LOL, I am not emotional at all!
And I never called you a hoe...I suspect you to be a Pro
As for the 200v cap's negative terminal, it is commonly grounded to the 1st circuit.... Like i said I am not hip to your lingo!!.....What I meant by PLL is that the sensing loop on the xformer is triggering the 1st circuits discharge via mosfet...hence phase locking loop
Also...YOU ARE COMPLETELY WRONG!!!....the Fet is triggered DIRECTLY BY RESISTIVE DIVIDER!!....gate is controlled by the sensing loop....and PWM drives OPTO!!!!! which pulses output circuit!!!!
You are not an authority...Nor have you seen this circuit...so ya...nice try...Maybe you're a Pro-Hoe???

Ohh and the Tesla remark pertains to disruptive discharging of capacitors!! So please....stoo foo....LOL....as I said b4 you give yourself way!!!! too much credit
You are not psychic..and i doubt you know this circuit...or any other Delta ADP circuits....Delta is an internationally renowned power supply company.

Ok...here's the cold hard truth Linda
I am so adamant about my power supply not doing that...because i have scoped it...and metered it with a H2Earth colleagues meter.
The fact of the matter is.....I don't like being called names.....It upsets me
Like I have said maybe.....I don't know...5 times now...I kept experimenting with power supply and eventually destroyed it..along with 4 other similar ones...NOT DOING THE MOTOR OR COIL TEST!!...doing a separate experiment....where I tapped into the 1st circuit...."bad idea".....anyway Linda......I will show you as soon as I get another....However!!!....you are taking petty pot shots at my intelligence, when in fact I gave 100% disclosure...Get the power supply yourself...then you can offer your opinion...because right now...you THINK you know what exactly is in this circuit...and you THINK it's giving higher voltage.....I KNOW it's not...according to a multimeter.

So in conclusion...My frustration comes out of the fact that you make statements as if you are here with me, actually looking at the circuit I have IN MY HANDS!!!

OK LINDA....So now for the 6th time.....I fried the power supply!!!....I will gladly do it again when I pick a new one up.
I told you I HAVE done it privately.....Answer me this Linda.....Do all small power supplies give out a perfect sawtooth wave???...and do they have all the negative capacitor terminals go to an insulated plate???

Your rationalizations do not impress me...they may dissuade people....But good for them, means I will be the only one doing it

And one more fact....You pride yourself on being an Imperialistic Scientist...yet you and others are BLIND....You cannot make inferences on things you cannot see.

Point in case......The Bead does not make the motor go faster in either case(the large 12v motor, or the small hobby motor)...what it does...is allow instantaneous RESONANCE!!!!!
If you go back and watch my 1st videos...you will see I must "coax" the effect(w/o bead it's faster once in resonance then with bead)....however, with the bead...all I have to do is flip a switch and it automatically hits it's NEW resonance with it's spherical spark gap/waveguide

You keep pounding this dead horse into the ground...However, I have told you HOW MANY TIMES NOW? I blew up the power supply....I would love to smear your face in the fact that doesn't go to a higher V....Sadly i must wait to "stick the sock in your mouth"


OHHHHH....here's one more thing for ya Linda....Armagagn03 has used KVs to try and replicate....surely your not saying the lil power supply passes that??....ONE MORE TIME.....IT"S RESONANCE PEOPLE....in conjunction with BEMF!!!

Sorry if I seem too stupid.

Let me see if I understand what you are saying: 

1.  The reason you do not show us a motor speeding up with the bead while using a battery supply is that it won't work.

2.  The reason it won't work is that the battery does not provide the essential sawtooth waveform.

3.  The sawtooth waveform is a small-amplitude high frequency AC voltage riding on top of the mainly DC voltage (27V) that your power supply puts out.

4.  Your theory is that this high frequency sawtooth waveform (otherwise known as the ripple voltage, present on all switching power supplies) resonates with the bead somehow and causes a large boost in the power delivered to the motor.

Is all of that correct?  Am I getting it finally?

Linda

Could you slow down for the retarded here and just indicate if the four points I made are exactly correct understanings or not, please?

Then, after that, could you tell me about this :"hum": and if its audible or what...

Thanks

I confess now that I am thoroughly spun, confused, bewildered and totally numb.  I will await your further reports with bated breath.  Glad we were able to get to here without too much bloodshed.  Have a ball with it. 

I'll never understand about the batteries, the ripple sawtooth, what is supposed to be resonating with what and all that, I guess.  It makes no sense to me at all and if I ask any more questions I can tell we will just go round and round forever, so I'm going to quit while I'm behind.  I have classes tomorrow anyway. This is only a small part of my unfinished homework! 

Thanks for your impatient patience and I'm glad we can "still be friends"...I hope...

Linda

The load must resonate with the circuits output.....Hence I believe the jamming is correct..but not jamming open voltage...jamming open frequency
The coil is a factor of 1...meaning one spark increents...so it tunes to resoance quite easy....the motors on the other hand....the Big `12v is balanced so it has an even increment of 2...the lill motor is off balanced...it has odd increments..so in complex ratios it can tune by 1 increment like the coil alone. This probably doesn't make sense, but I can't explain better what resonates with what...You would have to see my journal, and my notes of the lil motor's phases/sets

Sorry for the spelling errors....and I forgot the Big motor, it never truly resonates with the circuit...(due to balance)

And Linda...I get mad sometimes because I am not very good with terms, and so people try to discredit my findings because I can't phase it correctly...but, Would a rose by any other name be less beautifult?..But I assure you I am not naive. Hopeful, but not naive. Sorry for my (Pro/Hoe) comment, I get a lot of desperate/commited attempts to humiliate/refute my experiments...and it does get a lil old.
But, ya no harsh feelings...again sorry