Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Muller Dynamo  (Read 4302894 times)

lanenal

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 140
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #225 on: May 07, 2011, 03:36:12 PM »
Hello romerouk and all

My congratulations romerouk on your dedication and hard work towards the research of free energy solutions.

I have a concern on your previous video to the self runner.

Below are frames taken from your video before and after the bulb is turned on. I can see that the amp meter doesn't change however, there is a large drop in your Battery voltage every time the bulb is turned on. Then when the bulb is turned off the battery voltage recovers from the load.

Can you explain. Sorry if this has been explained before.

Thank you for sharing your excellent research.

Luc

Yeah, this one is ansswered already, see below:

Quote
I had few questions from the 'replicators' here about voltage on the battery going down when the load is on.
The reason for that is that from the output bridge rectifier I am using one diode to send power back to the battery to keep it charged.When the 20watt bulb is connected the power going back to the battery is reduced resulting that slight voltage drop.
This setup was built for about 25watt load, if the load is increased then all setup must be changed.
The gap from the coils to the rotor must be changed and some other things ...

Basically from my understanding, the 20w bulb is too heavy a load for the system...if it were a 5w bulb, you should see no voltage drop at all.

lanenal

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 140
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #226 on: May 07, 2011, 03:41:37 PM »
Hi Romero,
what is the spacing from the 2 driver coil pairs to the
pickup coil pairs ?

What is the interleaving there ?
Do you have the 2 driving coil pairs next to each other
or are they like:

1 driver coilpair,
4 pickup coil pairs
1 driver coilpair,
3 pickup coil pairs

?

Do you have an magnet polarity measurement device ?

Can you exactly say, if all the magnets inside the rotor
pointing up, when you have the device standing on your table,
are north or are all magnets inside the rotor pointing up
have south pole ?

It might be interesting to know this.
Maybe if you turn around your device on the
head (180 degrees turn),
will it still selfrun ?

So this could be an easy test to see, if your local
earth magnet field has anything to do with it and the devices direction
to it.

Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan.

I also asked about the coil spacing before...

Note that this is actually different from the original Muller device: on the Muller device, ALL coils serve as driving coil AND power generation coil, but in turn. RomeroUK has made this much simpler by using dedecated driving coils and generation coils. This is a great simplification.

gotoluc

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3096
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #227 on: May 07, 2011, 04:09:28 PM »
Yeah, this one is ansswered already, see below:

Basically from my understanding, the 20w bulb is too heavy a load for the system...if it were a 5w bulb, you should see no voltage drop at all.

So Romero has gone from a large voltage drop with battery connected when the bulb is on to a self runner using the same load with no battery connected?

These are amazing improvements!!!

@Romero, can you please redo a continuous sound video with your Muller on a glass (away from the legs) showing it running the load with no battery. Please do a view under the glass and all around as it is running.

Thanks for sharing and your time.

Luc

xenomorphlabs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 923
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #228 on: May 07, 2011, 04:24:15 PM »
@ Romero:

Thanks for the links, i have not been aware of the youtube replicators concerning the Kromrey device.

Does your Muller device also run cold at some points? Have you tested that?

For anyone interested in more information on this, Energy from the Vacuum Part 10 shows Bedini running a Kromrey Converter and explaining the principle.






romerouk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 366
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #229 on: May 07, 2011, 04:26:37 PM »
Hi Romero,
what is the spacing from the 2 driver coil pairs to the
pickup coil pairs ?

What is the interleaving there ?
Do you have the 2 driving coil pairs next to each other
or are they like:

1 driver coilpair,
4 pickup coil pairs
1 driver coilpair,
3 pickup coil pairs

?

Do you have an magnet polarity measurement device ?

Can you exactly say, if all the magnets inside the rotor
pointing up, when you have the device standing on your table,
are north or are all magnets inside the rotor pointing up
have south pole ?

It might be interesting to know this.
Maybe if you turn around your device on the
head (180 degrees turn),
will it still selfrun ?

So this could be an easy test to see, if your local
earth magnet field has anything to do with it and the devices direction
to it.

Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan.
what is the spacing from the 2 driver coil pairs to the
pickup coil pairs ?
I don't understand this question.
The 2 driver coils are not next to each other, one coil is on one side and the other exactly on the other side.
All magnets on the rotor are all pointing same direction, as you look at the device all magnets are with South up. I have never tried to run it upside down because of the dirving circuits but I will try it having it on one side.
I don't have a  magnet polarity measurement device. 

romerouk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 366
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #230 on: May 07, 2011, 04:30:12 PM »
So Romero has gone from a large voltage drop with battery connected when the bulb is on to a self runner using the same load with no battery connected?

These are amazing improvements!!!

