Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 515717
  • *Total Topics: 15375
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 18
  • *Total: 21

Author Topic: SPLIT: Permanent Magnet Lifters with on/off switch? the lawsutes! the lawsutes!!  (Read 17424 times)

Offline gaby de wilde

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 470
    • http://blog.360.yahoo.com/Factuurexpress
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3025.10.html
Now that we have unraveled the flux switching, I thought this post should have it's own topic not-to litter our precious resource. ;D

It looks very similar to both the Flynn and Hildebrand devices in most ways.
And many flux switching patents do share similarities.
If anyone manage to make a working MEG there must be a ton of lawsuits waiting to be filed.
Everybody wants a share of the big money cookie.

Not bad a guess after a quick glance, in fact the hundreds of magneto-lifter-apparatus all use the same effect. Apparently the skeptics forgot about this whole industry and are to far behind to ever catch up debunking said implementation thereof. hahaha

But you cant patent nor lawsuit the laws of nature.

A bit of competition would probably do miracles for Both Flynn research and Hildebrand intergalactic. After all the septics crawl back into the wood things will be business as usual. hehehe

Here is the link again. ;)
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3025.10.html

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Humbugger

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 290
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3025.10.html
Now that we have unraveled the flux switching, I thought this post should have it's own topic not-to litter our precious resource. ;D

It looks very similar to both the Flynn and Hildebrand devices in most ways.
And many flux switching patents do share similarities.
If anyone manage to make a working MEG there must be a ton of lawsuits waiting to be filed.
Everybody wants a share of the big money cookie.

Not bad a guess after a quick glance, in fact the hundreds of magneto-lifter-apparatus all use the same effect. Apparently the skeptics forgot about this whole industry and are to far behind to ever catch up debunking said implementation thereof. hahaha

But you cant patent nor lawsuit the laws of nature.

A bit of competition would probably do miracles for Both Flynn research and Hildebrand intergalactic. After all the septics crawl back into the wood things will be business as usual. hehehe

Here is the link again. ;)
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3025.10.html

@Gaby

Business as usual?  Hmmm...I started to look at some of those patents you referred to over in your last post on the other thread...almost none have anything to do with the subject at hand.  Really intimidating list, though, if quantity is the only measure.

I don't quite "get" your logic.  You're comparing industrial PM lifters that have mechanical lever release mechanisms, it appears, to electromagnet-based flux "valve" or "gate" devices, both motor and MEG-like, and thus implying that, because the lifters work, the latter must also, of course.  Seems like a bit of a leap there. 

Sure, you can wrap an electromagnet around a PM and overwhelm the PM field, but it takes significant power to do so.  Or you can use mechanical means to either align or anti-align a set of PMs.  Still takes a good amount of work!

Same principal?  Well, maybe with a huge stretch of the logic of analogies...but...To carry the analogy to closure, then, I guess one could place a nice fat coil of wire next to one of those big industrial PM lifters anyone can buy and get big power out of the coil by simply wanking the lever back and forth real fast (since it's so mechanically easy). 

Can you calculate how much electrical power would be available from the coil versus how much work you'd have to put in to wanking the handle back and forth?  It would not amount to overunity; that's how much! 

Now maybe if you put 49 or 57 of them in a big circle and had them all wanking real fast back and forth; their changing flux fields turning a giant armature with a generator attached...hmmm...what will we call it?  Any good ideas?  I can think of one.

Just because a skeptic is quiet (I can hear Stefan whispering "promises, promises" in the background here), doesn't mean the true believers have prevailed quite yet.

Seriously, I am waiting with bated breath to hear and see the outcome of the latest artfully magnificent build of the Jack Hildenbrand motor with Honk's extra-special super-deluxe 1500% improved-drive controller.  If anyone can do it, these two guys get my vote as a super team with a fighting chance.  Their physical works reek of super quality.

This is one skeptic who will be silenced gladly by even one good solid success with valid and accurate measurements and good scientific engineering documentation of over-unity performance and/or self-running.  I am looking forward to being totally amazed and "reborn" as a true believer! 

Until then, I remain somewhat puzzled at the giant...uhhhh...circular...ummm...I forget.

