Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power  (Read 825931 times)

dutchy1966

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 344
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #165 on: September 04, 2007, 02:39:28 PM »
I have some rough observation

Digital multimeter is wired in so...
+ ----------------------------|              |----inductor------
                11000uf cap    pulse circuit              tubes
- -----A----------------------|              |----inductor------
"A" is the meter, and the capacitor is connected directly across the lines, the supply is a 12 volt sealed lead acid battery reading 12.8 volts presently.

I first tried straight DC, current shown on the meter was 1.38 amps, good bubble flow.
Then I tried with the pulse circuit, got slightly less bubble flow but meter reading never went much above 400milliamp.

More to come later.

Hi RunningBare,

I guess you haven't adjusted the pulse frequency to the optimum value yet? Maybe you could use the calculations supplied by Tao at some point (based on acoustic resonance frequency for a given length)
What are the dimensions of your tubes?

regards

Robert

RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #166 on: September 04, 2007, 04:39:46 PM »
Hi dutchy, I'm in the proccess of sealing the sharp edges of the tubes at the moment, I noted the electrolysis had just started eating away at one edge of one tube, only extremely slightly but enough to motivate some protection, as soon as the seal is cured I will try another few tests.

btw, I agree that I need to find resonance, but it also must be remembered that the inductors will also be effected, if the frequency is too low they will just pass more current, if the frequency is too high then the current will fall below an acceptable level not allowing electrolysis to take place.

I've basically built everything to a smaller scale, these tubes would certainly need a higher frequency than Ravi's to reach resonance.

Gheller J

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 88
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #167 on: September 04, 2007, 06:12:12 PM »





 Ã‚                NEW     D14  -  04 Sept. 2007    UPDATE   POSTED


                        on radianth2o  group  a few minutes ago!!







                                                               :o          :o            :o

Gh. J.



Gheller J

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 88
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #168 on: September 04, 2007, 06:30:51 PM »





                  COLD ELECTRICITY!!!!!  >>>doing all the extra work??  :o

                                                    WOW!



Gh. J.

pese

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1597
    • Freie Energie und mehr ... Free energy and more ...
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #169 on: September 04, 2007, 06:34:39 PM »





                 NEW     D14  -  04 Sept. 2007    UPDATE   POSTED


                        on radianth2o  group  a few minutes ago!!







                                                               :o          :o            :o

Gh. J.





This version fron yahoo , is since days in panacea
 
http://www.panaceauniversity.org/D14.pdf

G.Pese

 www.pese.cjb.net

dutchy1966

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 344
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #170 on: September 04, 2007, 06:37:32 PM »
Gheller J,

Thanks for the updated D14 !!!  Matches very well with the electron extraction Stanley was using.....
It seems this WFC is gonna be totally uncovered soon.....

Regards,

Robert

tao

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 378
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #171 on: September 04, 2007, 08:48:26 PM »
I have a high res picture of Dave's light bulb that he is lighting with his Electron Extraction Circuit.

I will post it in some hours, when I get to my other computer, and attach it to this post.

Just to let you guys SEE it working too ;)...

tao

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 378
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #172 on: September 04, 2007, 09:07:52 PM »
Regarding the "slots" that are supposed to be on the tubes in Meyer's demo WFC....

I posted this some months back, but felt the need to do so again regarding the recent update of the d14.pdf

Here is an image I made showing why there are NO SLOTS CUT in Meyer's SS tubes...

They appear to be merely spacers that are easily removable.
Think of a a U-shaped plastic clip.
It just an 'easy to remove' spacer, that is all. The evidence is in the picture...

Click the image to zoom in.

RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #173 on: September 04, 2007, 10:22:08 PM »
While I have used the pulse circuit from D14 and it does work, it does have a flaw in it, the way the mark/space controls are wired also cause a change in frequency when adjusting mark/space.
The circuit below is very similar to D14 with a couple of acceptions, firstly the mark/space controls VR1 and VR3 are rewired so that they have negligable effect on the frequency, secondly instead of the frequency controls VR2 and VR4 being connected to the 555 timers pin 3 output they are instead taken straight to the positive line, I've not completed the circuit because the rest is basically the same as D14, if you have any questions please ask.

Edit to add, the multiple timing capacitors can be wired as per D14, I just put a single timing capacitor on each timer for drawing simplicity.

(http://hh0.no-ip.info/images/pulse_circuit_revised.jpg)

AhuraMazda

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 564
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #174 on: September 04, 2007, 10:29:38 PM »

Is the tube in the middle of the arrangement larger than the rest?

tao

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 378
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #175 on: September 05, 2007, 12:40:35 AM »
I have a high res picture of Dave's light bulb that he is lighting with his Electron Extraction Circuit.

I will post it in some hours, when I get to my other computer, and attach it to this post.

Just to let you guys SEE it working too ;)...


Here is the high res picture of Dave's actual setup with his light bulb being powered by the Electron Extraction Circuit...

The EEC works folks, believe that... One more vindicating action that supports Meyer...........

RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #176 on: September 05, 2007, 01:17:17 AM »
tao, are you sure the capacitors are 83,000 mfd 50 volt? the one I see in that picture is approx the same physical size as my 11,000 mfd 25 volt capacitors.

saintpoida

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #177 on: September 05, 2007, 01:56:02 AM »
looks cool!!

i have been trying to look up and research bifilar winding for past couple days now and most of them that i see
are wind with 2 wires have the 2 wires connected together at one end, but when looking at
stans stuff and d14 it looks more as if the 2 wires are wound together but then one is used for + and one
is used for -

is this correct? or am i reading the diagram incorrectly? (cause they sit so close together)


On another note looking at that "cold electricity" setup, if ravzz or daves for that matter system has a draw of
10v at 0.5 amps = 5 watts then would they not be able to run another 2 WFC from the extra current and so
on and so forth??

Sorry if that is a stupid question!

tao

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 378
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #178 on: September 05, 2007, 03:34:17 AM »
tao, are you sure the capacitors are 83,000 mfd 50 volt? the one I see in that picture is approx the same physical size as my 11,000 mfd 25 volt capacitors.

That image was made some months ago, so his circuit values and/or the circuit layout could have been a bit different than what is in the new D14.pdf , but I would think that they are basically the same.

Still though, the process works, and that is Dave's actual setup, which lead to that changed circuit in the D14.pdf

:)


PS - I was just looking up similar 83,000uF 50V caps to see what they could look like, and they look very similar to the one in Dave's pic there...

RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #179 on: September 05, 2007, 03:52:17 AM »
To test the volume of gas created over time I used a disposable plastic beaker that fitted over both tubes, I do not have the capacity so I drew a line on it with an indelible marker which sits around a centimeter below the water line, then I timed how long it took for the line to reach the water line.

Straight DC at 400ma falling to a steady 380ma - 10 minutes
Pulsed DC with circuit adjusted till multimeter showed 380ma - 8 minutes 30

It also must be born in mind that I have two leds drawing about 5ma each connected to both 555 timers outputs.

I ran the test twice, same result give or take a few seconds.
btw, I'm not using the low frequency pulser during these tests, just the high frequency, so I get a steady reading on the digital multimeter, I've got plenty of capacitor decoupling throughout the circuit to reduce noise.

Anyway, back to the lab.