Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 83913
  • *Latest: wdstk7

  • *Total Posts: 524253
  • *Total Topics: 15608
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 2
  • *Guests: 16
  • *Total: 18

Author Topic: THEORY on TPU energy scource  (Read 124534 times)

Offline scratchrobot

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 401
Re: THEORY on TPU energy scource
« Reply #135 on: October 12, 2016, 08:36:06 PM »
I  have come under some kind of cyber attack ? A very bad one !!! I am sorry but I can no longer post here ! I hope the data provide has been of some help and I wish you all the best of luck with all wish for ...


Thanks for all the info and best of luck with all wish for ...[/size] [/size]
Goodbye


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: THEORY on TPU energy scource
« Reply #135 on: October 12, 2016, 08:36:06 PM »

Offline MasterPlaster

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 494
Re: THEORY on TPU energy scource
« Reply #136 on: October 13, 2016, 12:13:46 PM »

All the best ! lol x


LOL indeed.

Your drip feeding of information did not work. Now I have a half finished space craft in my garden that will go no where.


Offline AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3267
Re: THEORY on TPU energy scource
« Reply #137 on: October 19, 2016, 09:09:52 AM »
OK VORTEX ! Not a problem . But one has to let go of all they know and take on board there are many of us that tend to keep things private and for good reason, as the world is a bit tricky to balance and sometimes knowledge in the wrong hands is a bad seed of unknown realities.

But I also except that we all need a chance fro freedom and to that, I will begin to lay the path that will reward you with your goal ! First, these things are never found by theory as there are no theories that created them.

For now let go !!!!! START AGIAN !!!!!! 

I will detail only the core transformer and one that is already on the market but it has this very interesting ability that does not relate to OHMs law but it is built by this law and there it should not do what it does.

This may come as a bit of a surprise but all 500 watt 2 AMP 240v to 275v AC variable transformers and also all the ones below that all have this interesting effect. And some of the old ones can hold a charge when you switch them off if by chance you had the right one and was messing around with it by shorting out the out put wire when in the off mode. Some will spark and even blow a 10 amp fuse or more.

But that is not the only thing it can do as on the QC mark it states a max voltage of 275 AC v but you get 330 V. All of these units produce the 330V so that is 55v over the QC mark. But you need the 240 to 250 v AC grid input to isolate the gain.

If you know how and what you can convert them to hold this magic charge but I will refuse to offer that out here and one has to give respect to the American for gaining hes patent but unfortunately its not worth a penny.

Who owns the combustion engine ? If you know what I mean ?

So you don't need anything but just a dumb transformer no secrets no head banging theory or a degree of the unknown as that is impossible . Where is there in this world a qualified zero pint engineer ? No such thing so no QC pass can ever be made ! This is a real problem for mass market use. And it is only a stupid off the shelf transformer, not an invention as its just an effect where we can all throw our worthless theory at it and compleat of such nonsense for the next 13.8 billion years.

Now this transformer just loves to give you abundant free energy but you're going to need a few more tricks for it to get above 100 watts and harmonics is how it is done with a guide of offsetting a gain in resistance !

Think water pipe like a garden hose and jump up and down on it as it flows, then bend it like a set of waves where each wave is bigger than the one before it . Think gravity and compare gravity to an electrical earth !

Think vacuum and measure the mass of the flow of water ! Know that the resistance is 7.76 G as the water travels up the wave in the pipe  but as it comes down it gains 9.8 G over a metre and the end result is one that can empty a swimming pool just with gravity.

The difference here between the water pipe and the magic transformer is one is water the other is electricity and the swimming pool is the transformer. But with a water pool it needs a lot of rain to keep a constant flow and is the same with the transformer.

The water pipe set up as a set of waves it also harmonics in electrical terms ! How many waves can you have inside a wave ? Well, it is always 2.2 trillion if each wave has the same potential of mass if each wave is a tiny bit faster so we can have a saturated field density inside each wave. Speed is equal to volts so as each wave harmonic is set under and inside the wave above not only is it best to increase the volts as to keep the overall potential constant for each wave added.

