Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power  (Read 825926 times)

Spewing

  • Guest
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #210 on: September 05, 2007, 09:59:57 PM »
 i have found nothing of this water fuel cell replication, could you give some source to it? i would really like to see what this guy, or guy's are doing!

esaruoho

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 222
    • Lackluster / Esa Juhani Ruoho - melodic electronic music
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #211 on: September 05, 2007, 10:24:19 PM »
i have found nothing of this water fuel cell replication, could you give some source to it? i would really like to see what this guy, or guy's are doing!

http://panaceauniversity.org/D14.pdf

RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #212 on: September 05, 2007, 10:57:39 PM »
i have found nothing of this water fuel cell replication, could you give some source to it? i would really like to see what this guy, or guy's are doing!


More information including links to Stan Meyers information.




----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

pofuk

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #213 on: September 06, 2007, 12:52:37 AM »
I'm planing to make replication as soon I'll have money for equipment. I'm going to make electronics first because it looks cheapest thing and I have friend working in electronic shop. I have one question an that would solve most of my dough's. My goal is to produce energy to heat my home. What i wanted to do and what I'm going to start doing this Saturday is to run lawn mower on HHO, I'm going to make some by using standard electrolysis, and connect it to generator(when i get one). The question is how to convert HHO into an 220V AC (50Hz) most efficiently?



saintpoida

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #214 on: September 06, 2007, 12:58:01 AM »
I was thinking about the closing the loop idea also

if it can charge a battery could it not recharge its own power source??
so if you were using a 12v lead acid battery so a small motorbike one
could it be used to try and make back what its taking out?

saintpoida

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #215 on: September 06, 2007, 01:03:49 AM »
Also with tuning the pipes, wouldnt making the inner tube longer push it closer to the freq of the outer tube?

If so you would just need to calculate by how much longer it would need to be?

Duranza

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #216 on: September 06, 2007, 04:06:21 AM »
Also with tuning the pipes, wouldnt making the inner tube longer push it closer to the freq of the outer tube?

If so you would just need to calculate by how much longer it would need to be?

I have done just that on my pipes... the extra lenght sits at the bottom and flush at the top. I calculated the surface area of the inside of the the outer pipe and adjusted the lenght of the inside pipe to have the same surface area. They sound identical when struck like a tuning fork..

RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #217 on: September 06, 2007, 04:46:29 AM »
May we please have the dimensions you used for the tubes?, when it comes to maths I'm a bit of a lazy git  :-[



I have done just that on my pipes... the extra lenght sits at the bottom and flush at the top. I calculated the surface area of the inside of the the outer pipe and adjusted the lenght of the inside pipe to have the same surface area. They sound identical when struck like a tuning fork..

ashtweth_nihilisti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 727
    • Panacea-BOCAF
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #218 on: September 06, 2007, 05:11:56 AM »
Guys some one was talking about Bi-filar cols before a firend sent me this

Check what Tesla says below keeping the WFC and a bi-filar inductor in context:



Tesla's "COIL FOR ELECTRO MAGNETS," patent #512,340  is a very special coil design because, unlike an ordinary coil made by turning wire on a tube form, this one uses two wires laid next to each other on a form but with the end of the first one connected to the beginning of the second one. In this patent Tesla explains that the double coil will store many times the energy of a conventional coil.[1] Measurements of two coils of the same size and with the same number of turns, one with a single, the other with a bifilar winding, show differences in voltage gain. These bifilar Tesla's coils can be explained solely on the basis of their electrical activity. A bifilar coil is capable of holding more charge than a single wound coil. When operated at resonance, the distributed capacitance of the bifilar coil is able to overcome the counter - electromotive force ( e.m.f.) normal to coils, inductive reactance.

Because of the electrical activity, a bifilar coil does not work against itself in the form of a counter - e.m.f., the potential across the coil quickly builds to a high value. The difference between the turns becomes great enough that the energy is practically all potential, at this point, the system becomes an electrostatic oscillator.

Minimal work is done in my radiant energy system due to the absence of wasted displacement currents. As small heat losses occur, oscillations are maintained by surplus charge generated by atomic catalytic reactions, energy is siphoned from the kinetic moments of these charges.. After an initial input of energy from an outside Very low energy expenditure allows power delivery to an electrical load over an extended time period without an external fuel supply source, the radiant energy electrical generator will operate as a very efficient device.


