ASTRAY LIKE YOURSELF.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
ED SAID THIS MATT...."IF YOU ARE TOO LAZY OR LACK THE MACHINERY...THEN YOU SHOULD PERISH AND THAT'S ALL THERE IS TO IT."  Ed.Leedskalnin 1936  ;)


Title: Re: Matt Emery's Theory of Anti-Parallel Double Helical Electromagnetic Interaction
Post by: scotty1 on March 01, 2008, 10:06:35 AM
I decided to call my work "ON THE MAGNETIC CURRENTS" 
It was to make a reference to William Gilbert...who wrote the famous work (DE MAGNET) on magnetizm long ago.
As it can be seen...all the words and drawings are made by me alone.
Scotty
Title: Re: Matt Emery's Theory of Anti-Parallel Double Helical Electromagnetic Interact
Post by: JON DEPEW on March 01, 2008, 11:34:55 AM
...............Koo Koo 
Title: Re: Matt Emery's Theory of Anti-Parallel Double Helical Electromagnetic Interaction
Post by: M@rcel on March 01, 2008, 11:55:52 AM
Scotty, how can we learn more? Is your work available?
Title: Re: Matt Emery's Theory of Anti-Parallel Double Helical Electromagnetic Interaction
Post by: Matt Emery on March 01, 2008, 02:49:42 PM
Jon,

Was there any reference to the description of an anti-paralell double helix in those notes a kid could have done.

I am glad I have it copywrited so you two fools dont embarass yourself further.  Both of you claim to have entirely different theories...why are you so upset.  Just plain nonsensical.

See final post under topic Matt Emery
Title: Re: Matt Emery's Theory of Anti-Parallel Double Helical Electromagnetic Interaction
Post by: innovation_station on March 01, 2008, 04:05:46 PM
scotty


i side with you my friend

matt to steal is wrong !!!!!   i have not stole erfinders work altho i promote it  8)

and scotty did alot on that unit as well but let us not for get the man that did it all.......


TESLA

NOW  matt   you can not lay claim to the operation of this unit as it is currently not operational 

yes i have desinged a unit that works on thease princibles

but it also coinsides with mpi and the tpu and ed's work

and no one will lay claim to it  ;)  it will be given away here for free for everyone FORWARD MOTION

ist
Title: Re: Matt Emery's Theory of Anti-Parallel Double Helical Electromagnetic Interact
Post by: wattsup on March 01, 2008, 04:22:57 PM
Holy smoke, call Judge Judy.

Did not see the video, did not read the script, but I gather from this that Magnetism can attract much more than simple energy.

I'd advocate for @scotty1. He's been her long enough and has provided a wealth of insight here on Leedbaby. Court is now in session.

Seriously guys, I suggest you take this up elsewhere because everything that you say may be held against you in a court of OU.com.

Stefan, I would lock this thread to protect the innocent or even erase it completely as a non-event. Bad vibes indeed.
Title: Re: Matt Emery's Theory of Anti-Parallel Double Helical Electromagnetic Interaction
Post by: Matt Emery on March 01, 2008, 04:23:46 PM
The video describing this theory has been taken down. 

Thanks everyone for your interest and good luck with your research.

Read back through the posts thouroughly and you will see what fools these two are.   


See final post under topic Matt Emery
Title: Re: Matt Emery's Theory of Anti-Parallel Double Helical Electromagnetic Interact
Post by: JON DEPEW on March 01, 2008, 07:12:38 PM
Matt you are quite mistaken> the files you claim were uneditable >They were only JPEGS >FOR  SIMPLE SENDING ONLINE and "reviewing" > THEY ARE NOT THE WORKING fILES. Changes could have been made at anytime . 
 I HAD ALL THE WORKING FILES SET ASIDE FOR CHANGES TO BE MADE at any time. The working pages were always able to be edited. You > MATT  just did not know that.
Which now I can see was a grand thing.
 I never added my own notes to Scotty's drawings etc. You are wrong about that.
In the beginning I tryed to fix some grammer in the writings. I stopped doing that right away when I realized my grammer most likely was worst. Haa
You are asking about my theory? My own individual work?
You mean the three things that make everything? I'm not displaying that as my theory, I'm
displaying Ed's message to the world .
Are you saying you understand my work (Equilibrius Grid) and that you can achieve it?
Or that you understand the dynamics involved?
Because I will tell you now Matt.. you don't & you can't (not without cheating to get there)
Is this how you behave in your college studies? If so you should fit right into mainstream.
Goodluck.



Title: Re: Matt Emery's Theory of Anti-Parallel Double Helical Electromagnetic Interaction
Post by: MeggerMan on March 01, 2008, 07:36:20 PM
Hi Matt,
For the benifit of people that missed the video, can you explain in a couple of sentences why this setup is un-usual?

From what I understand:
You have a "U" shaped piece of steel/soft iron or what ever, with a winding mounted on one limb of the core.
You then placed a block of the same metal across the ends of the U core completing a magnetic circuit.
Then you connect a 1.5V DC battery to the coil winding for a few seconds and disconnect the battery.
You are then able to lift the whole core using the block across the U core, so the block is supporting the weight of the core through magnetic attraction.
Then you connect a small bulb or LED across the winding and remove the block by force causing the bulb to flash.