We can now say that there are 2 transformers one as the pool as a collector and the other as the field density amplifier and the final part is the load and the rain that keeps the pool collector full over infinity.

Keep it simple isolate the collector and the amplifier than work out your load and keep you working temperature at no more than 40c as at 80c you encounter electron permeability and depletion of the effective work of the field.

Maplin does a cheap 500 watt 2 amp transformer for £80 but in the small TPU he has a 1 amp core at around £40 but this gives you a good start on it with very little money . The more advanced ones have different cores and a bit of this and that ect ect .

Look again at the water pipe can you see in your mind many hills where each one is bigger than the next ? This in electrical terms is a gain on resistance and EMF would normally leak out at the high potential in each hill or wave in the pipe. And there are many ways to increase the resistance and counter use the back emf to overcome it and increase the flow of the current.

I have a 12 KW type system but to keep it producing a high field density I chose to add virtual particles and it keeps my system cold and helps me stay at low volts DC .....

But keep close to your TPU LEARN THE BASIC SET UP AND ISOLATE YOUR FREE ENERGY CURVE .......................................!


No need for the theory of how the pool collector transformer is kept constant for now! All I can say on that is each proton is equal to 1 KW of pure energy and all electrons are but one field one source of power throughout the universe.

You only need to say 10 of these transformers to power your home using the grid as the attractor and the transformers as the collector and then you have no electricity bill .......

But if you tel that to the energy company they will inform you that energy amplification from there grid also belongs to them and they will accuse you of energy theft ! They know !

But for now just buy the dumb stupid 1 or 2 amp transformer from Maplin and confirm the 330v AC at 55v gain over the QC mark ! Do it NOW ASAP ...........Than we can go to the next level and get you off the dam grid without problems from patents or governments or greedy evil energy companies.

Avoid the 3000 other youtube examples of crap or out dated heaps of junk or the buy me now head bangers !!!!

I am here now .....................GOOD LUCK !

Regards

S9
Does this idea really work ? after all it's just an autotransformer, wont it have loss just like any other device

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: THEORY on TPU energy scource
« Reply #137 on: October 19, 2016, 09:09:52 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3267
Re: THEORY on TPU energy scource
« Reply #138 on: October 19, 2016, 02:32:41 PM »
So where does the silver wound transformer come from, or can I use an RS type to test the phenomena  and how is it connected up and won't it need capacitors the tune the phase, not to mention the use of an Earth leakage trip for safety ? and it's nothing to do with a QEG device.

http://uk.rs-online.com/web/p/products/8902765/?tpr=3

AG

Offline Turbo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 270
    • Youtube
Re: THEORY on TPU energy scource
« Reply #139 on: November 02, 2016, 08:26:16 PM »
So where does the silver wound transformer come from, or can I use an RS type to test the phenomena  and how is it connected up and won't it need capacitors the tune the phase, not to mention the use of an Earth leakage trip for safety ? and it's nothing to do with a QEG device.

http://uk.rs-online.com/web/p/products/8902765/?tpr=3

AG

Dear AG,
You don't need that.
The only thing you need is a piece of wire and a voltage source.
No transformer no mass circuitry just a piece of wire and a voltage source and a means of measuring what comes out of it.
This is enough to generate / observe single kicks.
In this example the effect is electrostatic, open loop.

Autotransformer, you mentioned it above ,yes this is correct.
It's the same wire used in above example but formed into a coil with several tap points.
Next step you create multiple electron flows in that coiled wire.
In stead of observing only the electrostatic effect, you now start to see also the magnetic effects.

The fields generated bump into each other this causes the vibrating sensation in just the one wire/coil.
Now at some point, voltage / wave length / wire length / circumference starts to play a part.
But it is easiest to start by looking at these coil sections as completely separate circuits, so then you can experiment and find out how to drive them in a way that they start to interact with each other.

