Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Negative resistance via pyroclay.com material ?  (Read 83469 times)

armagdn03

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
Re: Negative resistance via pyroclay.com material ?
« Reply #45 on: October 05, 2007, 04:14:27 AM »
Do you by chance have access to a signal generator? because if you did, it would be interesting to see if you can replicate this with a source of power that can be fine tuned, with some amp meters maybe in series with the motor, then if you changed frequency, but the amp draw was the same, your theory on self resonance could be correct. I would mix an ac dc, or have a biased ac signal to feed the motor.

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Negative resistance via pyroclay.com material ?
« Reply #46 on: October 05, 2007, 09:23:48 AM »
Hi RadiantEnRg,
many thanks for coming over here and reporting.

Please try to measure the input power during the arc burning with a Kill-A-Watt Power meter. Many thanks.

dani1

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 85
Re: Negative resistance via pyroclay.com material ?
« Reply #47 on: October 05, 2007, 10:38:05 PM »

RadiantEnRg

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 66
Re: Negative resistance via pyroclay.com material ?
« Reply #48 on: October 05, 2007, 10:40:41 PM »
Sorry i couldn't reply yesterday, I was getting some weird error message. Anyway I am creating a pulse gen right now. I have very promising results too. Using just one 555, a .001J poly cap and some 100k pots, I can make a wide range of square waves. From 555khz(max) all the way down into Hz. I have also wired it so I can use it straight on a transformer :) . Normally the reverse spike would kill a 555 quick right?, well all I did was put a SUPERFAST HV diode..(byv26e) across the negative and output of my circuit. But I put it in reverse...so on every off pulse instead of comming back and frying my timer, it goes back into the coil, pretty cool ;) LOL. I don't have any meters yet:(, all I have is my analog scope....But I will be getting my financial aid soon, and thats on the list.

RadiantEnRg

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 66
Re: Negative resistance via pyroclay.com material ?
« Reply #49 on: October 05, 2007, 10:42:35 PM »
I have gotten some truly remarkable waveforms off of the secondary side!! Well I am going back to work, will update you guys later

jeffc

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 96
Re: Negative resistance via pyroclay.com material ?
« Reply #50 on: October 06, 2007, 01:30:42 AM »
I have gotten some truly remarkable waveforms off of the secondary side!! Well I am going back to work, will update you guys later
@armagdn03 

You are planning on replicating some of these configurations, yes?  I can't wait to see some confirmations and further meter readings!

Thanks to RadiantEnRg for being very open with his information so that we can more quickly understand the effects he has demonstrated.

Regards,
jeffc

RadiantEnRg

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 66
Re: Negative resistance via pyroclay.com material ?
« Reply #51 on: October 06, 2007, 02:27:19 AM »
Alright guys...I was so pissed off last night, about my false positive results from coupling with neutral, I stayed up all night and finished my circuit...I DID IT!!!
For real this time!!
I replicated the Tesla electron pump!!
Using only a 12v battery I pulsed a car ignition coil with a 555 circuit....I put a super fast 1000v diode across the negative and output..but I put it on reversed so when the off pulse Radiant Spike caomes it is diverted away from 555 and back into coil.....I then only use the one plug from the ignition coil and split it with 2 diodes, making a circular path.....I then wired a .22 cap onto across the circle and put a xenon flash bulb across that. I hooked the trigger to an ariel antenna....Guess what it worked to trigger it..It is Awesome!!!

Come check it out... http://youtube.com/profile?user=RadiantEnrG

RadiantEnRg

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 66
Re: Negative resistance via pyroclay.com material ?
« Reply #52 on: October 06, 2007, 09:21:24 AM »
@dani1...There may be something to that. I noticed that gas was very porous in the middle. And as it says, when heated it is many times it's original volume. YOu guys need to come look at my new video's....it's undeniable, there is an influx of aetheric energy. By splitting the positive, I have made an asymmetry and the environment wants to balance the situation.

http://youtube.com/profile?user=RadiantEnrG

RadiantEnRg

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 66
Re: Negative resistance via pyroclay.com material ?
« Reply #53 on: October 06, 2007, 09:24:49 AM »
Sorry, I'm a lil tired...gas=glass bead*...(negative resistant diode)...thats what I am convinced it is now, an N-type junction diode

tinu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 630
Re: Negative resistance via pyroclay.com material ?
« Reply #54 on: October 06, 2007, 10:53:54 AM »
I truly appreciate your experiments, excitement and willingness to share. My full respect to you.

On your way ahead, please consider the following: take a small 9V battery. Always in between the space of (+) and (-) there is an electric field gradient, as everyone knows. Now take either (+) or (-) and ground it. You?ve just expanded the said electric field into the whole room. Electric gradient may be very small, but as small as it is, you can definitely measure a current with a sensitive micro ammeter, as long as you close the circuit through your body and further on through the carpet, floor etc. And this is just from 9V, DC?
Replace DC with AC and you can see it on the scope. Effects are more pronounced because of capacitive coupling. (In DC it was only normal conduction through multi megohms). Increase the AC voltage and you can charge capacitors at really high voltage (although you have to wait some time as the overall power is quite small). Actually, by placing an Avramenko plug near (and not in electric contact) with the main power line, I was able to charge quite large capacitors (60-80microF) at about 308V. Theory predicts 311V for Europe (220V*sqrt(2)). That was done entirely by one wire.

