Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory  (Read 2180694 times)

ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5340 on: March 01, 2010, 11:05:33 PM »
Summary Description of FLEET in English and in Chinese

Forever Leadout Electromagnetic Energy Transformer (FLEET)

FLEET is basically a pulsed DC transformer with embedded magnets. The operating principle is as follow:

When we put a pulsed DC current to the primary coil of the transformer, it will create a changing magnetic flux in the core.  This will be picked up by the secondary coil of the transformer.  If we put a magnet as part of the core material of the transformer, the magnetic path will be affected.  In one direction of the current, the magnetic flux would be opposed by that from the magnet.  In the other direction, it will be enhanced by the magnet. According to the lead-out energy theory, electron motion energy from the surrounding will go into the system.  Our task is to determine whether this phenomenon is true. If true, what is the best combination (current, magnet, coil, core material, frequency etc)?  If the COP(output over input) were greater than one, can we design loopback mechanisms to constantly lead out and use this extra energy.

脈衝永磁引能機

當我們把脈衝直流電放進變壓器的第一組線圈,就會產生磁力線的變動。這些變動會伸延至第二組的線圈內。若我們把一個永磁鐵放在變壓器中,替代一部份鐵片,它便會影響磁力線的變動。在一個方向(線圈的磁極和永磁的磁極相斥),功能會被削弱。在另一方向(線圈的磁極和永磁的磁極相吸),效率會被提高。
根據引出能量理論,附近的電子轉動能量會被引到機器內。我們的實驗是要證明理論是否正確,若正確的話,甚麼是最好的組合(電流的大小,磁鐵的強弱,線圈的多少,變壓器的材料,頻率等)。若COP(輸出能量/輸入能量)能大於一,我們便可設計回饋電路,不停地利用這些引出的能量。



ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5341 on: March 03, 2010, 11:53:50 PM »
Meeting at the Institute of Energy of Hong Kong  on March 3

Member A: “How did you come up with this idea of FLEET.  It is too simple.”

Tseung: “We have been working with Pulsed DC for months with the Tong Wheel.  When Rasa asked whether we could bring something small to Hangzhou, I ruled out a tiny Tong Wheel.  The focus went to motionless lead-out energy devices.”

Member B: “The only breakthrough you really needed was – will Pulsed DC go through a transformer.”

Tseung: “Once that was confirmed, I was sure that we were on the right path.  I posted on the Internet and a Forum member Mags immediately worked on it.  He got the result comparing case 2 and case 3 as 1:1.5.”

Member A: “You did not apply for a patent.  Everyone can compete on equal grounds.  What is our special advantage?”

Member C: “None.  Except that we can touch and feel the Tong Wheel and the C core.”

Member B: “It is like eye glass shops.  There can be hundreds.  It is a matter of whether you want to enter such business.  This FLEET is definitely along the lines of Institute of Energy.”

Member D: “Are we free to talk to any Company.  My gut feel is that some Companies will pick up the idea and make money.  They may not even say thank you.”

Tseung: “I do not mind so long as the World benefits.”

Paul-R

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2086
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5342 on: March 04, 2010, 01:17:21 PM »
Meeting at the Institute of Energy of Hong Kong  on March 3
“The only breakthrough you really needed was – will Pulsed DC go through a transformer.”
Surely, it will. Transformers transmit changing levels. But there will be BEMF spikes of prodigious
voltage to deal with - a need for a rectifier using 1000v diodes and possibly dumping it all in a battery.

ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5343 on: March 04, 2010, 03:28:53 PM »
Dr. Raymond Ting and his Pulse Wheel.

He said, "Not all imitations will succeed.  I just used some material at hand.  THe wheel spins but show no sign of overunity."

This applies to almost any system.  If one did not do the mathematics and did not replicate exactly, the chance of failing to achieve expected results is high.

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5344 on: March 04, 2010, 06:52:33 PM »
er. who's listening to delusions?

cheers
chrisC
pavlov's doggie is back... here boy! i got a bone (question) for you to chew on... what purpose does your continual insulting of larry serve?

chrisC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5345 on: March 04, 2010, 07:33:09 PM »
pavlov's doggie is back... here boy! i got a bone (question) for you to chew on... what purpose does your continual insulting of larry serve?