You can check the documentation i made some years ago.

Read for example the following quotes from Mr Mark:

I told you that the simplest form of over unity is a piece of wire and a voltage source. 
Anyone can actually connect it and measure. 
See for yourself the kick. 
NO coil no xmrs, just a kick. 

WE are not talking about a coil or a transformer or anything developing a primary to secondary flux. 
We are just talking about a straight piece of wire, some electrons and a method of measuring what comes out of it.

Tesla states that you can have all kinds of electrons flowing through a wire traveling in different directions relating only to their potential power source. 
He even said that you could have different electron flows through a single wire completely separate from each other.
I tried it and he is right!

The two transformers get slightly out of phase with each other.

I became interested in the interaction between the two AC transformers. 
The interaction can be very reveling, trust me.

In the case of my power unit, you create several frequencies within a space of the collector coil's circumference. 
The frequencies are directly related to the circumference of the collector coil. 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So simple but at the same time so difficult, because it leaves the textbooks.
The classical formulas for power calculation do not deal with a wire that uses or is connected to several sources / multiple electron flows.
But i can assure you, if you do these simple experiments it will not take long for you to develop the understanding that you need to proceed.

Why don't you give it a try?
If you have any questions, or something isn't clear, just post it,  i will be happy to help.





Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: THEORY on TPU energy scource
« Reply #139 on: November 02, 2016, 08:26:16 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Bob Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
Re: THEORY on TPU energy scource
« Reply #140 on: November 03, 2016, 04:09:10 AM »
Turbo, I like it :)
I'm going to hypothesize...

Pulse a single strand of wire and you get a kick with a longitudinal impulse.
Insert 3 taps - say, 120 deg out of phase - and pulse them, you get kick-kick-kick.
If you can collect the longitudinal impulses coming off these kicks and dump them into a cap, it would seem to me you have some serious charge at your disposal.
Am I moving in the right direction?
Bob

Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5832
Re: THEORY on TPU energy scource
« Reply #141 on: November 03, 2016, 05:45:52 AM »


Tesla states that you can have all kinds of electrons flowing through a wire traveling in different directions relating only to their potential power source. 
He even said that you could have different electron flows through a single wire completely separate from each other.
I tried it and he is right!



I had thought of that before.  Say we have a wire 5in, and a AA battery on the left side of the wire, Pos at top, and a similar batt on the right side of the wire, pos down.

If the batteries are in a polarity position that when connected to the wire in the middle that each would produce a current in the wire opposite of the other, then the batteries are essentially in series! ;) There may be no or not much current in the wire at all as the batteries are in series.  There is no way to isolate them in the least if both are connected to the wire at the same time. Now if one batt is low on charge, or just different batteries, then there may be an imbalance where current most likely would flow in only one direction in that wire by way of the strongest battery potential. This is just my thoughts and opinion so far as I never tested it as it seems correct.

Now when it comes to complicated signals like cable tv and such, there would most likely be some nodes, in an instant of time, where electrons are poised to be flowing this way, and in another node electrons poised to flow flow the other way and nodes where the electrons are say at rest.

Mags

   

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: THEORY on TPU energy scource
« Reply #141 on: November 03, 2016, 05:45:52 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Turbo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 270
    • Youtube
Re: THEORY on TPU energy scource
« Reply #142 on: November 03, 2016, 09:30:43 AM »
I had thought of that before.  Say we have a wire 5in, and a AA battery on the left side of the wire, Pos at top, and a similar batt on the right side of the wire, pos down.

If the batteries are in a polarity position that when connected to the wire in the middle that each would produce a current in the wire opposite of the other, then the batteries are essentially in series! ;) There may be no or not much current in the wire at all as the batteries are in series.  There is no way to isolate them in the least if both are connected to the wire at the same time. Now if one batt is low on charge, or just different batteries, then there may be an imbalance where current most likely would flow in only one direction in that wire by way of the strongest battery potential. This is just my thoughts and opinion so far as I never tested it as it seems correct.

