Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 83680
  • *Latest: dnz007

  • *Total Posts: 516012
  • *Total Topics: 15381
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 7
  • *Guests: 19
  • *Total: 26

Author Topic: US District Court Unseals Second 9/11 'Inside Job' Case  (Read 3386 times)

Offline CB_Brooklyn

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 35
US District Court Unseals Second 9/11 'Inside Job' Case
« on: October 13, 2007, 08:50:45 AM »
US District Court Unseals Second 9/11 ?Inside Job? Case

Developments regarding Dr Judy Wood, a former Professor of Mechanical Engineering from Clemson University, and Dr Morgan Reynolds, the former Chief Economist of the US Department of Labor. Both Wood and Reynolds are represented by mainstream attorney Jerry Leaphart.


Those following developments in 9/11 ?inside job? legal proceedings are aware that the US District Court in Southern New York unsealed a complaint filed by Dr Morgan Reynolds against private contractors hired by the government. This lawsuit alleges that the contractors supplied bogus analyses for the NIST Report of an aluminum airplane with a plastic nosecone gliding through a steel and concrete building . Information pertaining to this lawsuit, including a PDF of the unsealed complaint, can be found on Reynolds website:
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=federal_case


More recently however, September 12, 2007 to be exact, the Southern New York District Court unsealed a second ?inside job? case. This second complaint was filed by Dr Judy Wood against the same private contractors, alleging the World Trade Center was destroyed by Directed Energy Weapons (DEW), and not airplane strikes, jet fuel fires, or gravity. Wood?s unsealed complaint is available here (in the Qui Tam section): http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html

Dr James Fetzer, the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, interviewed Dr Wood and Mr Leaphart on his October 11th Dynamic Duo radio show to discuss the new unsealed complaint. An MP3 of this broadcast is downloadable at this link: http://tinyurl.com/3dmpqo

Dr Fetzer also submitted a press release for this wonderful news. Read it and learn that NIST admitted to Dr Wood (in writing) that they did not analyze the ?collapse? of the towers!
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_jim_fetz_071011_9_2f11_scholar_files__22.htm


One of the Defendants, Applied Research Associates (ARA), is a manufacturer of directed energy weapons :
http://drjudywood.com/articles/ARA/ARA.html

ARA is also a Silver Level Founding Sponsor of the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS). Founded in 1999, DEPS put out their first newsletter one year before 9/11, containing the following excerpt:

"Lasers in space, lasers in the stratosphere, lasers
on and over the battlefield - we're at the
beginning of an evolutionary new wave of
weaponry."
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/graphics/wavefront2.pdf



Dr Wood has also discovered that the "Capabilities - National Defense and Aerospace" section of ARA's website contains an image depicting a simulation with the following characteristics:

1. A building (in the foreground) having damage similar to that of WTC 6 and the Murrah Building in OK City.

2. A building (behind the red building) with the same cosmetic design as WTC 3.

3. A building (in the background) turning to dust similar to the Twin Towers.

Here's the image:
(http://drjudywood.com/articles/ARA/pics/defens1_poof_l.jpg)


See pages 3 and 4 of Dr Wood?s Appeal to NIST for information regarding that photo:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_WoodAppeal.html

Here are pages 3 and 4:
(http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/apics/Appeal_03.jpg)
(http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/apics/Appeal_04.jpg)




Those skeptical of the directed energy weapon theory often ask how such a weapon could eject steel beams horizontally from the towers, as seem in some of the videos and photographs. Dr Wood says the DEW didn?t destroy the towers itself, but instead activated chemical clouds that were released from within the buildings; much like how light activates photographic film. Dr Wood has discovered photographic evidence of these chemical clouds coming from the towers, as well as WTC 7:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/dirt5.html
http://drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/WTC7.html




The Evidence for Directed Energy Weapons is Very Strong!


