Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 84217
  • *Latest: Jarik

  • *Total Posts: 897735
  • *Total Topics: 15821
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 4
  • *Guests: 12
  • *Total: 16

Author Topic: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory  (Read 1850158 times)

Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #390 on: October 02, 2007, 08:47:53 AM »
Lawrence:
.....

I saw the slide show done by your friend. The results were not what I would have anticipated if asked beforehand.  Interesting.

Bill

Dear Bill,

That is why it is extremely important  to actually do the Ms. Forever Yuen Experiment.  I shall explain the Lee-Tseung theory based on the results.  Those results can be reproduced  easily worldwide.

If you have two magnets, a string and a stop watch, you can repeat it yourself.  The significance will be explained in the coming posts.

I managed to dig up some notes from my Tsing Hua Trip.  One of the possible integral treatment is now attached.  Improvement and further editing may still be required.

Lawrence

Actual Experiments Lead Out verifiable experiments.  The fast heartbeats or pulses may go back to normal.
« Last Edit: October 02, 2007, 12:57:00 PM by ltseung888 »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #390 on: October 02, 2007, 08:47:53 AM »

Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
The patent exchange document
« Reply #391 on: October 02, 2007, 11:35:45 PM »
The attached patent exchange document  It was used by us to argue our case with the PCT patent office.

I have edited the patent exchange document to focus on:

(1)   Gravitational energy can be lead out by a horizontal pulse force  exerted on the pendulum bob from the stationary position (first pulse , Figure A1)

(2)   Gravitational energy can be lead out by a non-horizontal pulse force exerted on the pendulum bob when the bob swings to its highest position (second and subsequent pulses. Figure A2)

(3)   Gravitational energy can be lead out by any pulse force  (may not be most efficient) exerted on the pendulum bob. (Figure A3)

(4)   Examples of working prototypes (Figure B1, B2 etc.)

(5)   The key point is Pulse Force can Lead Out Gravitational Energy.

Hope that document helps in the understanding.

Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Shielding
« Reply #392 on: October 03, 2007, 02:01:47 AM »
Shielding

The concept of shielding is extremely important.  It is tied with the concept of CoE.

For example, if we could do gravitational shielding (which is NOT possible), we could:
(1)   Shield and raise a weight up to height h.  The effective g is much less than 9.8m/s/s.  The energy required is much less than mgh
(2)   Take away the shield and let the weight drop down to do work.  The energy that can be used is mgh.
(3)   Repeat from (1) and we have created a perpetual motion machine.

However, we know that we could do magnetic shielding or electrostatic shielding  (e.g. with Mu-metal or flux change in coil).  What does it mean???  Are we creating energy or just Leading Out Energy???

Lawrence Tseung
Shielding Leads Out  the possibility of perpetual motion machines.  This increases the Pulse rate.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Shielding
« Reply #392 on: October 03, 2007, 02:01:47 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Mr.Entropy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 195
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #393 on: October 03, 2007, 03:46:16 AM »
We assume that the Pulse Force is long enough to let the pendulum swing fully to its new position.  At the new position, the pendulum stopped momentarily to change direction to swing back.

Well, OK, but that is not a pulse force.  It takes a long time to get to the point at which it stops.

Quote
At the new momentary stationary position, Fs must be equal and opposite to the resultant force of Fp and Fg.

That is incorrect.  If the total force were zero, the bob would remain still instead of accelerating downward.

Quote
You are making the assumption that the force vector Fs [from the string] is always at right angles to the displacement vector D.  In constant circular motion such as the Earth going around the Sun, this is correct.  However, in accelerating and decelerating circular motion, this is incorrect.

As as long as the string is taught (and not stretchy), regardless of the accelerating or decelerating motion, the motion is at a right angle to the force from the string.  Strings are honest, in that they always point in the direction they are pulling!  And circular motion is always at a right angle to the radius.  That is why the string does no work (pulse force or not), why the lorentz force does no work, why the coriolis force does no work, etc.

Quote
As you have rightly pointed out, without the use of Integrals, we have to make certain assumptions and simplifications.  These assumptions and simplifications may be inexact or even incorrect.  Arguing over inexact or incorrect assumptions will waste much energy and time.

