Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: DISSOCIATING WATER, A KEELY Project  (Read 65248 times)

fritz

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 424
Re: DISSOCIATING WATER, A KEELY Project
« Reply #60 on: December 02, 2007, 11:11:29 PM »
Dear Hans,

Some further intentions...

If the piezos are operated at similar frequency
than in the water vaporizers, they have a beam of
3-5mm diameter. Having 3 beams in xyz configuration
would give a focal volume of 125-150mm^3.

At least if you operate all 3 of them at resonance
frequency used for the vaporizers - the power density
should be enough...
One idea is to modulate this carrier frequency AM
with another (quite lower) composite wavefrom to
crack the molecules. Maybe its interesting to do
this without carrier only on both sidebands......

Another construction option is the use of 2 opposite piezos
per axis - to have a forced "push pull" torsion wave... using
6 piezos with adjustable phase delay or complete separate
synthesizer which can be coupled to the other piezo on the
same axis.....

My plans for the electrical part - piezos, configuration, drivers
synthesizers are already in the design stage, waiting for
oscillator samples, ...

The mechanical part is still open to some degree ...
Is there a robust way to attach a camera to the device,
what have to be kept in mind if operating such camera
under water (magnification, focus)...
...
rgds...

Evil Roy Slade

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 117
Re: DISSOCIATING WATER, A KEELY Project
« Reply #61 on: December 03, 2007, 01:47:30 AM »
Hi Hans,

The concept of resonance is an interesting one. There are many factors
that determine the resonant frequency of a material and as I understand it a
major one is the length of the material.

The length of a hydrogen bond in a water molecule is 95.84pm and hence one
would expect the resonant frequency to be somewhere around 3130 Petahz (10^15)
This is in the upper Xray range which obviously was not available in Keely's time.

I think the idea of Keely using a 3 chord set was to try and get this high frequency
from a harmonic. If such a high frequency harmonic could in fact be generated (and I doubt it),
it's amplitude would be miniscule and require an enormous power input to create a useful harmonic.

Therefore from a power efficiency point of view one would be better off going straight to an xray
generator in order to try and get the hydrogen bonds to resonate and hopefully break.

Obviously throwing xrays around is not for the faint hearted.

We already use microwaves to produce heat by taking advantage of the dipolar nature of
the water molecule. However going to a high power xray generator is a significant step.

Finally, if one compares the power input of an xray generator solution to the simple electolysis
solution I am prepared to bet the latter is way less!

Your thoughts would be welcomed.

ERS


Goldsphere

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: DISSOCIATING WATER, A KEELY Project
« Reply #62 on: December 04, 2007, 02:09:40 AM »
Hi Hans,

I think it is most likely that Keely used the Well Temperament that was in use in the 1800's mostly thanks to Bach.
Here is some info on it.
http://www.kylegann.com/histune.html#hist4
http://www.uk-piano.org/edfoote/well_tempered_piano.html

This tuning allows for a great number of harmonics and for full modulation.

GS

fritz

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 424
Re: DISSOCIATING WATER, A KEELY Project
« Reply #63 on: December 04, 2007, 10:05:04 AM »
@ERS
I think that keely?s use of chords is ment in a way that this chord /
composite waveform doesn?t break up the water bond directly.
Keely?s technique is to break up the topologic shells which
separate the water bond from direct inflluence of kinetic energy
from outside.
By breaking up this shells you have the possibility to transfer
kinetic energy directly to a molecular level. This additional energy
distorts the equilibrium of the water bonds and induces interesting
"molecular options" for the involved atoms. While taking this (intermediate)
options - outer shells work against this trying to protect their own equilibrium..
By tricking out this inter-shell/over all equilibrium interactions -
single (intermediate not bonded) atoms can "escape".
This trick(changing the way how the atoms recombine) has the potential
to have a higher efficiency than electrolysis where you just
replace electrons.

You are right with your assumptions about breaking up water bonds
with x rays - but thats definitely not the "trick".

