The magnet ring pic reminds a lot of searl.

Hummm.. sound waves or mechanical waves need to move via pressure oscillations in air or another medium, won't work in space...

Might be an invisible undetectable (except for the gravitational forces) energy wave (shockwave) that is caused by a free highly energized (again unknown energy) neutrino or quark moving through and carrying with it residual electromagnetic or quantum energy particles (which act like air vibrations) even smaller then a quark or neutrino, which as you described is lessened by one side of planet (mass) thus pushing us towards another mass = gravity.

Nice theory, a little polishing and it won't sound so wacky, don't use sound or mechanical.
aether or unknown is better.

Thats not totally accurate... Sunlight is electromagnetic wavelength moving through space that is also known as a particle (photon) with its own mechanical force thats seen when colliding with metals to free an electron. Therefor it has been proven that mechanical waves freely propogate in space. A binary sun, solar flare, and supernova would also be great examples of mechanical waves or pressure driven particles traveling through space. Oscillations on any scale in any medium can be considered a mechanical wave or even crudely compaired to sound. Just my 2 cents...

~Dingus Mungus

@marco

I think what you are showing here is a form of Teslas' World Power Transmission method. The large magnet on the base is the world. The toroid is the transmitter. The right magnet is the local transducer and the left magnet is the receiving transducer.

Showing how immediate one can transmit through a magnetic world.

Now if you put an induction coil on the left side near the left magnet, maybe you could make some power to send back and loop it. I love loops.

Also, you have to try different voltages and distance placement between the toroid and the right magnet. See if you can eventually only have the left magnet dance, as you did by making only the right one to dance, but always with the toroid on the right hand side. This is transmission of power.

Actually, I have a few computers going back to 486's so I'll see what I can find.

If you have time, can you confirm the voltages and/or pulse types, instrument sources, instrument settings, etc., so as to document this.

Besides, I always wanted to take dancing lessons. lol

@tao

Thank you, thank you and thank you again.
Before I forget, I think it was on page 2, there is no Fig 4.

What a great read. Where did all this come from? How many hours? Incalculable.

Hello all....my first post here, so please be gentle.

@ marco

...and I was wondering what would happen if you placed another coil similar to the kick one but place it in between the two standing magnets,
Mike

hi Mike 

i have tried to put coils in between but they disturb the magnetic balance and then one magnet pulls over and sticks to it.
it's a bit of a sensitive setup, i am working on a better one.

Marco

Hi Marco,
If you remove the ring magnet nearest the coil, does the second ring magnet still move as much as with both ?

I would like to setup two of these experiments, side-by-side, together with seperate func. gens. and see if the magnets swing in sync. I am hoping that the 7.8Hz effect is a syncronised one.

One thing I did not realise before was that the coil you are using, self contained toroid, seems to be completely wrong for the setup yet it works, how strange is that.

Regards
Rob

It isn't wrong for the setup, see my page 2 of the thread. It actually is PERFECT for this setup. It isn't the B fields that are being modulated only at 7.8Hz, it is the A field potential / aetheric field that is truly being modulated at 7.8Hz, and this interacts with the magnets.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schumann_resonance
I'd bet similar results will occur when using multiples of this frequency such as 7.8Hz, 15.6Hz, 23.4Hz

cheers 

Read more on that Wiki link. You will see common harmonics (integer multiples) are not going to happen. We measure the EM portion and assume a base frequency of around 7.83. The next frequency up is base x 1.625 (varies with time, location and Sun activity). I think if the Sun wasn't distorting the magneto and Ionoshperes and the Earth perfectly spherical the base would be 6.28 Hz. (2pi)
Also thought, the base is a radiant energy signal(6.28). We just measure the EM portion(7.83). The result may be the seen beat frequency of around 1 Hz. (actually around 1.6 Hz. but also varies slightly).

I believe Marco checked this out and found only 7.8 to be interesting.

I'm glad to see this thread with a hit. I think it was the most important work done on the site. And if folks really understood the results it should be the most important to them.

Read more on that Wiki link. You will see common harmonics (integer multiples) are not going to happen. We measure the EM portion and assume a base frequency of around 7.83. The next frequency up is base x 1.625 (varies with time, location and Sun activity). I think if the Sun wasn't distorting the magneto and Ionoshperes and the Earth perfectly spherical the base would be 6.28 Hz. (2pi)
Also thought, the base is a radiant energy signal(6.28). We just measure the EM portion(7.83). The result may be the seen beat frequency of around 1 Hz. (actually around 1.6 Hz. but also varies slightly).

I believe Marco checked this out and found only 7.8 to be interesting.

I'm glad to see this thread with a hit. I think it was the most important work done on the site. And if folks really understood the results it should be the most important to them.

There are two main reasons why higher frequencys show less result.

1. The higher frequency's have less energy to move the magnets.
2. It takes more energy to move the magnets faster.

Due to these two facts i was unable to drive the setup at higher frequencys.
But i still think it's a miracle it did this, and i am looking into other shapes and sizes to rule out mechanical resonance issues.
The best hit would be a solid state setup without moving parts, but it alomost looks like there HAS to move something.

Marco.