Well, I was talking about a pulse force.  What I said is also true for every tiny moment during the application of a longer horizontal force.  The integration is simply summing up all those little zeros to find that the string, in total, does zero work.

When I initially read your post, Lawrence, I was quite dissappointed to find that you had spoken so clearly, but incorrectly above.  You have certainly seem to have visited some knowledgeable people at Tsing Hua University -- people who certainly know what I'm talking about, and would not normally countenance those kinds of errors.

Is it possible that, before you started talking to them, you actually showed them something that worked?  That would cause them to be somewhat respectful, mistakes or no...  Perhaps you did.

Cheers,

Mr. Entropy

Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
The significance of the Ms. Forever Yuen Experiment
« Reply #394 on: October 03, 2007, 04:12:30 AM »
The significance of the Ms. Forever Yuen Experiment

Many of you have downloaded the PowerPoint presentation file of Ms. Forever Yuen.  Some may have repeated the experiment.  Some may have taken out the toy purchased from the Over Unity.com store.  Some may ask ? it is so simple, what is its significance?

Before I answer that, I shall quote a few significant experiments in history:

(1)   Galileo experiment of a feature and a rock falling at same rate in vacuum.  Previously, people believed in Aristotle?s words that a heavier object falls faster.

(2)   Newton?s Apple.  Millions and generations of people have seen objects falling to the ground.  Who established the foundation of Modern Physics?

(3)   Lee-Tseung Pulsed Pendulum.  Millions and generations of people have pushed the swing.  How many realized that the Push or Pulse could lead out Gravitational Energy?
 
(4)   Ms. Forever Yuen Magnetic Pendulum Experiment.  A toy is already available from the Over Unity.com store.  How many people realize its significance.

I shall list the significance of the Ms. Forever Yeun Magnetic Pendulum Experiment here:

(1)   We can Lead Out Electron Motion Energy  (magnetic portion) by superimposing magnetic fields on gravity fields.

(2)   We can Lead Out Electron Motion Energy (magnetic portion) even without  having any gravitational field.

(3)   We can use the repulsion property  of the magnetic field to reduce the effective gravitational constant g from 9.8m/s/s to 0 or even negative.  This means we can make a device float or rise.

(4)   We can make the magnetic field in any direction  ? not just towards the center of the Earth.  Our Cosmic Energy Machine can orientate in any direction.

(5)   We can turn the magnetic field on or off.  The magnitude of the field can be many times  that of Gravity.  This gives rise to the Magneto Propulsion Unit that can power the Flying Saucer.  Nothing needs to be ejected out.

(6)   Our new space ships can be totally self-contained.  (Food, energy etc could be recycled.  Nothing needs to be ejected for traveling).

(7)   There will be a New Order for the World.  It is no longer the survival of the fittest.  Even the weakest can destroy Earth totally.  This will force the New Order of Mutual Respect and Coorperation.

Lawrence Tseung
Ms. Yuen experiments Lead Out New Order.  The Pulse Rate of World Development will be much faster.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

The significance of the Ms. Forever Yuen Experiment
« Reply #394 on: October 03, 2007, 04:12:30 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #395 on: October 03, 2007, 09:46:06 AM »

Is it possible that, before you started talking to them, you actually showed them something that worked?  (*** They already have working prototypes on Cosmic Energy Machines for years.) That would cause them to be somewhat respectful, mistakes or no...  Perhaps you did.

Cheers,

Mr. Entropy


Dear Mr. Entropy,

Before our visit, they already read everything about the Lee-Tseung Patent and Theory.  I believe the China Patent Office also talked to them first.  Remember we went up on their invitation.  They paid for lodging and meals.

In their possession and knowledge are the working prototypes of:
(1)   The Electricity Magnifier  that could magnify the Input 30 times for over 10 years. None of their top people could explain why.  You can check the video on this thread.  They knew about it since 1996.

(2)   The Dr. Liang Xingren patent and the Car.  Some of their professors sat on the car, drove it and looked for engines or other sources of energy.  What they saw was what was described in the Published Patent.  You can check the video and the Translated Patent on this thread.  They accepted that the Car worked but disagreed with the Ying-Yang explanation.  They sat in the car in 2000.