With Good Humor and, of course, All Due Respect,

Yours Truly,

Humbugger

Offline gaby de wilde

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 470
    • http://blog.360.yahoo.com/Factuurexpress
hello sir!

Can you calculate how much electrical power would be available from the coil versus how much work you'd have to put in to wanking the handle back and forth?

I say, it would be rather stupid to calculate this, a calculation does not reflect the real world. I never used a calculation for anything. Math is like connecting the dots, it's 100% fraudulent best entirely avoided where ever possible. hahaha ::)

Quote
It would not amount to overunity; that's how much!

I see you are also quite skilled at the art of guessing, the only difference is that you seem to promote your guess as a fact. I think you are reverse accomplishing things with it, just take things even more easy I guess? I don't see your elaborate math exercise here to back up your claim either. I understand you don't want to disappoint yourself. That's hardly an excuse to demotivate others? You should learn to give up all by yourself. hehehhe

Quote
Now maybe if you put 49 or 57 of them in a big circle and had them all wanking real fast back and forth; their changing flux fields turning a giant armature with a generator attached...hmmm...what will we call it?  Any good ideas?  I can think of one.

The name of the device is more important as actually building it? Well if it's important to you we should call it the Humbugergenerator of course. What do you mean with a big circle btw? Can't you make a drawing of your free energy motor for us? My advice is to use M$ paint.

Quote
Just because a skeptic is quiet

QUIET?  the sports of trolling researchers is a paid job for the most of them.

Quote
(I can hear Stefan whispering "promises, promises" in the background here), doesn't mean the true believers have prevailed quite yet.

Don't toy with Mr Hartberliner we still need him. ;D

Anyway, what do you think I'm interested in being debunked by people who generally can be bothered to read or even view a video? Look how you explain that you did read the patents as if it was something special for a skeptic to actually read something? You know what I mean. You don't have to be shy about it. You know perfectly well that most skeptics don't go and actually read things.

They prefer to just debunk things upon established believes which are ignorant to begin with.

But lets talk about the patents you found? Lets see you spend a few hours actually making something then we will take the fun out of it for you ok? lol You refer to people as "true believers" but you are not bringing in the data. You are the one with the elaborate believe system the way I see it, I wouldn't be researching stuffs if I would prefer to pretend I already know the answers.

Quote
Seriously, I am waiting with bated breath to hear and see

YES, you guys wait and wait, but when are you going to do something? Have you forgotten the golden rule when you want something done right? My guess is that magnetic holding apparatus may teach us how to build an overunity motor. Your guess is that it's probably not the case. I claim the only way to know is to make effort of it, such effort will allow for improved configurations and an overall advance in knowledge of the topic. If you cant back it up your claim is useless, it's so premature it's just ridiculous.

You are draining the effort. I do care what you think or I wouldn't be writing this. I think it sounds horrible but you just need to be honest! That's all!

As yourself: What would it look like if the evidence was right in front of your nose? I can't imagine a skeptical approach with such enormously premature conclusions would be likely to pick it up. I read all the septic slogans 100 times already. First it's "oh, to little information", then it's "oh, if quantity would only mean something". This approach is not trying to educate it~self. You have better softwares as that available to you.

Quote
This is one skeptic who will be silenced gladly by even one good solid success with valid and accurate measurements and good scientific engineering documentation of over-unity performance and/or self-running.
Oh, yes and you want a free ipod and a vacation to a tropical resort. Nature is not going to supply you will things like this I'm afraid. The clues will come as-is and we cant make any demands from them.

You have no idea how annoying this "true believer" BS is. The rubber stamping armchair cynic is a real weapon of mass destruction. Cant you just do nothing when you do nothing? Why hinder people? Why obstruct the research?

You claim you want theory and you want valid measurements but in reality when offered one of those the other never happens as a result of the massive attack upon the first bit.

