Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Marco's Dancing Magnets.... doing the 7.8Hz dance  (Read 56809 times)

tao

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 378
Re: Marco's Dancing Magnets.... doing the 7.8Hz dance
« Reply #15 on: July 23, 2007, 11:17:30 PM »
Below I will be showing you an excellent paper by Rick Andersen. He starts off with the premise that there is an 'aetheric' field, and from there he formulates exactly how magnetic fields are made. From this he stretches his theory to account for the KNOWN FIELDS 'B' and 'A' that make up magnetic fields, but he references them to the AETHER.

I want you to ESPECIALLY pay attention to the 'Figure 8'. It CLEARLY shows that this 'A' field is like Marco said, it is pointing OUTWARD from the CENTER of a TOROIDAL COIL, and based on Rick's theory, This 'A' field is really POTENTIALS IN THE AETHER/Vacuum...

So, in Marco's dancing magnets, he is POINTING this 'A' POTENTIAL DIRECTLY AT THOSE DANCING MAGNETS. And at 7.8Hz, the magnets are moving INCREDIBLY VIOLENTLY. Is it chance?, hell no...

There MOST DEFINITELY is something going on here, something to due with the Earth's natural resonance, which is found by dividing the speed of light by the Earth's circumference, and something to do with 'aetheric' (or 'potentials in the vacuum') flows here, and especially at this 7.8Hz frequency.

What SEEMS to be happening with Marco's magnets is that he is modulating the 'aether'/'vacuum' itself with his toroidal coil, and the permanent magnets seem to be perfect 'receivers' for these modulations!

SOMETHING is happening here, remember that!






Ok, here is the paper done Rick Andersen, called 'AETHER CONTROL via an understanding of ORTHOGONAL FIELDS'


AETHER CONTROL via an understanding of ORTHOGONAL FIELDS
                              8/2/98 by Rick Andersen

With all the hints in the Alt-Sci Underground about "Caduceus" coils,
"bifilar" coils, "Moebius" coils, and "Klein Bottle" coils, I thought I'd
deliver my two cents and invite you to consider just what a magnetic field
might actually be, that we should be trying to cancel it in the hopes of
generating the elusive "Scalar" fields.
 
  What follows is an "Andersenized" version of what magnetism is, and how we
might harness its derivatives to achieve the manipulation of subtler fields,
like the legendary "CHI" or "PSI" fields, or perhaps even GRAVITY itself...



An electric charge has been defined as a "stress on the aether", a "violent
spray of virtual particle flux", etc.

A magnetic field, created around an electric charge when that charge is
being accelerated, has often been called 'the relativistic transform of an
electric field'.  Ken Amdahl in his book There Are No Electrons compares
the magnetic field to the wake left in the water after a speedboat has zoomed
by, rocking the rowboats in the interference patterns generated by the
disturbance to the water.


Here's a visualizable model postulating a "spacetime" made of "aether",
which is an energetic flux of particles or waves (depending on your scale
of observation) filling all otherwise "empty" space. A magnetic field line
is formed from the "rolling" disturbance made in the aether when an electron
"punches through" it. Other fields follow; they build in complexity with each
step up the rungs of the "ladder" of reality, whose rungs are perpendicular
to each other on the 3 directional axes of 3D-space.

Let's visualize the following progression, starting with a moving charge:

1)  An electron "plows" through the "aether", into the computer screen.
The aether "rolls" at right angles, toroidally, leaving a "wake" around the
electron's path, like a smoke ring. (Fig. 1)

<img src="http://web.archive.org/web/20040825093201/http://www.tricountyi.net/~randerse/fig1.gif">

Thus we have a rotating, "rolling" toroid of aether, curving perpendicularly
to its "roll", around an axis that itself encircles the path of the original
perturbing electron.  Let us call this "roll"-direction of the "smoke ring"
the A-FIELD, also known as the MAGNETIC VECTOR POTENTIAL. I am here defining
it as simply a rotation of the aether caused by the electron plowing through
it, like inserting a rod between rollers and noting the direction of roller
circling.

2) Since the perturbing electron is most likely going to be part of a steady
CURRENT of electrons travelling down a wire, let's therefore visualize a
whole "row" of such toroids of aether, one after another, all rolling in the
same direction as the electrons pass by. (Fig. 2)  (Understand that the toroids are rotating, not along their outer circumference like turning a steering wheel; but they're "rolling" such that their centers 'turn inside out' and move to the outer edge, then roll back into the center, etc.)