 

The parts highlighted in red seem very very relevant in WFC context. So bifilar inductors are worth a try.What do you think?? any ideas on how we should try it??

Also
Could you check up on the following link and see if it actually works for a WFC?

http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/parabifc.htm


tao

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 378
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #219 on: September 06, 2007, 05:17:48 AM »
Guys some one was talking about Bi-filar cols before a firend sent me this

Check what Tesla says below keeping the WFC and a bi-filar inductor in context:



Tesla's "COIL FOR ELECTRO MAGNETS," patent #512,340  is a very special coil design because, unlike an ordinary coil made by turning wire on a tube form, this one uses two wires laid next to each other on a form but with the end of the first one connected to the beginning of the second one. In this patent Tesla explains that the double coil will store many times the energy of a conventional coil.[1] Measurements of two coils of the same size and with the same number of turns, one with a single, the other with a bifilar winding, show differences in voltage gain. These bifilar Tesla's coils can be explained solely on the basis of their electrical activity. A bifilar coil is capable of holding more charge than a single wound coil. When operated at resonance, the distributed capacitance of the bifilar coil is able to overcome the counter - electromotive force ( e.m.f.) normal to coils, inductive reactance.

Because of the electrical activity, a bifilar coil does not work against itself in the form of a counter - e.m.f., the potential across the coil quickly builds to a high value. The difference between the turns becomes great enough that the energy is practically all potential, at this point, the system becomes an electrostatic oscillator.

Minimal work is done in my radiant energy system due to the absence of wasted displacement currents. As small heat losses occur, oscillations are maintained by surplus charge generated by atomic catalytic reactions, energy is siphoned from the kinetic moments of these charges.. After an initial input of energy from an outside Very low energy expenditure allows power delivery to an electrical load over an extended time period without an external fuel supply source, the radiant energy electrical generator will operate as a very efficient device.


 

The parts highlighted in red seem very very relevant in WFC context. So bifilar inductors are worth a try.What do you think?? any ideas on how we should try it??

Also
Could you check up on the following link and see if it actually works for a WFC?

http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/parabifc.htm




Much of this relates DIRECTLY to my thread I posted soon before RAVI's 'coming out'. It deals with all this directly.

"Stanley Meyer, please meet Stanislav Avramenko: Water as a fuel..."
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2967.0.html

In regard directly to the Tesla bifilar patent and setup itself, I mention in the above thread a Mr. Milan Manchich. He used a flat Tesla pancake coil, and applied a HF voltage to the inner or outer wire of the pancake coil, and on the opposite wire of the pancake coil, he placed an 'Avramenko's Plug'. http://www.keelynet.com/energy/milan.htm

Please see the thread directly for the links to Avramenko and the like.

Tesla was the KING of voltage POTENTIAL, so I think these paths of research are good to follow to potentially lead us to the best WFC control circuitry.

Peace...

saintpoida

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #220 on: September 06, 2007, 05:49:46 AM »
May we please have the dimensions you used for the tubes?, when it comes to maths I'm a bit of a lazy git  :-[


lol i typed out what i thought was the answer but umm yeah its not

its somehting to do with  2*pi*r(h+r)

Gheller J

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 88
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #221 on: September 06, 2007, 06:24:57 AM »
                                                                 How come no one seems to have noticed this!!




Looks like ashtweth_nihilistic has been posting very relevant stuff!



I would say look out n try 2 read between the lines. :o

There cud b info which we are gettin frm reliable sources.



Gh. J.
« Last Edit: September 06, 2007, 09:10:44 AM by Gheller J »

ashtweth_nihilisti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 727
    • Panacea-BOCAF
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #222 on: September 06, 2007, 07:11:47 AM »
BTW

Im posting a friend as certain people want to lay low for a while till the spook mess is sported out, hence it doesn't matter who my friends are, just know they want to remain behind the scenes.







« Last Edit: September 06, 2007, 08:02:46 AM by ashtweth_nihilisti »

Gheller J

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 88
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #223 on: September 06, 2007, 07:44:50 AM »


It just hurts when ppl ignore posts that make a lot of sense wit regards to what is being done here

Just trying to get their attn to where they should look for to make their replic work!


Gh. J.
« Last Edit: September 06, 2007, 08:35:41 AM by Gheller J »

ashtweth_nihilisti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 727
    • Panacea-BOCAF
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #224 on: September 06, 2007, 08:06:36 AM »
post edited you can edit urs too if you want ;)