GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 499877
  • *Total Topics: 14808
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 18
  • *Total: 21

Author Topic: Offtopic: Helicopters don?t need tail rotors !  (Read 12628 times)

Offline hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7820
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Offtopic: Helicopters don?t need tail rotors !
« on: October 16, 2007, 11:56:41 PM »
Very interesting new invention:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvP_bZt65d0

Forward to about minte 4:00 to see it fly.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8364
Re: Offtopic: Helicopters don?t need tail rotors !
« Reply #1 on: October 26, 2007, 07:09:56 AM »
Very interesting.  I don't understand what control changes the direction then?  I am familiar with NOTAR and also, my favorite, the co-axial twin rotors, but what allows the 180 degree change in direction with this design?

Bill

Offline albert

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 95
Re: Offtopic: Helicopters don?t need tail rotors !
« Reply #2 on: October 27, 2007, 10:49:55 AM »
I think this is ridiculous. A helicopter that cant hover....all those guys never learned to hover and yet they still want to fly a helicopter.so this is the lazy man's approach...

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Offtopic: Helicopters don?t need tail rotors !
« Reply #2 on: October 27, 2007, 10:49:55 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline raburgeson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 705
Re: Offtopic: Helicopters don?t need tail rotors !
« Reply #3 on: December 14, 2007, 07:09:52 PM »
Apparently,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2IghwseoISc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQOB9d09x6A

They don't need any rotors at all. (not a model)
« Last Edit: December 14, 2007, 07:56:59 PM by raburgeson »

Offline Chad

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 128
Re: Offtopic: Helicopters don?t need tail rotors !
« Reply #4 on: December 15, 2007, 02:22:47 AM »
Apparently,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2IghwseoISc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQOB9d09x6A

They don't need any rotors at all. (not a model)

it does seem as though they arnt moving but the rotors are curved upwards indicating they are supporting weight, so maybe it is just the fps that are equal to the rpm of the rotors making them apear motionless.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Offtopic: Helicopters don?t need tail rotors !
« Reply #4 on: December 15, 2007, 02:22:47 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline raburgeson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 705
Re: Offtopic: Helicopters don?t need tail rotors !
« Reply #5 on: December 18, 2007, 06:18:47 AM »
Being able to sinc the rotors in the same position relative to the craft would be impossible. The craft was shown changing altitude both directions. When you give it the gas to go up the speed of the rotor changes drastically. That rotor can't be turning, radar and a computer to plot frame rate couldn't even do it.

Offline albert

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 95
Re: Offtopic: Helicopters don?t need tail rotors !
« Reply #6 on: December 18, 2007, 12:13:18 PM »
it has to be a strobe effect. rotor speed does not change when moving up or down, its the pitch of the blades that changes. With modern turbine governor systems the rotor speed will be so constant that one could shoot this with a video camera that allows manipulation of shutter speed/scanning time. you look thru the finder and set the dial so the rotor seems to stop. I dont think there is another explanation for this.
The only other thing I could think of is thrust systems like the harrier jet. but this would be visible.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Offtopic: Helicopters don?t need tail rotors !
« Reply #6 on: December 18, 2007, 12:13:18 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline blagoja

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Offtopic: Helicopters don?t need tail rotors !
« Reply #7 on: June 01, 2008, 11:05:21 PM »
Dear Sir, have created the new mechanical technique this new mechanical technique large ships can will crowd twice the larger speed instead of the propeller-driven system with the same operating engine. Using the strong piston plane engine this mechanism can easily will crowd smaller planes with the larger speed from the speed of sound and on the last exit from the plane jets from the alone clean air.Have made the prototype and look at pictures and film from the prototype. Effect with waters from the picture 2 has been got with el. m. from 1.1kw. the such waterspout with this operating energy from 1.1 kw. the neither other pump not was able will appear. Necessary we are help sponsor-partner that prove this what has written in the letter.
Please contact that you explain in some detail across the letter that you explain why needs that makes larger prtototip from this mechanical invention for in navigable or the flying object, in order to has understood why us necessary your help. Look at and film from the prototype and intensify the sound.
Best regards from Blagoje Dzikovski.
Dzikovski Blagoja.01.06.2008.Skopje.E-mail: blagoja46@yahoo.com  Republika Makedonja

Offline retroworm

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
Re: Offtopic: Helicopters don?t need tail rotors !
« Reply #8 on: June 02, 2008, 07:22:51 PM »
If you have to sacrifice hovering, I think it's more practical to take that final step and turn it into a gyroplane. Added benefits would be higher flight speed, better manouverability, better fuel efficiency and overall lighter design.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Offtopic: Helicopters don?t need tail rotors !
« Reply #8 on: June 02, 2008, 07:22:51 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline utilitarian

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 816
Re: Offtopic: Helicopters don?t need tail rotors !
« Reply #9 on: June 02, 2008, 09:37:01 PM »
Very interesting.  I don't understand what control changes the direction then?  I am familiar with NOTAR and also, my favorite, the co-axial twin rotors, but what allows the 180 degree change in direction with this design?

Bill

I think the flat tail serves as a rudder.

Offline buzz-ard

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 81
Re: Offtopic: Helicopters don?t need tail rotors !
« Reply #10 on: June 05, 2008, 12:24:03 AM »
@ util - You are exactly correct - it's a rudder. A rotating tail rotor provides power-rudder control at all speeds and prevents spin. The stationary rudder doesn't exert force of its own, thus continuous forward motion of the craft is required in order to maintain control. In a hover it would spin out.

@All - I never believed it until I learned to fly, but helicopters are generally preferable to airplanes if you lose an engine. The rotor blades act as airfoils and can allow enough control through pitch adjustments to waft the craft down. Conversely, the airplane becomes a very heavy glider that loses altitude quickly while picking up speed. Overall, the landing in a disabled heli is often softer than in a plane.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Offtopic: Helicopters don?t need tail rotors !
« Reply #10 on: June 05, 2008, 12:24:03 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Bulbz

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 419
Re: Offtopic: Helicopters don?t need tail rotors !
« Reply #11 on: June 05, 2008, 01:24:15 AM »
Being a model aircraft enthusiast myself, I have seen plenty of helicopters without tail rotors. They usually have two main rotors, one rotates clockwise, the other rotates counter-clockwise, by means of two motors and a coaxial shaft.

 

OneLink