Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power  (Read 828408 times)

leeroyjenkinsii

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 81
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #435 on: September 25, 2007, 12:24:59 AM »
Dutchy that's a nice box you got there.  Is anyone making tubes, etc. and selling them yet?

leeroyjenkinsii

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 81
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #436 on: September 25, 2007, 12:34:31 AM »
You mean this link?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94KzmB2bI7s

I have read that there are tales of ancient civilizations that could move tons of materials with sound.  I don't know if it's true or not, but clearly something odds going on in that chamber.  Supposedly Keely did this very thing.

I figure a resonant chamber is a resonant chamber.  Perhaps it applies to the Stan Meyer scenario?  Also, someone posted something about the guy from h2earth talking about all of these overunity possibilites relating to resonance.

Would the creation of  laser light be a type of resonance?  Basically the light is bounced back and forth between mirrors in a substance until it finally escapes through a hole and TADAH...odd things happen.

If you think about it...in the Kanzius experiment, perhaps the testube is resonating??  I don't know...just blabbing on and on here.

djctek

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #437 on: September 25, 2007, 04:15:04 AM »
Peter from OZ, Sorry to hear about your mishap, I would think it should have blown the fuse before it fried the mosfet, interesting?
if any one else has a problem with the unit please let me know. Feedback is the only way to make things better, I will repair any unit
that quits working for free for the first 60 days for the cost of parts and shipping. If you are going to run the unit for long periods of time it might be wise to place a small fan blowing on it. Under my tests at low amperage, the mosfet remained cool, if you crank it up it will get hot!

ALSO UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES HOOK UP THE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE INPUT BACKWARDS, IE REVERSE POLARITY,
I CANT STRESS THIS ENOUGH, IT WILL FRY THE 1N4007 DIODE IN A HEARTBEAT.

If you do or did, you will know what is wrong with it.

I listed a few more of these on eBay, for anyone who missed out on the last auction, item  # 120165493869




Gheller J

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 88
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #438 on: September 25, 2007, 07:27:03 AM »
More info on Multiple bifilars

Gh. J.


Forwarded msg
--------------------------------------------
I think my tubes are still being conditioned as I saw a lot of brown stuff generation when I connected the bifilar inductors. The conditioning I presume happens for every specific voltage.

 
Try to use a ferrite core torroidal to step up voltage connect to the inductors (individual and regular wound) as mentioned by Spewing on Overunity thread as of now as the bifilars are creating some problems...I blew up both the 1200V 40A diodes....looks like one of the tubes ( no.7) has shorted...no gas production. The voltages might have gone very high with the bifilars connected and theres a possibility that this is creating problems for the smaller gap to short out. Dont use the bifilar inductors till we have a proper understanding of how they can stably work.

I'll probably have to open up the unit to see what's wrong.

--------------------------------

atlantex

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 65
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #439 on: September 25, 2007, 06:43:52 PM »
Hi folks,

I'm in the process of conditioning right now, it's intersting to see that different frequencys seems to have different effects to the gas generation, so forms a lower frequence little sparkling bubbles and a higher frequence something like fog right in the water.

Well, after 8 conditioning cycles yet, the coating of the inner pipe has startet, I can't follow the exact values as recommented in the PDF because I only have one pipeset.
After that time now, I can't say that the gas generation has increased but don't worry, I'll don't stop the process now.

I'm going to make a new new choke tomorrow, someone like ravi's bifilar coil, shorting shouldn't be a problem here, because the gap of my pipeset is ~1.5 mm  ::)  anyway, I have to try it.


good night

atlantex

coolwater

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #440 on: September 25, 2007, 08:36:21 PM »
Well its official i suck at electrionics, hav shorts all over the board, so startn again will not give up.can some one show me or post pics of how the three pin pots are wired as on diagram shows link to additional pin thatg goes no where, also i have Mosfet IRFP240 can someverify if this is suitable for circuit, Well back to drawing board will post again soon if have blown up, Keep up the gr8 work guys
Coolwater

RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #441 on: September 25, 2007, 09:01:36 PM »

Beginners guide to pots

The IFRP240 is a little slow but should be ok, make sure it is on a good heatsink, its drain current handling capability is only 20 amps, I managed to wipe out a 70amp mosfet   ::)
If you are using the circuit from page 7 of the D14 pdf, the wiper pin is connected to one of the track pins on all the pots, but there is a variation on this circuit that will keep frequency relatively stable while adjusting mark/space, it's my own variation and it works for me.
http://hh0.no-ip.info/tubes.htm just scroll down the page and you will see the circuit.