In the first place you expect researchers to develop the thing in a cave, remote area, behind closed doors, better not leak a word about what kind of research it is or the place will be circling with vultures anyway. ROFL

Magnacoasters supplied you with a video, I supplied you with the theory and 100 patents. Repeated radius boot references and patent quotations. All your bases are belong to us! Even you reading septic didn't read enough again. lol

I have a much better idea! We leave this idea un-debunked and I give you just the next theory then you build it yourself while we encurage you and that will proof things to you beyond any possible other evidence proofabliltys and shadows. Or you utilise other means to debunk this one. Do try to aim for a point this time. haha :D

Look under tech > flux switching > text. Then read latest publication at the top.  I could give you the direct link but that would make it much to easy for you. hahaha

http://magnetmotor.go-here.nl

Remember to have fun!

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Sponsored links:




Offline Humbugger

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 290
"I never used a calculation for anything."  Gaby de Wilde

I totally believe you on that one, Gaby!

As for the rest of your long rant, I'm sure it will appeal emotionally to all those who are deeply offended by any suggested use of critical thinking as opposed to building every variation of every idea...an infinite task.  I'm just curious...is there ever a situation where you feel skepticism, abstract reasoning and analytical criticism of a claim is a valid approach or must every idea be built and tested to prove it does not work?  Seems like the last several centuries have provided plenty of examples of efforts that have not resulted in perpetual motion or free energy or overunity machines becoming understood and available...and zero examples that have.

With your approach and the voluminous number of claims you seem to believe in, I assume you must have built many experimental devices yourself.  Did any of them work?  Were they suppressed?  Or, maybe it's okay in your book to accept incredible claims without any building and proving, but not okay to reject them without doing so?  Please explain...seems the same criteria should apply to both.

Does your statement "If you can't back it up your claim is useless, it's so premature it's just ridiculous." only apply to critical claims from skeptics?  It seems that way when you contrast it with your complete willingness to believe the claims of inventors and researchers who seem never to do any valid testing or present viable working designs.

Maybe I missed something in reading and browsing your site's pages (where most of the links don't work) but I don't see anything you've built and tested anywhere, working or not.  So far, your arguments against critical thinking and skepticism seem purely emotional, just as do your arguments and "proofs" for believing in so many "working inventions", none of which have actually been shown to provide access to any free energy. 

I fail to see how a patent for a decorative magnetic tool holder {with no release mechanism whatsoever} goes to proving that OU can be had by using the well-known principals of permanent magnet mechanical-release lifters.  Seems like you might not be reading your own references to see if they actually apply.  So far, your references offered as evidence or proof of that idea are rich only in quantity; entirely lacking in quality.  I do read...plenty...and I've watched hundreds of videos claiming to show OU machines/phenomena.  The level of deception, error and delusion is the only amazement.

I don't share your belief that reading endless unproven claims and watching "amazing" but unscientific videos is doing anything to provide us with working solutions to world energy-supply problems.

I say to your unquestioning acceptance of the incredible and your absolute rejection/denial of the critical and conventional...

Bah...Humbug

After all...you posted in the thread for "skeptical views", so it seems only fair that I be allowed my expression without your emotionally-based attacks!
« Last Edit: August 22, 2007, 09:29:54 PM by Humbugger »

Offline gaby de wilde

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 470
    • http://blog.360.yahoo.com/Factuurexpress
After all...you posted in the thread for "skeptical views", so it seems only fair that I be allowed my expression without your emotionally-based attacks!

yes, my compliments for explaining your views so well. 8)

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Sponsored links:




Offline gaby de wilde

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 470
    • http://blog.360.yahoo.com/Factuurexpress
"I never used a calculation for anything."  Gaby de Wilde

I totally believe you on that one, Gaby!

There is not much to believe there.

Math is like connecting the dots. It seems like it gets you an okay picture of the thing but all the round corners have become boxed. The original picture is brutalised beyond repair. Like writing motzard in Hertz. (http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/emoticons7/24.gif)

Quote
As for the rest of your long rant, I'm sure it will appeal emotionally to all those who are deeply offended by any suggested use of critical thinking as opposed to building every variation of every idea.

Oh, but I love critical thought I just don't think most people know what it is. Or more correctly, who it applies to. I could try put a figure on it and do math now.

My guess is that the end product of non effort is also nothing. If it doesn't create anything it's useless. I don't see how debunking something is more useful as building something. You talk about " those who are deeply offended by any suggested use of critical thinking". So you know they exist and what kind of behaviour they find offending.