Note that the superposition of all these adjacent toroids, rotating, gives
a net vector of aether or "A-field" which gets "dragged along" after the
electron flow in the same direction; at the outer edge we find an opposite
flow of aether. Thus we have inner and outer A-field vectors which form long
loops in opposite directions, in the superposition of the individual aetheric
loops.

3) At the center of each of these individual toroids of aether, these "curls"
of the A-field, is a low-pressure axis (mentioned earlier) around which the
A-field aether rolls or rotates.

This central axis is one line of MAGNETIC FLUX, or a B-FIELD line.


Its "direction" is to the left, or counterclockwise, as the electron recedes
into the screen. (Fig. 3)  This curvature around the electron path is known
as the "left-hand rule" that electronics technicians learn in school.

<img src="http://web.archive.org/web/20040825093201/http://www.tricountyi.net/~randerse/fig3.gif">
 

4) If we now curve the electron current's path toward the left (Fig. 4),
forming the wire in which they're travelling into a loop, so that eventually
the electrons curve back around toward us and exit the screen, then curve
back into the screen to circle around again, the aetheric toroids (whose
axes constitute magnetic field lines) become aligned such that there is a net
direction of B-field into the loop, as well as an oppositely-directed
component outside the loop.  Thus we have "South" and "North" magnetic poles,
respectively. The South pole is where lines enter the loop, converging.
The North pole is where they exit the loop, diverging.

<img src="http://web.archive.org/web/20040825093201/http://www.tricountyi.net/~randerse/fig4.gif">

5) If we wind many electron loops, one after the other, along a common axis
(i.e., wind a SOLENOIDAL wire coil, and stand it up vertically on end, with
the electrons entering the top and spiralling down the coil to the bottom),
the superposition of all B-field lines will produce a concentrated vertical
"flow" of B-field lines down the center of the coil, which will then exit and
flow back up to the top of the coil in broad loops from bottom to top.
The top, where the field lines enter, is the South pole. The bottom, where
they exit, is the North pole. (Fig. 5) This whole pattern of loops at
right angles to the windings of the coil is what we call the "magnetic field"
of the solenoid, similar to that of a bar magnet.

<img src="http://web.archive.org/web/20040825093201/http://www.tricountyi.net/~randerse/fig5.gif">

6) At this point we take another look at what has happened to the A-field.
Although things are beginning to get more difficult to visualize at this
level of complexity, the net effect is that we now see the A-field as a set
of concentric circles, surrounding the solenoid up and down its length,
parallel to the windings of the coil (Fig. 6). The direction of "flow" within
these circles is apparently counter to that of the current flow in the coil.

<img src="http://web.archive.org/web/20040825093201/http://www.tricountyi.net/~randerse/fig6.gif">

The magnetic B-field exists at right angles to both the windings and the
A-field. Thus the electrical engineer defines the B-field as the "curl" of
the A-field. A magnetic line of force, again, is where the magnetic vector
potential, A, rotates or "curls" around a central, cylindrical axis. This
creates a low-pressure zone in the aether. A difference of aether pressure
produces a potential for force-- magnetic force, in this case. B = Curl A.

7) Now let's take the solenoid coil, itself, and bend it around into a curve
until the ends connect into a circle. We now have a TOROIDAL coil, and it is
here where things begin to get interesting when viewed from an "aetheric"
point of view.

<img src="http://web.archive.org/web/20040825093201/http://www.tricountyi.net/~randerse/fig7.gif">


The first thing we notice is that, for all practical purposes, all the
magnetic B-field lines are now INSIDE the coil. (Fig. 7)  This property,
especially when the coil is wound on a high-permeability core material,
gives the toroid the ability to shield itself from external magnetic fields.
This is why toroids have become so popular with radio receiver builders--
gone are the days when RF coils had to be encased in a grounded metal can so
that unwanted magnetic coupling would not occur between highly sensitive
amplifier stages.

