Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power  (Read 826075 times)

lltfdaniel1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #90 on: August 29, 2007, 05:59:21 PM »
Hmm Interesting, hope he keeps going with the tests and all.

As for people on to ravi,

I Have a suggestion, get a tracking web cam, and make it online,and people could take screen shots from webcam you know and record, it will be very interesting,

yippe to big brother,

although business man see money as life in millions in selling oil,

and money buys oil,

and oil shortens the natual food production,

and if a carrot gets to a cost of 1 million,

you surely get poor to bankrupt very soon , unless you order alot of food at 2007.

and that will happen.

well you could eat paper.

its fear really.
 

bolt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 921
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #91 on: August 29, 2007, 06:15:20 PM »
Just a thought but each tube maybe much better fired from 8 different controllers. Yes this is loads of work but assuming each tube is an end fed dipole waveguide then they may all require a slightly different frequency and/or sequence of firing.  Maybe like 1,8,4,3,6,5,7,2 is standard V8 timing LOL
Well you never know the collapse of each field between the tubes may greatly enhance the system. I noticed some want to leave out the diode in the output circuit. Im not sure thats a good idea for a start the way it works in theory at least as pulses across of the choke see the voltage increasing rapidly, the diode syphones this off and is held on the tubes capitance. At each cycle coming from the controlling the leading edge of the back EMF is tapped off by the diode which prevents the voltage from collapsing thus producing the very high tube voltages otherwise unlikely to get higher then the PSU supply at 12 volts. I notice some designs have a bleed resistor across the tube to help slam down the voltage after but i would not thought this would make a practical difference.  Once the current of the system is low and fully tweaked the only other way to get more performance i can see is to either build bigger tubes or get the voltage up on the tubes. This means using perhaps switch mode power supply inductors with transformer taps and really get that 12 volt chop cranked up to 1000+ volts to the tubes. I think the pratical limitation is when the thing starts literally arcing across the tubes which is not good but then we found the breakdown voltage of the system if one gets this high.

Anyway, perhaps see first if building two controllers and running 4 * 4 is better then one controller and adjusting each set of 4 independently. If there is no noticable gain with 2 controllers it may not be worth the hassle of running eight.

Just ideas..........


ashtweth_nihilisti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 727
    • Panacea-BOCAF
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #92 on: August 30, 2007, 03:09:10 AM »
antomarki Ravi followed D14, the the plans are there, we will be publishing ours here too

keithturtle

  • elite_member
  • Sr. Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 302
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #93 on: August 30, 2007, 04:24:07 AM »
Yeah, mramos, but there be nuthin' like a good mystery <grin>

Turtle

ashtweth_nihilisti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 727
    • Panacea-BOCAF
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #94 on: August 30, 2007, 06:16:01 AM »
mramos the magic is not in what you stated, you don't have a unit working like dave lawton and Ravi, i have spoken to Dave lawton and Ravi, i am in a position to know.

Thats a very large generalization i care not to refute.

You have nothing working or you would get a visit, i advise the skeptics and oil men, to stay out of this, and for genuine replicators to ASK, and or contribute. Replicate.




AhuraMazda

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 564
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #95 on: August 30, 2007, 09:33:20 AM »
@Mramos
If you are trying again, please use SS tubes. I can not remember who but one of the experts in Meyer technology stressed that for this to work you must use seamless SS tubes.



@Ashweth,
Well if I met Dave or Ravi I would ask them to tell me exactly what they did and with it being such a ground breaking achievement I would go home, build one and once verified I would post it on the net to several places at the same time. The construction is simple enough and does not take long. So, how long will it be before you get a visitation?

I am not being funny but the story said: 9 suits went to raid Ravi's place Now, in India, 9 men wearing black suits would definitely look out of place!

AM

ashtweth_nihilisti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 727
    • Panacea-BOCAF
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #96 on: August 30, 2007, 09:56:48 AM »
@AhuraMazda

Exactly what they did is already posted in threads and in D14
I See you haven't heeded my advice.
i advise the skeptics and oil men, to stay out of this, and for genuine replicators to ASK, and or contribute. Replicate.

I will now look upon suspicion to all who don't and only answer genuine replicators.


RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #97 on: August 30, 2007, 10:52:24 AM »
Heres a thought, the threats are genuine but not by MiB per'se, there are enough bully boys out there that like nothing better than to intimidate and they have the ideal targets in this group, they know we're all a bit nervous because of the information we have read on suppression of similar technology, the thing is, when you have a family to consider it does not matter where the source of the threats comes from, your first instinct is to protect your family, I tend to go along with the information given by peswiki on this one, these are not official people, I think they are more rogue bullies.