@Romero, can you please redo a continuous sound video with your Muller on a glass (away from the legs) showing it running the load with no battery. Please do a view under the glass and all around as it is running.

Thanks for sharing and your time.

Luc
Hi,
I don't have a glass that size but I will organise something like having it hanging with a piece of string, maybe that is even better.

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #231 on: May 07, 2011, 04:36:08 PM »
what is the spacing from the 2 driver coil pairs to the
pickup coil pairs ?
I don't understand this question.
The 2 driver coils are not next to each other, one coil is on one side and the other exactly on the other side.
All magnets on the rotor are all pointing same direction, as you look at the device all magnets are with South up. I have never tried to run it upside down because of the dirving circuits but I will try it having it on one side.
I don't have a  magnet polarity measurement device.

Hmm,
now I don´t understand your answer.

You say you have 9 coil pairs.

Which coil pairs are the 2 drivers and which coil pairs
are the pickup coil pairs ?

Maybe you can number them like a clock.
1 o´clock driver pair,
2 o´clock pickup coil pair
3 o´clock pickup coil pair
4 o´clock pickup coil pair
5 o´clock pickup coil pair
etc... ?


lanenal

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 140
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #232 on: May 07, 2011, 04:39:44 PM »
what is the spacing from the 2 driver coil pairs to the pickup coil pairs ? I don't understand this question.

If I understood correctly, stefan is asking about the relative position of the driving coils. Namely you have 2 pairs for driving purpose, and 7 pairs for power generation. Those pairs are evenly fixed on the stator plates. If we number the pairs clockwise from 1 through 9, and let the first pair be a driving coil pair, the question is, what is the number for the other driving pair?

romerouk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 366
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #233 on: May 07, 2011, 04:47:53 PM »
coil 1 and 6 are the driving coils from the left to the right.
I will go back to some more work now, I'll answer other questions later.

i_ron

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1170
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #234 on: May 07, 2011, 04:48:36 PM »
If I understood correctly, stefan is asking about the relative position of the driving coils. Namely you have 2 pairs for driving purpose, and 7 pairs for power generation. Those pairs are evenly fixed on the stator plates. If we number the pairs clockwise from 1 through 9, and let the first pair be a driving coil pair, the question is, what is the number for the other driving pair?

Number five...three gen coils between the drive coils on one side four gen coils on the other side because 9 doesn't divide evenly

Ron

dutchy1966

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 344
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #235 on: May 07, 2011, 04:50:04 PM »
Hmm,
now I don´t understand your answer.

You say you have 9 coil pairs.

Which coil pairs are the 2 drivers and which coil pairs
are the pickup coil pairs ?

Just look at the pictures he supplied you can easily see it on there:

driving coil 1 --- 4x generator coils --- driver coil 2 --- 3x generator coil

Hope that helps.

regards

Dutchy

romerouk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 366
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #236 on: May 07, 2011, 04:59:49 PM »
Parts left from my previous attempts. I might be able to use some towards the new build.
I am thinking to double the number of coils and magnets too. 3 driving coils will be better.

i_ron

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1170
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #237 on: May 07, 2011, 05:00:06 PM »
So Romero has gone from a large voltage drop with battery connected when the bulb is on to a self runner using the same load with no battery connected?

These are amazing improvements!!!

@Romero, can you please redo a continuous sound video with your Muller on a glass (away from the legs) showing it running the load with no battery. Please do a view under the glass and all around as it is running.

Thanks for sharing and your time.

Luc

Good to see you here Gotoluc, I have followed romero's work for a long time and can tell you straight out there is no hanky panky going on. You and Harti need to read the thread and just replicate, that is all he asks.

Lets all respect romero's privacy and patience.

Regards, Ron



Arthurs

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 79
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #238 on: May 07, 2011, 05:21:12 PM »
Hi romerouk

Have two questions:

1) Why is the 8 magnets- 9 coil, In accordance with the muller generator structure, seems 9 magnets- 8 coil More reasonable?

2) Core diameter of the coil you use 6mm, Diameter of the core diameter and the magnet seems rather, the effect will be even better?

I'm ready to replicate, The above issues should I choose?

Thank you for your answer

romerouk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 366
Re: Muller Dynamo
« Reply #239 on: May 07, 2011, 05:22:21 PM »
First picture shows 2 motors that are almost OU when comming from factory.They come with Muller arangements inside already.I have left info about them but looks that it was missed.
This is probably the easiest way for people to try Muller's config.You don't get a lot out but more than in.I have tested it with another normal dc motor to drive the shaft.Come on people, this one is cheap, search on ebay for it.You need to redo the windings again to have sections of 2 coils next to each other forming one set, coil up and coil down from my larger device.I used 0.3mm single wire.

Second pic shows more parts that are going to be used to the next device.