Now let's examine the A-field of a toroid (Fig. 8 ): It resembles the B-field
of a solenoid! Thus there's a net direction of "A-field flow" through the
center hole of the donut-shaped toroidal coil. There's a so-called "North"
and "South" direction. The A-field's "lines of potential" flow into the
center hole on one side, concentrate there, then flow out on the other side
and broaden out into larger loops that eventually converge back into the coil.
So, although the magnetic (B) field of a toroid is circular in shape and
contained almost entirely inside the toroid itself, the magnetic vector
potential (A-field) is TOROIDAL in shape, like an enlarged version of the
coil itself-- and composed of, presumably, toroidal loops of aether itself,
in a preferred direction through the toroid!

At this point we need to step back and ask ourselves how we "built up" our
description of the A-field. Well, the A-field was the original "rolling" of
spacetime or aether in smoke-ring fashion around the path of a moving
electron. Therefore, the A-field or magnetic vector potential IS identically
a movement, or POTENTIAL movement, of the aether! Therefore, the toroid-wound
coil, with its magnetic field "hidden" (not "cancelled"!) inside the toroid
itself, seems to "give off" no magnetic effect at all-- but it is giving off
a flow (or potential flow) of aether through the hole of the donut, in a
definite direction.

At this point let us step back again and "plant" the entire toroid coil into
a picture in which there are vectors of "aether" coming down vertically from
above (Fig. 9), and let's orient our toroid field's polarity such that its
central hole's aetheric vectors are pointing UPWARD, against the downward-
pointing background vectors.

<img src="http://web.archive.org/web/20040825093201/http://www.tricountyi.net/~randerse/fig9.gif">

Now let's assume that those downward-pointing vectors are equivalent to a
GRAVITY FIELD. Let's say that gravity is actually a PUSH, not a PULL, in the
sense that there's an omnidirectional flux of aether-pressure at any point
in space. If you happen to be on a large planet, like Earth, the planet is
absorbing or blocking the directional component of the aether pressure that
would normally be pushing UP at you if the earth weren't there. But since
there's nothing shielding you from the pressure from ABOVE, the net effect is
that you find yourself plastered to the surface of the earth by a force that
seems to be related to the size or mass of the planet you're on--- and so
everyone has always assumed that "gravity" is some mysterious force INTERNAL
to any mass, that causes a PULL toward that mass. (Note that Isaac Newton
figured out how to calculate the MAGNITUDE of this force; he never claimed
to have figured out WHAT IT WAS or what CAUSED it.)

But if gravity really "blows", rather than "sucks", and that "blowing" is the
force of the universal aether raining down upon us in a net downward direction
because the earth is blocking the opposing flow from the other side, then
perhaps we can build devices that generate a net OPPOSING "aether-wind"---
and perhaps we can cancel those gravitational vectors to zero. And float,
weightless and inertia-free, inside a "bubble" of our own making. Now THERE'S
an interpretation of Tom Bearden's "zero-vector = electrogravity" concept
that seems to make some sense.

Alt-Sci researcher Stan Deyo has a video in which he shows movies of toroidal
puffs of air colliding with clouds of smoke; rather than dispersing one
another, the clouds seem to "part" as the toroidal "soliton" of air slips
into it; the clouds close up behind it as it travels through. One is reminded
of the way fish and dolphins slip through the water with an absolute minimum
of disturbance to the water-- or how, according to some reports, UFOs seem
to slip in and out of clouds or even thin air without much more than a
momentary distortion of the space they occupy...

So based on the above, we can imagine a possible design of an antigravity
device (or "craft") based on a toroidal aether "pump" such as I've outlined
above, whose A-field vectors would be pointing UPWARD and then outward,
then down around the toroid and back into the bottom. Such a configuration
turns the toroid into an "aetheric smoke ring" which "parts" the downward-
pointing gravitational vectors, deflecting them away from and around the
"ship". (The device may need a DIFFERENCE of aether pressure to "pump"
and produce lifting force; see below.)


If the device is high in the air, the gravitational vectors eventually resume
their original paths on their way to the earth's surface. As the craft
descends, there appears a circular "shadow" zone under the craft where the
downward vectors are increasingly replaced by an "aetheric vacuum" or sucking
action created by the upward bending of the ship's G-vectors up into the
center of the ship.

Finally the craft descends to touch the ground, or hovers a few feet above it,
or rests on leg supports; the area directly underneath experiences a net
UPWARD gravity field or "antigravity" (as does the space directly above the
device). Thus it is sometimes reported that, when curious onlookers on the
ground came too close, the cautious pilots of the craft ascended quite
suddenly, taking some of the dirt from the ground with them!