I remember operating 27 mhz CB here in the UK before it became legal, there were some people going around posing as officials confiscating the CB equipment, some people felt intimidated and allowed the equipment to be removed without checking the validity of the supposed officials.

Personally I'm going to continue with my experiments in low energy HH0, and I give a one finger salute to the MiB who/whatever you are.
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/36/The_gesture02.jpg)

zero

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 149
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #98 on: August 30, 2007, 11:00:57 AM »

 Its a known FACT that the select secret society of bankers
OWN just about everything.  Especially big OIL and business.

 Look up 'Rockefeller'. (funny how the spell checker knew to correct my
spelling error on his name...)

 Rothschild's is another major name, in the European side.   And there
are many others.

  If anything, Id say that You  Runningbare are a minion working
with them.



RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #99 on: August 30, 2007, 11:09:46 AM »


  If anything, Id say that You  Runningbare are a minion working
with them.




Well, I'm flattered that you would place so much importance on me  ;)

It would also mean they have been taking me for a sucker and not paying me!  :o

I am curious however, why would I put effort into replication if I were a minion?

RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #100 on: August 30, 2007, 11:23:05 AM »

   If anything, Id say that You  Runningbare are a minion working
with them.




Btw, I ride a pedalec, do you drive a gasoline driven car?

zero

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 149
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #101 on: August 30, 2007, 12:10:37 PM »
 Hydrogen is still a system in which a form of control can be instituted.
As you will still need water fill up points.   They simply have to
increase the cost of the water.

 Also, these HHO machines are not nearly complete.   They are
not 'On the fly'  solutions  AFAIK,  Unlike Myers final version.
Myers was killed only after completing the final version,
which required no gas storage.

 HHO gas storage is a dangerous thing..  and do you really think
that the controlled corrupt GOVT will allow people to have
machines with unregulated potentially unsafe equipment? Not.
Weather safe or not, they will not allow it. 

 Do you all think you can get an investor to sink money into
a full out sellable version?  Think again.  The major businesses
and investment people are all on a leash owned by the
Illuminati.   The only way you will do it, is if you have some
sort of partnership with them.  Where they make the money..
and have the control.    Which is why Myers is buried.  He
wouldnt be party to such corruptions.


 HHO can also be used to create massive explosions in the hands
of the wicked or rebellious minded... which is another reason
this wont be allowed.

 AS for you personally...

 Ive seen many post of yours as bashing and mockery, as well
as trying to direct attention in an opposing or misleading directions.

 Breaking the will of the inspired, or causing
confusing disinformations. Such a post as above is evidence,
or complete naivety (which I find difficult to believe).

 

RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #102 on: August 30, 2007, 12:17:32 PM »
Many posts?

I've not created many posts, at least not here, and my misleading as you call it is to bring people like you back down to earth, my goal is more research and less conspiracy stuff, lets concentrate on whats important, clean energy for us and this planet.

I'm contributing, are you?

http://hh0.no-ip.info








 Ive seen many post of yours as bashing and mockery, as well
as trying to direct attention in an opposing or misleading directions.

 Breaking the will of the inspired, or causing
confusing disinformations. Such a post as above is evidence,
or complete naivety (which I find difficult to believe).

 

 

zero

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 149
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #103 on: August 30, 2007, 12:24:45 PM »
Disinformation again.

 Its not conspiracy.  Its factual knowledge and tons of evidence.

 Your IGNORance is very great.

 A simple example is that very fact that  Rockefeller wrote in his
own book that he was proud of forcing a New World Order.

 And thats only the tip of the Huge Glacier of non admitted evidences.

 It would seem that YOU are in the fluffy white clouds zone.


RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Stanley Meyer replication with low input power
« Reply #104 on: August 30, 2007, 12:30:31 PM »
I have a tendancy to think that people like you are the actual minions, your goal to make us all look like crazy nuts  ;)


Disinformation again.

 Its not conspiracy.  Its factual knowledge and tons of evidence.

 Your IGNORance is very great.

 A simple example is that very fact that  Rockefeller wrote in his
own book that he was proud of forcing a New World Order.

 And thats only the tip of the Huge Glacier of non admitted evidences.

 It would seem that YOU are in the fluffy white clouds zone.