Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: gravito-magnetic ( Imris Pavel patent CZ9401781 !)  (Read 25603 times)

mondrasek

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1301
Re: gravito-magnetic ( Imris Pavel patent CZ9401781 !)
« Reply #30 on: July 28, 2008, 04:03:24 PM »
@Drannom,

I think item #28 must be conductive plates to interupt the magnetic repulsion in 31 + 31' (32 + 32').  I believe the problem will be "eddy currents".  A magnet moving near a conductor creates eddy currents in the conductor.  The eddy currents create an opposing magnetic field in the conductor (even non-magnetic conductors like aluminum).  So the item #28 is acting as a brake whenever the magnet pairs are moving.

Good video of this effect here:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Q4eG_JhAyc

Thanks,

M.

Drannom

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 250
    • Cristallerie La Pyramide d'Alun
Re: gravito-magnetic ( Imris Pavel patent CZ9401781 !)
« Reply #31 on: July 28, 2008, 06:02:22 PM »
@Drannom,

I think item #28 must be conductive plates to interupt the magnetic repulsion in 31 + 31' (32 + 32').  I believe the problem will be "eddy currents".  A magnet moving near a conductor creates eddy currents in the conductor.  The eddy currents create an opposing magnetic field in the conductor (even non-magnetic conductors like aluminum).  So the item #28 is acting as a brake whenever the magnet pairs are moving.

Good video of this effect here:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Q4eG_JhAyc

Thanks,

M.


ah, your theory is possible, so it is possible that we have not all the input to fully understand it, except if the breaking effect is less than the unbalance magnets ? (and i believe so !)

the inventor may have found special composite metal to solve this breaking effect ?

here again trying it will answer it, and thank you