7) How might we shape this curving toroidal field into more of a straight,
homogenous, directional field? The answer would be to construct a "Helmholtz"
coil approach. Just as we can position two "hoop" coils, identically-phased,
near one another and thus create a "straight" field inside the area between
them, so we can position another toroid near the first one, and create a
homogenous, unidirectional A-field between them.

The next step would be to create a difference or GRADIENT in the aether
pressure; to do this, we would make one of our toroids of a different
diameter than the first (Fig. 10).  Placing these near each other on the same
"donut hole axis" will cause more of a cone-shaped A-field to form between
the coils; such a differential between potentials ought to give rise to a
force vector with a direction from the larger diameter coil to the smaller
one, and then out and around them as before. The formerly symmetrical field
then takes on an "imbalance" which manifests as a lifting or thrusting force.

<img src="http://web.archive.org/web/20040825093201/http://www.tricountyi.net/~randerse/fig10.gif">

Notice how the general cross-section of a "saucer"-shaped vehicle emerges if
we imagine a protective "hull" surrounding these coils.

Also notice that we are beginning to approach a "lens"-like structure, as we
"focus" our aetheric field vectors to a point above the device.

GENERALIZATION


Out of all of this we can generalize a basic relationship between magnetism
and the "aether":

1) Cause a flow of aether to rotate around a loop, and the axis of that
rotation generates a magnetic B-field line of force.

CONVERSELY,

2) Cause a circular flow of magnetic field lines, and you generate a toroidal,
directional flow of aether or A-field. Stack up a few toroids, and you can
direct the aether to flow in a straight line. Stack up a few toroids with
decreasing diameters, and you should be able to produce a gravity-like force
due to the gradient in the aetheric potential between coils.

More to come on these concepts as I develop and test them.
For now, any responses will be welcome!

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: Marco's Dancing Magnets.... doing the 7.8Hz dance
« Reply #16 on: July 24, 2007, 12:23:09 AM »
*.*
« Last Edit: July 24, 2007, 04:58:20 PM by Grumpy »

tao

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 378
Re: Marco's Dancing Magnets.... doing the 7.8Hz dance
« Reply #17 on: July 24, 2007, 06:25:49 AM »
A little visualization of the magnetic field(s) involved in the Dancing Magnets.................

You can see why the magnets move left to right and don't try to spin.........

You all need to remember/know that Marco inputs the same amount of power at each frequency!

So, obviously there is SOME LINK between the pointed 'A' potential / aetheric flow of the toroidal kick coil, and the 'A' potentials of the dancing magnets.

The REAL question that needs to be asked, 'Does the toroidal coil FEEL a LOAD AT ANY TIME?', ie. is this effect asymmetric?, ie. are we getting SEEING/RECEIVING more energy via the motion of the magnets that what WE PUT INTO the toroidal kick coil?,

No, I am not saying that the energy came from nowhere, I am saying, is the COP greater than 1? Did Marco 'hook into' a mechanism that is analogous to a windmill in wind? Are we tapping some sort of 'aetheric wind' at 7.8Hz???

If the we aren't tapping into anything, how come the magnets move more at 7.8Hz specifically, when the SAME amount of energy in input to the toroidal kick coil?

Think about it............


turbo

  • Guest
Re: Marco's Dancing Magnets.... doing the 7.8Hz dance
« Reply #18 on: July 24, 2007, 07:31:17 AM »
yes that is correct, i never changed the input power  :)
it's easy to see the 1 hz energy exchange.
if you put two magnets faced n - n to each other in two little bags and you make sure they are hanging and free to move ,and you push one, you will see the energy moves verry slowly from one magnet to the other and back.
the rate of energy exchange and movement is similair to that in the video and i do not know why magnets do that but they do and i have seen it many times..

it's like the energy of the whole field is taken over by the other magnet which in turn gives it back to the other one and so on.

Marco.



 

rensseak

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 330
Re: Marco's Dancing Magnets.... doing the 7.8Hz dance
« Reply #19 on: July 24, 2007, 04:07:50 PM »
Hi tao marco and all,

what is also curious with the dancing magnets that they are always swing in opposite direction.
(http://people.freenet.de/rensseak/dancemagnets.png)
and marco, how did you face the pools of the magnets?

regards
Norbert

specter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
Re: Marco's Dancing Magnets.... doing the 7.8Hz dance
« Reply #20 on: July 24, 2007, 04:09:25 PM »
I've made some experiments with toroidal coil. The only thing that happens - flux leakage. Magnets just attract when current is on. Non-magnetic materials are not affected (coper, aluminium, paper). No changes of mass.

