Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Gaussian gun energy gain  (Read 11623 times)

futuristic

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 175
    • HTML Color Codes
Re: Gaussian gun energy gain
« Reply #15 on: February 25, 2008, 08:29:12 AM »
In this case the first ball won't be attracted to the magnet because there are 3 balls in front of magnet.

konduct

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 215
Re: Gaussian gun energy gain
« Reply #16 on: February 25, 2008, 10:49:20 AM »
I wish Omnibus would find another community and keep his morally superior mouth closed.  He talks too much and offers very little other than criticism and other discouraging statements. It would be so much nicer around here if he would just STFU once in awhile. I don't even interact with him and I'm sick of having to read his posts. What a douchebag. Let's see if he attempts to disprove my own personal opinion by using COE as a basis.

Drannom

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 250
    • Cristallerie La Pyramide d'Alun
Re: Gaussian gun energy gain
« Reply #17 on: February 25, 2008, 11:59:13 AM »
I wish Omnibus would find another community and keep his morally superior mouth closed.  He talks too much and offers very little other than criticism and other discouraging statements. It would be so much nicer around here if he would just STFU once in awhile. I don't even interact with him and I'm sick of having to read his posts. What a douchebag. Let's see if he attempts to disprove my own personal opinion by using COE as a basis.

I try report your post to the moderator , with no success ! So i have to tell you how much angry i feel to read that stupid post , i appreciate all the posts from Omnibus, and many are like me


argona369

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
Re: Gaussian gun energy gain
« Reply #18 on: February 25, 2008, 03:19:07 PM »
In this case the first ball won't be attracted to the magnet because there are 3 balls in front of magnet.

So then the ball has to be pulled in by the magnet
And the escape ball ejected from a looser grip.
It looks asymmetrical and non OU then.

Joh70

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
Re: Gaussian gun energy gain
« Reply #19 on: February 26, 2008, 09:01:41 AM »
@Omnibus: "It isn't true that the table continuously does work because it doesn't allow the vase to fall on the floor."

I see that different. Indeed it does a kind of work on quantum mechanics level !  The atombindings have to compensate the weight (force = m * 9.81) continously. solid materials - maybe wood of the table - has the property to use free energy to keep its own weight and the vase above the floor. thats work (on the quantum mechanics level). the same with a house, a tree, the whole planet.