Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory  (Read 2180766 times)

ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5325 on: February 23, 2010, 09:32:07 PM »
Meeting with Mr. Woo

Daily events on Feb 23, 2010.

Mr. Woo is an electrical engineer who owns a Company doing electrical maintenance work for apartment buildings.

Woo: “Now I understand the Lead-Out Energy Theory.  There is no violation of the Law of Conservation of Energy.  There are hundreds of overunity devices described on the Internet.  Why is it that we cannot buy a product now?”

Tseung: “The mainstream scientists have not endorsed the Lead-Out Energy Theory yet.  Even today, some well-known academics and engineers have to withdraw open support because of pressure from their Organizations.”

Woo: “I am lucky because I am the Boss.  I can support whoever and whatever I believe.  Are there any simple experiments that I can do?”

Tseung: “How about the simple motionless device?”

Woo: “That is just Pulsed DC transformer.  You put a magnet in the magnetic flux path.  Have you done the experiment yourself?”

Tseung: “No.  But theoretically that should work.  The Lead-Out Energy theory allows for that.  The Pulsed DC will lead-out additional electron motion energy via the permanent magnet.”

Woo: “Will the permanent magnet lose its magnetism?”

Tseung: “No.  If you look at the set up, the permanent magnet should be enhanced by the Pulsed DC current.”

Woo: “Have you got a patent on this?”

Tseung: “No.  I do not intend to.  My goal is to benefit the World.  Let all Nations learn together and benefit together.  If I publish it now, nobody else can get a patent.  This is free to the World.”

Woo: “The cost of material for the experiment is less than HK$1,000.  I can afford it.  It should be a simple experiment.  I already have all the test equipment including oscilloscopes.  Are you sure that this have not been patented?”

Tseung: “I do not think so.  At this stage, we are only doing a simple experiment with no commercial activities.  I can post this on the Internet and many others will help us to find whether there are existing patents.”

*** Forum Members, you can all help to check whether there are existing patents related to Pulsed DC on transformers and the insertion of permanent magnets in the transformer core.  You are welcome to do the same simple experiment and report the results.  This can be OPEN SOURCE.  You can help to benefit the World! *** 

chrisC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5326 on: February 23, 2010, 09:46:43 PM »
....
If I publish it now, nobody else can get a .  This is free to the World.”


haha! Old Tseung you really have a gold fish memory; you don't even know you're swimming round and round the bowl!

Not so long ago, you boasted that your so called patent applications will give credence to your crappy theory. What happened to those? The patent office tore them up and used them as toilet paper?

So, plan B is now to make sure the rest of the world get this crap for free too? How about showing us something that really works and real scientists can be excited about. Your faithful dog, Wilberinated does not count as a real scientist. He's just a shitty dog!

cheers
chrisC

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5327 on: February 23, 2010, 10:04:16 PM »
haha! Old Tseung you really have a gold fish memory; you don't even know you're swimming round and round the bowl!

Not so long ago, you boasted that your so called patent applications will give credence to your crappy theory. What happened to those? The patent office tore them up and used them as toilet paper?

So, plan B is now to make sure the rest of the world get this crap for free too? How about showing us something that really works and real scientists can be excited about. Your faithful dog, Wilberinated does not count as a real scientist. He's just a shitty dog!

cheers
chrisC
pavlov's doggie is back... and still humping logical fallacies. here boy! i got a bone (question) for you to chew on... what purpose does your continual insulting of larry serve?

faithful to larry... ::) where do you come up with this garbage? i have never supported larry's theories, can you show where i have or is this latest fallacy of yours just a figment of your imagination?

Paul-R

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2086
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5328 on: February 23, 2010, 11:33:51 PM »
*** Forum Members, you can all help to check whether there are existing patents related to Pulsed DC on transformers and the insertion of permanent magnets in the transformer core.
Can you provide us with a simple pencil sketch? Your ideas should be put fully into the public domain, and it would be good if you were to provide a name for your device.

ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5329 on: February 24, 2010, 01:27:45 AM »
Can you provide us with a simple pencil sketch? Your ideas should be put fully into the public domain, and it would be good if you were to provide a name for your device.

The name - Pulsed DC transformer with embedded magnets.

See last figure of attached diagram.
« Last Edit: February 24, 2010, 01:48:00 AM by ltseung888 »

ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5330 on: February 24, 2010, 09:25:38 AM »
Conversation with Lee Cheung Kin

Lee Cheung Kin, nicknamed the ”number one genius of the World” saw the design of the Pulsed DC Transformer with embedded magnets.  He was the one who thought of the pulled pendulum as a mechanism to lead-out gravitational energy in 2004.

Tseung: “What do you think of the simple design?  Do you think that it will work?”

Lee: “It is in the spirit of OUR Lead-Out Energy Theory.  I am absolutely sure that it will work.”

Tseung: “Have you contacted your counter-part in the Chinese Government yet?  I do not want to be accused as a spy again.  How long do you think the Chinese Engineers will need to build and test such a device?”

Lee: “Not more than two days.  I shall make sure that they are aware it.  This device can be made very small.  It can be the size of a button as I predicted.”

Tseung: “I have different groups of civilians working on it.  The aim is to have a working prototype for Hangzhou at the beginning of April, 2010.  We may want to show it in Shenzhen in May.”

Lee: “That should be a piece of cake.  However, I do not think any of the overunity forum members will do it.  The top-secret Government Research Laboratories can build it with ease.  They are unlikely to publish their findings.”

Tseung: “This is easier to build and tune than the big Tong Wheel.  I have decided not to apply for patents.  It will be the first lead-out energy device to benefit the World.  Any Individual, Company or Country can build it.  It is a case of learning and building together.  I shall not be surprised that some organization will market it in the next few months.”

