Do some research into the information below before you reject this as absurd.

I believe that I am about to send you chasing a rabbit down its hole with this, but??? Is there some type of connection between electric cosmology, what we believe is gravity, Edward Leedskalnin?s Coral Castle and ancient stone monoliths? Honestly I believe so, but it is up to you to decide. You will find that it is not as outlandish as you would first believe it to be.

Here is some info on the topics

Plasma Cosmology
Gravity is week in comparison to electromagnetic forces. A new idea on what truly drives the universe. There is more plasma out there then matter.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V026kSw4XCs

Coral Castle
You just have to watch the video and attempt to figure out how this 100 lb 40 year old man that first arrived in Florida dying from pneumonia (which was incurable at the time) built this 1,100 TON stone monolith about 70 years ago with no help.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amXsPcD7g5g

Coral castle code
An attempt at explaining what Edd was saying. (Im not to sure what to think about this but it is something I find of interest.)
http://www.coralcastlecode.com/

Map of ley lines / global ?power grid? nearly every ancient monolith; the pyramids the sphinx, Machu Picchu, Easter Island, obelisks around the world, Angkor Wat, The Temple of Jupiter, Stonehenge, Teotihuac?n, Nan Madol (which is just unbelievable in its self) coral castle, and literally hundreds more (nearly every monolith you can think of), sits on this geometrical grid crisscrossing the globe. Most of these sit on the intersection of these lines. All of which seem to have magnetic anomalies.
http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/DC037E37-4428-44AD-B04A-C42959BD0B13/

I don?t hold this as true science but it is difficult for me to believe that these things are not connected in some way. What is it that Einstein said ?I don?t believe in coincidence god dos not play with dice? by the way Einstein was an avid atheist.


Science answers one question and reveals a hundred more which we must then answer. It is the love of answering these innumerable questions that drives us pleasantly insane.

On a side note I believe that
light is actually a multidimensional object.
 The universe is not expanding but its parts/particles are shrinking, which would appear to us (the particles) as an expansion.
I believe I have a way of visually describing and explaining the 5th dimension and how higher dimensions could be ?curled up? into the ?tiny? spaces they say it is, and still be much larger then are dimension,
 but I can explain all of that later if you would like.

Ok where to start?

I will start with what science knows about the universe.

A.) There are about 12 dimensions give or take.
B.) We live in the 4th dimension
   1st is length (this is the part I have a problem with)
   2nd is a flat plain
   3rd is length width and height
   4th is space time
C.) there are laws that govern how ?things? or matter and energy act in this 4th dimension.
   1.) Nothing can move faster then light
2.) The universe is governed by the four forces; electromagnetism, gravity, the strong force, and the week force. 

Now for what we know about objects in the 5th dimension

A.)   exact locations for individual objects vanish
B.)   restrictions on time such as how long it takes you to get from one place to the other vanish
C.)   The ability to ascertain the exact mass or volume of an object becomes impossible.
D.)   There are more but I don?t need to go into them at this point.

Light seems to follow every standard for a 5th dimensional object that we have.

As for the dimensional overlap concept is not an overlapping but more of a spreading out of the individual pieces of our dimension.

Expansion
The current problem with the multiple dimension concept is that somehow these other dimensions are curled up so small that we cant see them even though they are much larger then our dimension. (If that makes any scene.)

But what if this imagining of the higher dimensions is wrong?

I propose that the basic assertion of the first dimension is wrong (it left no room for anything higher then 4 dimensions) instead of a line what about a single point.

Fore example take some marbles.

The 1st dimension is one marble.
The 2nd dimension would then be a grid of marbles.
The 3rd dimension is a cube made out of marbles.
   Now consider the cube of marbles. There are small spaces in the shape of diamonds spread out within the cube. Even though we can not interact with those spaces within out dimension they do interact with 5th dimensional objects aka light. And this is what confuses scientists. It works out mathematically but we can?t see it.

My imagining of this is that our dimension is not the only marble in the cube.

Ok here we go,
Now think of colored marbles. Say our dimension is the green marbles. Next surround one marble with other marbles of slightly different colors. And now you have a small cube. Place many of those marble-cubes together and you have a much larger cube but you still have the same number of green marbles that you had before they are just simply spaced out around other marbles.

If that was difficult to follow here is a visual.

Say that our dimension is dimension e


a b c a b c a b c a b c
d e f d e f d e f  d e  f   
g h I g h I g h I g  h  i
a b c a b c a b c a b c
d e f d e f d e f  d e  f
g h I g h I g h I g  h  i

Take 9 pictures cut them up and space them out in this way and you have what I believe to be the multiverse.

I hope that this came across correctly.

Very interesting link libra...and interesting exchanges all around.

Nothing is more captivating than interesting concepts and theories.

I sometimes suspect we exist in a multi windowed prism...a cocmic disco ball if you will.

Actually in the face of workable theories that we are living a virtual existence, the one thing that negates that theory in my mind is the uniqueness of each snow flake...that and there is never a legitimate random function on an mp3 player.    

Regards...