Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Steve Marks Patent #06015476  (Read 47841 times)

Offline simonmagus

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 58
Re: Steve Marks Patent #06015476
« Reply #45 on: September 22, 2007, 01:51:25 AM »

Steven is obviously very careful about what he tells Lindsay, and this is someone Steven trusts. What is Steven going to reveal to a total stranger? Duh!


Please forgive me as I am not trying to be rude but, has anyone independently verified Steven's communication with Mannix? I trust Mannix and his hard work but we shouldn't need faith.

Offline simonmagus

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 58
Re: Steve Marks Patent #06015476
« Reply #46 on: September 22, 2007, 06:12:20 PM »
Might be best to trace him through his companies...

Steven's Patent Co-Author has been found now too...
...

Maybe it is him, maybe it isn't...But, if you really want to find Steven Mark, you might have to talk to David...


David ("Dave") Doleshal has been contacted before by Stefan in November 2006. Here is a link:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=1668
« Last Edit: September 22, 2007, 06:59:31 PM by simonmagus »

Offline otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Steve Marks Patent #06015476
« Reply #47 on: September 22, 2007, 06:34:35 PM »
Hello all,

what a waste of time!!!!!

Otto

Offline acerzw

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 455
Re: Steve Marks Patent #06015476
« Reply #48 on: September 22, 2007, 10:07:25 PM »
@all

Judging by the characters SM appears to hang around with, all fraudsters etc, and that fact that it looks like he is partnered with the Collins guy who ripped of John Searle (and some of his sucess is no doubt due to this), I would hesitate approaching him. I get the impression that he has helped mannix etc only because he is frustrated and wants some recognition, when someone replicates the TPU he will appear out of the woodwork and grab the publicity as the originator. He will be freed from his 'deal' with UEC because it has been replicated 'independently'.

SM is painted as a saint or hero by many, he is no hero, he has no balls, he is in it for self aggrandisment and money, if he wasn't he would have given it to the world. He is using others by helping them to replicate it. He is waiting for his moment, it bet he has some real BS horror story all ready for the press when he comes out of the woodwork, MIB, harrassment etc. He will write a book and sell his story. In short, until proven otherwise SM is pondlife, he just got lucky by accident and now is trying to exploit it to the maximum.

Good luck to those who seek him, but handle with care, something this way evil comes!

Acerzw

Offline MACEDONIA CD

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 388
Re: Steve Marks Patent #06015476
« Reply #49 on: September 24, 2007, 08:57:53 PM »
hi
to all
  yes  my engl.  is bad  but  my things  for all this  for find S.M  is bad mistake   
 i like to ask  WHAT YOU THING IF YOU FIND WHERE IS LIVING S.M   WHAT YOU  ASK .HIM
<<<<
<<<< PLEASE  M.R Steven Mark  you are god  please  tell as how to make  only one  tpu  nothing else  >>>>>  HA HA HA   :D :D :D
hey  you  lose  golden time to find him   he if you whant tell some thing  he already is tell as  whit his video clips  nothing else   you get nothig else  if you are find him  nothing 
OK the point is how fork tpu  is teling S.M   hi said the true  whit  secret in his worlds  this words is
 hi created elktrmagnet fild   to provide moving elktrones in the wire
ather  his tpu is generating  DC VOLTAGE  WHITT  5000Khz  <<<HMMMMMMMMMMM>>
HOW IS POSIBLE  DCWHIT 5000Khz
ANSVER  his tpu is like recivers 
and wire is important and coils in operations

i have some ansver of this read please
 HOW DC WHIT 5000 Khz ,,, IF YOU HAVE SIMPLE RADIO RECIVER  WHITOUT BATERY   YOU CAN CATCH  SOME  NOISE   THIS NOISE  IF YOU LISTEN SIMPLE FM RADIO  THIS FREKFEN.  OF NOISE  IS ABOUT 5500Khz    ANTHER  .. WHERE  IS DC   OK  IF YOU PUT  SIMPLE DIODE IN TO THE SIMPLE RECIVER COIL IN THE ATHER SAID OF THIS DIODE  YOU CAN GET SOME DC VOLTAGE  BUT  THIS DC VOLTAGE  WHILL BE  WHIT  5000 Khz  .. THAT IS THE ANSVER OF THIS 
ANTHER  HE GET SOME ELKTROMAGNET FELD FROM THE EARTH 
THIS ELEKTR.MAG  IS THIS  YOU GET TO MANY HARMONICS  IN TO THE SIMPLE COIL  AND  YOU COLECKT  MANY DIFERENTS  SPEED  OF ELK. MAG WAVE 
HO IS A HAVE POSIBYLYTY  TO MOVE ELEKTRONES AND WHEN IS MOVIN ELEKTRONES  IN WIRE  THEN YOU HAVE COURENTS 

