Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Harmonic Oscillating Power Electric generator video  (Read 93824 times)

Offline Freedomfuel

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 105
Re: Harmonic Oscillating Power Electric generator video
« Reply #105 on: January 22, 2006, 09:31:02 PM »
In reply to cverr I would like to point out that the excess energy from so called 'free energy' devices like the HOPE generator is not electricity.? Rather, this new form of energy could more acurately be described as 'magnetic current' and theories derived from conventional electrical engineering teachings do not apply.? I have seen ample evidence that this magnetic current is neither a wave or a stream of paricles but rather flowing vortex of magnetism around the outside of conductors. Since the factors that cause heating in electrical conductors do not apply with magnetic current there is not the same heating effect when the same amount of power is being conducted for a given diametre of wire.? In practice there is no consistant relationship between the power output of a free energy device and readings made with a digital instrument so claims made by Bushwacker based on such readings should not be taken seriously.There is a consistant relationship between the power supplied in the form of magnetic current and the readings of moving coil instrumets but the actual readings are meaningless since 'potential' and 'current' have different meanings with this form of energy.

All this might sound weird to someone with a degree in electrical engineering so I can understand why they might be sceptical.? You have to accept that this is a whole new physics that has been concealed within military research establishments for at least 60 years, but one day it will be taught in our schools.? Here is a guide to the new magnetic technology you may like to study:? http://www.magneticenergy.org.uk

I have to concede that so far Bushwacker has not given convincing evidence that much more energy is available at the output of his device compared to the input.? However, in my previous post have shown how such a device could indeed be overunity in theory so I am prepared to keep an open mind about any overunity claims untill definitive measurements can be made with a calorimeter.


Offline Freedomfuel

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 105
Re: Harmonic Oscillating Power Electric generator video
« Reply #106 on: January 22, 2006, 10:08:16 PM »
Hi LancaIV

Tell me more about the visit of rexresearch and Professor Ehrenhaft.

I have done some more research on the internet and I have concluded that such 'overunity transformers' must all depend on the phenomenon of 'triboluminescence'. ?Here is a paper written by one of the few scientists studying this phenomenon:

Wintergreen Candy and Other Triboluminescent Materials
http://pages.towson.edu/ladon/wg/candywww.htm#Spectra

This paper supplies graphs that show that the emission spectra of crushed sugar crystals is the same as that of lightning thus proving that there is an electric discharge involved and the light emitted is from the excitation of Nitrogen in the air. ?The paper also states that one third of triboluminescent materials also exhibit piezo electricity and the majority of piezo electric materials are also triboluminescent. ?I have not been able to find any information about how triboluminescence could be induced in piezo electric materials but I suppose that such materials could be excited ?either electrically or mechanically. ?There is enormouse potential for research here if some way could be found of collecting and measuring the magnetic energy being emitted from charge clusters in the material. I suggest concentric perforated tubes to capture the expanding magnetic bubbles from each discharge.

Another possibility I have considered is that triboluminescence may be overlooked in some experiments if it does not produce visible light. ?I hypothesise that charge clusters are produced in the brittle metal hydride film of 'cold fusion' cells by the same mechanism that produces triboluminescence in crystaline substances. ?With cold fusion flashes of light are not usually visible yet there is photo microscopic evidence for electrical discharges in the cathode. ?See the work of Ken Shoulders. ?I also believe that it is possible that sonoluminescence may also be due to an electric discharge ?in collapsing air bubbles and that any overunity potential of such devices may not be due to fusion of deuterium nucleii by heat as it is commonly understood. ?

Another interesting possibility is triboluminescence in plastics. ?You can demonstrate this by unrolling sellotape in the dark. ?Here is a weird experiment by Hal Puthoff that could depend on this property of plastics:

A Cursery Examination Of the Glow Discharge Panel
http://www.earthtech.org/experiments/gdp/cursory.html

You can see the original experiment done by JL Naudin here:

http://jlnlabs.online.fr/plasma/html/s_gdp1.htm

I believe that there is some kind of electric discharge going on here because Naudin says that Nitrogen Oxides and Ozone are produced by the device. ?I also believe that the glow around the device is not a plasma as it is normally understood but rather the same 'magnetic light' that occurs with the Adams motor. ?This device, in my opinion has potential for overunity if it is developed further.

Offline Freedomfuel

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 105
Re: Harmonic Oscillating Power Electric generator video
« Reply #107 on: February 10, 2006, 10:08:28 PM »
please visit the rexresearch-archiv(go to the post before) for the Prof. Ehrenhaft-Information,I think that the most
important statement you will find is inside "(5)Magnetic Currents-.....Ampere Refuted" !
Sincerely
? ? ? ? ? ? de Lanca

I think that the idea of magnetic charges is intriguing and I know that Myron Evans, an associate of Tom Bearden, agrees with Prof Ehrenhaft that light contains a stationary magnetic field.  I am using magnetic current to describe something that is more like a fluid than a flow of particles, but I am open to the idea that there are magnetisms in the atmosphere that do consist of particles.