Now when it comes to complicated signals like cable tv and such, there would most likely be some nodes, in an instant of time, where electrons are poised to be flowing this way, and in another node electrons poised to flow flow the other way and nodes where the electrons are say at rest.

Mags

 

Dear Mags,

You are very close.
However the two flows are completely separated.
I am not much of an artist but i have drawn a simple sketch for you of what it is suppose to look like.
As you can see in the image the two flows happen on the same single wire, completely separated from each other.
This only incorporates the clean DC components.
When you replace the batteries you mentioned with switching elements you will then be able to generate high voltage and rf components that do cause interaction between these coil sections.
Then you will be able to generate the interaction Steven mentions in his writings.
Especially when your switching frequency is somewhat related to the resonance frequency, or a harmonic of the coil you made.....

So as you can see in the schematic the batteries are not in series, this is where you (have to) leave that textbook.
I noticed the arrows are drawn wrongly, but i hope you get the point.

If you have any more questions let me know.


Offline MasterPlaster

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 494
Re: THEORY on TPU energy scource
« Reply #143 on: November 03, 2016, 11:18:20 AM »

What happened to sequential.9 and his posts?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: THEORY on TPU energy scource
« Reply #143 on: November 03, 2016, 11:18:20 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7266
Re: THEORY on TPU energy scource
« Reply #144 on: November 03, 2016, 04:17:47 PM »
S9 was playing outside of his Box and making a mess of other threads ,Stefan gave him many chances ,
he is on a time out....

 *he does keep reincarnating himself  .

if you truly wish to engage him I believe an Email can be found ?

Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5832
Re: THEORY on TPU energy scource
« Reply #145 on: November 04, 2016, 04:10:41 AM »
Dear Mags,

You are very close.
However the two flows are completely separated.
I am not much of an artist but i have drawn a simple sketch for you of what it is suppose to look like.
As you can see in the image the two flows happen on the same single wire, completely separated from each other.
This only incorporates the clean DC components.
When you replace the batteries you mentioned with switching elements you will then be able to generate high voltage and rf components that do cause interaction between these coil sections.
Then you will be able to generate the interaction Steven mentions in his writings.
Especially when your switching frequency is somewhat related to the resonance frequency, or a harmonic of the coil you made.....

So as you can see in the schematic the batteries are not in series, this is where you (have to) leave that textbook.
I noticed the arrows are drawn wrongly, but i hope you get the point.

If you have any more questions let me know.

Hey Turbo

Where did you run across that config as explained by Tesla? Just wondered

Mags

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: THEORY on TPU energy scource
« Reply #145 on: November 04, 2016, 04:10:41 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5832
Re: THEORY on TPU energy scource
« Reply #146 on: November 04, 2016, 06:00:46 AM »
Dear Mags,

You are very close.
However the two flows are completely separated.
I am not much of an artist but i have drawn a simple sketch for you of what it is suppose to look like.
As you can see in the image the two flows happen on the same single wire, completely separated from each other.
This only incorporates the clean DC components.
When you replace the batteries you mentioned with switching elements you will then be able to generate high voltage and rf components that do cause interaction between these coil sections.
Then you will be able to generate the interaction Steven mentions in his writings.
Especially when your switching frequency is somewhat related to the resonance frequency, or a harmonic of the coil you made.....

So as you can see in the schematic the batteries are not in series, this is where you (have to) leave that textbook.
I noticed the arrows are drawn wrongly, but i hope you get the point.

If you have any more questions let me know.

