Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 84254
  • *Latest: aaronhdd

  • *Total Posts: 898117
  • *Total Topics: 15837
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 2
  • *Guests: 12
  • *Total: 14

Author Topic: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory  (Read 1867348 times)

Offline Forever

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 68
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #600 on: November 03, 2007, 08:10:58 AM »
Participating in the AERO competition

I have discussion with Mr. Tseung on possibly participating in the AERO competition. The products that are already supported by the Chinese government (Wang, Liang, Tsing Hua, Chao etc.) will need government approval.

Quote
from Patrick Kelly
The ready-made product is the Chas Campbell electricity magnifier.   Just a brief note
to let you know that in the last two or three days, Chas has confirmed the excess energy in his system by letting it get up to speed and then disconnecting the motor from the mains and plugging it into the output generator, making it self-powered.

He says that the speed maintains perfectly well and he has put a 75-watt lamp on it as an extra load.  This is COP = infinity as the user's input power is zero while the output power is either 75 watts or 825 watts depending on how you view it.
 

We may be able to work with Chas Campbell, Gaby, Ash, Kelly and others to produce a prototype that can meet the requirement of the AERO competition.

It should be fun! US$ 200K plus USD $5million for the next two years is incentive enough for me. 8) ;D ;) :)
 
Forever Yuen

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #600 on: November 03, 2007, 08:10:58 AM »

Offline Forever

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 68
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #601 on: November 03, 2007, 08:29:36 AM »
The latest comments on Chas Campbell Device

From Patrick Kelly? s post, Chas Campbell could disconnect the input after the wheels had acquired the required speeds. He could connect the output generator and a 75-watt lamp. If the lamp could continue to light forever, he could claim to have produced a PPM.

In reality, he managed to use gravitational energy, most probably via unbalanced rotation. Ash et al should check that thoroughly. If that checks out we can improve the Campbell device and win the AERO competition.

The improvement might be a higher speed of revolution or larger wheels.
 
I can dream about my money!! ;D :o 8) ::)

Offline linda933

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #602 on: November 03, 2007, 09:31:55 AM »
Hi Forever,

Where is the post of Patrick Kelly about Charles Campbell written?  I would be interested in knowing the date, also.  Thank you.

Linda

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #602 on: November 03, 2007, 09:31:55 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #603 on: November 03, 2007, 04:33:28 PM »
Quote
Suppressed Energy Technologies
by Gary Vesperman

The U.S. Patent Office has a nine-member committee that screens patents in order to protect ?national security?.

An understandable reason for suppressing certain types of energy inventions is that the knowledge behind them is also capable of producing tremendously destructive advanced electromagnetic weapons such as the ?death ray? apparently invented by Nikola Tesla. Hence many such new energy technologies, particularly those using this kind of knowledge of advanced electromagnetic principles, are considered "dual use" technologies that are among the 4,000 un-numbered patent applications  confiscated in a vault at the US Patent and Trademark Office because of their military potential and the need to keep that knowledge from America's enemies.


Is it possible that US has more PPM patent applications than China?

Is it possible that US already has over unity devices and a flying saucer?

How would US react when China introduces the various Cosmic Energy Products?

Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #604 on: November 03, 2007, 04:59:57 PM »
Quote

from
http://www.aero2012.com/en/movingbeyond_laviolette.mhtml

4. Gravity Field Propulsion is Real:  Townsend Brown's Technology of Electrogravitics.

In the mid 1920's Townsend Brown discovered that electric charge and gravitational mass are coupled. He found that when he charged a capacitor to a high voltage, it had a tendency to move toward its positive pole. This became known as the Biefeld-Brown effect.  His important findings were opposed by conventional minded physicists of his time.

The Pearl Harbor Demonstration. Around 1953, Brown conducted a demonstration for top brass from the military. He flew a pair of 3 foot diameter discs  around a 50 foot course tethered to a central pole. Energized with 150,000 volts and emitting ions from their leading edge, they attained speeds of several hundred miles per hour. The subject was thereafter classified.
 ....

May be US already have the flying saucer technology.

I doubt that US already developed the Lee-Tseung Lead out theory before us.  The Lee-Tseung theory can explain almost all the Electrogravitic devices mentioned in that paper.

