Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 83799
  • *Latest: creatix9

  • *Total Posts: 520180
  • *Total Topics: 15501
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 6
  • *Total: 9

Author Topic: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory  (Read 1689361 times)

Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #3000 on: August 15, 2008, 02:17:15 AM »
FAQ on the MPU:

FAQ1:  Magnetic materials are often fragile.  They fall apart or lose their magnetism on repeated collision.  How can you overcome this drawback?

We can case and cushion them in stronger material.

FAQ2: How can you tell the exact position of the magnetic ball c?  This information is important for program control of the electromagnets.

We can employ laser-sensing technology.  Similar technology is available on the hard disk of computers.


FAQ3: If the MPU or flying saucer technology is so easy, do you think that it has already been implemented?

We submitted our China patent application in 2005.  We explained the theory and design at Tsinghua University in 2006.  In youtube.com, if one searches UFO Nanjing, one sees a video of a flying saucer powered by seven MPUs.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #3000 on: August 15, 2008, 02:17:15 AM »

Offline Top Gun

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 310
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #3001 on: August 15, 2008, 02:41:57 AM »
Dear Mr. Tseung,

Your MPU1.jpg is simply brilliant.  It is the pinnacle of the Lee-Tseung theory.  If gravitational energy can be lead out via a horizontal pull on a pendulum, MPU1.jpg is correct.

The design is just
(a)   Programmed pulse-rotation of a magnet to lead out magnetic or electron motion energy
(b)   Circular motion via an attractive magnetic force to provide the centripetal force.
(c)   Cutting off the attractive magnetic force to allow the magnetic ball c to fly away in the tangential direction.
(d)   Allowing the magnetic ball c to collide with the angle-shaped e to provide the force in the required direction.  Such forces can change the speed or the direction of motion.
(e)   Use two or more of these MPUs to achieve smooth motion.

Theoretically, this is correct.  It is just a matter of engineering now.  You believed that the youtube Nanjing UFO is real and probably followed the above theory.  That belief is logical.

Offline Top Gun

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 310
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #3002 on: August 16, 2008, 03:49:26 AM »
Professor John Searl - SEG generator and anti-gravity disk.  Is it theoretically sound?

http://www.searlsolution.com/

From the diagrams, there are magnetic units rotating in concentrate cyclinders.  Conceptually, this is similar to the Tseung MPU1.jpg.  If magnetic forces were cut, the magnetic units will fly away tangentially.  If the manufacturing was not perfect, a net force may be produced.

Tseung has the theory and a conceptual prototype in MPU1.jpg.

It is possible that Professor John Searl may have produced a prototype by hit-and-miss experimental efforts.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #3002 on: August 16, 2008, 03:49:26 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Top Gun

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 310
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #3003 on: August 16, 2008, 05:16:13 AM »
How many teams are building the equivalent of MPU1.jpg worldwide?

My guess is that more than a dozen teams are building it.  More are joining as the theoretical ground work has been completed.

The beauty of MPU1.jpg is that it combines the lead-out-energy machine capability with the inertial propulsion unit. 

It is almost impossible for governments to suppress this technology.  This technology does not need billions of dollars.  It does not need revolutionary breakthrough technology.  A good university or a good research laboratory can build it.

The flying saucer is no longer a dream.

Offline Charlie_V

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 362
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #3004 on: August 16, 2008, 05:50:30 AM »
MPU1.jpg is a horrible design.  Even if it works it won't last long.  How many things do you know can withstand constant pounding by a metal ball traveling at high speeds?  Plus, the ball would not stay on the track e anyway because of centrifugal force. 

@Hans,

Whats wrong with the pope? 

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #3004 on: August 16, 2008, 05:50:30 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Top Gun

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 310
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #3005 on: August 16, 2008, 10:53:33 AM »
MPU1.jpg is a horrible design.  Even if it works it won't last long.  How many things do you know can withstand constant pounding by a metal ball traveling at high speeds?  Plus, the ball would not stay on the track e anyway because of centrifugal force. 


This may be one of the reasons that China or USA has not announced the MPU or the Flying Saucer technology yet.  China pays much attention to its technical image.  The general attitude is on the side of caution. 

When the Official Announcement comes, the device would have been tested thousands of times.

You are welcome to suggest better designs.  (or you prefer to get a patent first.  That is understandable.)

Offline Devil

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 177
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #3006 on: August 16, 2008, 02:50:59 PM »
Tseung and Top Gun, do you know that you have opened the Pandora box?

Once the stupid human race knows how to build the Flying Saucer, it will be another arms race.  Many nations will try to develop the Flying Saucer as a military weapon first.  There will be selfish acts.  There will be spies and secret agents.  There are no fair rules to acquire and excel in this technology.

Expect many dirty plays.  That is the evil human nature.  They learn it from me.  You better watch out.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #3006 on: August 16, 2008, 02:50:59 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8365
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #3007 on: August 16, 2008, 08:20:34 PM »
Tseung and Top Gun have open the Pandora's box and Hans has pissed in it.  I am telling you, the
legendary piss mobile propulsion technology pioneered by Hans will be world famous soon.  Patent applications for this device are
flying all over the place but Hans has prior art rights.  Russia and China are using government agents to attempt to uncover the formula behind
Hans's device.  MIT and JPL have their own test models almost ready to fly.  Soon, the price of beer will exceed that of gasoline.  Big Beer will
have enormous power and control over the destiny of mankind for they hold the precious ingredients for our fuel requirements.

So far, Australia and the US are in the lead with this fantastic technology.  Many students are being educated at top universities in secret classrooms to prepare for future engineering of this device.

I am just very proud to know Hans and to be, even if in a small way, associated with him.