THE IMPORTANT IS SPEED NOT ELEKTROMAGNET  FILDS IS SPEED MY FRIENDS   IMAGEN IF YOU CREATED  VERY EVRY SMALL ELKTRAMAGNET WAVE   WHIT HIGH SPEED  YOU THING WHAT CAN HAPEND  IN THE COLECTORS COILS 
BY BY BY 8) 8) 8)

Offline Freezer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 414
Re: Steve Marks Patent #06015476
« Reply #50 on: September 25, 2007, 02:52:15 AM »
If he sold the patent, and created this device with company resources, then he probably doesn't even own the rights.  He may well be the creator, but he sold out, and or doesn't have ownership of the patent, therfore he couldn't tell you if he wanted to...  Why go through all this trouble to track him down, when he won't tell you anything.  Hes sitting on some beach right now enjoying a truck load of money and hiding out.  Only way the tpu will be known is through you guys working to unlock it.  From what I read, it was almost impossible for SM to do, so its gonna take nothing short of a miracle for someone else to do it, especially with inferior equipment. 

I can understand peoples frustration.  Its a complex puzzle which will take a massive amount of work, a lot of luck, and major time to decode.  Take your time, perhaps take some time off it.  Remember the reward for actually getting it to work!  You will have a device which 99% of the world thinks is impossible to build.  Just throwing this device in the face of all those critics who say free energy isn't possible would be worth it. :D

MACEDONIA CD - keep posting :D  Some people don't understand that English isn't everyones primary language..
« Last Edit: September 25, 2007, 04:23:52 AM by Freezer »

Offline wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Steve Marks Patent #06015476
« Reply #51 on: September 25, 2007, 02:45:52 PM »
Ho Ho Ho
206 batteries in a row.
Turn on the lights.
Let them glow.
But not too long
or something will blow.
Ho Ho Ho

Now change it to AC.
With my snazzy inverter.
Tackling those spikes
and putting them in line.
Now turn on the TV and press on the drill.
So all can see.
I'm a hero.....
Yes it's me.
Ho Ho Ho

Oh it's getting real hot if I dare.
Like 206 batteries cooked medium rare.
So it's time to turn off.
It's time to say good-bye.
It's time to write the book.
So I don't look like a crook.
Ho Ho Ho

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3279.msg49942.html#msg49942

Offline HopeForHumanity

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 295
Re: Steve Marks Patent #06015476
« Reply #52 on: September 26, 2007, 04:19:56 AM »
Can you please explain the weight....... I'm tired of hearing you talk about batteries and space, but no measure of weight.

Offline acerzw

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 455
Re: Steve Marks Patent #06015476
« Reply #53 on: September 26, 2007, 04:30:31 AM »
Wattsup was a poet
Though no one knew it
Until one day he posted away
'Bout batteries and stuff
And that was enough
God damn he nearly blew it!

Acerzw

Offline simonmagus

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 58
Re: Steve Marks Patent #06015476
« Reply #54 on: September 28, 2007, 09:37:34 PM »
Can you please explain the weight....... I'm tired of hearing you talk about batteries and space, but no measure of weight.

That is a good question. I find Steven's 6 in. TPU intriguing since he strayed from the usual slim toroid design and made it thicker.  Interestingly, it has enough space to fit a row of 9V batteries perfectly. Each battery can weigh an estimated 34 grams.

(http://orangeguide.net/users/simonmagus/steve_marks/fake/6inTPU.jpg)


Offline wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Steve Marks Patent #06015476
« Reply #55 on: September 29, 2007, 05:50:21 PM »
@simonmag

You catch on quickly. Nice design. Everready should be proud.


@HopeForHumanity

In the videos, it is said that the 17 inch TPU weighs 4 kilograms or just under 10 pounds. That's impossible if this also includes the two wooden bases. So if the weight of only the TPU itself with its center circuit weighs 10 pounds, then the weight of the wooden bases is considered not important and has not been revealed by SM. Why? Because it is not part of the TPU per say, so it does not require attention, or so he would have you think.

There was a towel placed under the TPU to aid it in sliding forwards and backwards when they were trying to move it. No one would notice if the whole TPU weighed 10 pounds or 25 pounds.

At 34 grams per 9 volts battery, 206 batteries would weigh 7004 grams or 14 pounds.

This would explain why he had to put a cloth under the TPU to move it otherwise the weight would be too much to move over the table top surface. And this would have tipped others to the whole systems actual weight, thus giving away the trick.

The illusion of a smooth forward/backward movement was that it seemed to float effortlessly, and gives more influence to their gyroscopic claims, which were probably and simply a vibration from creating a Tesla current cutting technique in the rings. I'll be posting a new diagram for how the rings are made on the Control Inside thread, during the weekend.