What?s my point?
I?m still looking for the ?radiant energy?. But I couldn?t find it until now?

....it's undeniable, there is an influx of aetheric energy. By splitting the positive, I have made an asymmetry and the environment wants to balance the situation.

Imho and in the light of the above-described experiments (that almost everyone can try) the above statement is questionable. I wish it was true but I?d say it?s plain old-fashion electricity?
Please comment.

Tx,
Tinu

Super

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 118
Re: Negative resistance via pyroclay.com material ?
« Reply #55 on: October 06, 2007, 11:45:49 AM »
maybe stefan will add something about this ... look at: http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/fep01.htm and http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/afep01.htm

RadiantEnRg

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 66
Re: Negative resistance via pyroclay.com material ?
« Reply #56 on: October 06, 2007, 01:20:10 PM »
My circuit is in no way grounded, mains ground has no affect on the antenna...same as air!. Parasitic C cannot charge a cap through air that fast, sorry not possible!!!. Now if the antenna is coupling with battery post the air is not breaking down and there is no direct loop of electrons. This is not unnatural or irregular electricity..its just an open circuit which lets the ambient electrons in...(if electrons even exist). I am sorry but AC is filtered on the input and the output..only one direction of flow is allowed. I have heard this argument already today and it doesn't hold any merit in my eyes. believe what want. I know what I see. I put that neon on a carbon rod..then taped it to piece of wood..and guess what still lights....Oh and i am powering the coil straight with a 555 @ around 200ma max....I would like to see you light a xenon @ that amperage...and the fact that it doesn't ionize until antenna is put on glass????...well anyway i am tired, goodnight.

Super

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 118
Re: Negative resistance via pyroclay.com material ?
« Reply #57 on: October 06, 2007, 04:04:01 PM »
  ;) good night RadiantEnRg, time-lag between europe and us ^^

i think this article can give u some more setups for experiments Avramenko

maybe this is "like" your circuit:
(http://jnaudin.free.fr/images/sparkfx2.jpg)

... try to use your special corroided connections, from your further experiments, for producing a permanent discharge at the spark gap.

Don't know, could be interesting?!?

armagdn03

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
Re: Negative resistance via pyroclay.com material ?
« Reply #58 on: October 06, 2007, 07:22:30 PM »
I think an interesting thing to try would be a DC biased AC signal through your out of balance motor. I just want to see a replication of the motor you had before, but with out the questionable power supply. Maybe you could use a battery, or some other DC power source, hook it up so the out put of your circuit is DC with an AC warble through it. Becareful, you will need to use diodes to make sure the DC doesnt find its way into your 555 through its outputs or you will definitly fry it. What I think would be interesting about this and why I am so ademant about it is because it represents a varifiable test to one of your theories about the astable motor finding resonance with the pulse fed into it. If you change the frequency of the 555 either up or down, technically the speed of the motor should also change up or down.

Anyways, I wont be able to replicate for a bit, still havent got the Pyroclay, and my GF surprised me and came into town, and I bought a new plasma TV to play my beloved Halo 3. I think I could be the next tesla if I didnt have videogames and girls. lol.

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Negative resistance via pyroclay.com material ?
« Reply #59 on: October 07, 2007, 12:10:03 AM »
Hello everyone, I am Jdub6d9 and let me first say...it is no fake. I have had even more success. I have achieved one wire illumination, and have powered much larger loads then just LEDs. If you remember that 12v radiator motor in my other videos. Well with only one wire and ground, I fried the shit out of it. I have a new youtube, however I am laying low for now..here is my newest video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQPit2n5_f4)



Hi RadiantEnRg  and All,
I was on vaccation for 3 days and only had my PDA with me and could not see yet
this above video and now it is again removed ...
Too bad.
Could somebody upload this again ?

Also on the new page:
http://youtube.com/profile_videos?user=RadiantEnrG

I only see these kind of Avramenko plug experiments,
but no experiments with these silicon dioxid beads.

@RadiantEnrG

could you please try to do these arcing experiments
with graphite <-> pyroclay mix  and see,
if it will even work better.
But watch out, there couldbe generated toxic CO gas,
so please only do it with open windows, cause CO is very
toxic.

If you are successfull, you could generate this way
also SiC which is is large bandgap semiconductor
and is also used for radioactive to electricity converter devices.
It is also used in the Qynergy.com cells.

Maybe there are also in this pyroclay some low radioactive Silicon
isotopes, that are excited via the pulses from your power
supply to release their beta radiation, so additional
electrons are coming into the circuit like in a Morray
converter, which also used excited radioactive decay
via RF radio signals and worked like negative
resistors (= amplifiers).

Regards, Stefan.