PS  The Wall Street Journal was preparing a front page story on this device but was told by the US government that if they ran it, they would be shut down for good.

Bill

Offline Top Gun

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 310
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #3008 on: August 16, 2008, 11:24:22 PM »
I believe that the MPU should work in pairs as in the figure.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #3008 on: August 16, 2008, 11:24:22 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #3009 on: August 17, 2008, 02:55:31 AM »
I know that the lead-out-energy devices and the flying saucers will bring immense benefits to the World.  The ones who contribute early are likely to get higher rewards.  At the same time, their efforts might be ignored or exceeded by the latecomers who climbed on their shoulders.

I do not have the cash to reward the contributors like a normal company.  What should I do?

Offline Devil

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 177
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #3010 on: August 17, 2008, 03:06:37 AM »
I know that the lead-out-energy devices and the flying saucers will bring immense benefits to the World.  The ones who contribute early are likely to get higher rewards.  At the same time, their efforts might be ignored or exceeded by the latecomers who climbed on their shoulders.

I do not have the cash to reward the contributors like a normal company.  What should I do?

Stupid Tseung.  You call yourself as an innovator.  You pointed out that money is just a number in a trusted financial institution.  You defined modern wealth as the quality and quantity of meaningful economic activities.

You do not have the cash to be a real company.  But you have infinite virtual money.  If people do not trust you, they will not join you.  If they join you and contribute, they believe in your theories and/or ideals.

You can create a virtual company such as Forever Innovative Unlimited (FIU) and award FIU points to your helpers and contributors.  These FIU points can be converted to real dollars if and when FIU becomes successful.  If FIU fails, the contributions will be treated as group training.

Just design the rules for running this virtual FIU and its award systems.  Wake up, stupid humans.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #3010 on: August 17, 2008, 03:06:37 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #3011 on: August 17, 2008, 03:49:01 AM »
Stupid Tseung.  You call yourself as an innovator.  You pointed out that money is just a number in a trusted financial institution.  You defined modern wealth as the quality and quantity of meaningful economic activities.

You do not have the cash to be a real company.  But you have infinite virtual money.  If people do not trust you, they will not join you.  If they join you and contribute, they believe in your theories and/or ideals.

You can create a virtual company such as Forever Innovative Unlimited (FIU) and award FIU points to your helpers and contributors.  These FIU points can be converted to real dollars if and when FIU becomes successful.  If FIU fails, the contributions will be treated as group training.

Just design the rules for running this virtual FIU and its award systems.  Wake up, stupid humans.

Thank you Devil, I accept that I am stupid.  The following is a draft of the rules for Forever Innovative Unlimited.

(1)   Any one can join FIU if he or she can present the Lee-Tseung lead out theory and the flying saucer theory as described in http://www.energyfromair.com/IOE_talk.  If he were in Hong Kong, he can do a real presentation to three or more existing members of FIU.  He will be awarded 1,000 FIU points.  He will be regarded as a level one member of FIU.

(2)   If he is outside Hong Kong, he can do a webcam or MSN session.  He will also be awarded 1,000 FIU points.  He will also be regarded as a level one member of FIU.

(3)   A level one member of FIU can help to train others on the Lee-Tseung lead out theory and the flying saucer theory.  He receives 1,000 FIU points for every student he trains and who passes the examination in (1) or (2).

(4)   After a level one member has trained 5 or more students, he will be promoted as an FIU examiner.  He will be assigned the task of judging the presentations.  He will be given FIU 500 points for each examination session ? no matter whether the person passes or fails the examination.

(5)   Any one can contribute ideas to FIU openly.  There will be a three-member review committee.  Each accepted idea will get a base point of 1,000 FIU.  These ideas will be posted for all to share and review.  Monthly bonus points will be given to the selected ideas.  There is no upper limit to the bonus but there will be written comments from the review committee.

(6)   Some actual contributions such as drawing cartoons for the book, designing the website, manning the discussion forums etc will be awarded FIU points at pre-agreed amounts.  These agreements will be posted openly for all to learn.

(7)   There may be some out-of-pocket or actual cash contributions such as traveling and materials.  For every 100 Hong Kong dollar contribution, 200 FIU points will be awarded.

(8 )   The number of FIU points awarded will be published and updated every week.  Thus every contributor can see his share of contribution and reward.

This draft will be discussed with the FIU management.  With the brilliant innovation, starting a company with zero cash is possible.  FIU can be an example or a model for the World.

Offline chrisC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #3012 on: August 17, 2008, 05:15:49 AM »
I believe that the MPU should work in pairs as in the figure.

I can see clearly now! Wow, it's my kid's Nintendo Game controller! How stupid of me not to see the great innovation!

cheers
chrisC

Offline Ben Waballs

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 63
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #3013 on: August 18, 2008, 04:25:48 PM »
Quote
I do not have the cash to reward the contributors like a normal company.  What should I do?

Blow em?;)

Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #3014 on: August 21, 2008, 10:40:32 AM »
Modern Wealth is equal to the quality and quantity of meaningful economic activities.

Is China hosting the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games a meaningful economic activity?

Positive:
1.  Have it provided a good image for China in the eyes of the World?

2.  Are there more infrastructures such as roads, trains, bridges etc?

3.  Have there been more employment?

4.  Have there been more money (number in trusted financial institution) pumped into the economy to make more people rich?

5.  Do the Chinese people feel good about the game?

Defining what are meaningful economic activities are often subjective.  It is often a matter of collective will.  However, someone must propose it first.  Threre will be jeers and cheers for the visionaries.

Is proposing to design and build the MPU for the benefit of the World meaningful?

 

OneLink