Lee: “You will not get any money because of it.  You may even not get any credit as the inventor as you do not have a patent.  All you did was to suppose putting a magnet in a Pulsed DC A”

Lawrence Tseung
Director
Help Seedling Innovate Foundation Limited

onthecuttingedge2005

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1336
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5331 on: February 24, 2010, 09:40:22 AM »
may I be as so bold to say, you don't have anything the world needs, you are either an intentional or unintentional fraud. you can not get OU in a system that uses the Macro classical mechanics in this world to achieve it.

I don't mean this in offense so long as you are not aware of your fault. but I am quite sure you know what you are explaining whether intentionally or not.

you can not violate Lenz law period, I beg to differ with you. there are to many field losses. you will not get back what you put in or more!

you are a pipe dream waiting for the people.

Paul-R

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2086
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5332 on: February 24, 2010, 09:58:42 AM »

I don't mean this in offense so long as you are not aware of your fault. but I am quite sure you know what you are explaining whether intentionally or not.

You can not violate Lenz law period, I beg to differ with you.

Have you read up on Lawrence's theory?

Have you read: http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk  ?

The WHOLE point of this web site is that this is thought NOT to be correct. You haven't read up on Bearden, the 1957 Nobel Physics laureates, Hal Puthoff, Quantum foam, Westinghouse's Minuteman missile problem etc etc etc.

onthecuttingedge2005

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1336
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5333 on: February 24, 2010, 10:05:09 AM »
Have you read up on Lawrence's theory?

Have you read: http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk  ?

The WHOLE point of this web site is that this is thought NOT to be correct. You haven't read up on Bearden, the 1957 Nobel Physics laureates, Hal Puthoff, Quantum foam, Westinghouse's Minuteman missile problem etc etc etc.

so what are you really saying Paul?

Paul-R

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2086
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5334 on: February 24, 2010, 11:24:13 AM »
so what are you really saying Paul?
If you could get at all the energy that exists in the space occupied by  coffee cup, you could boil the Atlantic ocean dry. Then you could go on the boil all the other oceans dry.

When the rains come, you could then repeat this performance several more times. (Credit: Hal Puthoff, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hal_Puthoff)

The question is: How do you get at this energy?

Lawrence has a well documented paper on this; others point to BEMF. There are several theories, most of which dovetail to some extent. I am sure that Stefan would support the view that this web site exists mainly to solve that question.

Your local public library probably has a number of copies of a book by Keith Tutt called "The scientist, the madman, the thief and their lightbulb". Amazon has many secondhand ones going for peanuts. This book is very out of date, but the principles are sound. The preface by Arthur C. Clarke, scientist and science fiction novelist, is very much worth reading.

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5335 on: February 24, 2010, 06:02:21 PM »
so what are you really saying Paul?
i think what paul is saying is that anyone who speaks in absolutes (like yourself) should have their delusional opinion dismissed a priori... here's why. speaking in absolutes, implying or vocalizing that you know something to be impossible is idiotic and obviously so. impossible has no time constraint. if you say impossible PERIOD. ::) you are claiming it is impossible now, 10 years from now, a million years from now, etc... now, we all know that you do not hold such knowledge, no matter what you claim. we also know the 'books' do not hold such omnipotence either.

simply put, you have no idea whether something is impossible or not, and to claim you do is extremely delusional and arrogant.

"in all of my universe i have seen no law of nature, unchanging and inexorable. this universe presents only changing relationships which are sometimes seen as laws by short-lived awareness. these fleshy sensoria which we call self are ephemera withering in the blaze of infinity, fleeting aware of temporary conditions which confine our activities and change as our activities change. if you must label the absolute, use it's proper name: temporary." -the stolen journals

neptune

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1127
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5336 on: February 24, 2010, 06:36:08 PM »
It is worth remembering , that back in the year 1890 or thereabouts , the then Chairman of the Royal Society stood up and proposed a motion . He proposed that the Society should be disbanded , on the grounds that all worthwhile scientific discoveries had ALREADY BEEN MADE . Remember ,this was1890 .

Cap-Z-ro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5337 on: February 24, 2010, 10:24:30 PM »

With "worthwhile" being the operative word, he may very well have been right on the money, so to speak.

Regards...


ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5338 on: February 27, 2010, 12:13:42 AM »
FLEET - Forever Leadout Existing Energy A

The Pulsed DC Transformer with Embeded Magnets now has a more sexy name:
Forever Leadout Existing Energy Transformer (FLEET).

I like the name because it reflects the truth.  The permanent magnet embedded will not degrade with time.  The Pulsed DC current tends to strengthen its magnetic flux with use.  There are no moving parts.  The material can last for years if not centuries.  Energy is not created.  Electron motion energy is leadout (bring in) from the surrounding.

Details are in the Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets thread.  Mags did a simple proof-of-concept experiment.  His result was 1:1.5 comparing case 2 and case 3.

chrisC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5339 on: February 27, 2010, 01:22:29 AM »
FLEET - Forever Leadout Existing Energy A

The Pulsed DC  with Embeded Magnets now has a more sexy name:
Forever Leadout Existing Energy Transformer (FLEET).

I like the name because it reflects the truth.  The permanent magnet embedded will not degrade with time.  The Pulsed DC current tends to strengthen its magnetic flux with use.  There are no moving parts.  The material can last for years if not centuries.  Energy is not created.  Electron motion energy is leadout (bring in) from the surrounding.

Details are in the Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets thread.  Mags did a simple proof-of-concept experiment.  His result was 1:1.5 comparing case 2 and case 3.

er. who's listening to delusions?

cheers
chrisC