Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 43 44 45 46 47 [48] 49 50 51 52 53 ... 359   Go Down

Author Topic: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory  (Read 2181235 times)

FreeEnergy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2014
    • The Freedom Cell Network
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #705 on: November 26, 2007, 09:38:44 AM »
Quote from: hansvonlieven on November 26, 2007, 09:26:58 AM
Well done FreeEnergy,

I didn't know there was that much power in an antenna.

Problem solved, string an antenna in your back yard and supply all your needs with it, after all who needs 25000 Watt?

Free energy forever for the cost of a few insulators and a bit of wire. A truly remarkable discovery.

Hans von Lieven

no problem! now lets replicate this baby!  :o
Logged

ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #706 on: November 26, 2007, 10:56:55 AM »
Quote from: FreeEnergy on November 26, 2007, 09:38:44 AM
Quote from: hansvonlieven on November 26, 2007, 09:26:58 AM
Well done FreeEnergy,

I didn't know there was that much power in an antenna.

Problem solved, string an antenna in your back yard and supply all your needs with it, after all who needs 25000 Watt?

Free energy forever for the cost of a few insulators and a bit of wire. A truly remarkable discovery.

Hans von Lieven

no problem! now lets replicate this baby!  :o

The solution as presented works but could be dangerous.  On stormy days with high concentration of ions, the voltage could be huge.

Ever heard of the "lightning in a box" invention by Kwok and Chan of China?

Lawrence Tseung
Another story of how CIA or the Like used the weakness of Human Nature to disrupt OU inventions.
Logged

FreeEnergy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2014
    • The Freedom Cell Network
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #707 on: November 26, 2007, 11:11:31 AM »
Quote from: ltseung888 on November 26, 2007, 10:56:55 AM
Quote from: FreeEnergy on November 26, 2007, 09:38:44 AM
Quote from: hansvonlieven on November 26, 2007, 09:26:58 AM
Well done FreeEnergy,

I didn't know there was that much power in an antenna.

Problem solved, string an antenna in your back yard and supply all your needs with it, after all who needs 25000 Watt?

Free energy forever for the cost of a few insulators and a bit of wire. A truly remarkable discovery.

Hans von Lieven

no problem! now lets replicate this baby!  :o

The solution as presented works but could be dangerous.  On stormy days with high concentration of ions, the voltage could be huge.

Ever heard of the "lightning in a box" invention by Kwok and Chan of China?

Lawrence Tseung
Another story of how CIA or the Like used the weakness of Human Nature to disrupt OU inventions.


look http://youtube.com/watch?v=FnwIxgwk43I
Logged

ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #708 on: November 26, 2007, 11:16:34 AM »
Just heard and saw on the 6 pm news that the Chinese satellite sent back its first 3 dimensional picture of the moon.

My vision is to get a Chinese Flying Saucer to land on the Moon and fly back before the rest of the World.  It will give this old man the necessary drive to get out of bed in a cold morning.

The World will learn and benefit together.

Lawrence Tseung
Flying Saucer gives the old Tseung the necessary drive to get out of bed in a cold morning.
Logged

ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #709 on: November 26, 2007, 11:47:41 AM »
Quote from: FreeEnergy on November 26, 2007, 11:11:31 AM
look http://youtube.com/watch?v=FnwIxgwk43I

I believe the attached file contains more information.

I extracted it from the energy from air document.

China patent  number: 200620117555.5     

Title: 收集空气中的离子及其利用所述离子的装置 
(Apparatus for collecting the ions in the air and their use)

The focus is on technical issue at present.
Logged

utilitarian

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 816
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #710 on: November 26, 2007, 03:19:48 PM »
Quote from: ltseung888 on November 26, 2007, 07:02:13 AM
Quote from: utilitarian on November 26, 2007, 06:57:28 AM
Ideas that work on paper but not in reality are a dime a dozen.  How about a video of a Lee-Tseung pull in action?

Please show us your repeat of the Forever pendulum experiment.  If you cannot take video, a picture is fine.

That experiment does not produce or "lead out" any energy, so it is pointless to repeat.  You keep talking and talking and talking.  Show us some energy being lead out.  It is pretty pathetic that you cannot do this simple thing.  I guess talking is all you're good for.
Logged

ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #711 on: November 26, 2007, 06:28:55 PM »
Quote from: utilitarian on October 16, 1973, 09:37:58 AM

That experiment does not produce or "lead out" any energy, so it is pointless to repeat.  You keep talking and talking and talking.  Show us some energy being lead out.  It is pretty pathetic that you cannot do this simple thing.  I guess talking is all you're good for.

I should have guessed by now that you have no formal Physics Training.

The Forever Yuen magnetic pendulum experiment clearly showed that the frequency of oscillation could be increased.  This has the same effect as increasing the gravitational constant.

