Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 ... 88   Go Down

Author Topic: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power  (Read 828287 times)

Gheller J

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 88
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #195 on: September 05, 2007, 05:19:07 PM »
Tao>>>

Why not power d EEC from d free electrons in the water of WFC instead of powerin it from the WFC pipe input lead??

Any ideas how dis cud b done??


Gh. J.
Logged

RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #196 on: September 05, 2007, 05:23:35 PM »
A quick dirty video of my fizz chamber.
Logged

tao

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 378
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #197 on: September 05, 2007, 05:24:38 PM »
Quote from: Gheller J on September 05, 2007, 05:19:07 PM
Tao>>>

Why not power d EEC from d free electrons in the water of WFC instead of powerin it from the WFC pipe input lead??

Any ideas how dis cud b done??


Gh. J.


The WFC pipe is IN the water, and hence, when there is a positive pulse on the one side of the 'amp consuming device'(light bulb, etc), the electrons come FROM the water. So you ARE powering the EEC from the free electrons in the water, that is what it is doing.
Logged

Gheller J

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 88
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #198 on: September 05, 2007, 05:27:40 PM »
Tao>>>

Is ther a possibility that pancake bifilar cud work better on a WFC than the 1 in new D14?


Gh. J.
Logged

Gheller J

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 88
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #199 on: September 05, 2007, 05:33:53 PM »
Tao>>>

So thers a possibility of another WFC bein connected instead of d lamp right? n dis can go on from one WFC to another?

Gh. J.
Logged

Duranza

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #200 on: September 05, 2007, 06:41:03 PM »
Quote from: tao on September 04, 2007, 09:07:52 PM
Regarding the "slots" that are supposed to be on the tubes in Meyer's demo WFC....

I posted this some months back, but felt the need to do so again regarding the recent update of the d14.pdf

Here is an image I made showing why there are NO SLOTS CUT in Meyer's SS tubes...

They appear to be merely spacers that are easily removable.
Think of a a U-shaped plastic clip.
It just an 'easy to remove' spacer, that is all. The evidence is in the picture...

Click the image to zoom in.

That seems to be an easy way to manipulate the tuning of the pipes. By putting a dampening clip it might be possible to tune the outside pipe to the inside. It might also just be removable U-cell spacers with an outside grip to them.... Beats using a flat tip screw driver to remove them to clean the cell....
Logged

dutchy1966

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 344
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #201 on: September 05, 2007, 07:02:57 PM »
Quote from: Gheller J on September 05, 2007, 05:33:53 PM
Tao>>>

So thers a possibility of another WFC bein connected instead of d lamp right? n dis can go on from one WFC to another?

Gh. J.

It seems like you might be able to close the loop if we take the output of the EEC and use that power to replace the 6 watts of input power.....

Robert
Logged

RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #202 on: September 05, 2007, 07:26:18 PM »
Quote from: dutchy1966 on September 05, 2007, 07:02:57 PM
Quote from: Gheller J on September 05, 2007, 05:33:53 PM
Tao>>>

So thers a possibility of another WFC bein connected instead of d lamp right? n dis can go on from one WFC to another?

Gh. J.

It seems like you might be able to close the loop if we take the output of the EEC and use that power to replace the 6 watts of input power.....

Robert

Do not be too misled, a 12 volt 10watt lamp can glow quite brightly with just 6 watts of input, give it a try, get a 12 volt battery, 12 volt 10 watt lamp, in order to get the lamp to dissipate 6 watts instead of 10 you will need a resistor in series to dissipate the other 4 watts.

12 volts at 10 watts is .833ma therefore lamp resistance is 12/.833 = 14.4 ohms, a resistor is chosen to dissipate 4 watts, a 1 ohm resistor is close enough giving a total circuit dissipation of 9.33 watts, the resistor must be rated 5 watts or higher, you will see their is not a great deal of difference in lamp brightness.
Logged

AhuraMazda

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 564
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #203 on: September 05, 2007, 07:27:35 PM »

@any one with a working cell,

Is it true that you get a kind of glow ( or may be some kind of sparks ) in the bottom of the cell?
If this is so, perhaps the intensity or fluctuations of this can be used as a feedback machanism.
I thought I get this in before someone thinks of patenting the idea!

AM
Logged

Duranza

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #204 on: September 05, 2007, 07:29:25 PM »
Quote from: dutchy1966 on September 05, 2007, 07:02:57 PM
Quote from: Gheller J on September 05, 2007, 05:33:53 PM
Tao>>>

So thers a possibility of another WFC bein connected instead of d lamp right? n dis can go on from one WFC to another?

Gh. J.

It seems like you might be able to close the loop if we take the output of the EEC and use that power to replace the 6 watts of input power.....

Robert

It has to stay an open system, meaning you cannot close the loop by using it to power itself. It is just like Bedinis work. Once you close the loop on itself you get no gain. Now the idea of using that power and storing it in a battery to power another WFC is very possible.
Logged

RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #205 on: September 05, 2007, 07:34:09 PM »
Quote from: Duranza on September 05, 2007, 07:29:25 PM

It has to stay an open system, meaning you cannot close the loop by using it to power itself. It is just like Bedinis work. Once you close the loop on itself you get no gain. Now the idea of using that power and storing it in a battery to power another WFC is very possible.

You see, now I find this very odd, if it is capable of charging batteries then it is capable of charging capacitors, in which case if the output is higher than the input then you should be able to close the loop, its simple logic.
Logged

Duranza

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #206 on: September 05, 2007, 07:45:31 PM »
Well I'll take a wild guess that we are not working with your ordinary everyday energy souce here...
Logged

RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #207 on: September 05, 2007, 07:58:56 PM »
Quote from: Duranza on September 05, 2007, 07:45:31 PM
Well I'll take a wild guess that we are not working with your ordinary everyday energy souce here...

Uh huh, thats one road I'm not going down.....yet.

If this device is tapping from an unknown source such ZPE, you should know thats the lowest energy state that can be varified, the vacuum void between the atoms is just that as far as we know, so nothing there, squat.

But I'll be extremely happy to proved wrong!
Logged

leeroyjenkinsii

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 81
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #208 on: September 05, 2007, 08:20:11 PM »
Are these tpus working at all or is it a wild goose chase?  Was Steven Mark a fraud?  Are the videos on YouTube a scam?  Just curious.
Logged

leeroyjenkinsii

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 81
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #209 on: September 05, 2007, 08:20:48 PM »
Oops posted in the wrong section.  Sorry.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 ... 88   Go Up
« previous next »