Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: TPU - General Discussion  (Read 350369 times)

acerzw

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 455
Re: TPU - General Discussion
« Reply #360 on: October 25, 2007, 08:59:41 PM »
<removed>
« Last Edit: December 07, 2007, 09:40:49 PM by acerzw »

turbo

  • Guest
Re: TPU - General Discussion
« Reply #361 on: October 25, 2007, 10:04:14 PM »
The TPU is a "conversion device".

Is this a reference to converting between two types of energy?  Two different aspects of the same thing?



Grumpy

Do you remember the big guys took away the money, once they found out Tesla was into "Free energy" ?
They did so because they could not make any profit of it by sending out bills to the people.

If Steven had called it a "Free energy device" in stead of a "conversion device" what do you think would have happend?

Unfortunatly i think it still did not end up the way he would like it to be.....

Marco

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: TPU - General Discussion
« Reply #362 on: October 25, 2007, 10:27:26 PM »
Come on Marco.  I expect more from a person of your intelect.

Convert that which is static and unusable, to that which is changing and usable.

If there was a giant tuning fork in front of you, you would not be able to use its vibration unless you had another tuning fork of the same frequency.

z_p_e

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 651
Re: TPU - General Discussion
« Reply #363 on: October 25, 2007, 10:30:57 PM »
Robert.

I'm not an expert in Bedini's motors, but I have played with and designed the circuits to drive them. Not tried the negative resistance battery charging methods though. There are many folks here at ou (and other places) much more qualified than myself to speak about the Bedini systems. I would encourage you to try one of the Bedini threads here, and specify which system you are referring to. Rick Friedrick is probably your man...google him. There are tons of pages on the SSG motors etc.

Here's a link to that photo I mentioned. Was taken by the Hardy's and ended up on the cover of someone's book.

http://keelynet.com/unclass/hardy1.htm

Cheers

z_p_e

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 651
Re: TPU - General Discussion
« Reply #364 on: October 25, 2007, 10:44:21 PM »
Free Energy Device

Conversion Device

Indeed both would be correct.

Energy can neither be created nor destroyed, only converted from one form to another.

No one said the conversion process has to be limited to COPs < 1, nor that only closed systems are involved.

If we can use a minute amount of energy to elicit in the conversion process an even greater amount of energy in return, then indeed to us it would seem like Free Energy.

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: TPU - General Discussion
« Reply #365 on: October 25, 2007, 11:00:53 PM »
Otherwise how could one thump a girder and bring down a bridge.

Call it what you want. All the kings men couldn't put Humpty Dumpty back together again.

--giantkiller.

innovation_station

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5134
Re: TPU - General Discussion
« Reply #366 on: October 25, 2007, 11:05:41 PM »
@ marco

i will help to do it the way sm would like it to be  so i see i need tubes and you waite and waite

but we are still too blinded

you all dont know how alone i feel at this game why?!?!?!

i know  why

i wish more people would come and build and post

did sm build this alone ?!?!?!?!            lol!!!   hell no

@ mannix    you gonna release the high quality footage soon??
@marco       you gonna fire up some heaters??
@gk             you gonna keep on ss??
@bolt           you gonna  expose the chord of freqs??   
@sauron       you gonna teach us more ?? about transformers??

so guys what is the plan anyways??

lets just get er done   

ist

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: TPU - General Discussion
« Reply #367 on: October 25, 2007, 11:46:29 PM »
@IS,

I blow shit up. I don't do small tests. I am sticking with SS. I am also applying the Keely & Jaro frequencies.
Marco, Hans, Bolt posted about the frequencies also. I have those docos and will apply them also to satisfy all curiosity.

I will get results before anybody else has gotten results, again and even bigger. So its taken a year.

I've had my rest and have gotten my personal life back in order. I am back in the cave and the bench is hot!
What made Keely and Tesla look esoteric to others only points out the most obscure truths about these Men's results. These are what has been hidden or not researched. We have all the facts we need to get dangerous. And that means results.

So, IS don't lose hope. To be an experimenter puts you in a whole different class than the rest. And that is a lonely place. Keep on truckin'. You're results are necessary. Your controller is only a step forward but in the right direction. If you need to test and experiment then do it. If it is overkill then you still got results. Don't gauge your progress by others needs.

At this time last year everybody and his brother was winding coil after coil after coil. Miles of piles! Why not the same this year? Hehehe... We crossed that boundary. I blew shit up. Then the physics of the energy fields by Mark Snoswell was posted. Then the Bedini shift to show magnetic field shearing and the RE field expression. Then the ECD hit and not too many derivations of that either. Why? Because it blows shit up! See the trend here?
Then the shift by Bolt to sine waves. What happend next? The Bose standing wave thumper video and the link to the Keely doco by Hans. The maturity of information has consistently progressed towards the correct results.

--giantkiller. There are always weeds along the garden path but even the roses have thorns.
« Last Edit: October 26, 2007, 12:29:56 AM by giantkiller »

wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: TPU - General Discussion
« Reply #368 on: October 26, 2007, 12:26:22 AM »
@z_p_e

Is the following diagram more understandable.

@Guys

Talk about jolts and blowing things up, I will tell you what happened yesterday. I was with an inventor group testing a new motor/gen set-up with a brand new 3hp 240v DC drive motor running a 10kw generator. At one point we decided to put the field voltage to the drive on a huge sweep variac. The field variac was set at 0. When the 240 volts DC hit the stator windings without the field already excited, there was nowhere for this current to go. Big Mistake. It loaded the stator like a big capacitor. I saw a spark in the motor, then it was as though everything imploded around me, like a one second slow motion, I yelled out "WATCH OUT" and the guy that put the main 150 amp rated contact switch had just enough time to remove his hand and then the contact switch just blew up . BANG! What a bang. This heavy duty switch was in pieces and burned. I saw the beast and heard its howl. Go figure, it's almost Haloween. That KICK was one hell of a jolt. My ears were resonating for at least an hour.

acerzw

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 455
Re: TPU - General Discussion
« Reply #369 on: October 26, 2007, 12:56:05 AM »
<removed>
« Last Edit: December 07, 2007, 09:42:02 PM by acerzw »

acerzw

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 455
Re: TPU - General Discussion
« Reply #370 on: October 26, 2007, 01:51:23 AM »
<removed>
« Last Edit: December 07, 2007, 09:42:51 PM by acerzw »

z_p_e

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 651
Re: TPU - General Discussion
« Reply #371 on: October 26, 2007, 03:31:51 AM »
From the Morgan Jones book. It has already been posted here some time ago, but here it is again:

acerzw

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 455
Re: TPU - General Discussion
« Reply #372 on: October 26, 2007, 03:50:25 AM »
<removed>
« Last Edit: December 07, 2007, 09:43:42 PM by acerzw »

turbo

  • Guest
Re: TPU - General Discussion
« Reply #373 on: October 26, 2007, 06:37:15 AM »
Come on Marco.  I expect more from a person of your intelect.

Convert that which is static and unusable, to that which is changing and usable.

If there was a giant tuning fork in front of you, you would not be able to use its vibration unless you had another tuning fork of the same frequency.

The guy was seeking funding to crack the code.
He was looking for investors, do you really think he would make a video and claim he had made a free energy device?

And even a normal transformer can be called a conversion device.
But really, what does it matter?

Marco

turbo

  • Guest
Re: TPU - General Discussion
« Reply #374 on: October 26, 2007, 06:44:14 AM »

@marco       you gonna fire up some heaters??

ist

Yes i am.

M.