Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Over Unity NOT Achieved!!!  (Read 29401 times)

RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Over Unity NOT Achieved!!!
« Reply #45 on: August 10, 2007, 09:09:15 PM »




Point, the speed of the alternator, the faster a magnet sweeps past a coil the higher the frequency change, the higher the frequency change the higher the coil reactance(look it up) the higher the reactance the less load it can supply, reactance is loosly the AC equivelant of DC resistance(look it up).

reactance is also where a lot of accounting errors take place, you cannot calculate reactance in the same way as resistance since current lags voltage by 90 degrees in a coil and current leads voltage by 90 degrees in a capacitor.


oouthere

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 167
Re: Over Unity NOT Achieved!!!
« Reply #46 on: August 10, 2007, 10:18:58 PM »
I will not argue that!

It's just when something says 270VAC @ .35 amps (94.5 VA) is going across a 110VAC light bulb (measured with both a DMM and o'scope) and the light is not burning brightly obviously something is amiss.  You can plug the same bulb directly into the wall at 120VAC and it will burn many times brighter.  The SM device is pulsing at 5Khz/875VDC with 10 bulbs which is well below their intended voltage and much above their intended frequency.....the same as the RV setup except the SM bulbs are really bright and the RV's is extremely dull.

Rich

RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Over Unity NOT Achieved!!!
« Reply #47 on: August 10, 2007, 10:31:36 PM »
I will not argue that!

It's just when something says 270VAC @ .35 amps (94.5 VA) is going across a 110VAC light bulb (measured with both a DMM and o'scope) and the light is not burning brightly obviously something is amiss.  You can plug the same bulb directly into the wall at 120VAC and it will burn many times brighter.  The SM device is pulsing at 5Khz/875VDC with 10 bulbs which is well below their intended voltage and much above their intended frequency.....the same as the RV setup except the SM bulbs are really bright and the RV's is extremely dull.

Rich
I understand the confusion, but not difficult to explain
There are high frequency componants that the meter and scope will be picking up, you have to consider time also, I can pulse a 120 volt lamp with 1000 volts and not have it burn out, simply by making sure that the 1000 volt pulse is very short in duration, in other words not on long enough to push the lamp filament past it's stress point.

oouthere

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 167
Re: Over Unity NOT Achieved!!!
« Reply #48 on: August 10, 2007, 11:30:54 PM »
Indeed, I understand what you are saying but the input wave into the light bulb is a perfect sine wave and a little over 100hz.  That would easily be enough to light the bulb fully imo if all of the potential were indeed current carrying potential.  The only reason I'm making the video is to show that only a small percentage (less than 20% calculated in my case) is actual current carrying voltage.

Rich

RunningBare

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
Re: Over Unity NOT Achieved!!!
« Reply #49 on: August 11, 2007, 12:27:57 AM »
Indeed, I understand what you are saying but the input wave into the light bulb is a perfect sine wave and a little over 100hz.  That would easily be enough to light the bulb fully imo if all of the potential were indeed current carrying potential.  The only reason I'm making the video is to show that only a small percentage (less than 20% calculated in my case) is actual current carrying voltage.

Rich

At a guess I would say that most of what your measuring is actually returning to the excitation coils in the alternator, but alternators are not my speciality.