What is the purpose of the AERO competition if so many cosmic energy machines and the flying saucer technologies are listed at their website?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #604 on: November 03, 2007, 04:59:57 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #605 on: November 04, 2007, 12:26:51 AM »
@ Forever:

Hey, if you win the millions...will you buy me dinner somewhere?



Asking a pretty girl to buy you dinner will Lead Out to a great evening.

Bill

Offline linda933

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #606 on: November 07, 2007, 12:39:24 AM »
Participating in the AERO competition

I have discussion with Mr. Tseung on possibly participating in the AERO competition. The products that are already supported by the Chinese government (Wang, Liang, Tsing Hua, Chao etc.) will need government approval.

Quote
from Patrick Kelly
The ready-made product is the Chas Campbell electricity magnifier.   Just a brief note
to let you know that in the last two or three days, Chas has confirmed the excess energy in his system by letting it get up to speed and then disconnecting the motor from the mains and plugging it into the output generator, making it self-powered.

He says that the speed maintains perfectly well and he has put a 75-watt lamp on it as an extra load.  This is COP = infinity as the user's input power is zero while the output power is either 75 watts or 825 watts depending on how you view it.
 

We may be able to work with Chas Campbell, Gaby, Ash, Kelly and others to produce a prototype that can meet the requirement of the AERO competition.

It should be fun! US$ 200K plus USD $5million for the next two years is incentive enough for me. 8) ;D ;) :)
 
Forever Yuen



Interesting that $5,200,000 US isn't enough to get Patrick Kelly, Ashtweth, Gaby and Charles to even respond to your suggestion!  Could it be that the "news" of Charles Campbell now having a self-running machine that produces excess power is another big fat delusion? 

If there were any substance to this third-hand report, one might think it would raise a response or two!  Where is the excitement?  The hoopla?  Better yet...where are the corroborating reports and videos? 

This sounds like a good time for Mark Dansie to visit Charles and check it out, maybe.  Or has everyone lost all belief in the non-credible claims and fourth-party reports of this motley crew?

Linda

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #606 on: November 07, 2007, 12:39:24 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline shruggedatlas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 549
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #607 on: November 07, 2007, 01:01:36 AM »
Interesting that $5,200,000 US isn't enough to get Patrick Kelly, Ashtweth, Gaby and Charles to even respond to your suggestion!  Could it be that the "news" of Charles Campbell now having a self-running machine that produces excess power is another big fat delusion? 

If there were any substance to this third-hand report, one might think it would raise a response or two!  Where is the excitement?  The hoopla?  Better yet...where are the corroborating reports and videos? 

This sounds like a good time for Mark Dansie to visit Charles and check it out, maybe.  Or has everyone lost all belief in the non-credible claims and fourth-party reports of this motley crew?

Linda

CIA or the Like have gotten to them.  According to Lawrence's first-hand account of CIA or the Like, they do the following evil things: (1) give you millions of dollars, (2) tell you they are Chinese, and (3) make you speak publicly about your invention at prestigious universities.  The bastards!
« Last Edit: November 07, 2007, 02:04:40 AM by shruggedatlas »

Offline hansvonlieven

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2558
    • Keelytech
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #608 on: November 07, 2007, 01:21:49 AM »

Is it possible that US has more PPM patent applications than China?

Is it possible that US already has over unity devices and a flying saucer?

How would US react when China introduces the various Cosmic Energy Products?

How come if China has this kind of technology they are building windmills to save on fossil fuels? Maybe Cosmic Energy is not as hot as it is cracked up to be.

Hans von Lieven

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #608 on: November 07, 2007, 01:21:49 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline gaby de wilde

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 470
    • http://blog.360.yahoo.com/Factuurexpress
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #609 on: November 07, 2007, 10:14:28 AM »
Gaby,

What do you think about this AERO organization?


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2576280827351339152
Dr. Stephen Greer - Advanced Energy Research Organization (AERO), LLC

didn't think much of it, looking now...

Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #610 on: November 07, 2007, 01:07:26 PM »
Gaby,

What do you think about this AERO organization?


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2576280827351339152
Dr. Stephen Greer - Advanced Energy Research Organization (AERO), LLC

didn't think much of it, looking now...


Gaby,

Thank you for digging up the video.  I just finished watching it.  It confirms my suspicion that USA have some Cosmic Energy Technology or even some form of the Flying Saucer Technology.  They have kept such Technologies top-secret.