**Let's take this Vertical Cut on WTC 4 as an example.
The building material on the other side of the cut is "missing".
Where'd it go?
(http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k126/CB_Brooklyn/DEW%20Evidence/Image194Resized.jpg)


**Has anyone noticed... the WTC 4 cut is in the same path as the South Tower's north wall?
The South Tower is also "missing".
(http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k126/CB_Brooklyn/DEW%20Evidence/Image271Resized.gif)


**How about these Cylindrical Holes in WTC 5 and WTC 6?
What, if not a beam weapon, could make these?
(http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k126/CB_Brooklyn/DEW%20Evidence/Image140Resized.jpg)


**How about this video of the Steel Core Turning to Dust and trickling down?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVRh4U2BlhQ


**What type of weapon could destroy car engine blocks, yet leave unexploded gas tanks?
(http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k126/CB_Brooklyn/DEW%20Evidence/ZoominGJS-WTC105_toasted.jpg)


**This police car looks too weird.
(http://s18.photobucket.com/albums/b108/janedoe444/ARG/Image172.jpg)


**These cleanup workers certainly look puzzled.
What happened here?
(http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k126/CB_Brooklyn/Pulverize%20Post/WeirdSerpentBeams.jpg)


**About 20 minutes before the South Tower is destroyed, the FAA orders all aircraft to land.
Two minutes after the North Tower is destroyed, the FAA allows military craft back up.
Why?
(http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k126/CB_Brooklyn/DEW%20Evidence/FAAOrdersResized.jpg)



One must wonder... where did the towers go?


Look at these two comparisons. What happened?
(http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k126/CB_Brooklyn/Pulverize%20Post/HTR-combine.jpg)
(http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k126/CB_Brooklyn/Pulverize%20Post/WTC6-WTC7-Verizon.jpg)



Drs Wood and Reynolds have filed legal challenges, which provides an excellent opportunity for a new investigation.
They deserve our full support.


It?s every American?s duty to remove corrupt elements in the government.

Please help by distributing the above information to your local media.



Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline b0rg13

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 651
Re: US District Court Unseals Second 9/11 'Inside Job' Case
« Reply #1 on: October 13, 2007, 09:27:23 AM »
does any one REALLY think bush and his buddies will be rounded up? , i cant see it my self, i am curious tho *they* keep killing ppl left right and center and many ppl cant wait to go to war and kill more ppl yet again, personaly ill never understand it, but its EXTREEMLY obvious many many more ppl will die and many more wars will continue.

Offline shruggedatlas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 549
Re: US District Court Unseals Second 9/11 'Inside Job' Case
« Reply #2 on: October 13, 2007, 07:08:49 PM »
More recently however, September 12, 2007 to be exact, the Southern New York District Court unsealed a second ?inside job? case. This second complaint was filed by Dr Judy Wood against the same private contractors, alleging the World Trade Center was destroyed by Directed Energy Weapons (DEW), and not airplane strikes, jet fuel fires, or gravity. Wood?s unsealed complaint is available here (in the Qui Tam section): http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html

OK, I am confused.  What brought down the towers?  Was it ICBM missiles, missiles from space, Bush space death rays, timed detonation, or what?  Can't you troofers get your stories straight?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: US District Court Unseals Second 9/11 'Inside Job' Case
« Reply #2 on: October 13, 2007, 07:08:49 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline buzneg

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 249
Re: US District Court Unseals Second 9/11 'Inside Job' Case
« Reply #3 on: October 14, 2007, 03:16:23 AM »
More recently however, September 12, 2007 to be exact, the Southern New York District Court unsealed a second ?inside job? case. This second complaint was filed by Dr Judy Wood against the same private contractors, alleging the World Trade Center was destroyed by Directed Energy Weapons (DEW), and not airplane strikes, jet fuel fires, or gravity. Wood?s unsealed complaint is available here (in the Qui Tam section): http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html

OK, I am confused.  What brought down the towers?  Was it ICBM missiles, missiles from space, Bush space death rays, timed detonation, or what?  Can't you troofers get your stories straight?

we don't have a mass media source to feed us the same story, so we're not unified. It's the age of ununity, not overunity  ;D

Offline gaby de wilde

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 470
    • http://blog.360.yahoo.com/Factuurexpress
Re: US District Court Unseals Second 9/11 'Inside Job' Case
« Reply #4 on: October 14, 2007, 05:32:56 AM »
OK, I am confused.  What brought down the towers?

Let us know when you have figured it out ok?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: US District Court Unseals Second 9/11 'Inside Job' Case
« Reply #4 on: October 14, 2007, 05:32:56 AM »
Sponsored links:




 

OneLink