The Ehrenhaft material is certainly very interesting since magnetic monopoles are a hot research topic today.  I wonder if anyone has attempted to reproduce his experiments recently.

Online hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8025
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Harmonic Oscillating Power Electric generator video
« Reply #108 on: February 21, 2006, 01:21:32 AM »

Begin Forward:

 
For those of you who have been keeping tuned to the progress of HOPE R&D you may want to just skip the forwarding message immediately below and go directly to the information update.
J.D.
-----------------------------------------------------
Because of the large number of requests for more in depth information concerning developments in HOPE technologies I must reply to your request in the form of this general response due to the lack of sufficient time to answer all the individual requests for information at this time. Unfortunately there are no other persons involved in the R&D of HOPE technologies to date, and t o my knowledge I am currently the only person investigating this discovery so far. There is a great deal of R&D that needs to done in this area before anyone can claim to be an expert and so I ask that you please keep this in mind. Even though I have been able to learn much during the months since this discovery there are likely many things which will change during the process of investigating the various phenomena and physical principals involved with the HOPE approach to alternative energy. The information which I will be relaying to you is intended to help you to better understand some of the principals involved with the production and transfer of energy during the operation of HOPE but does not rule out possible means of improving upon current designs and/or configurations of HOPE Generators. I encourage all free thinking individuals to utilize their own personal knowledge and intuitions involving this type of approach to AE technologies and to try to look beyond the typi cal applications of many existing technologies which you may already be aware of. Because there is still a great deal of investigation and work that needs to be done in order to better understand the full potential of HOPE style technologies this field is now open to all who desire to join me in the R&D of HOPE. I have been able to prove that it is indeed possible to invoke high electrical potentials by means of harmonic resonance and phase conjugation/inversion within certain materials by using the proper materials and electrical configurations. I have now successfully acquired the international patent certificate for all current and future developments of HOPE technologies. I have taken the steps necessary to acquire this international patent NOT for the purpose of restricting further developments but, to try to insure that certain entities are not able to lock this knowledge away as they have succeeded in doing with so many other alternative energy technologies to date . I am pleased to share any successful improvements and/or developments with those who share the vision of true freedom and progress, however I will give NO allegiance or means to control this technology to any individual, government, military, or corporate entity. I have had a good deal of personal experience with the powers that be who do not want the general public to know that these technologies in fact exist. My reasons for pursuing these kinds of technologies are not strictly for personal gain, and I hold no illusions of becoming extremely wealthy by presenting them to the market-place. On the contrary, I believe that in order for mankind to be able to evolve to the level that we have the potential to experience we must first overcome the obstacles that have been intentionally placed in our way by those who wish to continue to maintain power and control over us. The time of innocence and ignorance is over, and it is now up to each of us to see that future generations do no t fall prey to the same controlling class that has held mankind hostage for far to long already. The information that I am sharing with you is intended to be freely distributed and may be shared with anyone and everyone you wish. Please remember that HOPE technology is only in its newborn stage and is completely open to be researched and developed by any and all who wish to pursue it. There are many other technologies that I believe the people have a right to have available to them as well, and which I am also currently trying to find help with however as time will not allow me to share everything at this point I must therefore restrict the following information to that which is involved with HOPE Technologies.
 
Latest Info on HOPE R&D:
 
Since the basic step-by-step assembly instructi ons for the original HOPE Generator explains the purpose and function of HOPE Technologies for the most part I do not want to be wasting valuable time to go into these general details once again. Therefore I will try to avoid repeating that which has already been explained and try to restrict the following information to what I have been able to learn since writing those initial assembly instructions.
In my recent months of investigation I had hoped to find out far more than I actually have concerning the many technical details of operation. The so-called partner whom I had recommended and asked to be the Electrical Engineering expert for the new company that we have been trying to form IE: Genesis Engineering Unlimited (GEU) has now had my best HOPE unit in his posession for the last four months. However he has proven to be of little use in determining the details of which I had hoped to learn and pas s on to others. Therefore, I am giving him two more weeks to do something before I request that the unit be sent back to me. I have spent a great deal of time and money towards this purpose to try and enable him to aquire the proper tools in order that he would be able to investigate the technical aspects of operation. It appears that 4 months time is insufficient to build the small amplifier circuit that we had decided on building to try and boost the output to much higher levels. Most folks consider me an extremely patient man however I suppose that 4 full months of doing absolutely nothing should be enough time to show anyone what they can and should expect or in this case I guess, not expect. Even so, I have personally continued to work very hard to conduct my own research into HOPE tech as best I can, and have learned some additional information of which I believe may be of some interest and value to someone out there.
 
