Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 84216
  • *Latest: chs11

  • *Total Posts: 897725
  • *Total Topics: 15821
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 20
  • *Total: 23

Author Topic: DEBATE THREAD  (Read 107591 times)

Offline DA

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 31
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #270 on: February 01, 2008, 02:55:08 AM »
Would you rather go to a similar forum, where Omnibus is banned, and insults are not allowed?  One with a moderator who actually deletes useless insults and bans people who degrade the threads?

Vote yes or no. 

Yes - 2, DA and bw
No - 1, Omnibus

This is a debate thread, I refuse to clutter a real thread with this.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #270 on: February 01, 2008, 02:55:08 AM »

Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #271 on: February 01, 2008, 03:07:36 AM »
Would you rather go to a similar forum, where Omnibus is banned, and insults are not allowed?  One with a moderator who actually deletes useless insults and bans people who degrade the threads?

Vote yes or no. 

Yes - 2, DA and bw
No - 1, Omnibus

This is a debate thread, I refuse to clutter a real thread with this.
You shouldn't clutter any thread with this, debate thread or not. You're so weak that banning your opponent is your only resort. The most pathetic thing is that when your opponent has arguments and you don't you consider that an insult. You should be prepared because you'll face many more such insults. I wouldn't say that if you were not so impudent. You asked for that. Go back to your masters, the Randi's of the world, and report what I told you. This may serve them well.

Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #272 on: February 01, 2008, 03:21:28 AM »
@All,

Those of you who consider hearing the truth insulting, as @DA does, restrain from posting the first thing that comes to mind. Study, think, ruminate and only then post texts.

@DA should go back to his masters who are paying him directly or indirectly for this underhanded activity he's been performing for a while and tell them that they cannot pay him enough to withstand hearing the truth all the time and not being able to do anything to suppress it. It's abusive to him and he wants to resign.

Oh, another way not to be abused by reading the truth, just skip this thread or any thread, for that matter. Don't participate at all in it. That'll save you a lot of aggravation caused by listening to the truth.

Mediocrities, dishonest people, incompetent ones shouldn't be allowed to govern such discussions no matter how much they outnumber the learned and the decent ones and how many votes they'll gather.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #272 on: February 01, 2008, 03:21:28 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline gaby de wilde

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 470
    • http://blog.360.yahoo.com/Factuurexpress
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #273 on: February 01, 2008, 03:47:49 AM »
Why not debate one of my contraptions rather then the smot.

This one should show you things you don't believe.

http://forum.go-here.nl/viewtopic.php?p=524

I have not been able to debunk it, it works much to well for that.

Do remember how you got the innovation all for free before complaining.

Good luck,

:-)
____
http://wind-car.go-here.nl

I show you free energy.

You where all to busy pretending to know everything.

again non of you even bothered to look.

Everyone who does not look at actual existing technology should not bother to debate it either.

Prove me wrong, show how you looked at any actual tech.

You cant! Have made up your mind already.

Lets not look and pretend you already know everything.

dishonest people indeed.

But have even you replicated my previous disclosure Omnibus?

The one you said was "interesting"

I'm willing to bet 1 ball and 1 magnet was already to complicated, even for an enthusiast like you.

Now an experiment involves 2 magnets and an iron strip?

Your ran out of excuses.

Why are you posting in the magnet motor forum if you do-not even own a magnet?

Should that not be the question?

Not even one magnet omnibus?

Do you have an address so that I can send a magnet to your house so that you can do the experiments and look for yourself?

I can send you a buck though e-gold.

Is that enough?

Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #274 on: February 01, 2008, 03:55:12 AM »
Gaby, I'll do that later. Can't spread out too thin. I remember, however, how sometime in December last year you proposed experiments very similar to what we're exploring now (@alsetalokin's rig) and @CLaNZeR took them to heart. There are a couple of threads devoted to that exploration here. So, you're not left unnoticed. Keep up the good work.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #274 on: February 01, 2008, 03:55:12 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline hansvonlieven

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2558
    • Keelytech
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #275 on: February 01, 2008, 04:00:38 AM »

depends what you think "nothing" is.

According to Omnibus: A nothing is a something you can pull energy from.   

How is that for an oxymoron?

Hans von Lieven
No, don't put words in my mouth. This is your interpretation because you think that there must always be a pre-existing energy source to pull energy from. You are about pulling energy from, not me. I've explained that when CoE is violated energy isn't pulled from anywhere but appears out of nothing, there;s no source to pull it from. Read what I write and don't fantasize.

