@Shruggedatlas:

Wow!  The pulses lead out the energy from the pendulum spheres.  Please be careful to not burn your house down with all of that excess energy. It might be hard to contain.

Bill

An important meeting today.

The key factors for the success of this meeting are:

(1) Good presentation on the Lee-Tseung Theory
(2) Discussion of the various working prototypes
(3) Identifying the products to develop
(4) Evaluate the talent, time and resources needed
(5) Spread the message of benefiting the World

We expect much insults.  Hope the training in this forum helps.

The meeting lasted from 9:30 am to 7 pm.  Thanks to the insult training on this forum, I was able to keep my calm in front of all the bullets.

Some of the bullets were from senior engineers in the Top Research Institutes including some from the China Space Program.

They were all smiles  at the end.  They were happy to try out the Flying Saucer concept.  Some wanted to implement the Wang generator and the Pulse Motor.

Thanks once more.  I do not mind insults.  They are good for the soul.

Lawrence Tseung
Insults Lead Out calmness at important meeting.  The heart will not pulse uncontrollably.

Hold your horsies Bill and Shruggedatlas, stop poking fun at poor Lawrence.

He is right, you know.

Consider this:

Spin a flywheel faster and faster and faster, it starts creaking and you go still faster and faster, it starts to wobble but you still don't stop until BANNNNGGGGG the whole shebang explodes and bits of shit fly all over the place.
[/u]

You should have balanced it properly.

On the "forum" it says:

Quote

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Not much of a FORUM, is it??

Hans von Lieven

On your site I read this:
http://www.keelytech.com/
HANS VON LIEVEN

I was born in 1939 in a small rural town in Germany. My family was not wealthy, though we were not poor by any stretch of the imagination. I hold a degree in mechanical engineering, majoring in physics. I do not want to give my credentials here, judge me by my work, not by what you think my professional status might be.

Now retired, I live in Sydney, Australia, where I have been for many years

In the early 1970's I read Clara Bloomfield Moore's book about Keely. I was instantly intrigued. The various accounts of Keely and his achievements seemed to be full of contradictions.

On one hand he appears to be some metaphysical dreamer, yet the machines he built and the methodical thoroughness with which he conducted his experiments belie this.

Having read much of Clara Bloomfield Moore's writings she strikes me as a silly woman with too much education and too much money, incapable of having an original thought of her own, the type that Helena Blavatsky cultivated and filled with her peculiar brand of metaphysical crap.

To get to know Keely as a man and technician meant I had to bypass much of her account and rely on things he said and on the evidence provided by a number of photographs of his devices, as well as contemporary newspaper articles.

Having a reasonable grounding in technical and scientific subjects as well as musical theory I judged the man as an honest researcher trying to come to grips with problems and phenomena well outside the scientific understanding of his time and having to work with comparatively primitive research instruments barely suitable for the task he had set himself.

That he achieved something at all is staggering.

But did he?

Keely built a bewildering array of massive machines with almost unbelievable precision. He demonstrated his devices in his laboratory and on exhibitions repeatedly. No-one understood how they worked, and his explanations, couched in an obscure terminology, only helped to spread the confusion.

History has labelled him a fraud, though he was never caught doing anything fraudulent.

I have endeavoured to look at his machines in the light of today's understanding of science, paying scant attention to his theories and his metaphysical model.

Working mainly with photographs and descriptions of his machines, his stated observations of unexplained phenomena and his account of technical difficulties met on the way, I have come up with some startling revelations that seem to indicate that Keely's technology is real.

I leave it for you to judge.

The following paper is still very much work in progress and there is much to be done yet. Any comments, criticisms and suggestions are welcome.

But no more talk.

Here it is.

To contact me click here.

not much of a website now is it?

On your site I read this:

http://www.keelytech.com/
HANS VON LIEVEN

I was born in ...quote]

not much of a website now is it?

Load of BS

Are you kidding or just doped too much already?

On this page it even says:

http://www.keelytech.com/qa.html

This section is not activated yet.

You are a BS talker.

Drink less; not only you can?t see well but your face is already falling apart.

Quote from: hansvonlieven on October 05, 2007, 09:33:22 AM

Hold your horsies Bill and Shruggedatlas, stop poking fun at poor Lawrence.

What are you verbally menstruating now Hans boy??

Better get yourself a job, looser. And get some education too. Or vice-versa, for better chances. 

By the way, what?s your main qualification, ?magnet-man (in repel mode) go-there??

Sharing some juicy discussions:

"When you push a stationary pendulum horizontally, it will rise up.  I cannot dispute that.  But I am saying that the energy required to raise  up comes from the horizontal force.  Nothing is Lead Out.  This is the conventional teaching."

"Conventional teaching also says a horizontal force cannot do work in the vertical direction unless some kind of machine is used to change its drection?  What kind of machine is hidden behind the simple pendulum?"

"I can accept that we are immersed in gravitational fields.  I can even accept that we are interchanging gravitational energy with one another all the time.  But I cannot accept that the simple pulsed pendulum  has a COP of greater than 1."

"I can follow your line of reasoning.  However, if you are right, I have to re-learn  everything.  My electrial engineering training tells me that I have to find fuel  for my generators.  You are telling me that I can use gravitational energy that is free.  You are telling me that I can even use Electron Motion Energy  when I am in outer space.  It was a shock to me when I first read the information.  I am still shaking from that shock."

"You mean that US, USSR, China have been wasting billions on their space programs.  You mean a Flying Saucer with your type of descriptions could replace them all."

"We have been doing Energy Research for over 10 years.  We focused on wind, solar, tidal and other renewable sources of Energy.  What would happen to our funding if your technology is correct?  Does it mean that we have to study and implement your Lee-Tseung theory for us to survive?"

"Even though I do not agree with your theory totally, I consider that this is a worthwhile trip for me."

Greetings all this was given to me by our on line university Author Patrick Kelly

"If I understand Lawrence Tseung's theory correctly, the main "lead-out" of gravitic free-energy is from each IMPACT of a weight (or thrust) in the direction of rotation.  In other words, a smoothly rotating flywheel has no free-energy gain while a pulsed flywheel has serious energy gains.  Yes, providing a weight imbalance will cause the wheel to rotate but for generating serious drive power, the wheel has to be subjected to pulsing.  You see this in the John Bedini scaled up self-runner which has kilowatts of excess power thanks to being driven by a pulsed DC motor, and to a lesser degree in the Adams motor  with its lightweight rotor.  The heavier the rotor and the greater its diameter, the greater the free-energy gain from gravity.

If Lawrence's theory is correct, then it is a major step forward in the free-energy scene.  The Chinese developments seem to show that his theory is correct."

Dear Ash,

I almost overlooked your post.  Patrick Kelly is one of the few who grasped the idea.  A smooth rotating  flywheel will not lead out gravitational or electron motion energy. An object travelling with x velocity along a straight line will continue forever if there were no external force (Newton's Laws of Motion).  In circular motion, a spinning object with x rpm will spin forever if the centripetal force does not change.  No energy is needed to keep the velocity  or the rpm x!

The Pulse will accelerate the rotation of the cylinder.  There is energy gain in the acceleration. The drawing out of energy by external load or friction will decelerate the rotation of the cylinder.

The gain in energy is partly from the Pulse and partly from the Lead Out energy.

I am glad that the Bedini scaled up self-runner can confirm that.  I shall contact him and produce a win-win.

Thank you for your posting.

Lawrence Tseung
International coorperation Leads Out  benefits to the World. My underlining Lead Out and Pulse did have seeds in fertile soil.