The Mikovic pendulum invention clearly showed that we could extract energy from the swinging motion of the pendulum.  If replacing the pendulum by magnets can increase the energy without affecting the magnetic properties of the magnets, the Physics implication is that there must be energy exchange or Lead Out.

Refusing to do the experiments in my view is like a student refusing to learn subtraction.  He then claims his teacher cannot teach him multiplication.

Doing the experiment is important because some forum members previously reported breaking of the magnets; then claimed that the frequency of oscillation was unchanged.  Such experimental results were clearly wrong.  Other forum members might draw the wrong conclusions from such misinformation.

Teaching via the Internet is like sowing seeds as taught in the Bible.  Some would fall on rock.  So be it.

The antenna example is a brilliant one showing that free energy  can be drawn from the surrounding.  I hope you have enough common sense to accept that.  However, I would advise you not to do the experiment as outlined.  The danger of getting electrocuted is too high.  I do not want to be accused of killing my critics! ;) :o ::)
Logged

hansvonlieven

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2558
    • Keelytech
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #712 on: November 26, 2007, 09:52:42 PM »
G'day all,

Congratulations Lawrence, you have just uncovered the biggest scam of all time, a conspiracy so huge it defies imagination.

You better hide from the CIA for a while.

All these years we were led to believe we need power stations to generate electricity, when all along the millions of miles of antenna, by way of power lines that criss cross the earth, have been extracting the energy we pay dearly for from the environment for nothing.

25000 Watt from a small antenna, how much energy are millions of miles extracting? Staggering!

I said it before, some people believe anything, and I got flamed for it by your offsider. I say it again.

Let the flames begin!

Hans von Lieven
Logged

ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #713 on: November 26, 2007, 11:28:46 PM »
Quote from: hansvonlieven on November 26, 2007, 09:52:42 PM
G'day all,

Congratulations Lawrence, you have just uncovered the biggest scam of all time, a conspiracy so huge it defies imagination.

You better hide from the CIA for a while.

All these years we were led to believe we need power stations to generate electricity, when all along the millions of miles of antenna, by way of power lines that criss cross the earth, have been extracting the energy we pay dearly for from the environment for nothing.

25000 Watt from a small antenna, how much energy are millions of miles extracting? Staggering!

I said it before, some people believe anything, and I got flamed for it by your offsider. I say it again.

Let the flames begin!

Hans von Lieven

The conventional wisdom is to hide from the CIA or the Like.

The unconventional and superior strategy is to Benefit the World.  Let the technically unqualified agents debunk.  During their paid debunking, they would expose their technical weakness.  I feel sorry for them.  They had to say something - that is their job.  However they do not understand what they are saying.  (The worst thing is - they understand it.  But they have to say the opposite!)

I think I should stick to the technical issues here.  I can sell the juicy stories of how the CIA or the Like try to disrupt the Chan-Kwok inventions.  The movie writers can obviously dress it up to win the Oscar.  Sorry, folks, you have to paid to see the story in the movies.

The flames will get hot, very hot soon.

Lawrence Tseung
Understanding the antenna is a Free Energy Extraction device Leads Out more inventions.  One of them is the "suppressed" Lightning in a box.

Logged

utilitarian

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 816
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #714 on: November 26, 2007, 11:45:32 PM »
Quote from: ltseung888 on November 26, 2007, 11:28:46 PM
The conventional wisdom is to hide from the CIA or the Like.

The unconventional and superior strategy is to Benefit the World.  Let the technically unqualified agents debunk.  During their paid debunking, they would expose their technical weakness.  I feel sorry for them.  They had to say something - that is their job.  However they do not understand what they are saying.  (The worst thing is - they understand it.  But they have to say the opposite!)

I think I should stick to the technical issues here.  I can sell the juicy stories of how the CIA or the Like try to disrupt the Chan-Kwok inventions.  The movie writers can obviously dress it up to win the Oscar.  Sorry, folks, you have to paid to see the story in the movies.

The flames will get hot, very hot soon.

Lawrence Tseung
Understanding the antenna is a Free Energy Extraction device Leads Out more inventions.  One of them is the "suppressed" Lightning in a box.

Asking you to prove up your claims with practical evidence is debunking?  Well, if so, call me a debunker.

We are not interested in further testimony. Show us some energy being lead out.  That is all I ask.  Why can' t you do this simple thing?  A little video with a pendulum with a "Lee-Tseung pull" applied.  Let's see some of this 2 parts in, 3 parts out business.  It should be easy to show.  Yet despite your volumes of writing, you have not done this simple thing.  Remember, don't talk about it, show it.  A video is worth a million words here.
Logged

hansvonlieven

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2558
    • Keelytech
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #715 on: November 27, 2007, 12:05:56 AM »
No Lawrence,

this time I don't even give you the benefit of doubt.