Now I'm not saying there were 206 batteries exactly. Who cares how many. There could have been 103 and granted, SM could have managed to develop a rudimentary power multiplication system, but he never figured out how to loop these two different DC sources. One source of DC from the batteries to run his transistors and capacitor discharges and the other from "spiking a wire with current and stopping it before it can reach the end of the wire". Tesla Style. Sparks would shoot out perpendicular from the horizontal rings and into each vertical collector wire turn.

The Tesla technique was SM's first explanation and I think the only one that was ever based on fact. After that revelation SM got spanked for talking too much and since then he has been feeding us total bullshit to set us away from the actual simplicity of his device as a current multiplier. He only started talking about frequencies when others here suggested such a technique. He than came back and started talking about his stereo system, etc. Probably wanting to push guys here into this unknown territory while leaving the Tesla technique behind. I think it's time to go back to the basics.

series = increased voltage
parallel = increased amperage

He was producing 850 volts at about 1 amp so his system was in most likely series.

The more you analyse the reality of this device, the way he is showing it, the way he is not showing other facets or hiding them, the more you can smell a rat. Otherwise, please provide me with an acceptable explanation as to why the center platform is considerably higher then the second outer platform itself. It is very hard to notice when looking at a black video.

Another big mistake.

When viewing the U.E.C. video starting 6:25 where he demonstrates the 17"er, when he does a start up.

At 6:55 he flicks the left power switch and says "I'll turn on the primary frequency". He then flicks the other switch to the right of the first one and says "And now the secondary frequency. THE UNIT IS NOW IN OPERATION!!!!!!!".

Big mistake in procedure. He never used a magnet to start the TPU as he did in all his other demos. So where did the power come from when he turned on those switches? Big mistake indeed since he knew the magnet thing was another distraction to the obvious. It even distracted him in this demo.

Look, I'm not totally bent on realizing this is a fraud. I would like to see this thing work and that is why I am doing other posts on the Control Inside thread. Let's look at both sides of the medal to get all the answers. We owe it to ourselves and more to all the guys here that are doing great work, but may be basing it on fiction, whereas I feel all their advancements in testing here is based on their own works, creations, etc.

Offline pauldude000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 614
    • My electronics/programming website
Re: Steve Marks Patent #06015476
« Reply #56 on: April 09, 2008, 07:09:53 AM »
Concerning batteries:

Watts brought up an interesting point, which should be considered. Could it have been 9v batteries?

Let us examine whether this is possible. Watts stated 850volts at 1 amp.  Not considering the fact that that high voltage would cause internal rupture/damage within said batteries which not one manufacturer has designed for such over-voltage connections, we will just examine the realities, discover how many batteries are necessary.

95 9v batteries will produce 855 volts, if connected in series. However, the output current is only around 500 mAH per battery for the expensive ones, or 250 mAH for the cheap ones. To derive a 1 amp load, 2 parallel sets of 95 batteries hooked in series (290 batteries) would be necessary using EXPENSIVE batteries, or 4 sets (580 batteries) of the cheap ones.

For each set of 95 batteries, since the size of 9v batteries is standardized, a given volume of space is determinable. allowing an extra 1/8 of an inch for the connector, the size of a connected battery would require 2" X 1" X 11/16 (.6875)" of space per battery. this yeilds a volume of 1.375 cubic inches per battery, or 130.625 cubic inches per set of 95, or 261.25 cubic inches necessary for the number of batteries necessary for the number of batteries requires to sustain the load demonstrated in the videos, IF USING EXPENSIVE BATTERIES. 522.5 cubic inches for the cheaper ones.

Using the expensive batteries, you are talking about a 16" x 16" X 1" volume (or 8" X 8" X 4"),  using cheap batteries, you are talking 2" thick. This is assuming you are able to leave NO gaps or spaces whatsoever, AND that your space is rectangular.

If any noticeable size differences were apparent, either in person let alone in video, such would have been noted by an examining engineer........ (they expected a fraud anyway, so would have been LOOKING for such spaces.)

Paul

Offline pauldude000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 614
    • My electronics/programming website
Re: Steve Marks Patent #06015476
« Reply #57 on: April 09, 2008, 07:17:04 AM »
Just a side note, I would almost bet Mr. Steven Mark is here already, posting under an alias.

Paul

Offline otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Steve Marks Patent #06015476
« Reply #58 on: April 09, 2008, 10:54:27 AM »
Hello all,

Gentlemen,

would you please use just 1 9V battery?

Otto

Offline wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Steve Marks Patent #06015476
« Reply #59 on: April 09, 2008, 04:26:28 PM »
@otto

Maybe 2. lol