(3)   The Chao Ching San Car.  The car was driven 1500 km to Beijing with news coverage.  One of them was CCTV10, the Official Chinese News Agency. Tsing Hua University was one of the consulted parties  on the certification.  The Beijing Journey was in April 2006.

Our first meeting with them was in July 2006.  More meetings were in September and October 2006.

They probably have many more  since they are the Consultants the China Patent Office used on New Patents. I personally knew that they had full information of the above three.  We discussed those three inventions in our meetings.  In their words, "The Lee-Tseung theory is the only theory at present  that can explain the energy source of the three above inventions. "

Once we explained the boat in calm waters and good sunshine, they immediately knew that the CoE was never violated  in the Lee-Tseung Theory.  All they need to do was to focus on the Lead Out  concept.  They did the Wang four-legged stool experiment  during our meeting in our presence.  They mentioned that they also did the equivalent of the Ms Forever Yuen magnetic pendulum experiment.   

Thus, it was very easy for us to discuss the theory with them.  They said that they would perfect the theory and write the scientific papers.  I took some notes and left the vigorous proofing of the Integral to them. (The CIA or the Like screwed things up for us ? you can read that story on this thread and on the Wang Invention http://www.energyfromair.com/beijing/wang3.htm).

We are extremely confident  that we are right because we have already worked with a number of inventors who could not identify the source of energy of their inventions.  We used the Lee-Tseung Lead Out theory to explain and improved their inventions.

Lawrence Tseung
Having a working prototype  generating electricity in front of you Leads Out a different prospective.
« Last Edit: October 03, 2007, 11:41:43 AM by ltseung888 »

Offline tinu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 630
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #396 on: October 03, 2007, 12:42:20 PM »
Mr. Tseung,

Now I have a very clear picture of your skills. They are very basic in physics, well below high-grade level.

You might have catch me in a bad day but I?d say it?s definitely time for you to revise your background and stop claiming non-sense ?supported by? outrageous elementary mistakes.

You say that

"?there will be THREE forces involved in the pendulum system.

(1) The Weight of the Pendulum (or more exactly m *g where m is the mass and g is the gravitational acceleration at the surface of the Earth which is 9.8 m/s/s approxiately.  Please yell if you don't understand the statement)

(2) The Horizontal Pulse Force F (Note that it is an externally applied Force controlled by the Engineer. )
 
(3) The Tension of the String (If there were no string, the pendulum will not swing back)
?
The relationship of the forces MUST obey the Law of Parallelogram of Forces.  That set of Laws is taught at Mechanics 101 in secondary school physics."

and from your file (Integral.doc file) where you also say that

"Component B is the Horizontal Energy Component expressed as
    Integral(T1(x)sin(a)dx) 
where T1(x) is the varying tension of the string as a function of the x position variable
Angle a is the varying angle due to the swing
dx is the horizontal displacement"

I simply deduce that you assume that the above vector forces (1+2+3) sum zero.
This is an elementary mistake (they obviously do not sum zero) and you need to go back and read again Newtonian mechanics.
That's BASICS, Mr. Tseung! Well below high-grade!

Actually, you very clearly show again your low level of physics understanding, by mistakenly saying (Integral.doc file) that
?T1(x)sin(a) is effectively equal to Fp (Horizontal Pulse Force).?

That?s lack of basic knowledge, Mr. Tseung. The correct equation is
Fp-T1(x)sin(a)=m*acc
See? Newton. In it?s simplest form.
Any astute 14-15 years old student understands it from the first glance. You don?t.  ;D

You might have been lectured in some universities but guest lecturers are common and they do not prove a thing. It doesn?t mean that any of those guest lecturers are somehow competent. It is just a leisure course for summer time and/or on other various occasions. Such lectures usually cover marginal subjects. That?s for clarifying another issue.

So, I stongly suggest you stop posting non-sense.

That?s because, basically I do not understand how you can have the guts to impertinently come in front of the world when you know that your intellectual skills and training in physics and math do not value much at all!  ???
You also drag a fine person along ? Ms. Forever. Let her study real things and let her make a valuable and solid life!

I'm sorry to say it frankly, but your ?science? is crap.
(Actually you said it first in your equations.
I just used my physics knowledge to translate it in common language that everyone can understand.)

So, your 'kung-fu' is very weak, Mr. Tseung.
Very, very weak?