What I have found is that there seems to be a definate relationship between the specific material makeup of the core, an apparent piezo like component present in the core material itself, the electromagnetic components of both the core and copper coils, and the total mass of the total unit assembly which will depend upon the particular core to be used to build any particular HOPE unit. As far as I can see up to this point, the size of the core does not seem to be as much of a factor responsible for producing the potential output as I had previously presumed. However, being that I am still currently in the process of testing the various sized cores and configurations I am not yet ready to draw any definate conclusions on this just yet. One advantage that a larger core does provide is that it does allow more space for coil configurations and more total area to provide for induction by those c oils.
 
On the unit that I had built and sent to our alleged engineer, I had added an additional but seperate 200 winds/wraps of 29 AWG wire on top of the initial 300 winds/wraps on both of the 2 first stage induction coils. The second set/stage of induction coils were each wrapped with the usual 500 turns of 29 AWG wire. The extra 200 turns of wire on each of the two first stage induction coils was then insulated from the initial 300 winds/wraps, and the leads of these extra winds/wraps were routed back to the initial input. This successfully boosted the output potential substantially and raised the output level several hundreds of volts higher than it had been previously to adding these additional coils to the initial 300 winds/wraps. When I had tried to simply add an additional 200 turns directly to the initial 300 winds of the first stage input coils s o that was instead a continuous 500 turns there seemed to be no difference in the output potential. Therefore since it seems likely that it was not a direct increase in the electromagnetic component alone which contributed to this rise in potential. It seems logical to me that it was the way in which I had configured the additional 200 winds seperately from the initial 300 winds which seems to have caused a phase inversion within the core resulting in this greater induction and output potential. I could be wrong but by taking all things of which I have observed thus far into consideration I can think of no other reason for this kind of reaction to occur. I have just completed a very similar set-up with a much larger AMC-1000 Powerlite C-core but due to the level of e-mail that I have been receiving lately I have not yet had the opportunity to conduct any experiments with this unit. I should be able to do this within the next couple of days and will publish any successful findings w hen I have the time.
 
Last evening I was almost ready to throw in the towel on a new wiring configuration and so I decided to try and get some rest. As usual thats often the time when my mind likes to go into high gear, and after being unsuccessful at falling to sleep after about four hours I finally gave up and went back to work to try the configuration that had kept surfacing in my mind. It seems to be working well and now appears that I have found an even better wiring configuration than the one I used for the unit that I sent to our engineer. The new configuration should allow for additional coil space on the 320 core although I haven't yet had the time to try that either. I have tried so many different wiring configurations throughout the last 3 to 4 months that I have lost count. Some work better than others and some will only work in conjunction wit h a specific transformer. Another important note to remember is that certain transformers seem to compliment a HOPE unit by not only greatly widening the range of prime operating frequencies but it can apparently boost the total output potential by a large margin as well. I'm not certain how or why this is, only that I have seen both the voltage and amperage levels rise significantly when the proper wiring configuration is found for a particular combination transformer and HOPE unit.
 
Another important finding is the fairly recent application of a miniature audio transformer. This little component is inexpensive and can be found at Radio Shack. Somehow by bridging the the Radio Shack mini amplifier unit with this little audio transformer it allows the 320 HOPE unit to operate strictly on feedback from the audio amp circuit when it is hooked up properly. When this is done the voltage goes off the scale on my MM and the very noticable increase in ampere's cannot easily be explained away. So far every measurement that has been taken on the unit which our engineer now posesses has registered just under 3 amps max., at approx., 683 vAC. I believe that the new configuration which I had discovered only this morning is noticably higher still, however I do not have the proper tools to correctly measure the AC amps. I know that there are probably many who would disagree with me on this but, to me this is no big thing and no matter how I go about trying to provide evidence there is always someone who will inevitably try to blow it off as heresay anyway and call me a liar. The skeptics are never satisfied until they can see it and touch it themselves, and I am always happy and willing to see their reaction when they finally do, lol. I would love to see someone show up at my door and ask to examine a unit. Engineering standards do imply that you can boost a few volts up to a few hundred volts however according to these rules as that voltage increases the amperage must decrease and vice-versa. In this case that standard does not seem to hold water anymore, and as I have previously stated, such an apparent increase in both the voltage and the amperage cannot be easily explained away by using these standard rules. The only thing that makes sense in this case would be in my opinion the presence of an initial piezo-like reaction that is influencing an electromagnetic response within the core and coils and thereby an increase in current response which actually seems to cycle the unit up to a much greater operating potential. This observation is how I came upon the idea of intentionally using highly reactive piezo materials such as "Lead Zirconate Titanate", and/or "Barrium Titanate" together with a highly permeable ferromagnetic materials etc.., etc.. . Other candidates to consider for possible materials which may likely incr ease the output potentials of future HOPE style generators might also require those which conduct better sound resonance such as "Indium" or possibly even glass made from pure crushed quarts. We have entire beaches made up of this material and it is at least nice to think that the cost to make such custom core materials could actually drop rather than rise. Who knows at this stage in the game right?
 