P.S, be persistant, don't give up  :)

Well its official i suck at electrionics, hav shorts all over the board, so startn again will not give up.can some one show me or post pics of how the three pin pots are wired as on diagram shows link to additional pin thatg goes no where, also i have Mosfet IRFP240 can someverify if this is suitable for circuit, Well back to drawing board will post again soon if have blown up, Keep up the gr8 work guys
Coolwater

coolwater

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #442 on: September 25, 2007, 10:37:33 PM »
Thanks for the info, IF youve blown such large capacity parts why does the doc say to supply, 200v/20amp only?
Also a question how much pressure is required to run a car, What PSI? Wots the flow Rate for these cells (D14) And is the D14 Circuit capable of morphing to suit an array of cell configurations calculated together  and frequencies adjust to suit in order to supply a vehicle on demand sufficient gas to run X vehicle or internal combustion engine of any kind (so to sound ignorant but just curious as i assume this would be the ultimate goal, to fill car with water and off you go again) I have experimented with cell thats will supply enuff gas to run a car but these are done with brut force amps and ultimately kill the battery and loss of energy ie thru heat etc, would appreciate info
Thanks again
Troy(Coolwater)

PS Can some body post pic of the pots with pin allocation numbers on them 1 2 3 etc for D14 circuit would prob take 2min for the gurus out there but just askin for the electronically fresh people out there (ie myself)
Thanks

djctek

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #443 on: September 26, 2007, 04:20:14 AM »
I made a video yaaaaaaaay......
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7x9l8CHOO4

RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #444 on: September 26, 2007, 04:51:18 AM »
I was pushing for higher frequencies, transistors/mosfets will dissipate more heat with higher frequencies, I just happened to push mine too far.
I'm not sure about PSI, I've read that some go for 5 PSI.
I'm not a car driver,much prefering my electric cycle, afraid I cannot answer the rest of your questions.

Thanks for the info, IF youve blown such large capacity parts why does the doc say to supply, 200v/20amp only?
Also a question how much pressure is required to run a car, What PSI? Wots the flow Rate for these cells (D14) And is the D14 Circuit capable of morphing to suit an array of cell configurations calculated together  and frequencies adjust to suit in order to supply a vehicle on demand sufficient gas to run X vehicle or internal combustion engine of any kind (so to sound ignorant but just curious as i assume this would be the ultimate goal, to fill car with water and off you go again) I have experimented with cell thats will supply enuff gas to run a car but these are done with brut force amps and ultimately kill the battery and loss of energy ie thru heat etc, would appreciate info
Thanks again
Troy(Coolwater)

PS Can some body post pic of the pots with pin allocation numbers on them 1 2 3 etc for D14 circuit would prob take 2min for the gurus out there but just askin for the electronically fresh people out there (ie myself)
Thanks

RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #445 on: September 26, 2007, 04:56:21 AM »
Very nicely done!
Do you know what currents you were pulling?
And what were those cone shaped pieces?, I've been thinking along the lines of forcing the tiny bubbles into larger bubbles before hydrogen and oxygen has the chance to recombine into  water, kind of putting a cone at the top of each tube with small hole at the tip, this will force the tiny bubbles together forming larger bubbles that will escape to the waters surface more readily.

I made a video yaaaaaaaay......
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7x9l8CHOO4

djctek

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #446 on: September 26, 2007, 05:34:30 AM »
The cone shaped pieces are the stainless plates from the centerfuge of a 1939 mccormick deering cream separator, If I hook up the atx power supply direct they draw 5 amps @ 12.2V, with the circuit I can produce good bubbles with 300ma to 1.5a, I have no idea as to the gas production it is creating....

saintpoida

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #447 on: September 26, 2007, 05:37:41 AM »
Yeah that was cool
I made a video yaaaaaaaay......
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7x9l8CHOO4

being an electronics newbie i was wondering what is the simplest way to test the circuit without plugging it into tubes?

Like test that the electronics are all wired up correctly before running it?

Thanks

djctek

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #448 on: September 26, 2007, 05:54:27 AM »
You could just hook the output leads to a multimeter set to DC and watch the voltage jump up and down, it does not need to be hooked to anything for it to create the pulsed signal.

saintpoida

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #449 on: September 26, 2007, 05:57:41 AM »
yeah thanks

i was more wondering if i needed to have some sort of load there or not, but i guess
the multimeter is enough

Thanks again!