Tinu

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #396 on: October 03, 2007, 12:42:20 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #397 on: October 03, 2007, 12:53:14 PM »
Dear Tinu,

Thank you for your insults.  Please do it more,  I need that as training for my coming meetings.

Someone asked - Who is my partner?

The simple answer is God (may that be Jesus, Budda or Allah).  With God as a partner, I can think big.  I can let others shine.

Lawrence
God as Partner Leads Out  peace.  The heart will not Pulse that much unnecessarily.
« Last Edit: October 03, 2007, 02:03:21 PM by ltseung888 »

Offline tinu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 630
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #398 on: October 03, 2007, 01:05:39 PM »
Dear Tinu,

Thank you for your insults.  Please do it more,  I need that as training for my coming meetings.

Lawrence

Please correct your equations.
They are the real insults!

Tinu

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #398 on: October 03, 2007, 01:05:39 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #399 on: October 03, 2007, 01:59:31 PM »
Dear Tinu,

Thank you for your insults.  Please do it more,  I need that as training for my coming meetings.

Lawrence

Please correct your equations.
They are the real insults!

Tinu

Dear Tinu,

Let me quote steorn:

All great truth start as blasphemies.

I shall let my errors or mistakes if any  to be seen by the World.  The Professors and Students at Tsing Hua University already promised to correct and improve  them.  Let them shine.

In discovering something new, not every path is a straight line.  Falling flat with face covered in mud is to be expected.

Lawrence Tseung
Showing one's possible errors Leads Out  lesson for the World.

Offline Freezer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 414
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #400 on: October 03, 2007, 02:11:36 PM »
Let me quote steorn:

All great truth start as blasphemies.

I shall let my errors or mistakes if any  to be seen by the World.  The Professors and Students at Tsing Hua University already promised to correct and improve  them.  Let them shine.

In discovering something new, not every path is a straight line.  Falling flat with face covered in mud is to be expected.

Lawrence Tseung
Showing one's possible errors Leads Out  lesson for the World.

All great truths begin as blasphemies. - George Bernard Shaw, Annajanska, 1919

Great words.  I do believe this is the case, as It's hard to throw away what you believe as truth, but as we have seen in history, our reality has changed, and things we thought as fact were actually wrong.  How soon can we as a society change our ways before it becomes too late?  I believe we are nearing that time, if not already surpassed it.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #400 on: October 03, 2007, 02:11:36 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline tinu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 630
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #401 on: October 03, 2007, 02:22:37 PM »
Dear Tinu,

Let me quote steorn:

All great truth start as blasphemies.

I shall let my errors or mistakes if any  to be seen by the World.  The Professors and Students at Tsing Hua University already promised to correct and improve  them.  Let them shine.

In discovering something new, not every path is a straight line.  Falling flat with face covered in mud is to be expected.

Lawrence Tseung
Showing one's possible errors Leads Out  lesson for the World.

 :'( ..."Touche, pussycat!"

How about talking ?kung-fu? instead of poetry?   ;D
Tinu

Offline shruggedatlas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 549
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #402 on: October 03, 2007, 03:14:20 PM »
All great truth start as blasphemies.

You conveniently forgot the rest of the quote rom Mr. Shaw: "But not all blasphemies become great truths."

Anyway, as soon as you mentioned flying saucers and new world order, I think it should be pretty apparent to everyone what's going on.

Offline Freezer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 414
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #403 on: October 03, 2007, 03:22:33 PM »
All great truth start as blasphemies.

You conveniently forgot the rest of the quote rom Mr. Shaw: "But not all blasphemies become great truths."

Anyway, as soon as you mentioned flying saucers and new world order, I think it should be pretty apparent to everyone what's going on.

Flying saucers?  What?  Tell me what's going on.  I'm always interested when someone mentions flying saucers.

Offline shruggedatlas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 549
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #404 on: October 03, 2007, 03:33:24 PM »
All great truth start as blasphemies.

You conveniently forgot the rest of the quote rom Mr. Shaw: "But not all blasphemies become great truths."

Anyway, as soon as you mentioned flying saucers and new world order, I think it should be pretty apparent to everyone what's going on.

Flying saucers?  What?  Tell me what's going on.  I'm always interested when someone mentions flying saucers.

See reply 395.

 

OneLink