Can you tell me what the core and block are made from?
If you introduce the block back on to the U core will it re-attach and can you still lift the core using the block?

I just puzzled by all this.  ???

Regards
Rob
Title: Re: Matt Emery's Theory of Anti-Parallel Double Helical Electromagnetic Interaction
Post by: innovation_station on March 01, 2008, 08:11:52 PM
 :)

hello matt and all

i did not see the video altho i will have a look now ....   

i have also done some simple expairments with this tech .......


most is all ready public  here at ou 

but it does get far better than it currently is.....

what is hapining here   is a GREAT THING  i will tell you this

just keep it come ing 


!st                                                   ~ OUT OF THE BOX~
Title: Re: Matt Emery's Theory of Anti-Parallel Double Helical Electromagnetic Interaction
Post by: scotty1 on March 02, 2008, 01:15:36 AM
Matt....if you cannot see the double helix in the book notes you must have read it with your eyes closed?
Every single drawing shows it with sectional views looking from the West and East.
I have added alot of other preliminary drawings as well to show how it works.
It was your job Matt to edit the words....and if you could not understand the drawings you should have said so.
The words i provided were only the base to give Jon a hand to computerise the graphics....
All of the explanations and descriptions will be added later....
You knew all these things Matt.
Stop using these things to justify what you did....it is sad.
I am also making video descriptions to go with my book....
I made one the other day and sent it to a friend of mine....he had some trouble to understand it and so i will have to change it to make it easier....
----------------------------------------------------
To everyone here who is interested.....
I have tried in my work to present a large paper.
The paper will show Lenz's law
The right hand thumb rule
Oresteads experiments
A/C procuction.
New explanation of why a/c can travel long distance.
New theory on radiant pulses...Tesla coils ect...
New theory on Tesla's STATIC LAWS
New theory on SKIN EFFECT in conductors.
New theory on A,B,Gamma radiation.....
Ed's notes on gravity...ideas on atomic orbit interactions.
ect ect ect.....
---------------------------------------------------------------
Ed Leedskalnin's notes envelope all the above mentioned things....
I feel that if present everything as a whole work, it may gain more of a serious potentiol for study among scientific thinkers.....rather than just wind 2 springs together and tell you it is the secret of the universe.... ???
My work is intented to satisfy the needs of a new theory.....
It will explain the current (or old) theory.
It will be more simple.
It will be able to be used to make predictions of quantum dynamic motions.
----------------------------------------------------------
Thank you all for your support...my work will take time, but i will go as fast as i can....
---------------------------------------------------------
Now i must point out where my former collegue has made a mistake.....
Take a car battery and use a wire to make a 6 foot dia loop.
Connect the loop to the battery and drag a compass over the wire loop.
One end of the compass will stay inside the loop and one end will stay outside the loop...EVEN IN BETWEEN THE BATTERY TERMINALS.
Ed says..."This shows that the magnets are not only running aorund the loop but are running around many times"
---------------------------------------------------------
Now about the Perpetual motion holder....
It shows an a/c reading ua......and the reason is because of minuite fluctuations of fields in its vicinity.
Any large coil will show a little a/c if you put a meter on it.
The iron bar with magnetized keeper contains a d/c current....
If the current in the bar was a/c then Ed could not do the test with the 2 displaced needle magnets.....
The needle magnets are displaced by a field that is the same as the field produced by a conductor carrying D/C current.
If the field was alternating...the needles would oscillate....and they do not.
I can make a clip to show it.....put the pmh near any appliance and it draws a little power...i'm sure if you measured it you would see 50 hz..or 60hz.
That has nothing to do with the theory behind the pmh.
-----------------------------------------------------
The work is not hard...you just need to think a little.
Scotty.
Title: Re: Anti-Parallel Double Helical Electromagnetic Interaction
Post by: JON DEPEW on March 22, 2008, 02:16:55 AM
Matt ,
Your calling me a fool? Do you think a Magnetic double helix is a new theory or principle ? haa haa
I put many hours in trying to help you and scotty and for zero in return(you would not have done the same for me), I wasn't apart of any aspect of your project and "I didn't want to be".. It was all just a friendly favor to help you and scott, You have the nerve to call me names when I gave so much of my own time and tryed to help you? You really are a piece of work Matt.
Pretty much the lowest of low that I've seen so far. First of all you don't have a clue what my theories and facts accumulated represent,You just compile others work and act as though you've done something.
I was never responding here because of your stealing theories "dumb ass"
 I was responding because you brought my name into it.
You really are amazing in your behaviors, kind of makes a queazy feeling if you know what I mean.
I'm glad I decided not to trust when you wrote to me asking CAN MY MACHINE DO THIS TO? Haaa Haa I thought you were a little squirrely.I was right about that. How do you live with yourself really?Pathetic Indeed.