Alright, I amend my statement.

Physics according to Omnibus: A nothing is a something energy can appear from as long as CoE is violated.

Did I get it right this time??

Still an oxymoron though.

I have an idea. We should call this significant finding in physics: The Moron's Oxymoron. That should give him the Nobel Prize he is after.

Hans von Lieven

Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #276 on: February 01, 2008, 04:08:36 AM »

depends what you think "nothing" is.

According to Omnibus: A nothing is a something you can pull energy from.   

How is that for an oxymoron?

Hans von Lieven
No, don't put words in my mouth. This is your interpretation because you think that there must always be a pre-existing energy source to pull energy from. You are about pulling energy from, not me. I've explained that when CoE is violated energy isn't pulled from anywhere but appears out of nothing, there;s no source to pull it from. Read what I write and don't fantasize.

Alright, I amend my statement.

Physics according to Omnibus: A nothing is a something energy can appear from as long as CoE is violated.

Did I get it right this time??

Still an oxymoron though.

I have an idea. We should call this significant finding in physics: The Moron's Oxymoron. That should give him the Nobel Prize he is after.

Hans von Lieven
Read on and think. More is needed to understand that. Go back in the thread, I've explained it. Might help (or might not if you don't try harder).

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #276 on: February 01, 2008, 04:08:36 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline gaby de wilde

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 470
    • http://blog.360.yahoo.com/Factuurexpress
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #277 on: February 01, 2008, 04:16:45 AM »
Gaby, I'll do that later. Can't spread out too thin. I remember, however, how sometime in December last year you proposed experiments very similar to what we're exploring now (@alsetalokin's rig) and @CLaNZeR took them to heart. There are a couple of threads devoted to that exploration here. So, you're not left unnoticed. Keep up the good work.

We have to keep flooding the farm animals with actual research.

The evidence is abundantly available.

There is so much documentation it really is impossible for little me to even look at everything. And yes, the documentation is a total mess. But thats what you get when everyone puts his effort towards making it go away.

The liars are here to keep you from doing anything useful.

Nothing would make them more angry as to see more smot like devices.

One day might have to give up on the entire Einsteinian science.

Or we will just wave at them from the space ship.

hahaha

Offline Bessler007

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 302
    • Observations of a Crank
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #278 on: February 01, 2008, 04:20:25 AM »
Hello Da,

The idea of the thread is to bring what might happen in other threads to a place people can look at or ignore.  The whole point is to avoid the clutter in other threads.  So far it's doing a good job.

Omni has said this isn't peer review so you have to wonder why is he attempting to make a case here.  I wonder.  The proper place to make the case the SMOT violates CoE would be in a scientific publication.  Why does he argue here and not before his peers?  One guess is they wouldn't be his peers.  The real truth is (whether he's their equal or not) is they would tear his argument to pieces.

The real reason no publication would publish Omni is that his absurd point has no basis in reality.  If he's a professor he could easily publish his idea where he teaches.  I've read papers at different universities.

The sad truth is Omni is a fraud.  The good news is he's not asking for money.  :)



Bach, bach, bach-it-i bach.  No hair, just feathers!



Bessler007

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #278 on: February 01, 2008, 04:20:25 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #279 on: February 01, 2008, 04:42:37 AM »
Hello Da,

The idea of the thread is to bring what might happen in other threads to a place people can look at or ignore.  The whole point is to avoid the clutter in other threads.  So far it's doing a good job.

Omni has said this isn't peer review so you have to wonder why is he attempting to make a case here.  I wonder.  The proper place to make the case the SMOT violates CoE would be in a scientific publication.  Why does he argue here and not before his peers?  One guess is they wouldn't be his peers.  The real truth is (whether he's their equal or not) is they would tear his argument to pieces.

The real reason no publication would publish Omni is that his absurd point has no basis in reality.  If he's a professor he could easily publish his idea where he teaches.  I've read papers at different universities.

The sad truth is Omni is a fraud.  The good news is he's not asking for money.  :)



Bach, bach, bach-it-i bach.  No hair, just feathers!



Bessler007
Boy, oh, boy ...

Offline psychopath

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 62
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #280 on: February 01, 2008, 05:45:21 AM »
Hello Da,

The idea of the thread is to bring what might happen in other threads to a place people can look at or ignore.  The whole point is to avoid the clutter in other threads.  So far it's doing a good job.