By far, two of the most interesting pieces of information that I have learned recently involve (1) what seems to be this piezo-like response to the initial audio stimulus within the Powerlite core materials that I have been using. I believe that this is likely due to the nano-crystaline particle structures present within the materials used to make the Powerlite cores. These cores are comprised of high grade ferro-magnetic metals and basically speaking glass. Thus the name of the manufacturer that makes them eg; (MetGlass). The material is produced in the form of a thin tape which is then layered and formed and then bonded together to form a solid core. (2) Secondly, it appears that the total size and mass of a particular core along with the specific gauge of wire and corresponding number of wraps will largely determine the prime frequency range that will be required to produce the optimum electrical potential. This may seem somewhat obvious to many of you since we know that the specific materials, size, shape, and mass are all very important in designing many musical instruments. However, there seems to be something else happening here in addition to what may at first appear plainly obvious. There is a lot of phasing or phase inversion that is going on within a HOPE Generator and often times you can input a very high frequency and yet see a much lower frequency at the output end. On the other hand you may be inputting a relatively low fr equency and yet witness a very high frequency at the output terminals. I believe that this is most likely due to this phase inversion and/or phase conjugation, and it is my opinion that this phenomena is responsible for exciting the very electrical valances of the nano-crystaline structures at the atomic level. A similar reaction can be verified as occuring in gas lasers at the photonic level when when a sufficient energy state and volume of photons begin to bounce around in the mirrored structure of the laser. I believe that the use of the unusual extra induction/input coils serves to provide the necessary phased inversion that produces these high electrical responses witnessed in the HOPE model. When the electrons become excited by the proper resonant frequencies and increasing electric and electromagnetic force is applied matter can literally fall apart. When the electron shells/valances reach a point at which they become unstable in the turbulent environment present in and aroun d a HOPE unit some of the electrons and in some cases proton and/or nuetrons can seperate from their otherwise stable arrangement. These liberated electrons, protons, nuetrons, etc.., will be influenced by the strongest force to which they are either attracted to or forced to repel away from. In the case of the HOPE model the route of least resistance becomes the output terminals for the most part. At the same time nature will always seek to right itself and find equalibrium, especially at the atomic level. When this equalibrium is disturbed to the extent that normally very stable atomic and/or molecular structures begin to fall apart nature seeks to replace those missing pieces with new particles of the same order. You may have heard it said by someone recently that energy is all around us. As Albert Einstein pointed out many years ago "Mass is energy and energy is mass". Some would say that these things all point to the alleged "Zero Point Energy Field" or perhaps you prefer the te rm "Sea of Energy" as remarked by Nikola Tesla. Since these are questions that nobody will ever be satisfied having answered by anything I might be quoted as saying I will leave all of that up to the so-called experts to deal with. I will never claim to be an expert in anything so long as I remain in this pitiful shell that we call a body because until our minds are allowed to fully join again with our spirit and with the Holy Spirit we will remain imperfect mortal beings. I am certain that a great many self professing so-called experts would disagree with me if nothing else but for the mere sake of disagreeing. All I can honestly say is that I have found that it is useless and a complete waste of time to try and argue with a fool. For those who seek the truth it matters not who is right and who is wrong but wherein lies the truth. If it is true that conventional physics and therefore electrical engineering are flawed then the complete truth lies somewhere else beyond that which the experts boast in their knowing. Mankind likewise is flawed due to his rebellion to the greater laws and interests of God.
 
It is currently my understanding and belief that it should be very possible to develop new materials which could be more specifically designed for HOPE tech application. I believe that we need to develop these new core materials keeping in mind that we are dealing with a number of various areas of art and science and which to my knowledge have never been considered to be used in conjunction with each other in this fashion. I also believe that this new knowledge may very well enable us to create the most conservative energy technology ever conceived of and which does not produce a radioactive waste byproduct. I have spoken to several very knowledgable EE's about this very idea over the period of the last month or so and they ha ve all stated that they see no reason why it should not be possible to create a technology that could conceivably provide a COP that could far exeed the alleged OU barrier. My research has lead me to look into various new highly reactive piezo materials which could conceivably be used in conjunction with high grade ferri-magnetic and/or ferro-magnetic materials to produce a superior core much better suited for this type of application, and which should logically result in output potentials far exceeding those we are currently witnessing so far.
 