You can find hundreds of thousands of topics where those unsure about the subject get shouted down and laughed off the board. "That's life" you would think but I'm not so sure if I have to accept it.

You demand to do this in the name of reason. So there is a point where one should stop. This point was crossed for a lot of those asking questions. This should be a learning opportunity. Even devices that doesn't work offers a great learning opportunity. But not if you shout at those investigating. Then those same stupid questions remain unanswered for ever! Learning and teaching is a very delicate processes. But look and read what snake like tricks are being played on people?

For example it was suggested I was beginning to sound like quote "your friend Lawrence", in those words. Now if you combine 20 or so of those remarks you would have to conclude this ends up a rubber stamping technique where people are blamed for who they talk with.

Rational it is clearly not. Combine 50 or so of those remarks and it becomes rather uninteresting to further share your thoughts on the topic. The learning moment is now dead.

Lets look what you teach us.

Age: 57 Pacific Northwest, USA

Dude! At least make a homepage? You don't have to put pictures of yourself on it but try be interesting for the duration of a whole page. It doesn't have to be that long. but you are 57, we are not fooled, you have all kinds of interesting things to teach us. Now look how you are waisting your time being a skeptic. It's truly breaking my heart. ghehehe

Quote
..an infinite task.

No, it's quite easy, you would be a master overunitist in no time. The thing is, you know everything already you just didn't make a page about it. You can play the act of the semi-septic who hates his overunity addiction. Put some ronpaul banners on there and off you go. No nekked wimmen plz.

Quote
  I'm just curious...is there ever a situation where you feel skepticism, abstract reasoning and analytical criticism of a claim is a valid approach or must every idea be built and tested to prove it does not work?

I think reasoning and analysis can lead to new perspectives or point out complications and imperfections. But you need it in it's full perspective man, you cant just use criticism. I compare that to trying to photograph a nesting bird with one foot in the nest. The criticism should be balanced with respect and honesty. If you make a homepage displaying your stuffed hamster collection then that will give your critique much more dimension flavor and life. Then when you convince us the search for free energy is hopeless you can teach us how to stuff rodents. :D

Quote
Seems like the last several centuries have provided plenty of examples of efforts that have not resulted in perpetual motion or free energy or overunity machines
Nobility Kelvin wrote that motion from heat was impossible. If you would have showed a solar panel 200 years ago they would have agreed it was magic. The number of things we have today that where unimaginable 20 years ago is flabbergasting. We cant interpret their horse and carriage research as significant of such one-liners.

Quote
becoming understood and available...and zero examples that have.

With your approach and the voluminous number of claims you seem to believe in, I assume you must have built many experimental devices yourself.  Did any of them work?
I have not decided if I will share the answer to this question jet. ;D

 
Quote
Were they suppressed?

ok, now I have decided. ;D

Quote
Or, maybe it's okay in your book to accept incredible claims without any building and proving, but not okay to reject them without doing so?  Please explain...seems the same criteria should apply to both.

I don't accept or reject things, I look at them the way they are. hehehe

Quote
Does your statement "If you can't back it up your claim is useless, it's so premature it's just ridiculous." only apply to critical claims from skeptics?  It seems that way when you contrast it with your complete willingness to believe the claims of inventors and researchers who seem never to do any valid testing or present viable working designs.
I don't believe anything, this makes reading the repeated duplicate believes of others rather dull to say the least. If they are intentionally annoying the point of arguing about the topic is just out of the question.

Quote
Maybe I missed something in reading and browsing your site's pages (where most of the links don't work) but I don't see anything you've built and tested anywhere, working or not.  So far, your arguments against critical thinking and skepticism seem purely emotional,

And this isn't appropriate?

Quote
just as do your arguments and "proofs" for believing in so many "working inventions", none of which have actually been shown to provide access to any free energy. 

now you are subscribing me to believes.

Quote
I fail to see how a patent for a decorative magnetic tool holder {with no release mechanism whatsoever} goes to proving that OU can be had by using the well-known principals of permanent magnet mechanical-release lifters.

Yes, but thats not how it works. I'm not the macdonalds. You get the raw ingredients and you bake something from them.

