Quote from: HopeForHumanity on November 15, 2007, 02:40:31 AM

Now your stating that nothing you said is of relevance to what you mean or something... Good job, you confused me... I thought we were talking about how you never heard of barium ferrite bars (or cores). Did I miss something?

By the way, I wasn't matching ignorance and stupid, I was saying it's stupid to STATE how your ignorant of something....

Like you said, you didn't know about barium ferrite bars, so your ignorant of it... Now, instead of stating how you were ignorant about something, why didn't you just go research a tad before your post? it's a question... You never said that people told you it didn't exist, you just said you never heard of it. This led me to believe there might be more to why you never knew, so I asked a question.

Why is it you only quoted the first sentence the last part says I did research and found none. Read this I state it twice "I DID REASEAECH AND FOUND NONE" maybe if I say it enough it will soak in. Buy the way 99% of the time if I have not heard of something I been doing for 45 years, it because it does not exist. You are about forcing me to use "STUPID" word.

 And by the way read this direct quote from original post" So I did some research for different core manufactures and none I found had Barimum" read quoted part several several more times do you see the words "I did research"   Do not ask me again why I did not research when I did. Read this again "I DID REASEAECH AND FOUND NONE" . Enough on this. You confuse to easy.

Look, I'm just trying to encourage you to look harder. I see lots of barium ferrite powders. I see references to cores, but not many for sale. I'm most likely not going to be attempting this thing, but, I believe that if you put down your extremely stiff beliefs, you could have the ability to replicate this thing. It looks very cheap, and why be afraid of a small waste of time, when it might go against your odds and turn out to be exactly as Dr.Stiffler said. Look at it not as a waste of time, but a lesson. I wish that I had the material and ability to just go get everything and build it. You almost do, and if you just put that extra effort into hunting down a barium ferrite core, it would look as if you had everything you need. Do it and fail, make your conclusion. Do it and succeed, be apart of the people who made it happen. Seems like a win win situation.

How totally unpredictable .. hahaha

Oh the great Stifeler has decided to punish us and make us wait ... lol .. get out of here .. are you guys still buying this malarky !!

Cheers,

Keep on Keeping on ...

Dean

It is hard for me to keep jumping to Stifler's web site and back to see what he has done. Most of his coil windings do not show the red dot. The windings are very hard to discern on some coils what direction that is. All my coils seem to be the same. With the red dot up and to your left start winding the coil in a counter clock wise direction starting from your left. I hope this make sense all this left and right stuff. If you need maybe I can a picture tomorrow. Happy experimenting and good luck.
In case I am wrong about all 4000 parts being the same ,I can not check them all but I did a random check of several hundred. If you think this may be causing you problems when you protype your circuit just reverse the outer winding leads in your circuit.
Another thing he keeps showing L2 in the schematic posted some pages back as a dual winding. If the coil you are winding is L3 it makes no difference which direction it is wound.

Quote from: dean_mcgowan on November 15, 2007, 08:00:29 AM

How totally unpredictable .. hahaha

Oh the great Stifeler has decided to punish us and make us wait ... lol .. get out of here .. are you guys still buying this malarky !!

Cheers,

Keep on Keeping on ...

Dean

KneeDeep...Yeh, I'm sort of buying the malarky. Me, I don't believe in O/U. But each jump for the impossible, brings within reach the newly possible. We all know that LEDS are more efficient than Incandescent Lamps in terms of Lumens per watt, but is direct current versus RF excitation the best means to get those lumens per watt?

That is the....KneeDeep.......Question that I am asking. These LED experiments are important on shedding new light, (pun intended) on the best possible methods of creating said light from said LEDS.  Buuuurpppp. 

Back in the 1980-1990's we were introduced to RF/Fluorescent light bulbs, which proved to be much more economical than incandescent or standard ballast triggered Fluorescent bulbs. If the search for O/U results in higher real efficiencies, then all the malaky is worthwhile.

In the meantime I just like bright lights,, ,, and whirrrring motoors,,,,,,  KneeDeep!.....

From the Toad who Hops

You are correct whether DC or some kind of driver may be more efficient is yet to be seen.

I was only breaking the Stiffler schematic down into parts for understanding its operation in a private email that got posted. No more no less. I just do not like to have my break down called "crap" by Stiffler. I did not challenge him making LEDs turn on I was only explaining the operation of it. He was asked many times to explain the circuit and did not. So I did. He has tweaked the circuit to operate the best he can and made improvements. But the basic circut operation is the same.

I would like this to be for real as much as the next guy but, so far, according to everything I have read here, it is just an ordinary rf generator lighting up some diodes, with zero evidence that it is OU.

If stiffler ever offers real evidence and enough information for people to replicate the circuit, or provides sample devices for people to test, then I guess we will know for sure one way or the other. But all he does, as far as i can see, is play games, the latest one being the 'big announcement' that he was going to make, but will not make because somebody dared to be skeptical.

He sure as hell doesn't sound like somebody who really has invented a world-changing device.

canam101
DrStiffler does not owe anyone anything here. He has discovered a peculiar behavior in his circuit and is sharing his findings with us as he wishes.
You should try to build it for yourself and then you decide whether it is OU or not or, where the extra energy comes from (if any).

AM

I would like this to be for real as much as the next guy but, so far, according to everything I have read here, it is just an ordinary rf generator lighting up some diodes, with zero evidence that it is OU.

If stiffler ever offers real evidence and enough information for people to replicate the circuit, or provides sample devices for people to test, then I guess we will know for sure one way or the other. But all he does, as far as i can see, is play games, the latest one being the 'big announcement' that he was going to make, but will not make because somebody dared to be skeptical.

He sure as hell doesn't sound like somebody who really has invented a world-changing device.

I was not trying to skeptical just explain the various functions the circuits preform. Stiffler himself says he does not believe in overunity. I do not challenge his view on this. (Read earlier posts) or go to his web site http://www.drstiffler.com read his views on overunity, to increase efficiency is to primary goal I assume. I may be wrong it's hard to tell from him what he thinks one paragraph he says overunity is erroneous and he does not believe in it then the next paragraph he talks about unknown power sources that will make the term overunity a common thing.