As only one man there is only so much that I can accomplish without the necessary funding and assistance from qualified people. This work has been extremely slow and tedious, and without even the most basic of tools being available to me I have still been successful in learning a good deal about this new approach t o alternative energy technologies. I believe that with the proper tools and assistance we could have a fully developed new technology that could power everything from our cars and homes to future colonies on other worlds, and we could do this within a couple of years under the right conditions. I am only at the stage where this technology could provide nearly 100% of a homes lighting needs free from the grid but if the proper materials could be developed I believe that we could be seeing HOPE technologies supplying the power for everything else as well within very little time. I don't believe that this is a pipe dream at all. The only really big obsticles seem to come in trying to change the way things have always remained throughout our lifetimes, and the people need to have the sufficient desire to challenge the status quo and demand our God given right to true freedom.
 
Although there is certain information which is of great importance for anyone who may be conducting experiments with HOPE technologies I believe that it would be destructive to publish this information at this stage of development. There are those who would love to pose problems towards this effort and such information would very likely serve only to hinder rather than help progress in this area. I HOPE that the information I have been able to glean thus far has given you a better understanding of where this research stands at the moment, and what needs to be accomplished in order to develop this technology to a much higher level. I have tried to cover everything that I could think of at the moment however there are likely still many questions that will need to be answered as time allows. Please feel free to pass this information on to your friends and colleagues. I will try to keep everyone as up to date as is humanly possible for me to do.
 
Best Regards All,
Jim
 
James D. Fauble
jfauble@sbcglobal.net


Offline BushWacker

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 76
Re: Harmonic Oscillating Power Electric generator video
« Reply #109 on: February 23, 2006, 09:59:51 AM »
Hi Group,

   I was finally able to coax some information out of the engineer I've refered to in the past. He was pretty angry with me but heck, four months is long enough to wait for a few simple readings escpecially when he's the most qualified EE I've ever known of. I will post the info as soon as I have sufficient time. It's not great news, but I've tried to be honest and you all deserve to know the truth even if its sometimes painful. I'll get back to ya very soon on this so hang in there eh?

Jim

Offline Elvis Oswald

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 256
    • ONI
Re: Harmonic Oscillating Power Electric generator video
« Reply #110 on: February 23, 2006, 01:14:14 PM »
Jim,

I have an idea that may shed some light on some of the results you are getting with HOPE.  :)  I hope... haha
If I am repeating anything, I'm sorry. :-[

You have a jump in power output at certain frequencies - and I am assuming that you have not yet concluded why this is happening.
So I thought I might run a little theory up the flagpole and see if anyone salutes. ;)

I know this is not a LC circuit... but what you are seeing sounds alot like a similiar effect seen in a series LC circuit... so hear me out and think about how this might come into play - since you do have a rather "odd" arrangement of inductors in series in the HOPE.

**
In series inductive/capacitive circuits... When a state of resonance is reached (capacitive and inductive reactances equal), the two impedances cancel each other out and the total impedance approaches zero.
-and-
The total impedance of a series LC circuit approaches zero as the power supply frequency approaches resonance.
This can achieve 100-1000 volts from a 1volt power source - if the frequency is resonant to the circuit.
**

This may be waaaay off base.  But hey - there's no math to explain what you've got there anyways, right? ;)  This has to relate in some way.
« Last Edit: February 23, 2006, 01:25:50 PM by Elvis Oswald »

Offline BushWacker

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 76
Re: Harmonic Oscillating Power Electric generator video
« Reply #111 on: February 24, 2006, 12:26:07 AM »