ROFL @ instant-everything

You come tell me my ingredients are no good, well show us then?

If you are not in the race then why are you on the track? At least get out of the way? lol

Quote
Seems like you might not be reading your own references to see if they actually apply.  So far, your references offered as evidence or proof of that idea are rich only in quantity; entirely lacking in quality.  I do read...plenty...and I've watched hundreds of videos claiming to show OU machines/phenomena.  The level of deception, error and delusion is the only amazement.

And you have not documented this knowledge? Do use reasonable words, don't go debunk your own hobby, eh I mean addiction.

Quote
I don't share your belief that reading endless unproven claims and watching "amazing" but unscientific videos is doing anything to provide us with working solutions to world energy-supply problems.

oh, but it's very obvious you are posting on this forum because you want to see a working device in the once and for all kind of sense.

You can say it isn't so but I'm much to smart for that. HAHAHA

Quote
I say to your unquestioning acceptance of the incredible and your absolute rejection/denial of the critical and conventional...

Social critics are cool, preferably with much pictures, videos, new math and new physics, drafts for lawsuits etc etc :D


Offline Humbugger

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 290
Gaby...you are the man!

When I have something I think is worth sharing or building, I'll put up a website or draw lots of diagrams and make videos galore. 

Meanwhile, I'm watching, studying, learning and, yes, criticizing when blatant blunders are glossed over and illogical conclusions are leapt to. 

I appreciate the time and effort you are putting into "my case" here.  You're right, I'm a closet believer in UFO's, in the idea that amazing changes will take place in technology and physics...all that!  But that doesn't mean I have to chase every wild goose down a dark alley or wear rose-colored glasses all day! 

You also have me pegged politically...I'd love to see Ron Paul elected...and I'm a gold bug...a "holder of physical" as they say.  I believe there are lots of covert conspiracies going on behind the scenes, having even participated in a few many years ago...I gave up wearing a tinfoil hat a long time ago.

Changing the subject...

Here is a link to a theory you might enjoy about why so many airplanes are crashing.  It also predicts that, soon, AC power will no longer flow on our planet...wow!  Dire!

Of course, in my opinion, the theory is pure hogwash but I thought you'd appreciate it maybe. 

http://perdurabo10.tripod.com/id51.html

Anyway, Gaby, take care and keep up the brainy philosophical sparring and enthusiastic curiosity.  It suits you well and you're damn good at it!

Humbugger

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Sponsored links:




Offline gaby de wilde

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 470
    • http://blog.360.yahoo.com/Factuurexpress
Gaby...you are the man!

When I have something I think is worth sharing or building, I'll put up a website or draw lots of diagrams and make videos galore. 

Meanwhile, I'm watching, studying, learning and, yes, criticizing when blatant blunders are glossed over and illogical conclusions are leap to.
 

My best of luck, the agony is in that they don't know because you didn't tell them. (haha) People can only be ignorant if you allow them to be.

Quote
I appreciate the time and effort you are putting into "my case" here.  You're right, I'm a closet believer in UFO's, in the idea that amazing changes will take place in technology and physics...all that!  But that doesn't mean I have to chase every wild goose down a dark alley or wear rose-colored glasses all day!
 

I cant make much sense of the UFO records, some are military crafts, some reports are mind control projects where either the person or the public is to be dis informed. Rather then review little bits of info we should agree the information is there it's just not shared with us. Such lack of sharing with those who paid for it is evidence of something quite different. How is being kept stupid good for security? Nothing else as secrecy can make us doubt our governments more?

Quote
You also have me pegged politically...I'd love to see Ron Paul elected...and I'm a gold bug...a "holder of physical" as they say.  I believe there are lots of covert conspiracies going on behind the scenes, having even participated in a few many years ago...I gave up wearing a tinfoil hat a long time ago.

I guess we don't have to expect Europe to change any time soon. So I figure we have the best odds globally if we start rationalising things in the US first. The neocon fearmongers are just a perk.  :D

Quote
Changing the subject...

Here is a link to a theory you might enjoy about why so many airplanes are crashing.  It also predicts that, soon, AC power will no longer flow on our planet...wow!  Dire!