7.8 Hz - is simply a resonant frequency of Marco's setup. Try different magnets (different shapes, sizes, strength) and you will get another resonant frequency.

@tao

If A-field lines outside of toroidal coil where of toroidal shape (see Fig. 8 ) there whould be magnetic field (B-field) outside the coil, because in this case the equation rot(A)=B=0 doesn't stand. rot(A)=0 means that A-vector must be a gradient of some scalar function outside the coil. Only in this case B=0 outside the coil. In case A=grad(f) (which means that B=0) lines of A-field must be uncurled and basicly start somewhere and end somewhere, similar to electrostatic field which starts and ends at charges (remember E=-grad(phi), where 'phi' is electroctatic potential). It's elementary vector analysis.

>> Below I will be showing you an excellent paper by Rick Andersen.

It's not excellent - it's missleading.  ;)

tao

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 378
Re: Marco's Dancing Magnets.... doing the 7.8Hz dance
« Reply #21 on: July 24, 2007, 04:19:21 PM »
I've made some experiments with toroidal coil. The only thing that happens - flux leakage. Magnets just attract when current is on. Non-magnetic materials are not affected (coper, aluminium, paper). No changes of mass.

7.8 Hz - is simply a resonant frequency of Marco's setup. Try different magnets (different shapes, sizes, strength) and you will get another resonant frequency.

@tao

If A-field lines outside of toroidal coil where of toroidal shape (see Fig. 8 ) there whould be magnetic field (B-field) outside the coil, because in this case the equation rot(A)=B=0 doesn't stand. rot(A)=0 means that A-vector must be a gradient of some scalar function outside the coil. Only in this case B=0 outside the coil. In case A=grad(f) (which means that B=0) lines of A-field must be uncurled and basicly start somewhere and end somewhere, similar to electrostatic field which starts and ends at charges (remember E=-grad(phi), where 'phi' is electroctatic potential). It's elementary vector analysis.

>> Below I will be showing you an excellent paper by Rick Andersen.

It's not excellent - it's missleading.  ;)


Look up the Aharonov-Bohm effect and the electron slit experiments specter. It isn't 'It's elementary vector analysis.'

In fact, look up the Telos experiments, read the links that Grumpy posted in his post.

In addition, I HIGHLY doubt that the 7.8Hz frequency is the mechanical resonance frequency for Marco's SPECIFIC SETUP... I will bet ANYTHING that that is NOT THE CASE, in FACT, I KNOW it isn't the case. I have evidence from other researchers I have been talking to and they remark about MUCH STRONGER energy transference effects between magnets around the 7-8 Hz frequency mark.

Sorry to say, but this might just be more complex than you want it to be, no offense...

specter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
Re: Marco's Dancing Magnets.... doing the 7.8Hz dance
« Reply #22 on: July 24, 2007, 04:37:15 PM »
>> Sorry to say, but this might just be more complex than you want it to be, no offense...

I'm not offended :)

Firstly Aaronov-Bohm effect is quantum effect described in terms of Schredinger's equation. So it's completly wrong to simply extrapolate it to our (non-quantum) scope. Just google for scientific papers describing effect (not Bearden's!).

tao

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 378
Re: Marco's Dancing Magnets.... doing the 7.8Hz dance
« Reply #23 on: July 24, 2007, 05:02:06 PM »
>> Sorry to say, but this might just be more complex than you want it to be, no offense...

I'm not offended :)

Firstly Aaronov-Bohm effect is quantum effect described in terms of Schredinger's equation. So it's completly wrong to simply extrapolate it to our (non-quantum) scope. Just google for scientific papers describing effect (not Bearden's!).


I do realize this is a quantum effect, and I am not solely quoting Bearden. Bearden 'extrapolates' quite a bit...

The issue is, I have collaborating evidence that in this 7-8 Hz range, a seeming 'transference' (or 'additive effect') of magnetic fields is greater.