Hi Guy's,

   Well, ......... I have some good news and some bad news, and then some good news again, lol. First of all the good news. I was finally able to get some figures out of our engineering expert for the HOPE unit that I sent him more than 4 months ago. I know that it seems like you've all waited an eternity to hear the actual/true readings on the total power output of the unit that I have been talking about. It probably seemed much longer to me and I finally had enough of the waiting. I pissed the guy off and may have ruined a friendship and partnership in the process. However I figure that if someone as allegedly brilliant and highly qualified as this guy claims to be takes that long to give me a few numbers that it should take him such little effort to get, then I'm not so sure I want to work with a guy like that anyway. We don't have another lifetime to wait for someone to develop something which will enable us to free ourselves from the energy pirates and stop destroying the only planet we have right now. In the months of waiting I have gotten a good deal of negative mail suggesting that I was nothing more than a fraud or worse and I simply had to nip it in the bud before it caused people to lose heart in their own efforts and research. The bad news is that the readings that the engineer quoted were not what either of us had expected initially. For the past 6 months he has repeatedly told me that he is convinced that the device was surpassing the OU barrier. After waiting four months and paying him $400.00 I became tired of tryng to defend myself against all the accusations. I finally decided to be completely honest with my ISBP forum members and told them the real reasons for the extended delay to get these simple figures/readings. I did not disclose his name but simply stated that our alleged engineer had failed to provide any readings for us after waiting for four months. The guy's ego got the best of him and he came back revealing himself as the ass he really is. He immediately shot out some numbers and suddenly changed his tune saying that the HOPE was far from OU but that he had all the answers to how it could be made to reach the OU barrier. He came back so fast that I have to wonder if he really took any readings at all, and he said that $400.00 was not enough to even pay for the meter he required to get the measurements. And yet he was able to give us those alleged measurements only hours after my posting the real reasons for them taking so long to get. I put his name on the patent application for HOPE tech and gave him an executive seat on the board of the new company I have been trying to start up. Yet all I got in return was a slap in the face. He has his own idea's about the mode of operation concerning the unit that I sent him and seems to be stuck on the old-school way of thinking in matters of electrical engineering. He is afterall an alleged experienced engineer and I had trusted and respected his word and knowledge more than any alleged expert I have known. I would like to point out that he has agreed with me completely concerning the idea to develop more suitable core materials based upon my theory that there is a piezo-like component present in the Metglass cores that I've been using in my research. On the other hand he simply refuses to acknowledge this when describing how to improve the output with his updated design. It's almost like he has two different minds and a selective memory when he gets ticked off. I had suggested creating a torroidal shaped core out of the new piezo and high grade ferrous materials that I have mentioned developing, and now he's telling everyone that it was his idea. It certainly isn't the first time that someone has done this to me and most likely won't be the last. Personally, I find his behavior repulsive and unethical. My other new partner has done this with nearly every idea that I have told to him and is now apparently passing much of the information off on the web as being his own. Same ol - same ol I guess, and the more things seem to change the more they stay the same. I don't understand the mentality behind such behavior in people but to each his own, and who's going to care when were all dead and gone anyway. Just so that everyone knows, I have written the patent application for HOPE technologies in a specific mannor so that all current and future developments based on this idea will be covered by the existing international patent certificate. This means that as long as the U.S., military/government does not declare the tech dangerous to national security and find a way to protect the information under the guise of sensitive miltiary technology, anyone and everyone has my full permission to develop anything they like from of all this. I will gladly add the names of those who help to develop further designs and/or improvements to the existing patent and they will share the benefits equally with anyone else on that patent application. I see this as a good way to try and encourage others to do the same and share in the efforts and rewards while providing alternative technolgies to the real people of this world. I will spare the speach on how we all need to change our way of thinking in order to evolve to our higher potential because there are now many others who are already preaching that gospel. Finally, the good news regardless of the fact that the current model appears to be nowhere near the OU barrier according to our enraged engineer is, that if true, we can use the knowledge that we now need far less actual wattage to provide for lighting if nothing else. I have run several full sized 4 foot fluorescent lights/tubes throughout the entire evening and nightime until sunrise the following morning on a 9v DC transistor battery and still had a very good charge left in the batt. By purchasing a small PVC battery charger I can now fully charge that 9v battery in about 3 hours using the suns energy and run my lights the entire night completely free of the grid. I can use this even if nobody else see's the value of it and so I plan to use the remaining cores that I purchased to offer my folks free lighting as well. My step dad is a real penny pincher and will love me for it, lol. Anyways guys, at least we have what appears to be the information many of you have been wanting to know for so long. It's not what it appeared to be to me or the engineering expert up until yesterday but its still valuable information that should be posted. I am pasting the exact figures and remarks from our engineer directly below. I have deleted Bill's last name in order to protect his complete identy since he is afterall quite mad at me now, and I don't have his express written permission to use his name anywhere besides the ISBP os Project Forum. Personally I think that Bill's mind is going bad quickly, and he has reversed reality in his own mind concerning many events which he may honestly remember differently then how they actually occured. If this is the case it is a great loss to this community and I hope that Bill will choose to use his remaining time in the real world more wisely and efficiently while he still can. Bill see's me as having stabbed him in the back because I stated that our engineer had failed to give us any readings after 4 months of waiting. I don't know how much slack a guy needs to take a few simple readings with a proper meter and I was simply being honest instead of feeling like I had to make more excuses for Bill's failure to keep one of his many promises just once. Those readings cost me around $1,000.00 total which of course Bill selectively forgets. I don't know if Bill is intentionally lying outright because he is mad at me now but until now he has been the one telling me that he was convinced that the unit was an OU device and should have absolutely no problem closing the loop. If thats the case he is a liar either way in my book because he has a problem with being honest and forthright. Bill has also wanted a new RMS meter for a long time and I'm sure he can use it for many other things besides the couple of readings he took for us all. Don't anyone worry about this falling out between Bill and me over this stupid thing. If a guy feels the world owe's him that much just for one moment of his time to help towards finding some solutions to such an important thing, it's my opinion that he probably deserves to be in the situation that he is complaining about being in. One last thing, I have tried to get through to Bill that the introduction of magnets simply made no difference what-so-ever in the output readings that I was getting. I got the same readings with or without the magnets installed months ago on the unit I sent to Bill, and still get the same results on the new unit that I built using the same model core. Bill refuses to acknowledge any piezo component being present in the core material itself even though on the phone he has agreed 100% on the idea of making our own custom cores using the types of materials that I have suggested time and again. I understand a lot of things but I have never been able to understand people I guess. Anyway, enough from me eh? lol. You can read Bill's comments below.