Some example:
You are inside a church and want to excite the church bell
by emitting acoustic waves tuned to the resonance frequency
of the bell. It is almost impossible to do that because of the massive
church building and the massive church tower where the bell is mounted.
You have to overcome the damping(mass) of both parts.
Its not possible to establish an energy transfer at this frequency on that path.
To enable an energy transfer for that purpose - you can excite the resonance
frequency of the church building first - this enables you to put the church tower
into resonance by adding the second frequency. Now you have an energy path
from inside the church to the mounting point of the bell. It is possible to excite
the bell by adding the resonance frequency of the bell.
Church building, church tower and church bell are 3 connected oscillating
resonators operated at there resonance frequency and are able to transfer
kinetic energy.
The self resonance of the construction part overcomes the damping coefficient
of the part. Now energy induced on other frequencies to the part isnt damped
anymore - it can be transfered to connected parts.
I think thats the process Keely refers by "liberation" -
This method is quite power efficient. Maybe it takes some energy to establish
the oscillation and to overcome the damping - but it takes quite less
energy to maintain it due to accumulative nature of the phenomenon.

so long.


Evil Roy Slade

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 117
Re: DISSOCIATING WATER, A KEELY Project
« Reply #64 on: December 04, 2007, 11:04:31 AM »
Hi Fritz,

Your analogy with the bell, tower & church is an interesting one. It seems you are using
the resonance of each part, first being the church, as some sort of carrier for the next resonant
wave. The problem here is that the frequencies intended to resonate the tower and bell would be absorbed
by the church. And even if these frequencies could get through, imagine the power wasted on resonating
the church walls, then the tower. My point is that only a tiny percenatge of the incoming power would
reach its intended target.

I am not sure what you mean by 'topological shells'? Are you refering to
electron energy levels? As in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_level

Please point me to a reference explaining your terminology so I can better understand
what seems to be a key point in this theory.

ERS

fritz

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 424
Re: DISSOCIATING WATER, A KEELY Project
« Reply #65 on: December 04, 2007, 11:37:08 AM »
Hi, ERS,

With "topologic shells" I mean stages.
It would make some sense here to study
the very nice keely hompage from hans. www.keelytech.com.

In case of the dissociation of water this shells (could) be:

1. technical carrier wave just used to couple into the media
2. wave to "freeze" water clusters
3. wave to separate water clusters
4. wave to resonate the isolated cluster
5. wave to crack the cluster

This is just an example how I think Keelys technology works.
Right now I?m in a stage where I want to find out about the
nature of Keelys technology.

Pls. don?t take the church example to serious from physical
point of view - as well as the other stuff I posted -

rgds.



fritz

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 424
Re: DISSOCIATING WATER, A KEELY Project
« Reply #66 on: December 04, 2007, 11:47:56 AM »
@ERS
Church - huh -
If the church is resonating - you can feed extra
kinetic energy during the phase where the kinetic
power of the oscillation dominates.
If the oscillation is at "top" or "bottom" where the potential
energy is maximum - (would be same as non-resonating church)-
the damping is maximum.
This would mean that for an energy transfer as described in my last
mail - the resonance frequencies have to be in a monotonus order.
f1<f2<f3.
So its possible to transfer kinetic energy of higher frequency during
the kinetic phase of slower oscillation.
(you cannot excite the church ringing the bell) ;-).

rgds.

Again: These are no claims, feel free to comment.

hansvonlieven

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2558
    • Keelytech
Re: DISSOCIATING WATER, A KEELY Project
« Reply #67 on: December 04, 2007, 08:41:22 PM »
G'day Fritz and all,

Your example of the church and the bell is a good one, it proves you understand what Keely was on about.

One way of making this work is to chip away at the church and the tower until both are tuned to a harmonic of the bell. Now you have a clean path for energy transfer. Keely called that graduation.

Keely had no other way to get the vibrations to where he wanted them, he was forced to use the entire structure as a conductor. We don't need to do this anymore, we have now other ways of inducing resonance in a cavity.

That is where I see the development.

Hans von Lieven

Evil Roy Slade

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 117
Re: DISSOCIATING WATER, A KEELY Project
« Reply #68 on: December 05, 2007, 12:45:57 AM »
Sorry guys, I must be missing something.

Why are we trying to use a by-product harmonic instead of trying to generate the actual resonant frequency we need to act upon the target, in this case the water molecule?

ERS

fritz

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 424
Re: DISSOCIATING WATER, A KEELY Project
« Reply #69 on: December 05, 2007, 07:39:38 AM »
@ERS
If there would be a single water bond hanging around
somewhere in space-time - there would be some
possibility to crack it with a primary oscillation tuned
to its resonance frequency.
As you stated some posts before - this frequency is
quite high and the energy needed.
In real water there are lots of things going on, molecules
swap atoms, the molecules keep on going to build clusters
and "hang out" in different ways.
By using well choosen harmonics - I think its possible to
organize a well configured transfer path down to the molecule
level - which gives a robust way to crack it - keeping the primary
frequency low.
I think that the self-resonant frequency of the water bond finally is
generated by inducing high power densities which exploit nonlinear
transfer characteristic at the "last mile" to the bond. This nonlinear
behaviour generates even higher harmonics which finally cracks the bond.
- so there?s no need to generate the water bond self harmonic.