Omni has said this isn't peer review so you have to wonder why is he attempting to make a case here.  I wonder.  The proper place to make the case the SMOT violates CoE would be in a scientific publication.  Why does he argue here and not before his peers?  One guess is they wouldn't be his peers.  The real truth is (whether he's their equal or not) is they would tear his argument to pieces.

The real reason no publication would publish Omni is that his absurd point has no basis in reality.  If he's a professor he could easily publish his idea where he teaches.  I've read papers at different universities.

The sad truth is Omni is a fraud.  The good news is he's not asking for money.  :)



Bach, bach, bach-it-i bach.  No hair, just feathers!



Bessler007

You have so much fath in mainstream science. What you do not realise, is that mainstream science ignores many things out of the ordinary, because it threatens what they have worked for their whole lives.

When Einstein published his papers, some scientists simply denied it, the refused to even look at his work. The wright brothers were "crackpots". Galileo was supressed. There is no secret conspiracy, the oil companies don't care about your youtube videos, this happens naturally, many people resist new things. People want to make sense of the world, so they dismiss unusual things.

This has decreased over the years, but it is still here.

We do not know if the smot is not overunity, and we do not know if a looped smot is possible or not. And there is nothing wrong with this, we don't have to make something up just because we can't explain it, since that is religion, not science. Just because you have failed to do it doesn't make it "impossible".

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #280 on: February 01, 2008, 05:45:21 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline PolyMatrix

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 104
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #281 on: February 01, 2008, 06:53:39 AM »
Been looking around the net and Joined the Joe's Cell free energy device group  on yahoo and there is not one person that says it does not work. There are many saying that it does work! Fuel line to engine is disconected and the engine is running!

Now if ever there was proof of a new energy source that would be it.

Offline PolyMatrix

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 104
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #282 on: February 01, 2008, 06:58:49 AM »
Here is an example of the emails I am getting from this group.

Quote
Hi Patrick,

I thought that was clear, but I guess I was wrong. What is happening is that the aetheric energy creates standing waves along the metal at nodes which are exactly 1.89475" long. So as long as your tubes are cut to any multiple of this length a resonant condition is set up to maximize the energy output. Much like a radio antenna.

All the central tubes in a cell will still be cut to the same length, but precisely at one of these odd lengths.

The canister needs to be long enough to accommodate a water depth at the next length up the chart. The water acts just like another length of tubing and will also exhibit the same nodal lengths.

The tubes need to be spaced about .61" off the canister bottom. And the optimum tube spacing would be .61" as well, but this is somewhat impractical without rolling tubes as BW did in his cell.

The one cell that I modified, essentially went to stage 3 without ANY charging, which is exactly what Dave Lowrance predicted it would do. The man is amazing! I do think however that the water should be prepped first to maximize the cells output.

I'm sorry if I missed your email about JC advances. Possibly I never got it, because I generally pay attention to any email that you send.

My document in both JCFED and JC2 titled "Assembling and Charging a Joe Cell" basicly covers my technique for "prepping" water. All it really discusses that's new is the fact that it's nearly impossible to charge water in a standard JC because of the gap spacing, so I simply suggest people build a small flat plate electrolysis cell to prep water for the JC. With plate spacing around 1/8" is easy to generate the H & O necessary to strip all disolved iron out of the water. Once this is done and the water filtered, than most any JC will go right to stage 3. This process along with passivating both cells with strong Phosphoric acid eliminates the brown scum problem and should allow the cell to hold stage 3 for a long time.

It's also important to get the tube polarities set properly, whether this is accomplished through dowseing, or testing of the cells residual voltage is unimportant, but it definitely needs to be done. I've been meaning to write up a short document regarding how to do this with the voltages, but haven't gotten to it yet. It can be a little tricky!

I've found that simply carrying a stage 3 cell inside the car will give a decent shandy mode operation, even without a transfer tube or even electrical connections. However I don't know how long the stage 3 will last! Possibly a cell built to the lengths specified here will hold stage 3 forever, but that needs to be tested. A cell not set up to these lengths should probably be given a 1 minute charge from the car battery before driving each morning. It's important to not leave the battery connected for too long as this can kill the cell.