Cheers All,

Jim

                       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

Hello,

"I am Bill, the "alleged engineer", and Jim's business partner. I have tested the HOPE unit which he has sent me, and it does not break unity. In fact, it is far from it, with an input of 360 milliwatts (on one run) and an output of 36 milliwatts, which gives it an efficiency of 10%. It needs extensive reconfiguration to even break unity, which I am in the process of doing."

"What I found was a device that was put together on a purely intuitive level, with beautiful craftsmanship. I bought the required meters, most notably a 37XR True-RMS Multimeter with capacitance and inductance measuring capabilities."

 "I found that the system was wired such that the coils had an inductance of 18 Henries. Guys, run your impedance formulas on that one at 2000 Hertz. I found that only one switching coil actually did anything, and it was in series with the output coils. Not a good idea. As a result of this, I had an output of 600 volts at around 3 milliamps on the first run with varying frequencies which seemed to center on 2000 Hz. Yes, that's MILLIAMPS, Jim. Check your range. Subsequent runs tested lower with fully charged batteries."

I tried to get the frequency down with the current configuration, but found that even when I disconnected the oscilllator, the thing wanted to self-oscillate at around the same frequency. I put balancing caps on the coils, but the impedance was still too high with that frequency. I asked Jim if I could rewire the model, and pulled the jumpers off and bought more materials from Radio Shack to power the coils and eliminate the feedback loop. That's where things stand now. Currently, the four coils on the outside are non-powered, and they need to have some kind of power input, possibly close to saturation. Also, the other three coils on the inside need to be powered as well.

"Here's the scoop, guys: What we're building is NOT A MEG! It is a modified Richardson generator, originally patented by Frank Richardson in tha 70's. Frank said that varying the reluctance of the two sides of the core was the key. He had a WORKING device in a VW in the 70's which he tooled around town with."

 "Well, here it is, for what it's worth. Get the Richardson patent at the uspto.gov site, "Electromagnetic convertor with stationary variable-reluctance members", number 4,077,001, patented Feb. 23, 1978. Bearden's MEG is based on this patent. This patent holds the clue on how to fix the HOPE, and make it break unity. We need to SYMETRICALLY vary the reluctance of the core. One side goes high, the other side goes low. Flux follows the lines of least resistance, so first one side saturates, and then the other. Flux ping-pongs from one side to the other, and it ALWAYS sees one side with a low reluctance. Remember that, or your magnets will go dead."

"Why isn't it working now? Two problems: one, flux is not switched symetrically. It only has one point. I've been trying to get a magnetic probe to prove this, but so far the finances are not permitting it. Yes, I know, Jim. You gave me $400 dollars to work with, but that meter is $500. Until I can get some work in that'll have to wait. Remember I'm donating my time for free on this one, and cut some slack."

"The other problem is the metglas core. It's already in a low-reluctance state, so it's like trying to turn on a switch that's already closed. Look at the position of the internal coils, and contrast it with the Richardson patent. If you try to saturate the cores, you can't get any more output. SO we need to vary it from where it is, to a higher reluctance. We do this by powering the exterior coils... all of them. First one set switches on (on one side), putting the core into a high reluctance state, and then they switch off and two internal coils switch on-- on that same side.. Why do this? To get rid of the residual magentism in the core which will raise the reluctance. If some of you out there say that it looks like we're building an inverter, BRAVO! You got the point. We do this sequence first on one side, and then on the other."

"This is what I'm doing right now. If Jim decides he wants the unit back after releasing this information, so be it. You geniuses out there run with this and see if the theory is valid and let me know if it works. But remember the Richardson patent is the key. BTW: Jim, I told you about the problem with the core, and that a toroidal geometry would tend to fix this."

