Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Muller Dynamo  (Read 3938284 times)

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #6195 on: December 11, 2014, 07:12:27 PM »
Iv been doing research on wind turbines and thought of a design I dont think I have seen anywhere.
Romero used and even and odd number of magnet to coil ratio
What if  ::) each magnet was on its own rotor fixed to a shaft
six rotors spiraling like a screw
seven coils each on thier own stator
everthing offset to cut down on cogging
The magnetic field would be shaped like a screw along the shaft
I tried to draw it up but ms paint is very limited.

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #6196 on: December 11, 2014, 08:59:51 PM »
Rotors shown without stators
If this was spun up think about the field that would be created.
There would be a stator assembly in between each rotor.

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #6197 on: December 11, 2014, 09:13:55 PM »
Actually the stator assembly could have multiple coils around the circumference as long as the magnets never lined up on all the stators.
You could have six magnets each on its own rotor with seven stator coils on each stator.
The ratio(magnet to coil) could be any odd even combination, I used six to seven as an example.

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #6198 on: December 11, 2014, 09:38:01 PM »
A four to five ratio, just an example

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #6199 on: December 11, 2014, 09:54:11 PM »
four magnets, twenty five coils

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #6200 on: December 11, 2014, 10:06:54 PM »
Would a magnetic vortex be created?
The coils would be in that vortex path.
Hmmmmmmm
very interesting.

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #6201 on: December 11, 2014, 10:26:04 PM »
The rotors could have all the magnets installed say six magnets on the rotors seven coils on the stators then each could be twisted along the shaft to create the spiraled vortex.
If enough stators and rotors were installed along the shaft cogging would be eliminated completely, yet each coil would catch the full impact of the passing magnet.
Something to think about.

dave

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #6202 on: December 11, 2014, 10:58:39 PM »
You could have six magnets on the rotor six coils on the stators and offset each along the shaft
When any magnet rotor and stator were aligned there would be others that were leading away, cogging would be eliminated.
I may build a wind turbine and twist it a little  ;D
fun pun

dave

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #6203 on: December 13, 2014, 01:34:45 PM »
eliminate cogging
 

Offline T-1000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1739
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #6204 on: December 13, 2014, 02:01:24 PM »
Hi,

The 8/9 combination is most close for cogging elimination (the balancing of magnetic forces) and also I took that Muller arrangement to my design:
http://overunity.com/15083/the-new-generator-no-effect-counter-b-emf-part-2-selfrunning/msg426062/#msg426062
That setup was built and is being tested, no drag from Lenz and the rotor can be turned by hand easily so far..

Cheers!

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #6205 on: December 13, 2014, 03:34:01 PM »
We should be able to eliminate cogging even in alternators by coupling and offsetting the shafts.

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #6206 on: December 13, 2014, 04:25:53 PM »
Hi,

The 8/9 combination is most close for cogging elimination (the balancing of magnetic forces) and also I took that Muller arrangement to my design:
http://overunity.com/15083/the-new-generator-no-effect-counter-b-emf-part-2-selfrunning/msg426062/#msg426062
That setup was built and is being tested, no drag from Lenz and the rotor can be turned by hand easily so far..

Cheers!
Nice setup T
Alternators could be setup 1st aligned, 2nd 1/8, 3rd 1/4, 4th 3/8, 5th !/2, ect. ect.


Dave45

  • Guest
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #6207 on: December 13, 2014, 06:11:46 PM »

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #6208 on: December 13, 2014, 06:51:29 PM »
I usually get flack from the bigwigs around here.
Can someone give a reason why this wont work.
Mark? TK?

Offline alex1234

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #6209 on: January 30, 2015, 12:25:38 PM »
Hey guys,

i would like to build an Muller Motor with the instructions fom RomeroUK.
Is this device already working? I mean is the setup of the coils and magnets providing an OU run?

greetings,
Alex