To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

Storing Cookies (See : ) help us to bring you our services at . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: aether is ''neutrino'' in science lauguage  (Read 13585 times)

Offline lltfdaniel1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
aether is ''neutrino'' in science lauguage
« on: September 05, 2007, 08:18:44 PM »
aether is ''neutrino'' is science lauguage

incase your confused.

Offline Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: aether is ''neutrino'' in science lauguage
« Reply #1 on: September 05, 2007, 09:00:31 PM »
Great, another shotgun blast of confusion.  ???

Hmm.  I wonder what "quarks" think of that statement?

Offline raburgeson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 705
Re: aether is ''neutrino'' in science lauguage
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2007, 06:23:01 AM »
Actually Neutrino energy only describes the action of aether on matter. The aether is much more than that carrying energy were no atoms exist. Described as a all encompassing universal lattice it is to provide energy were mass does not exist for it to act upon. The Relativity followers like to call this Zero Point energy. I'm still reading on this to and as far as Neutrino energy goes have not gotten a complete grasp of it yet but don't throw out the good stuff you have learned. That would be the equivalent of someone throwing out Maxwell's formulas including space-time. And, we know that happened as a matter of convenience. Without neutron mass there is no neutrino energy.  The thing is we do all the work to educate ourselves and then we have to go back and learn the formulas all over again. The original formulas are available on the net.

Offline Koen1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1172
Re: aether is ''neutrino'' in science lauguage
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2007, 12:40:36 PM »
Err... pardon?

"aether" is the 'quantum' structure of spacetime.
Neutrinos are particles IN spacetime.
Huge difference.

Anyone that has some proper knowledge of aether theories and of fudamental particles knows this.
Claiming that "aether"="neutrino" is absurd.

And besides that, neutrinos and neutrons are also fundamentally different. Neutrinos dot not derive their energy from neutrons nor from the neutrons mass.

In fact, in various forms of multidimensional theories (that als utilise an "aether" although it is usually referred to in terms like "spacetime", "quantum structure of the vacuum", "inertial field", "quantum gravitational matrix", "multidimensional spacetime manifold", "zero point field", etc) mass can be explained as a multidimensional effect of matter as "knots" in the "aether". (It is no coincidence this borders on intersecting branes theory, or "string theory".)

Mass in commonly accepted physics is still not explained properly. The search for the Higgs boson is on in full now, and they are hoping to find proof of its existance, so that they can work out mass as a side-effect of Higgs-interactions. But nobody has managed to prove its existence yet. Quite possible that it does not exist at all...

Offline Azoth

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: aether is ''neutrino'' in science lauguage
« Reply #4 on: February 19, 2011, 09:55:30 PM »
Aether and gravity are the same.  Gravity is DESCRIBED by Newton just as if it were a radiant energy.  Einstein did nothing but further DESCRIBE the properties of gravity.  Nobody has ever told us what gravity is.

If gravity is a radiant energy then gravity is a push not a pull and we must talk about gravity sheilding to explain the effects of gravity as in Newton.  Now you can see how easily gravity fits into an aether mold.

One more thing which we should all know but is largley unvoiced: in discussing aether, just as in discussing gravity, we are at the same time discussing space-time.

Offline Hope

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 701
Re: aether is ''neutrino'' in science lauguage
« Reply #5 on: August 13, 2011, 07:56:20 PM »
Just read "Neutrinos" authored by Frank Close and it was not dry nor boring at all.  I was amazed.  Also from study of Walter Russell,  can it be neutrinos are in 90 degree opposition from atomic matter?  How can we sense Aether?  Seems when we can sense it with one our senses, especially sight, we can observe effects then mold it into something useful. (If that is a close enough rendition of how science works)

If in opposition to carbon based matter, could this be why it seems not to be acted upon by magnetic fields, and thus no verifiable weight? Einstein's theory should be remembered to not only work as internal Energy=MC squared, but also Mass squared divided by C squared = internal energy ,but is NOT the substance of the atom only its stored energy.

Offline hoptoad

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1009
Re: aether is ''neutrino'' in science lauguage
« Reply #6 on: August 14, 2011, 03:38:39 PM »
Confused Us says : Aether we know or we don't know, but Aether way, we know what we know.


Offline IotaYodi

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 551
Re: aether is ''neutrino'' in science lauguage
« Reply #7 on: August 14, 2011, 04:23:30 PM »
Agree with Koen1. You cant assume that aether is a separate entity unto itself. It could be a soup mixture of interactions. These unknown gamma ray energy bursts may be a part of it.  From what Ive read these bursts are the most powerful energy force in the universe.

Offline ATOM1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 151
Re: aether is ''neutrino'' in science lauguage
« Reply #8 on: June 11, 2015, 04:28:21 AM »
There are 500 million neutrinos to each photon and are found in a 1 centimetre cube of space time around each photon ! No point shouting up theories or rubbish about neutrons hahahah a neutrino is a constant equal to all the atomic mass in the universe so there is a lot of them around hahaha The interesting connection to the ether is only observed  at the very first stage of the big bang this is where the either is formed as an ether bubble. This bubble is in fact nothing a moment of nothing can never be something again unless created. To measure the either bubble you must create one it is a bubble that when formed in water will never reach the surface and will collapse back to nothing .

It is thought that a neutrino is a bubble in space time by it has mass and is confirmed as a plank level quantum entangled particle it will have some super natural abilities like being in two or more points in space and time at the same time. A faster than light neutrino is also confirmed and affects time not space .

So lets be all on the correct path as re the either it is a bubble of nothing and is confirmed by the true nature that before something there had to be nothing so put the either there and leave it there ! An either as a gas of what ???? nothing than how can it be something ?? It could be said that nothing exists at the edge of the expanding universe and is where nothing belongs ! Go to the edge and fill up a jar with nothing and bring it back open it and everything in the universe will want to enter into to it. Its nothing will very quickly return back to the edge of the universe where nothing belongs hahaha

You can never have something before nothing and you can never have nothing without something hahahah its the cosmic joker a super natural balance ! Now view the electron as a single electron that all mass is sharing than see all particles in the same way and the so called big bang is only a tiny bang that shows up as a very large bang. IT TAKES A LOT OF TIME TO MAKE SOMETHING OUT OF NOTHING and is the only component of nothing so nothing = time x infinity = one tiny electron that produces waves that make photons and photons make neutrinos ! Just because super nova emit lots of neutrinos or the suns reactor makes them does not mean you need an atom to make them...

Regards 93rd atom 1 atommix king monkey