Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator  (Read 172598 times)

rakarskiy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 924
    • Free Energy Systems (UA)
Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator
« Reply #105 on: August 26, 2018, 10:20:36 AM »
The engine shown in the video can not be - the output is more than one.
The whole effect in the overclocked mass. Only for a system on one shaft, I'm not sure that these flywheels are completely suitable.

JulesP

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 33
Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator
« Reply #106 on: November 29, 2019, 10:30:11 AM »
Hi there,

I have read with interest this 12 year post as a flywheel system is something I am ready to look into as an 'open system' researcher based in the UK. From what I can see various replication attempts at Chas Campbells original device have failed to reproduce what he says it did. I don't know how much attention has been paid to the apparently necessary pulsing of the flywheel, by electronic or loose belt methods which, it is suggested, Lead Out gravitational energy, but has any one been able to communicate with Campbell himself to discuss why replication has not been successful?

I was looking at one video from 2012 by Sohail Anjum (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98aiISB2DNw) who 'demonstrates' success - has he been able to share any useful info?

Incidentally, one of my latest projects was an attempt at a small scale replication of the William Skinner Gravity Power device. I did not get a CoP>1 but there may be a good reason for that on a small scale. Anyone interested can see my 4 pager report (attached) and a video at my Dropbox at: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/bws0akodif0dkep/AAAozinnUABXKk6hfIdN6zVZa?dl=0

Regards,

Julian

Toolofcortex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator
« Reply #107 on: November 29, 2019, 02:14:33 PM »
There was a man here by the name of libra_spirit, he made a good post.

But please approach this as a high gain, low probability time investment and dont design your life around this working.

Now Rakarsky has some good documents, matbe he can send them to you for free.

JulesP

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 33
Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator
« Reply #108 on: November 30, 2019, 10:19:47 AM »
Thanks ToolofCortex.

Jules

Toolofcortex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator
« Reply #109 on: November 30, 2019, 07:23:42 PM »
Please try the idea of a hidden eccentric, thus allowing pulley tension to be varied.

A motor with a solid connection to a flywheel (input accumulator), an intermediate wheel with shifting that is constantly disconnecting and reconnecting, and a final grand wheel, with possible gearing for this particular wheel.

Perhaps you can make a squeeze wheel underneath, that bounces on the pulley and acts as a limit.

You could possible make this symetric or phase controlled almost, and double your input with a second motor, to "pulse on a pulse". Perhas even magnets in a bedini-esque fasion.

But magnets suck compared to flywheels. Flywheels are like the perfect pulse device, they have absolutely "zero output impedance" , not even .1 ohms like batteries.

Anyways, play with such things. Plan ahead, be flexible. Use telemetry, sensors, encoders, know the timing diagram of it, that way you can be creative.

You are building a test bench, you are not replicating a "insert name" device.

Good luck.

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator
« Reply #110 on: December 01, 2019, 03:53:47 AM »
“Lead Out” is not really a thing...


Its’ just a coin-term invented by Tseung to promote his
b.s. theories.




Toolofcortex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator
« Reply #111 on: December 01, 2019, 04:31:42 AM »
Yeah let him experiment and spend his money.

Hes motivated.

JulesP

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 33
Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator
« Reply #112 on: December 01, 2019, 09:55:32 AM »
Please try the idea of a hidden eccentric, thus allowing pulley tension to be varied.

A motor with a solid connection to a flywheel (input accumulator), an intermediate wheel with shifting that is constantly disconnecting and reconnecting, and a final grand wheel, with possible gearing for this particular wheel.

Perhaps you can make a squeeze wheel underneath, that bounces on the pulley and acts as a limit.

You could possible make this symetric or phase controlled almost, and double your input with a second motor, to "pulse on a pulse". Perhas even magnets in a bedini-esque fasion.

But magnets suck compared to flywheels. Flywheels are like the perfect pulse device, they have absolutely "zero output impedance" , not even .1 ohms like batteries.

Anyways, play with such things. Plan ahead, be flexible. Use telemetry, sensors, encoders, know the timing diagram of it, that way you can be creative.

You are building a test bench, you are not replicating a "insert name" device.

Good luck.

Hi again,

Your suggestions are very specific which gives me the impression that you have yourself developed or contemplated some flywheel generator designs, that presumably were found wanting?

My approach, as with my build of a solid state pulsed induction ‘Bediniesque’ system (see my report and files at: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/cwlace7c8hi6hxn/AACQkxPpZlc3SK3dd2Me5piba?dl=0) is to do a thorough review of all the literature to get some sort of theory of how the device might work, or at least some theoretical proposition to test, and then build a design in Fusion360 CAD as this clarifies the practical logistics.

