Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: OverUnity Question  (Read 23438 times)

z.monkey

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1660
    • Scientilosopher's Domain
Re: OverUnity Question
« Reply #30 on: September 12, 2008, 04:05:39 PM »
Howdy GiantKiller, Paul-R,

Point me to the specs...

The Infinity Transformer is teetering on the threshold...

Blessed Be...

the_big_m_in_ok

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2087
Re: OverUnity Question
« Reply #31 on: July 25, 2009, 04:08:33 AM »
[quote author=Spewing said:

... 1.Have you Seen a device that puts out more POWER than it Consumes?...

@all
There's a logical question I might ask:

If a Bedini charger/motor can be operated and powered by an earth battery (others on this site---Bedini systems forum for instance---have reported it's possible to do that), this earth battery having unlimited electrical potential over time; wouldn't that define OU?

Oh, yes, I looked at the Rules .PDF:   Earth batteries should be okay, unless the rules are changed after I will have looked at the file,
24 Jul 2009.

--Lee

Wonderous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: OverUnity Question
« Reply #32 on: May 25, 2010, 04:39:40 PM »
Okay so this question is perplexing me a little.

A perpetual motion machine-(free energy) only counts as free energy if the substance powering it hasn't been discovered.  Technically, a waterwheel is a free energy device from an economic perspective.

So my question is this.  Are we failing to see the point when we create things that move in an understandable manner?

Maybe this free energy question should be zero point energy question.  As in the first person to rob space of it's inherent latent power.  Rather than using some of the commonly available free energy like wind.

Even nuclear, heavy water, electric latentent energy devices and a myriad of other incredible free energy sources won't be able to win, because it will have to be a force hithertoo uncaptured.

I'm repeating myself.


Wonderous Mountain

Paul-R

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2086
Re: OverUnity Question
« Reply #33 on: May 25, 2010, 04:49:52 PM »
Okay so this question is perplexing me a little.

A perpetual motion machine-(free energy) only counts as free energy if the substance powering it hasn't been discovered.
Not so. Such machines tend to be powered by the energy in space itself, as muted
by the Nobel Physics prizewinners for 1957, Lee and Yang. See also Hal Puthoff who
opined that if the energy available in the space occupied by a coffee cup were
accessed fully, it would boil the Atlantic dry, then the other oceans - and this could
be repeated several more times. (Google these folks along with "quantum foam")