@dankie i didn't ask you any free circuit as i already have the phase lock loop circuit done and working i have constructed the all design stanley meyer proposed with the resonant scanning circuit and lock indicator and feedback obviously.

Idiot is who really don't understand that electrons are consumed (being attached to the oxygen atoms to allow the hydrogen to be liberated) yes splitting the water as you know you must pass the current thru the water to make electrolysis.

lol... "consume" and electron huh... you do know that you can't technically consume anything...  (consume being in context of destroy, not ingest)
water is not consumed even in electrolysis, it is broken down / separated. The electrons may be removed (eg taken/absorbed by the electrode with the posititive charge) but its not consumed. Your statement about current goes in direct opposition with stan's theory. "yes splitting the water as you know you must pass the current thru the water to make electrolysis."
Since Mr Meyers tried to get as little current as he could your statement in this regard is null and void. If we were talking about brute force electrolysis you would be on the right track... As for your constant request for donations... if you want donations work for a charity... if you want investors speak to companies... you wuoldn't go to the goverment welfare department and ask the people in line if they can spare you some cash to go bowling would you?

Electrons might just be considered energy carriers in electrolysis..   two electrons come into  a cell with an energy of at least 1.23 eV  ...  Do work (make gas or heat)  ... Then two electrons  leave with 0 eV.. 


What Meyer's proposes is:   0 electrons (or a few) come into a cell from HV source, and voltage performs the work..    and electrons are "sucked" out of water molecules  (BS) ...

Thermionic emission involves lots of heat...   Field (induced) emission might be at play with the laser light injection & electrodes...

Hello!
Maybe someone could help us with a wise advice? We’re now studying  Ravi’s Water Fuel cell Replication from http://www.panaceauniversity.org/ and we faced a conflict:
In this manual we couldn't find the frequency at which the converter “boils” the water. What frequency should we tune the device? Does somebody know?

Thanx in advance
Kosta

Hm.... do you know where can i get clear and workable HHO manual?

related theory perhaps?
http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/blog/7200-relativistic-hydrogen-inside-casimir-cavity-appears-have-fractional-quantum-state-external-perspective-25072.html

We're started to study the HHO topic with Ravi Cell manual http://panaceauniversity.org/Ravi%20Cell.pdf but we didn't find any mentions about the mechanism frequencies, so i addressed wise people - you : )

Which experiment exactly?

I understand the article because I wrote it - which is to say I integrated other peoples work. based on the Puthoof atomic model my theory is very similar to the Haisch-Moddel model and could actually be tested in the same fixture. Only difference is the way we interpert the rectification of relativistic (fast) hydrogen energy. Everyone (Mills,LENR,star in a jar) all depend on the equivalence boundary of a Casimir cavity to diverge inertial frames which was introduced by Italiane researchers DiFiore et all back in 2002. It appears the small 10E-14 average deacceleration inside vs outside occurs in gradients proportional to the Spacing of the plates (or in your case either the miniscus of conductive electrolyte or actually pores on the plates) can be accelerated by heat like mills disassociating tungsten filament or acoustic energy. That is, once the equivalence boundary is set up by the Casimir effect the resulting tiny acceleration of the inertia frame can accept contributions from other sources due to the confinement. I think this is why some of the Japanese /Arata  - Zang experiments and other LENR experiments take weeks or even months to produce excess energy while the heated variety like Mills at Black Light Power are instant. I think this would not have languished for so long except for the misidentification of "fast" hydrogen as being fractional quantum state which is impossible. When Jan Naudts published his paper he did not emphasize the meaning - He was defending Mills but people took this to mean he was defending fractional states but his proof was from a math perspective and apparently you can solve for fractional states from a relativistic perspective outside the cavity - and so the war of disinformation has progressed. that is all IMHO of which you are certainly free to disagree.
Regards
Fran