I doubt this one works either.
Who cares? You claim to have done a little digging, where is the long list of patents you found in the first 3 min? Why are we not discussing hundreds of patents? I don't doubt you didn't look. I know for sure!
http://www.google.com/patents?id=-64KAAAAEBAJ&dq=6,362,718Motionless electromagnetic generator
REFERENCES:
Patent Number Title Issue date
2153378 CURRENT RESPONSIVE ARRANGEMENT Apr 1939
2892155 INPUT F Jun 1959
3079535 VARIABLE STRENGTH PERMANENT MAGNETS Feb 1963
3165723 MAGNETIC MEMORY DEVICE Jan 1965
3228013 MAGNETIC MEMORY DEVICE Jan 1966
3254268 PROTECTIVE SYSTEM FOR CAPACITANCE SERIALLY CONNECTED WITH INDUCTIVE APPARATUS May 1966
3316514 FAIL SAFE ELECTRO-MAGNETIC LIFTING DEVICE WITH SAFETY-STOP MEANS Apr 1967
3368141 SUBIETA-GARRON Feb 1968
3391358 CIRCUIT BREAKER WITH IMPROVED MAGNETIC TRIP MEANS Jul 1968
3453876 MAGNETOSTRICTIVE LOAD CELLS Jul 1969
3517300 POWER CONVERTER CIRCUITS HAVING A HIGH FREQUENCY LINK Jun 1970
3569947 MAGNETIC MEMORY DEVICE Mar 1971
3599074 HIGH-POWER DIRECT-CURRENT TO SQUARE- WAVE CONVERTER UTILIZING AN INDUCTIVELY COUPLED GAS DISCHARGE TUBE Aug 1971
4006401 Electromagnetic generator Feb 1, 1977
4077001 Electromagnetic convertor with stationary variable-reluctance members Feb 28, 1978
4366532 AC/DC or DC/AC Converter system with improved AC-line harmonic reduction Dec 28, 1982
4482945 Transformer for low distortion rectifier system Nov 13, 1984
4554524 Secondary circuit breaker for distribution transformer with indicator light switch mechanism Nov 19, 1985
4853668 Integrated magnetic converter core Aug 1, 1989
4864478 Integrated-magnetics power converter Sep 5, 1989
4904926 Magnetic motion electrical generator Feb 27, 1990
5011821 Method and apparatus for generating electricity Apr 30, 1991
5221892 Flux compression transformer Jun 22, 1993
5245521 Suppression of transformer capacitive current Sep 14, 1993
5327015 Superconductor device to produce electrical impulses Jul 5, 1994
5335163 Power supply circuit with integrated magnetic components Aug 2, 1994
5694030 Magnetic element for power supply and DC-to-DC converter Dec 2, 1997
Referenced by
Patent Number Title Issue date
7247337 Method and apparatus for microarray fabrication
Don Adsid has a nice page he says is from Geoff Engels Site
Bougon, G.H. 1859764 Magnetic Device Permanent Magnet Motors USA
Clover, L.W. 4025807 ELM Motor Permanent Magnet Motors USA
Ecklin, J.W. 3879622 Magnet Motion Converter Permanent Magnet Motors USA
Gay, H. #2486327 P.M. Self-Movement Device Permanent Magnet Motors FRANCE
Jines, J.E. 3469130 Magnetic Motor Permanent Magnet Motors USA
Johnson, H.R. 4151431 Magnet Motor Permanent Magnet Motors USA
Kelly, D.A. 4082969 Magnetic Torque Converter Permanent Magnet Motors USA
Kelly, D.A. 4167684 Magnet Torque Multiplier Permanent Magnet Motors USA
Kelly, D.A. 4179633 Magnetic Wheel Drive Permanent Magnet Motors USA
Kiniski, Z.C. 3811058 Magnetic Motor Permanent Magnet Motors USA
Kinnison, R.W. 3899703 Magnet Motion Converter Permanent Magnet Motors USA
Kuroki, 5. 4305024 Magnetic Motor Permanent Magnet Motors USA
Powell, A. 1835721 Magnetic Motor Permanent Magnet Motors USA
Poysa, J.W. 1963213 Magnetic Motor Permanent Magnet Motors USA
Putt, J.W. 3992132 Energy Converter Permanent Magnet Motors USA
Scholin, H.W. 4011477 Magnet Motor Permanent Magnet Motors USA
Sheridan, F.R. 3609425 Magnet Motor Permanent Magnet Motors USA
Stahovic, R.F. 4207773 Magnetic Piston Motor Permanent Magnet Motors USA
Teal, B.R. 4024421 Magnetic Engine Permanent Magnet Motors USA
Teal, B.R. 4093880 Magnetic Engine Permanent Magnet Motors USA
Worthington, H.L. 1859643 Magnetic Motor Permanent Magnet Motors USA
http://www.theverylastpageoftheinternet.com/menu/patents.htmOne should feel free to try be a little more specific as one generalised opinion. I'm sure the inventors range over a width spectrum. One universal debunk doesn't do justice to any of it. It merely describes the author.
If you want a clear violation of scientific dogma you look at the hundreds and hundreds of electrolysis patents. Stan showed a working model, everyone knows this. No way in the world would he have gotten that patent if he didn't have anything to show. They are granted under Section 101, the contraption has been examined by US Patent Office".
It's just like the medical establishment having problems with moderating ships logs. Any reasonably good captain however will describe what ever happened. His log is not something one can question.
In that same way the scientific establishment may pretend the patent office has zero credibility. But 101 is 101! The man in dresses can chant their mantra all day. Still 101 is 101. Then Stan was forbidden to continue his research under the US national security act. Science doesn't trust that either I guess? I would love to hear the opinion of a forensic scientist on this topic.
Give me a break? No rational argument is going to repair this lie.
The patent database is much like the Internet, it's only much more complicated to navigate. But if you compare navigation with 1980 then you will have to conclude that your 5 min google searching would have cost you thousands of bucks back then, your query would continue to return results over a very long time span. If you take a few hours to seriously collect links and compare that to 1960 you will have the equivalent of an extremely slow and most expensive project. It would have cost an enormous heap of cash and it would have taken years to resolve the data. Meanwhile everyone on the Internet is acting like a 12 year old kid crying wolf over not getting things on a gold plate. You are just lazy, this proves it.
My own "found patent list" got kind of crufty when I started mixing application numbers though it.
It's pretty sad to have just an application number, most of the time you really cant find anything with it. 1 in 50 or so you can find the patent or (even better) another similar patent mentioning the application.
So, I decided upon having them rather then not having them I just forgot it takes 100 times as long to validate as a patent number. So, yeah my page is a big mess sorry peoples, please have mercy... What is your excuse btw?
http://magnetmotor.go-here.nl/others/patentspatents - others - magnetmotor
http://magnetmotor.go-here.nl/othersothers - magnetmotor
____
puh, it's probably just nothing, all of it, it has to be, it must, no no no it cant be anything noooooo I hate smurfs!!