Of course, in my opinion, the theory is pure hogwash but I thought you'd appreciate it maybe. 

http://perdurabo10.tripod.com/id51.html

lol, much like the UFO's I gave up on looking at plane crashes. Some are so obviously assassinations it's a bit to scary to talk about for me. It's pretty safe to assume today there are weapons that would look far fetched in an episode of roadrunner. Manipulate contextual thought from satellites? ehm, sure?? ROFL?? We cant argue it doesn't work either as we paid for it ourselves? lol

Quote
Anyway, Gaby, take care and keep up the brainy philosophical sparring and enthusiastic curiosity.  It suits you well and you're damn good at it!

Humbugger

Thank you, I couldn't have written it without your description of skepticism. I guess it's okay to think of all free energy researchers as crazy, maybe it takes a bit of the crazies I don't know. But to keep pointing at those you think of as crazy and calling them crazy perpetually is just rude. I would much rather be crazy then a rude person. :D

It's not that they don't know they are being rude or acting crazy. Even the Loch ness monster enthusiasts know exactly what they are doing.

Yeah, maybe it's right to attack people for acting totally crazy. A rational explanation why they are wrong without any attacks would be a more rational approach.

Most of astrology may be bunk, at the end of the day we are constantly subjected to gravitation fields from the planets around us. They are very close to us actually. We also relate emotions to frequencies. So there isn't enough bunk in there to get rid of the thing just jet. But if we refuse to ever seriously look at it it's going to remain the weird thing it has become.

There is no way in the world the topic is going to escape it's firm septic grasp. the "there is no way out, you cant win" kind of logic cant be defeated by rational arguments.

The irony!

Offline exnihiloest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 715
...
I don't see how debunking something is more useful as building something.
...

Question of efficiency and brain time saving.
If tens or hundreds of guys are trying to build something from apparently "brilliant" but bogus ideas, what they are building is not useful, it will never work (for ex. see the waste of Joule Thief threads).
If these ideas are obviously bogus for skeptics, it's surely more profitable for all that skeptics explain the flaws and people try other better ways.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline gaby de wilde

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 470
    • http://blog.360.yahoo.com/Factuurexpress
Quote from: exnihiloest
Question of efficiency and brain time saving.

Being an asshole = time saving?

Quote
If tens or hundreds of guys are trying to build something from apparently "brilliant" but bogus ideas, what they are building is not useful, it will never work (for ex. see the waste of Joule Thief threads).

Tens of thousands of stalkers harassing lone persons.

Quote
If these ideas are obviously bogus

Your ideas are obvious bogus, you are a crank and a loon.

There you have it.

What a waste of time you are!

Amazing!

Quote
for skeptics, it's surely more profitable for all that skeptics explain the flaws and people try other better ways.

Septics are not profitable in any way.

They are ego tripping lynch mobs.

Now go fuck yourself.


Offline CompuTutor

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 438
<Goes to make a sandwich to watch the longest/stupidest pissing contest  8) >

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline exnihiloest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 715
...
Now go fuck yourself.

I will not. Keep your own work method for you :D, the results are null: you have not a working device to show, not even a promising track, but only blah, like all irrationnal and ignorant FE bigots.


Offline exnihiloest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 715
...
A bit of competition would probably do miracles for Both Flynn research...

Flynn research surely needs miracles to become Flynn findings. Should we pray Jesus, Muhammad or the Devil?
In his "PPMT Technology" principle he makes the common error of under-undergraduate students, he is confusing force and work. Only one minute is needed to see the bug. So his "technology" is conventional, no overunity can be expected, Flynn research remains an ideal model for ignorants having time to waste.



Offline gaby de wilde

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 470
    • http://blog.360.yahoo.com/Factuurexpress
Flynn research surely needs miracles to become Flynn findings. Should we pray Jesus, Muhammad or the Devil?
In his "PPMT Technology" principle he makes the common error of under-undergraduate students, he is confusing force and work. Only one minute is needed to see the bug. So his "technology" is conventional, no overunity can be expected, Flynn research remains an ideal model for ignorants having time to waste.

With a mind set like that you are never going to find anything.

 

OneLink