Also, one thing I find in common with 2 outer coils and one in between, if one of the coils is wound opposing, or not as you show, where you just reverse the input of one of the outer coils, is the fact that 2 bucking coil fields of the outer coils presents a single pole in the middle with those fields emanating out radially in the area of the middle coil. This seems like a good thing as it is concentrated on the middle coil as a whole.  Like the way I have been applying magnets to mechanically induce coils, Ive mounted disk magnets with like poles facing with a plastic spacer and that combined pole fieled leaves that spacer gap radially so as it passes through the air core the fields are in a position to cut the coil winding all the way around the coil, not just one side of the coil, as we typically see. Like a typical pulse motor, the magnet passes one side of the coil, cutting that side, causing current to say go up in those winding portions producing say a pos output swing, and then the magnet departs the coil center its fields cut that side of the coils windings, now causing the current in that side of the coil to go up, and in the opposite direction as the approach, giving a neg output swing. In that case, only half or most likely less than half of the winding is being induced by the magnet pass, at least at perfect right angles.  That was why I did my Lasersaber Eazy Spin Motor version with twice as many mags alternating poles, so that there is a magnet cutting the approach of each coil while the other mag of opposite polarity is cutting the other side of the coil.

Even in a transformer like a toroid where the pri is on one side and the sec on the other, if you believe like me that the primary field cuts across the core hole to cut the sec to induce it, then most likely only the pri winding portions in the toroid hole are interacting with the inner portions of the sec winding, etc.


So in reference to this, Im wondering if there is an advantage to inducing the whole sec coil via this radial field from the 2 opposing coils, or mags.



I suppose the 2 legs in the middle are the output? Does the middle coil even have to be connected to the outer coils as shown, as the only way I see it providing any output is by way of induction?

Mags

Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5832
Re: THEORY on TPU energy scource
« Reply #147 on: November 04, 2016, 06:03:58 AM »
Also, you can download Picpick picture editor and resize the pics to fit the page. It has a resize option and it looks like you need to shrink to 30%

It has screen capture also which helps making pics you cant grab n save easily

Mags

Offline Turbo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 270
    • Youtube
Re: THEORY on TPU energy scource
« Reply #148 on: November 06, 2016, 10:10:52 AM »
Dear Mags,

I do not really care about the size of my image, i care more about what it displayed.
Nothing has survived.
The schematic was intended exactly 'as is' but unfortunately, you already started to modify it mentally.
Unfortunately, if you remove the electrical connections between the coil sections, the model does not meet the one wire criteria any more.
As a result, the model would also not meet the multiple electron flow in a single wire anymore.

Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5832
Re: THEORY on TPU energy scource
« Reply #149 on: November 07, 2016, 01:53:34 AM »
Dear Mags,

I do not really care about the size of my image, i care more about what it displayed.
Nothing has survived.
The schematic was intended exactly 'as is' but unfortunately, you already started to modify it mentally.
Unfortunately, if you remove the electrical connections between the coil sections, the model does not meet the one wire criteria any more.
As a result, the model would also not meet the multiple electron flow in a single wire anymore.

Its been told to many here about the reason pics should fit the page. It stretches the screen beyond normal borders, of which a lot of text posts are stretched along with it. So it is yeah, easy for those to throw up huge pics, even if that detail is unnecessary, but now most readers have to move the screen back and forth, back and forth, just to read the posts of a page, all because one guy doesnt care.   ???


Ok, so how exactly are you determining that the currents are flowing in both directions in one wire?

1   Is it just trickery by having current flow one way in the left coil/batt and current flowing in the other direction in the right coil/batt, and the coil in the middle is just there for the sake of calling it all one wire???

2   I thought that what Tesla meant here was that currents could flow in opposite directions side by side in a wire. like a 2 way street. But if as you seem to illustrate that he just meant that in a length of wire that in one section of the wire we can apply a source across just that section, making current in one direction, in that wire section, and then doing the same on another section of the wire, but reverse polarity of that source so the currents in that section of wire are opposite of the other powered section, no 2 way streets, then I have to say, well, woopty doo.  What is the gist?

3   The way I see it, as you show, the middle coil should do exactly what it would do, whether it is connected to the outer coils or not. It would be induced by the outer coils for a short period when applying dc input and when removing it, or if the outer coils are ac input.  So what makes it special with the middle coil connected to the outer coils vs not connected?

Mags

 

OneLink