I?m sorry but the math DOES NOT prove CoE violation. This must be a misinterpretation or a misunderstanding because the equations already posted actually disprove CoE violation without any doubt whatsoever.
Thanks,
Tinu
I found the proof! I think. Very straightforward post by Omnibus in the thread mentioned above.
(from the great Ommibus)
"Thus, as seen in the above link (which doesn't work), when an amount of energy |(mgh1 ? (Ma ? Mb))| is necessary to be imparted to the ball to raise it from A to the apex B then obviously the ball should lose exactly the same amount of energy |(mgh1 ? (Ma ? Mb))| if it is to return from B to A. CoE is obeyed. However, if the same amount |(mgh1 ? (Ma ? Mb))| of energy is imparted to the ball and the ball doesn't settle with B as an apex but, as experiment shows, instead reaches another apex C then, obviously, when the ball returns back at A the ball loses amount of energy different from the amount |(mgh1 ? (Ma ? Mb))| imparted to it. This is in clear violation of CoE."
He calls this a proof? Rigorous? Irrefutable? It says absolutely nothing. To repeat |(mgh1 ? (Ma ? Mb))| four times with some words and the letters A, B, and C interspersed says nothing, and proves or disproves nothing.
My faith in Omnibus is shaken, but I did find these other statements made by Omnibus in that thread. He does seem to be fairly consistent.
"The one and only thing that really matters in such a case is actually building the device in flesh and blood and demonstrating that it really works." (use flesh and blood, not HDPE and magnets!??)
"Go away @RunningBare. Your input isn't necessary. You have made no contributions to this field and your only role is to be a nuisance."
"You have no contributions. And you're not supporting these guys. You're a hypocrite. I have rarely seen anyone spew so much crap throughout all these years in a forum and have no shame."
"You're wrong. It has never been nor it will ever be that theory would precede experiment. Absolutely not. You're quite confused about that."
"This analysis is incorrect."
"Don't clutter the thread with nonsense."
"This is obviously incorrect."
"If you don't have anything to contribute, as you obviously don't, restrain from posting."
"As for playing with a full deck, that's an unfair statement."
"Science requires to do the opposite of what you're saying."
"Science is a totalitarian system."
"No, you're wrong. "
"You and the likes of you who contribute nothing to the discussion at hand should be prevented from cluttering the thread."
"Your's is wishful thinking by someone who, as you've already demonstrated, doesn't know elementary things pertaining to the discussion but pushes impudently into it."
"Stop posting rubbish."
"You don't know how science works."
"Wrong. As I told you yesterday, go learn some physics and then come back."
"Stop with this nonsense."
"You should be banned for flooding the thread with your nonsense."
"Go away. Learn some physics first and then come back."
"Stop posting crap here."
"This quote shows to what great lengths of ridiculousness one can get in his desperate attempts not to admit his mistakes."
"Instead of being ashamed of yourself and quietly watch what's going on so that you can learn something you're participating in multiple threads arrogantly spewing utter nonsense teaching others what is and what isn't."
"Of course, I'm not wrong. Those who confuse force with energy are wrong."
"Restrain from showing your incompetence. You've shown enough."
"This last posting is a proof you have no understanding."
"This is a useless exchange. Learn some physics first before trying to understand this argument."
"Don't bother. You can't prove the unprovable. Like I said, learn some physics first and then come back for a discussion."
"No, that's incorrect."
"Stop cluttering the thread with this nonsense."
"You haven't understood it correctly."
"What you're saying is incorrect."
"You want to be funny, don't you? You forget, however, that physics isn't a comedy show."
"Don't even bother continuing this."
"Please try to understand this on your own. Don't clutter the thread with your confusion."
"No, I can't waste time to sort out your confusion."
"Your incoherent rantings should stop. This thread isn't a trash bin for intellectual garbage."
"Continuously posting crap won't help you figure out what's what. "
"What you're writing is nonsense. When somethings is nonsense it must be identified as such and that isn't derogatory."
"Stop filling this thread with crap."
"I will not stop asking you to cut out filling the thread with gibberish, be sure. Don't waste your time."
"I will not stop asking you to cut out filling the thread with gibberish, be sure. Don't waste your time."
"Stop insulting the intelligence of the readers."
"You are confused and should deal with your confusion first before bothering people with it."
"Your impudence has no bounds."
"Everyone can go back in this thread and read your incoherent blabber."
"You have to do something about your gaps in understanding physics instead of trying to push it on others."
"Hey, idiot, . . ."
"Now, yours is really cretinism. What high school physics? You're not fit for grade school even, you moron."
"Only someone who has entirely lost his mind can claim such a thing. "
"You must be a complete idiot not to see this."
"Cut this out, you moron, that was explained numerous times already. and people shouldn't suffer from your mediocrity by reading infinite exchanges explaining the same thing."
"This is impudence to no end. You have no shame."
"Who are you to say that? A mediocrity impudently uttering nonsense."
"You are completely wrong and you must apologize again. I didn't start calling you names. You did."
Gee whillikers, this Omnibus guy is not very nice. Rather quick with the insults! Since his "proof" is obviously lacking, meaning it "proves" nothing, I am heartbroken. He is so quick with insulting people for no reason, I can see why so many people would like to have him banned. Add me to the list, ban him.