In a real way the actual build is the final stage and sits on top of a lot of soul searching and questioning to justify the expense and garner the motivation to pursue the project to completion.

On the theory and design side I have written to libra_spirit and am awaiting a reply and also chased up Rakarskiy and found he has produced a book looking at a range of OU devices. What I am not sure yet is if he has simply observed freely available video and other material on each of them and then tried to reverse engineer the specifics or if he has been in actual communication with some or all of them and then written up actual construction details supplied by the developers. The former is more opinions and informed guesswork while the latter is more useful and fact based. I aim to write to him to clarify but he also seems to have built a few devices according to his videos.

So I need to collate all the info from different sources, including members here if they have something useful, and start to coalesce something specific. I’m happy to share such growing ideas on the forum and indeed the whole process.
My ultimate aim is to find a system that has a CoP>4 and which can be readily replicated, write it up thoroughly and scientifically and make if freely available to all and anyone who is open to such info. In my retired status I don’t wish or need to make money from anything and besides the world desperately needs this sort of information and small communities such as where I live would welcome options to get off grid and be a lot greener.

Jules

Grumage

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1113
Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator
« Reply #113 on: December 01, 2019, 06:53:01 PM »
    ;)

Middle photo shows eccentric " bouncing " intermediate drive with " pendulum " actuator. Pendulum weight is not fitted in the photo.

Cheers Graham.

Grumage

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1113
Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator
« Reply #114 on: December 01, 2019, 07:13:07 PM »
Oh....

And before you ask, I went solar the following year.... never looked back!!

Toolofcortex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator
« Reply #115 on: December 01, 2019, 08:00:04 PM »
Well in the best of worlds, with a 20,000$ budget, I would build a better testbench.

You have no wheel at the beginning and your intermediate wheel is not how I would like it.

Somebody made an analysis of the Chas video and it does not look at all like yours.


Toolofcortex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator
« Reply #116 on: December 01, 2019, 09:27:13 PM »
Dont get discouraged, learn to become a good builder and maybe this can be cheaper than you think.

My way of looking at what I would like to achieve, is kinda like Chas to be honest, some floating limit, and a shifting eccentric mass, if not 2, wich is adjustable.

On the main wheel you should be "oscilalting the energy". 

Theres is 2 or 3 good videos out there.

One of these videos is from the front, and it starts with

"Keep talking"...bla bla...

Anyways, the amount of energy that was displayed and the fact that the wheel was still spinning and if  all was as said and self looped it was proof of OU.

IF there was no trickery involved, as in hidden wire, it was OU. It really boils down to, do we trust this video was unaltered and as claimed?

Toolofcortex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator
« Reply #117 on: December 02, 2019, 05:11:36 AM »
I wanna say something also.

That anjum video has the whole build on a pallet... What ever happened to this guy? He is acting like the typical "fraud diode" where he will only answer via pm.

You have to expect a fraud before real OU, if its on a pallet. These people from poor countries can sometimes do bad things you know...

I would have liked, very much, for him to show without doubt and lift it.

What it boils down to , basically, do you have the calling to be a mad scientist or are you just another pu***?

I think I gave you some good tips, its up to you.

But you know, there is not much you can do really, what effect can you have? What other techniques are offered to you on how to make a powerful pulse or jerk?

Any modifications on the motor, capacitors? I doubt their power honestly.

Be the mad scientist, go where no man has gone before!




Toolofcortex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator
« Reply #118 on: December 02, 2019, 05:35:40 AM »
Rakarskiy, I just saw you lurking ;D what are the best techniques to pulsing a mass.

What are the options?

rakarskiy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 924
    • Free Energy Systems (UA)
Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator
« Reply #119 on: December 02, 2019, 06:54:47 AM »
Rakarskiy, I just saw you lurking ;D what are the best techniques to pulsing a mass.

What are the options?

Working with a kinetic pulse does not mean that a traditional synchronous generator will accept it.  The flywheel is first and foremost, the drive of the kinetic potential, to release a mechanical force. The eccentrics work in terms of moving the lever points, but in any case any constant load will bring the system into equilibrium. The work of such systems is based on balancing between equilibrium and asymmetry of forces in the system. In addition, it is necessary to link the kinetic and electrical circuits into a single mechanism.  If you need this book give me your address and I'll send it to you. Maybe this will help you. or cool naive fervor with the thought of the simplicity of the system.