@WilbyUrinated

Well, retards will never understand what the purpose is despite several rounds of challenges to old Tseung to prove O.U and not just talk. If you are able to read Mr. Ting's own words(?), there is NO O.U in the Tong wheel. Can you understand English, you retard? Or is it that old Tseung has urinated on his pet dog so much this dog cannot tell piss from water?

Enough said. Retards will always be retards, they are born that way.

cheers
chrisC

chrisC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5346 on: March 04, 2010, 08:39:59 PM »
Dr. Raymond Ting and his Pulse Wheel.
... THe wheel spins but show no sign of overunity."

...

Well, after years of delusions, the final analysis straight from the horses mouth?

The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth!

cheers
chrisC


WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5347 on: March 05, 2010, 05:35:55 AM »
@WilbyUrinated

Well, retards will never understand what the purpose is despite several rounds of challenges to old Tseung to prove O.U and not just talk. If you are able to read Mr. Ting's own words(?), there is NO O.U in the Tong wheel. Can you understand English, you retard? Or is it that old Tseung has urinated on his pet dog so much this dog cannot tell piss from water?

Enough said. Retards will always be retards, they are born that way.

cheers
chrisC
logical fallacy as a response from you... how typical. so for sake of argument, let us say larry doesn't have OU... what purpose do your continual insults and name calling serve? other than to demonstrate just how immature you are.

Paul-R

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2086
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5348 on: March 05, 2010, 01:20:45 PM »
logical fallacy as a response from you... how typical. so for sake of argument, let us say larry doesn't have OU... what purpose do your continual insults and name calling serve? other than to demonstrate just how immature you are.
It earns him a wage.

chrisC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5349 on: March 07, 2010, 03:38:00 AM »
It earns him a wage.

@Paul-R

You can't pay me enough to live in your part of the (rotten) woods and you certainly won't be able to afford to live in my neighborhood. Oh, you definitely won't be able to afford to pay me enough to watch old Tseung's posting for O.U truths!

Haha, you're a real wanker.

cheers
chrisC

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5350 on: March 07, 2010, 04:03:18 AM »
@Paul-R

You can't pay me enough to live in your part of the (rotten) woods and you certainly won't be able to afford to live in my neighborhood. Oh, you definitely won't be able to afford to pay me enough to watch old Tseung's posting for O.U truths!

Haha, you're a real wanker.

cheers
chrisC
when did paul ask you to live in his neighborhood? when did he say he wants to live in yours?

are you mental?

chrisC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5351 on: March 07, 2010, 04:14:32 AM »
when did paul ask you to live in his neighborhood? when did he say he wants to live in yours?

are you mental?

You are definitley NOT intelligent! No wonder you live sandwiched between the railway tracks in public housing! I guessed born like that has it's disadvantages.

cheers
chrisC

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5352 on: March 07, 2010, 04:17:24 AM »
You are definitley NOT intelligent! No wonder you live sandwiched between the railway tracks in public housing! I guessed born like that has it's disadvantages.

cheers
chrisC
ding ding, ring the bell and pavlov's doggie is back with another logical fallacy for a response. have you ever used a cogent argument? do you even know what one is? i noticed you avoided answering my questions again.

chrisC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5353 on: March 07, 2010, 04:19:14 AM »
ding ding, ring the bell and pavlov's doggie is back with another logical fallacy for a response. i noticed you avoided answering my questions again.

WTF are you that I should answer your question/s?

That clearly show's you're as intelligent as old Tseung's piss dog.

cheers
chrisC

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5354 on: March 07, 2010, 04:20:50 AM »
WTF are you that I should answer your question/s?

That clearly show's you're as intelligent as old Tseung's piss dog.

cheers
chrisC
you don't have to, but as i have pointed out, your statements make you sound delusional. you should take the opportunity to clarify why you think where paul lives is relevant, or you could go on with your usual behavior, like your name calling and responding with logical fallacies. i'll put my money on the latter...

how does it clearly show that? could you be a bit more specific? i doubt it... ::)