@Hans,

I think that Keely is using some other effects on top of "graduation".
If you have 2 connected resonators working on different harmonics -
you can transfer the energy from one resonator to the other and back.
(thats somehow veljkovich (or how to spell) 2nd order pump stuff in 3rd dimension).
By having standing waves and "beat sensation" frequency setup - you can
alter the acoustic impedance of the energy transfer point between the resonators -
which gives you the chance to control the distribution of energy between
resonator 1 and 2 by means of "acoustic" control.
This effect can be used to commutate an acoustic "motor" or to produce
shock waves (of high density) to exploit nonlinear behaviour - as mentioned above -
to generate very high and powerful harmonics.

rgds.

Evil Roy Slade

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 117
Re: DISSOCIATING WATER, A KEELY Project
« Reply #70 on: December 06, 2007, 03:31:25 AM »
In real water there are lots of things going on, molecules
swap atoms, the molecules keep on going to build clusters
and "hang out" in different ways.

Hi Fritz,

Firstly, I cannot agree that atoms 'swap' amongst molecules under normal conditions. Can you quote a source for this statement?

Secondly, clustering of water molecules is a normal phenomenum due to their dipolar nature. However these clusters form and reform naturally and without any external impetus. There is near zero energy stored in the very weak bonds of a cluster hence little can be released by breaking them.


ERS

fritz

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 424
Re: DISSOCIATING WATER, A KEELY Project
« Reply #71 on: December 06, 2007, 11:12:01 AM »
In real water there are lots of things going on, molecules
swap atoms, the molecules keep on going to build clusters
and "hang out" in different ways.

Hi Fritz,

Firstly, I cannot agree that atoms 'swap' amongst molecules under normal conditions. Can you quote a source for this statement?

Secondly, clustering of water molecules is a normal phenomenum due to their dipolar nature. However these clusters form and reform naturally and without any external impetus. There is near zero energy stored in the very weak bonds of a cluster hence little can be released by breaking them.


ERS

google, first hit:
http://web.jjay.cuny.edu/~acarpi/NSC/7-ph.htm

There is a nice introduction on water at Hans?s homepage -
additional there is a nice link somewhere in this thread:
http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/index2.html

I don?t want to break or store energy in the cluster.
I just wanted to give an example what "shell?s" can be.
In this case, clusters will not participate in energy transfer -
maybe they are needed to get a special configuration
for this purpose ...

hansvonlieven

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2558
    • Keelytech
Re: DISSOCIATING WATER, A KEELY Project
« Reply #72 on: December 06, 2007, 08:01:52 PM »
G'day all,

Consider the following: Keely says that before you can act on a mass you have to determine its mass chord. You then have to level a flow of vibrations at it which is in strict harmonic relationship to that mass chord. Then, and only then can a chord antagonistic to the mass chord be introduced that will reach into the heart of matter and enables manipulation.

Now we know about water clusters. We also know that there are only dominating forms of clusters under varying conditions and never a uniform cluster formation throughout the liquid.

Now each cluster would have its own natural frequency. Even in a liquid with a dominating cluster formation there would be many clusters whose mass chord is antagonistic to the dominant form.

Now what if the main flow of vibration does nothing more than create a uniform cluster formation, somewhat like a crystal lattice. Now the liquid acts as a whole in terms of vibrations and can be manipulated with very little energy input by levelling some antagonistic flow at it.

Perhaps this is Keely's "secret". What  do you fellows think?

Hans von Lieven

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: DISSOCIATING WATER, A KEELY Project
« Reply #73 on: December 06, 2007, 09:53:49 PM »
Great theory Hans.  Kind of like using the the main flow to line up the dominos and then a very small input (finger) will knock them all down once properly aligned. I like it.

Bill

hansvonlieven

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2558
    • Keelytech
Re: DISSOCIATING WATER, A KEELY Project
« Reply #74 on: December 06, 2007, 10:01:00 PM »
You got it in one Bill,

This is exactly what Keely is saying.

Hans von Lieven