 "It would look like the Greek letter theta, with the magnets in the middle. Doing this would also produce a rotating magnetic field. Imagine this as a rotor, and you get the idea. Also, the torus would vary the curl-free A potential, which you can do all kinds of wonderful things with much to the consternation of the EE crowd. So if Jim want's it back, fine. It's time to start on a new configuration. Also, I already have a working theory for a Coler device anyway that needs to be built, and it's being put off working on the HOPE. Jim knows this as well."

"I'll be tinkering on this tonight after job hunting this afternoon. Sorry if you don't like that Jim, but those are my priorities."


Take Care,

Bill


Offline BushWacker

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 76
Re: Harmonic Oscillating Power Electric generator video
« Reply #112 on: February 24, 2006, 03:30:59 AM »
The attached pdf file is a paper which Daniel Jackson sent to me today and wondered if I would think it worthy of posting, lol. Daniel seems to understand the concept of my latest work very well and HOPEfully it will catch on with others in a big way (Punn Intended). Haven't had time to go over all of Daniel's work yet and I am not big on circuit design but maybe someone here can understand his circuits and explain them in common English, German, or whatever.

Online hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8025
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Harmonic Oscillating Power Electric generator video
« Reply #113 on: March 07, 2006, 03:55:13 AM »
Hi de Lanca,
sounds impressive !
So you have a COP of 1750 ?

How is your Magnet-Transformer working ?

Some kind of overunity transformer ?
Does it use Neodym magnets ?
Simular to a MEG ?
Do you have a selfrunning system ?

Please let us know more !
Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan.

Online hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8025
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Harmonic Oscillating Power Electric generator video
« Reply #114 on: March 07, 2006, 05:46:11 PM »
Hi de Lanca,
yes, of course COP=175 , was a bit late in the night when I saw this.
Can you post a picture of the device ?
Do you still want to patent it, or what do you want to do with it ?
Please let uis know more and when you expect to release more infos.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan-

Offline BushWacker

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 76
Re: Harmonic Oscillating Power Electric generator video
« Reply #115 on: March 07, 2006, 09:32:51 PM »
LancaIV,

    I just wanted to congradulate you on your success so far and encourage you to keep up the good work. It's to bad that these tasks are left completely up to individual researchers because we could certainly make a great deal more progress with the kind of tools and finances that the big boys have at their disposal.
Even so, it sounds like you are working hard with what you have, and if you've come this far already just remember to keep thinking of the very real posssibilities if and when you ever become discouraged. The thing about real hero's Lanca, is that most people never know what they've had to go through or what sacrifices they've made to try and help others. I don't even know you but, I know that if you are working hard to bring new alternative energy technologies to this world then you are a real hero my friend and I thank you.


Best Regards,

BushWacker

Offline BushWacker

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 76
Re: Harmonic Oscillating Power Electric generator video
« Reply #116 on: March 08, 2006, 08:03:57 AM »
Hello Group,

    Does anyone know of a specific frequency range used for spliting water into hydrogen? Several of us have observed certain phenomenon during HOPE operations and testing that could mean that a HOPE Generator may be able to be built to tune into the precise frequency range of any type of matter including water for the purpose of disasembling the molecular and/or atomic structure of that matter. If anyone does know of this specific frequency range please let us know.


Best Regards All,

Jim

Offline rensseak

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 330
Re: Harmonic Oscillating Power Electric generator video
« Reply #117 on: March 08, 2006, 10:46:42 AM »
Hallo BushWalker,

maybe this program can help you! It is based on a theory of elemtar resonance from Gabi Mueller

http://www.torkado.de/progs/Resonanz.zip
http://www.torkado.de/progs/progRauch.htm
http://www.torkado.de/elementarresonanz.htm

I HOPE it helps you!

for translation copy the adress to this site!

http://webtranslation.paralink.com/


regards
Norbert


Hello Group,

    Does anyone know of a specific frequency range used for spliting water into hydrogen? Several of us have observed certain phenomenon during HOPE operations and testing that could mean that a HOPE Generator may be able to be built to tune into the precise frequency range of any type of matter including water for the purpose of disasembling the molecular and/or atomic structure of that matter. If anyone does know of this specific frequency range please let us know.


Best Regards All,

Jim

Online hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8025
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Harmonic Oscillating Power Electric generator video
« Reply #118 on: March 09, 2006, 03:59:54 AM »
Hi DeLanca,
how long will the patent proces take
until you can tell us more ?

Is your unit replicateable ?
Does it run all the time ?

Regards, Stefan.

Online hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8025
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Harmonic Oscillating Power Electric generator video
« Reply #119 on: March 09, 2006, 06:42:01 AM »
Why do you want to patent it at all ?
Patents are no good at all...

Share the ideas and make money with being the inventor...

Regards, Stefan.