The real problem that most people will run into is how the the engine computer responds to the cell, and different cars will have different responses. My 86 Accord got a performance boost of possibly as much as 25%, but saw no mileage improvement. So it's really going to be important to work with the O2 or MAP sensors to spoof the computer.

In summarizing, I think people need to follow through on all these steps to really optimize their cells. I'd like it if someone would roll a set of tubes to this larger gap size, because it could be the path to a true stage 4 cell. But that's only conjecture on my part.

Now all we need to do is get to work on the cell / engine interface and  reliable gasless operation.

Bernie
----- Original Message -----
From: Patrick Kelly
To: Bernie
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 4:01 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Joe Cell info

Hi Bernie,

I had already archived your similar post to watercar. I don't understand what you are saying in your post. I am always happy to upgrade any document with new information. In passing, I didn't get any reply to my person-to-person e-mail to you asking what Joe Cell advances had been made which gave reliable shandy operation, and that information would definitely warrant a document upgrade.

Can you explain your table to me? Does:

1 x = 1.894745
2 x = 3.7949
3 x = 5.684235

mean a 1" diameter s/s tube 1.89" tall surrounded by a 2" diameter s/s tube 3.79" tall, both surrounded by a 3" diameter s/s tube 5.68" tall ? If that is the case, then the inner tubes would presumably be totally submerged.

If that is not the case, then are you saying that for a set of four or five concentric s/s tubes, then 3.79" tall is a particularly good height for the whole set of tubes ? If so, to what does the "2 x" in the first column refer ?

Sorry to be slow on the uptake here, but I bet that most people reading it won't have understood it either.

As I write this, rain is pounding on the window beside me and a gale is blowing. Have people in cold, wet climates had any sustained shandy success with a Joe Cell? I am glad to hear of advances in this field as there is clearly great potential in the system.

All the best,

Patrick

Bernie <bernieheere@ peak.org> wrote:
Patrick,

I just released the following to the Joe cell groups, and thought maybe you might want to incorporate it into your JC information. I'm hoping others will step up and test other lengths, but I was quite impressed with the one length that I tested.

I recently asked Dave Lowrance to evaluate Joe cells for me, and after some analysis and testing of one, he has come up with the following:

Tube sets cut to any of the following lengths should be optimum:

Inches
1 x = 1.894745
2 x = 3.7949
3 x = 5.684235
4 x = 7.5898
5 x = 9.473725
6 x = 11.36847
7 x = 13.263215
8 x = 15.1796

Along with this is a recommended bottom spacing for the pack off the bottom
SS of .61" and a recommendation that the water height be set to the next
length up the chart.

I cut a set to the 2x length set the bottom spacing to the .61 distance and
filled the water to the 3x spacing. I filled the cell with raw (unprepped)
water and let it sit overnight. When I applied power the cell went to stage
3 immediately. This cell is assembled in a $12.95 Wal Mart canister.

Incidently, along with this is a suggestion that the optimum tube spacing
should be the .61" as well, so obviously the .5" tube spacing is at best a
compromise. BTW, according to Peter Stevens, Joe has also
stated that the gap should be bigger than .5. Obviously this tube spacing
would require rolling custom tubes.

Bernie


Offline bw

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 126
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #283 on: February 01, 2008, 03:06:49 PM »
hi anus-bus,
how much money does the energy cartel pay someone like you to call people who are working on this stuff stupid?  does it pay more if you can get them to give up?  is there a bonus for that?  do you get free vacations or anything if you get more than one to throw in the towel so to speak?  just curious.   one other question.
is this really worth selling your soul for?  think about it please before you do more harm.  free energy is everywhere and many devices like joe's cell, steve mark's tpu, al's magnet wheel that accelerates to over 4000 rpm's and holds that rpm, just to mention a few are here now and being tested and improved upon.  i believe this will be the year that energy giants are overwhelmed because of these forums.  for the last 100+ years they could buy and squash almost every new development because inventors would patent and sell their idea.   now we share on forums like this.

bw

Offline Bessler007

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 302
    • Observations of a Crank
Re: DEBATE THREAD
« Reply #284 on: February 01, 2008, 04:04:03 PM »
I went to Gaby's site a couple of times with the same results.  Any browser I had open on any desktop (4 of them) with all the tabs opened would magically close for me.

I am going to look at your link, Gaby, when I can get a high octane browser that can handle what's there.  In the meantime why don't you open a thread here with your ideas.


Bessler007

 

OneLink