Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: DEBATE THREAD  (Read 126387 times)

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #255 on: January 31, 2008, 11:19:35 PM »

depends what you think "nothing" is.

According to Omnibus: A nothing is a something you can pull energy from.   

How is that for an oxymoron?

Hans von Lieven
No, don't put words in my mouth. This is your interpretation because you think that there must always be a pre-existing energy source to pull energy from. You are about pulling energy from, not me. I've explained that when CoE is violated energy isn't pulled from anywhere but appears out of nothing, there;s no source to pull it from. Read what I write and don't fantasize.

FreeEnergy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2014
    • The Freedom Cell Network
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #256 on: January 31, 2008, 11:26:55 PM »
i guess nothing can be transparency without time and space which is something, but I don't know if you can extract energy from it. The only energy you'll extract is nothing of itself?

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #257 on: February 01, 2008, 12:25:10 AM »
i guess nothing can be transparency without time and space which is something, but I don't know if you can extract energy from it. The only energy you'll extract is nothing of itself?
Again, violating of CoE is not about extracting energy. I know it's difficult to get used to that concept but that's the case and it should sink in somehow.

Bessler007

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 302
    • Observations of a Crank
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #258 on: February 01, 2008, 12:33:19 AM »
Physics and reason according to Omni, coming to a university near you.  Might as well put your brains in "park" and enjoy the ride.

If you would publish this nonsense I'm sure you would looking for a job where you'd have to wear a hat.  The bulk of your conversation would be, "would you like fries with that?"

I can see it now.

Customer:  Sir, I asked for fries!
Omni:  There are fries,  you dolt.  Now get out of this store and stop cluttering it up with  your nonsense.
Customer:  Look in here!  There are no fries!
Omni:  Just because you don't see any fries doesn't mean they're not there.  When you get back to where  you came from the fries will be there.  There is no violation of the creation of fries necessary for this to happen.


Bessler007

FreeEnergy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2014
    • The Freedom Cell Network
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #259 on: February 01, 2008, 12:35:13 AM »
i guess nothing can be transparency without time and space which is something, but I don't know if you can extract energy from it. The only energy you'll extract is nothing of itself?
Again, violating of CoE is not about extracting energy. I know it's difficult to get used to that concept but that's the case and it should sink in somehow.

extract is not really the word I was looking for.

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #260 on: February 01, 2008, 12:39:19 AM »
Physics and reason according to Omni, coming to a university near you.  Might as well put your brains in "park" and enjoy the ride.

If you would publish this nonsense I'm sure you would looking for a job where you'd have to wear a hat.  The bulk of your conversation would be, "would you like fries with that?"

I can see it now.

Customer:  Sir, I asked for fries!
Omni:  There are fries,  you dolt.  Now get out of this store and stop cluttering it up with  your nonsense.
Customer:  Look in here!  There are no fries!
Omni:  Just because you don't see any fries doesn't mean they're not there.  When you get back to where  you came from the fries will be there.  There is no violation of the creation of fries necessary for this to happen.


Bessler007
Don't clutter the thread with this silliness.

Bessler007

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 302
    • Observations of a Crank
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #261 on: February 01, 2008, 12:45:43 AM »
I dare you to publish this nonsense.  You don't have a hair on your behind if you don't.


Bessler007

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #262 on: February 01, 2008, 12:50:23 AM »
I dare you to publish this nonsense.  You don't have a hair on your behind if you don't.


Bessler007
I person who doesn't have a clue dares me. That's funny.

armagdn03

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #263 on: February 01, 2008, 01:58:58 AM »
My god,


I see you guys have been spending your time on worth endevors!

DA

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 31
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #264 on: February 01, 2008, 02:23:14 AM »
My god,


I see you guys have been spending your time on worth endevors!

Well, not exactly.  Mainly this seems to be a proof that any thread can be infected by Omnibus and SMOT and his insults, stifling all worthwhile thoughts.

Lot's of great people here though.

I propose a vote. 

Would you rather go to a similar forum, where Omnibus is banned, and insults are not allowed?  One with a moderator who actually deletes useless insults and bans people who degrade the threads?

Vote yes or no. 

If there are enough yes votes, someone will start one.  It might help communication and progress.

I'll start, I vote YES!

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #265 on: February 01, 2008, 02:29:55 AM »
My god,


I see you guys have been spending your time on worth endevors!

Well, not exactly.  Mainly this seems to be a proof that any thread can be infected by Omnibus and SMOT and his insults, stifling all worthwhile thoughts.

Lot's of great people here though.

I propose a vote. 

Would you rather go to a similar forum, where Omnibus is banned, and insults are not allowed?  One with a moderator who actually deletes useless insults and bans people who degrade the threads?

Vote yes or no. 

If there are enough yes votes, someone will start one.  It might help communication and progress.

I'll start, I vote YES!
See how pathetic you are. Having no counterarguments your only resort is voting. Truth in science isn't established by voting. You should be ashamed of yourself.

You should go back to Randi or to whoever is paying you to do this creepy stuff and should explain that to him. The Randis of the world are strangers to science (sometimes having good intentions, though) and shouldn't be allowed to set their standards when discussing scientific matters. What nerve.

DA

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 31
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #266 on: February 01, 2008, 02:32:07 AM »
Yes 1
No  1

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #267 on: February 01, 2008, 02:33:55 AM »
Yes 1
No  1
Stop this nonsense. You don't own this forum. Go away.

bw

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 126
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #268 on: February 01, 2008, 02:41:25 AM »
i vote yes.  this clown is paid by the energy tycoons to distract anyone getting too close for their comfort.  ban his butt.

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #269 on: February 01, 2008, 02:51:20 AM »
i vote yes.  this clown is paid by the energy tycoons to distract anyone getting too close for their comfort.  ban his butt.
The feast of the mediocrities. Arguments, scientific arguments is the only way to win this battle. The rest is clownery.
« Last Edit: February 01, 2008, 03:14:37 AM by Omnibus »