Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Muller Dynamo  (Read 4322010 times)

k4zep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 650
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #975 on: May 13, 2011, 03:40:29 AM »
Ben,

If this is the one you are thinking of... it wasn't even animated, just a still,
I made a pencil sketch of it... sorry no download

Ron

Thanks, thats the way I remembered it, just wanted to be sure. 

Ben K4ZEP

toranarod

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 133
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #976 on: May 13, 2011, 03:43:15 AM »
OK I have a stupid question
I have seen some conflicting data.
I am sure Romerouk said it was a push pule motor? 
Yes or No ?

wopwops

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #977 on: May 13, 2011, 04:15:23 AM »
@ eastcoastwilly

What are we seeing there? Does he have it working only partially built, or is it just running off the cap?

e2matrix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1956
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #978 on: May 13, 2011, 04:18:25 AM »
Lidmotor over at the Energetic Forum has posted a video of his early replication. Here's a link for you guys.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mniWYLz8AV4


Will

Oooohhh - that's very encouraging.  Lidmotor is a good builder and well known and he does not scam things.  That's very good news and his device was not even close to complete nor did he have nearly as many coils as Romero.  Not sure but it didn't even appear he had Litz wire on them. 

e2matrix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1956
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #979 on: May 13, 2011, 04:23:16 AM »
OK I have a stupid question
I have seen some conflicting data.
I am sure Romerouk said it was a push pule motor? 
Yes or No ?

Not totally sure I understand your question but I'm going to take a guess that you are asking if it was based on attraction or repulsion.  If so I believe he said it was based on attraction. 


duff

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 298
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #981 on: May 13, 2011, 04:58:15 AM »
Here are the possible frequencies / voltages of RomeroUK scope shot wave form.

Possible timebase settings / Frequency:
1ms  = 500Hz
.5ms = 769.23Hz
.2ms = 1.92KHz
.1ms = 3.85KHz
50us = 7.69KHz
20u  = 19.23KHz

Peak To Peak Possibilities:
Range / Volts
.1 = 263mV
.2 = 520mV
.5 = 1.3V
1  = 2.6V
2  = 5.2V
5  = 13V
10 = 26V

duff

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 298
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #982 on: May 13, 2011, 04:58:42 AM »

Audio Spectrum  Analysis of RomeroUK "Suspended In Air" Video
(first 20 seconds of sound)

tanakat

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #983 on: May 13, 2011, 05:21:20 AM »
Rotated version, helpers

*edit* uploaded the image twice it looks... can't edit attachments ?

eastcoastwilly

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #984 on: May 13, 2011, 05:47:54 AM »
@ eastcoastwilly

What are we seeing there? Does he have it working only partially built, or is it just running off the cap?

He has pre-charged the capacitor to 1.5 volts to run the motor and demoing the power output via the Joule Thief circuit. It's not self running just showing that it is generating some power.

Will

Thaelin

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1093
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #985 on: May 13, 2011, 06:06:07 AM »
Hi Khabe:
   This design has been around for a few years. I even conversed with him a bit. He did a hell of a build and then went silent. His coils were small and heavy wire size. I did have all the build info but lost it to a HD crash.

thay

Edit:   Should have waited a few more messages as they said the same. Interesting that I conversed with Bill and didn't even realize it.

I have no idea who is this guy (or these guys) but building description is much better ::)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70E0Q_pCB-4
http://wn.com/FreeEnergyLT  ... perhaps they accidentally visited London ...like unfair competition :o
http://overunity.ifrance.com/
cheers,
khabe

redrichie

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 34
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #986 on: May 13, 2011, 06:21:52 AM »
Looks like there are mags on the bottom coils.  But not mirrored.

e2matrix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1956
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #987 on: May 13, 2011, 06:41:18 AM »
Hi redrichie,  good to see you over here too on this one.  Sorry to have to ask but just trying to understand all info that comes up on this.  When you said they aren't mirrored I'm not sure what that means.  Is it that the bottom ones are not totally in line with top or that not all top coils have magnets?  Romero did say he had run out of magnets and didn't have enough for all the coils. 

Charlie_V

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 362
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #988 on: May 13, 2011, 07:07:32 AM »
Hi Guys,

So I watched Lidmotor's video and I also find it interesting.  After thinking about it, isn't this the reverse of how a cargo train works?  In trains, a diesel engine powers a generator which charges batteries which then run the motors in the wheels.  Here a source (in case of Lid's video it was a super cap) powers a motor which turns a generator which powers a light source.

Electric machine cogging isn't our problem though because you can use an air core (which has zero cogging) and you still have back torque which puts a drag on the rotor.  In Lid's video he's using LED's which require extremely small amounts of energy to light up.  It would be interesting to load the output to a variable resistor and plot the power versus load.

I think my biggest beef with this motor in general is how it is negating the back torque of the generating coils.  I don't see how back torque is negated at all.  Sure you can put coils between magnets and use expensive core materials.  Sure you can reduce cogging by having an uneven coil/magnet ratio.  None of that will help if the generating coil's put a drag on the rotor (which they will most definitely do in this arrangement). 

If I'm understanding the logic in the design, the driving coil acts to reduce a stationary magnetic field which repels against the rotor.  You turn on the drive coil, stationary PM field goes away, rotor moves into position, you turn the drive coil off and the stationary PM pushes the rotor away.  Assuming I got this right, the only way I see the machine working is if the pushing the of stationary PM is greater than the energy it takes to neutralize its field (aka the coil can negate the stationary PM with less energy than the stationary PM's push). 

I guess the current thinking is that with the right permeability (and reduced cogging) this may be possible?  However, it has always been my experience that to reduce a PM's flux requires a magnetic field of equal intensity.  So the coil would have to generate a field of the same magnitude (and these are neodymium mangets which are really strong).  Most ferrous materials have a hysteresis loop so its going to take a little more energy to reverse that field (otherwise a large air coil with a lot of current).  I know that some ferrofluids have almost a linear hysteresis curve - but their permeability is crappy.  I'm not trying to be a naysayer here, I'm just trying to think about the system from a logical standpoint.  I really hope it works.


e2matrix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1956
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #989 on: May 13, 2011, 07:38:06 AM »
Charlie_V,  It is good to use logic.  However if you are basing your logical conclusions on traditional education in magnetic and motor theory than it may not apply unless you assume we already know everything about this world and physics that can possibly be known.  I don't think we are there yet.  In fact a long way from being there.  So things can occur that we don't yet understand and that's why experimenters and tinkerer's like RomeroUK and Bill Muller just to name a few will stumble on something that just does not yet fit what we currently know.