Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power  (Read 828207 times)

RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #405 on: September 21, 2007, 06:53:54 AM »
I'm copying this across to save me having to type it all out again.

Actually to explain, this was never a test for gas output because my tube configuration is totally inefficient anyway, this was actually a test of the bifilar transformer configuration

I'm not going to even bother completing the second test, it has already confirmed what Ravi advised and I thought about a few hours ago.

In the first test the bifilar configuration was the one Ravi suggested

In the second test which has now been running for 2 hours and barely giving much gas the original bifilar arrangement is being used
apart from the bifilar the parameters are pretty much the same, in fact I had to bring down the frequency and pulse width so that the current drawn matched the first test because it was above 0.6amps



Ok guys, I finally got some numbers you can run with...

I fed the tubes with a DC pulse at 6080hz approx.
Total current drawn by circuit and tubes 0.5amps, voltage 12.5
Then the 6080hz was gated, 90ms ON, 60ms OFF.
It took 1 hour 20 minutes to collect approx 600ml of gas.

If anyone would like to run those numbers I will be back with a second lot after another test run.

tao

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 378
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #406 on: September 21, 2007, 07:12:32 AM »
Can you attempt to feed a frequency to your tubes based on my previous post?

the base equation, after simplification is: 717.5/L = F, where L is in meters, and F is in Hz

let google convert your inches for you: Example: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=5+in+to+m&btnG=Search

So, for 5 inch tubes, 5 in = 0.127 m ,  so F=717.5/.027 = 5,650 Hz


You might have already done this, and if you have, excuse me.......

RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #407 on: September 21, 2007, 07:26:30 AM »
Thanks tao, my tubes are 8cm in length, calculated frequency 8968.75 hz, I've got it very close to that now, running the test again from fresh, including a change of water.


Can you attempt to feed a frequency to your tubes based on my previous post?

the base equation, after simplification is: 717.5/L = F, where L is in meters, and F is in Hz

let google convert your inches for you: Example: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=5+in+to+m&btnG=Search

So, for 5 inch tubes, 5 in = 0.127 m ,  so F=717.5/.027 = 5,650 Hz


You might have already done this, and if you have, excuse me.......

esaruoho

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 222
    • Lackluster / Esa Juhani Ruoho - melodic electronic music
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #408 on: September 21, 2007, 10:02:07 AM »

Gheller J

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 88
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #409 on: September 21, 2007, 11:38:05 AM »


Looks like d bifilar input connection has been corrected in this D14 after Ravi's schematic on d last pg.

Gh. J.

atlantex

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 65
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #410 on: September 21, 2007, 07:51:12 PM »
Hello,

today I got all parts I needed to build the circuit and it's now nearly finished. First test can start tomorrow :-)


so far for now

atlantex

RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #411 on: September 21, 2007, 11:13:54 PM »
Thats good work atlantex

I hope you wont take my criticism in the wrong way, you are going have incredible instability problems because the leads feeding the chip timers are too long, you need to get the componants as close to the timers as possible keeping all leads as short as possible, especially the input leads pins 2, 4, and 6 of the timer chips, you should get the timing resistors and capacitors as close to these pins as is physically possible, its not so much of a problem for the gating part as that is low frequency, but the high frequency part is quite critical, the long leads on the input pins will behave like antennas causing the circuit to be unstable.

Hello,

today I got all parts I needed to build the circuit and it's now nearly finished. First test can start tomorrow :-)


so far for now

atlantex

RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #412 on: September 22, 2007, 01:35:47 AM »
I've revised the revised pulse circuit, sorry to all who were confused by the ommision of some componants, I will do my best to keep things updated.

http://hh0.no-ip.info/tubes.htm

albator10

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 45
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #413 on: September 22, 2007, 04:29:43 AM »
HI,

Found this Canadian patent of Stanley Mayer.

Date : 1988

Title: ELECTRICAL PARTICLE GENERATOR.

We saw a drawing (fig. 3) of a very special choke of "3 parallel non-magnetic tube". There are other kind of choke

I am not a specialist, but I think you shuold read it.

RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #414 on: September 22, 2007, 05:04:01 AM »

albator10

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 45
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #415 on: September 22, 2007, 05:16:16 AM »
Hi,

Can someone check the value of this circuit ?

In German, sorry, but I am sure that the symbol are universal.


atlantex

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 65
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #416 on: September 22, 2007, 06:43:47 AM »
Hi RunningBare,

Quote
I hope you wont take my criticism in the wrong way, you are going have incredible instability problems because the leads feeding the chip timers are too long, you need to get the componants as close to the timers as possible keeping all leads as short as possible, especially the input leads pins 2, 4, and 6 of the timer chips, you should get the timing resistors and capacitors as close to these pins as is physically possible, its not so much of a problem for the gating part as that is low frequency, but the high frequency part is quite critical, the long leads on the input pins will behave like antennas causing the circuit to be unstable.

no problem, good advices are always welcome, I'll try to shorten some of the criticle cabels. I also have the possibillity to create PCB's, so it would be nice if you could post an updated pcb shematic.


stay tuned

atlantex

atlantex

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 65
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #417 on: September 22, 2007, 04:51:30 PM »
HiHo,

first test is still running, what I noticed.

- one coil is ticking while power is switched on
- the current on the ampmeter is jumping (ampmeter right after the power supply)

I'll do some pictures and post those here.


atlantex
« Last Edit: September 22, 2007, 05:12:21 PM by atlantex »

Gheller J

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 88
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #418 on: September 22, 2007, 05:21:46 PM »
MULTIPLE BIFILAR SETUP for WFC!!


Quote from the sender:



------------------------------------------------------
Im sending a pic of the multiple bifilars I tried on the WFC just a while ago. These were connected to each pipe individually. Diode used 1200 V 40 Amps. Solid core length 8" wound with 0.711 mm conductor end to end.

The generation increased by approximately another 10cc of gas for a 20 second period.

This works on efficiency!! Need to try out other combos to see if it can increase some more.
-------------------------------------------------------



Gh. J.

RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #419 on: September 22, 2007, 05:39:12 PM »
Are you connecting those the way Ravi advised?


MULTIPLE BIFILAR SETUP for WFC!!


Quote from the sender:



------------------------------------------------------
Im sending a pic of the multiple bifilars I tried on the WFC just a while ago. These were connected to each pipe individually. Diode used 1200 V 40 Amps. Solid core length 8" wound with 0.711 mm conductor end to end.

The generation increased by approximately another 10cc of gas for a 20 second period.

This works on efficiency!! Need to try out other combos to see if it can increase some more.
-------------------------------------------------------



Gh. J.