When I was a kid every boy that was into science had three things. A Meccano set, a chemistry set and a crystal radio complete with Galena crystal, air condenser, high impedance headphones and an antenna.

I strung my first antenna in about 1950 when I was 11 years old. It was 30 meters long and strung between porcelain insulators at the back of the house about 10 meters above the ground. There was a knife switch that connected it to the ground which was earthing the antenna when It was not in operation as a safety thing, in case of a thunderstorm.

At that stage, if what you have published about yourself is correct, you would have been only 4 years old. (How that makes you an old man at only 61 is a mystery to me)

Anyway, the power derived from such an arrangement is in the micro watt range and not dangerous at all, otherwise every kid in town that was playing around with the same thing would have been long dead.

Perhaps you can get 25000 watt when a lightning hits it but that will be the only time.

Ask any radio enthusiast and experimenter and they will tell you the same thing.

Hans von Lieven

Silly theories do not Lead Out energy where there isn't any. All the flaming in the world is not going to change this.
Logged

FreeEnergy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2014
    • The Freedom Cell Network
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #716 on: November 27, 2007, 12:10:09 AM »
Quote from: hansvonlieven on November 27, 2007, 12:05:56 AM
No Lawrence,

this time I don't even give you the benefit of doubt.

When I was a kid every boy that was into science had three things. A Meccano set, a chemistry set and a crystal radio complete with Galena crystal, air condenser, high impedance headphones and an antenna.

I strung my first antenna in about 1950 when I was 11 years old. It was 30 meters long and strung between porcelain insulators at the back of the house about 10 meters above the ground. There was a knife switch that connected it to the ground which was earthing the antenna when It was not in operation as a safety thing, in case of a thunderstorm.

At that stage, if what you have published about yourself is correct, you would have been only 4 years old. (How that makes you an old man at only 61 is a mystery to me)

Anyway, the power derived from such an arrangement is in the micro watt range and not dangerous at all, otherwise every kid in town that was playing around with the same thing would have been long dead.

Perhaps you can get 25000 watt when a lightning hits it but that will be the only time.

Ask any radio enthusiast and experimenter and they will tell you the same thing.

Hans von Lieven

Silly theories do not Lead Out energy where there isn't any. All the flaming in the world is not going to change this.

so what would be the average watts on something like that?
Logged

hansvonlieven

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2558
    • Keelytech
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #717 on: November 27, 2007, 12:28:18 AM »
Sorry FreeEnergy,

I forget the actual figures, it was just enough to drive a small high impedance electromagnet that vibrated the diaphragm. Unless you had it very close to your ear you couldn't hear anything. Certainly not enough to drive a small speaker.

We tried to build a small motor with the electromagnet from the headphone but there was not enough power there to drive the thing even though it was very light and turned easily.

Any good book on antennas will give you the figures you are looking for.

Hans von Lieven

EDIT: Edison actually built a motor that ran, from memory he soldered a small pin to the diaphragm that pushed a ratchet drive but to duplicate this was out of our league, we could not get the parts machined to the precision required with our resources then.
Logged

ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #718 on: November 27, 2007, 12:49:45 AM »
Quote from: hansvonlieven on November 27, 2007, 12:05:56 AM
No Lawrence,

this time I don't even give you the benefit of doubt.

When I was a kid every boy that was into science had three things. A Meccano set, a chemistry set and a crystal radio complete with Galena crystal, air condenser, high impedance headphones and an antenna.

I strung my first antenna in about 1950 when I was 11 years old. It was 30 meters long and strung between porcelain insulators at the back of the house about 10 meters above the ground. There was a knife switch that connected it to the ground which was earthing the antenna when It was not in operation as a safety thing, in case of a thunderstorm.  

At that stage, if what you have published about yourself is correct, you would have been only 4 years old. (How that makes you an old man at only 61 is a mystery to me)

Anyway, the power derived from such an arrangement is in the micro watt range and not dangerous at all, otherwise every kid in town that was playing around with the same thing would have been long dead.

Perhaps you can get 25000 watt when a lightning hits it but that will be the only time.

Ask any radio enthusiast and experimenter and they will tell you the same thing.

Hans von Lieven

Silly theories do not Lead Out energy where there isn't any. All the flaming in the world is not going to change this.

Is your home in a thunderstorm prone area???

At Age 11, you already used "earthing the antenna" techniques.   Good Kid. I am sure that you also had the knowledge or scientific sense of not using your device on thunderstorm days or nights.
Logged

Evil Roy Slade

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 117
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #719 on: November 27, 2007, 01:05:43 AM »
Given that I have not been deregistered here yet I may as well post something useful.

@hans&utilitarian

You can get further information about 'lead out' from my wee little shitzu.
Her email is pepper@dogsworld.com.au

ERS



Logged
Pages: 1 ... 43 44 45 46 47 [48] 49 50 51 52 53 ... 359   Go Up
« previous next »