I do realize, it will soon become a  'put up or shut up' situation, of which I KNOW. Yet, I need to formulate the best testing setups, so as to alleviate unnecessary $ loss to my person :P ...


turbo

  • Guest
Re: Marco's Dancing Magnets.... doing the 7.8Hz dance
« Reply #24 on: July 24, 2007, 06:42:44 PM »
Hi tao marco and all,

what is also curious with the dancing magnets that they are always swing in opposite direction.
(http://people.freenet.de/rensseak/dancemagnets.png)
and marco, how did you face the pools of the magnets?

regards
Norbert

well actually in those speaker magnets, one side of the disk is north and one side is south..
the magnets were placed same poles facing each other so that would be on one side n - n  and the other s - s.
so they were repelling each other.

Marco.

turbo

  • Guest
Re: Marco's Dancing Magnets.... doing the 7.8Hz dance
« Reply #25 on: July 24, 2007, 08:41:56 PM »
okay so i'm happy to say i have recreated another setup with diffrent magnets and i'm in for another video  :)
hopefully i will be shooting it this weekend and i am now polishing the magnets for improved movement, there is still some glue on them and that's not good so i have to remove that.

hopefully we will see the dance once again  :D

Marco.

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: Marco's Dancing Magnets.... doing the 7.8Hz dance
« Reply #26 on: July 24, 2007, 09:16:20 PM »
Don't assume that the magnetic field inside the toroidal ring stays there.  Toroids will interact with external fields and have been replaced in some power electronics applications with air-cores due to troublesome external magnetic fields.

BEP

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1289
Re: Marco's Dancing Magnets.... doing the 7.8Hz dance
« Reply #27 on: July 25, 2007, 12:30:55 AM »
You should find that the field is very flexible on each magnet. Flexible like a bubble that will not break. When one is moved toward the other the other bounces off. When that same one is drawn away the other will follow. At the right frequency of movement they will act as is they had a rubberband between them.

Why 7.8? My understanding is this:

Magnets do not produce a field. They only shape or focus the field they are in. On Earth that field moves best at 7.8 because of the size of the Earth. I don't believe the Earth's mag field is generated by perm mags rather by electro dynamo effect.

This is why we have a Faraday generator paradox and why spinning a magnet on its axis does not rotate the field of that magnet - because it doesn't have a field.

As I have found a very long time ago you should find now that any magnet setup will dance best at 7.8. - unless you move to Mars.

>> Oh what they hey? ... Imagine what might happen if you build a transformer to work at 7.8 (with a PM core). We'll all be doing things in three's and driving cars by pushing rods into boxes instead of turning a key. You'll need to put a space between the windings and the core. An E field cancelling toroid would be nice. Then the secondary could just be a loose coil of wire passing through the center like two interlocked rings.

Don't forget there is an international treaty banning electronics under 16Hz! And the number 7.8 isn't always correct. It changes hour by hour sometimes.
« Last Edit: July 25, 2007, 02:41:20 AM by BEP »

tao

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 378
Re: Marco's Dancing Magnets.... doing the 7.8Hz dance
« Reply #28 on: July 25, 2007, 03:15:32 AM »
Very well put BEP...

Nice analogy to the rubberband, that does make sense, and seem that way. I have similar thoughts to you about why 7.8Hz was the best frequency. I liked your addition of the Faraday generator paradox and field notions, good to now KNOW these additional 'pieces' of this puzzle.

I also agree about making a generator out of all this. This is why I initiated this thread again, even though by many these dancing magnets were only seen as a 'neat trick'. There is just 'something' integral being displayed here, something that can be exploited for OU, at least that is what I feel...


Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: Marco's Dancing Magnets.... doing the 7.8Hz dance
« Reply #29 on: July 25, 2007, 06:03:26 AM »
http://www.maxwellsociety.net/PhysicsCorner/FaradayDisc/faraday.html

Faraday also found that a rotating magnet produced a magnetic vortex.  (I think it weas a bar magnet - have to check his notes - three volumes of them.)   Had he explored this further, rather than the electric field, mankind would be exploring the universe in person.  He was so close.

By the way, A-field need not be conservative, it can produce current - the teach this in college. 

Spin does not cancel.  My understanding is that it expands or compresses.  Guess Lenz didn't get hold of that little aspect of nature.  Walter Russell stated that this expansion and contraction is all that is required for everything in the universe.  Kinda goes with Marinov's statement that there are no fields - only the potentials.