Now, I am sure the CIA or the Like already knows what is going on in China and Japan.  The Technology and Products will come out shortly.  The Lee-Tseung theory is already out and examined by top academics.  That already laid the groundwork for hundreds of Cosmic Energy Machines.

I do not mind helping Chas Campbell to win the AERO competition.  His success will benefit the World.

Lawrence Tseung
The AERO competition Leads Out possible World Cooperation

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #610 on: November 07, 2007, 01:07:26 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #611 on: November 08, 2007, 02:09:57 PM »
Overunity is defined as extracting more energy from a system than was input.  Obviously physics has a few issues with this concept- namely because it is impossible....

In the Lee-Tseung theory, additional energy is Lead Out by the Input.  The Sum of Input PLUS Lead Out energy can be greater than Output energy.  Mathematically it is correct.  It does not violate any Laws of Physics.

Lawrence Tseung

Understanding Lead Out eliminates all the heated arguments.

Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Helping Chas Campbell to win the AERO competition
« Reply #612 on: November 09, 2007, 03:33:48 AM »
Quote
Quote from: hartiberlin on November 07, 2007, 09:42:29 AM
This the last message I received from Chas:

From: chas campbell
To: Patrick Kelly
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 12:37 PM
Subject: simple test

Patrick as I told you in a recent e mail as soon as posiable I would build a unit to test using your simple idea , I am now delighted to let you know the results were as follows using the same .075 motor that has a speed of 1430 RPM and driving my 3.5 KVA alternator I was able to loop the motor back to one of the outlets on the alternator without loosing any speed I was then able to plug into the second outlet a bed lamp with a 75w bulb and yes they both  worked.The unit I assembled has a flywheel that is unbalanced as a mater of fact its like standing in front of a fan, one of the bearings over heated and no mater how I tried I could not stop the belt slipping on the motor . so a hell of a lot of improvments could be made. I do hope you will continue to show interest in my project and any simple advice you can give me would be wellcome .Chas   

We are doing a number of things to help Chas.

(1) Reproducing his unbalanced device in China.  The Lee-Tseung theory already predicts that unbalanced rotation can lead out gravitational energy.  Chas confirmed it.  It is now a matter of multiple replication.

(2) Giving Chas a bearing that can stand high overheating without deforming.  This bearing is another invention of Wang Shum Ho who met similar problems.  The bearing essentially has multiple slits on the outer cylinder allowing for the metal to expand. 

(3) The over-heating of the bearing is a demonstration of the Lead Out gravitational energy having nowhere to go in the system.  Thus the external load could be appropriately increased.  We are optimistic on meeting the AERO competition requirement of 72 hours with 1KW output - even with the existing Chas device.

This post will be repeated in the Lee-Tseung Lead Out theory thread.  Please post your comments there.

Lawrence Tseung
Helping Chas win the AERO competition Leads Out International Cooperation.

Offline linda933

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #613 on: November 09, 2007, 08:32:16 AM »
Lawrence...

I think you might have misunderstood Charles' email to Patrick Kelly.  You see, Charles only mentioned the wobbling flywheel and overheated bearings so that he would have an excuse in case anyone wanted to come over and see his "self-running" machine in action.  It is broken and no longer works, of course, so Charles cannot demonstrate it.  Such a pity.

Instead of seeing these as "problems" that Charles makes ready in advance because he assumes people will want a demo and he obviously can't give one (because the poor old guy is now so desperate for more attention that he's obviously lying), you appear to have capitalized on his out-of-balance bearing-burning flywheel as a new key principal of the "Lead-Out" theory! 

I never cease to be amazed at the audacity and ultra-non-credibility of your conclusions and assertions, Lawrence.  But what is even more amazing is that there are people apparently eager to believe this tripe! 

In your post you leap from "Chas confirmed it." to "It is now a matter of multiple replication."  Don't you think it might be prudent, especially given Charles' past record of 100% fraudulent and deluded, inaccurate claims, that before mass replications are begun, someone credible like Mark Dansie (or anyone other than Charles himself) might witness and corroborate Charles' new claim that his machine now self-runs with an excess of output power? 

Or is the creed "Simply Believe All Claims and Wildly Replicate...no specific performance or construction details will be given" the ruling concept here, as is always the case with every project you seem to adopt and promote?

Linda

Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #614 on: November 09, 2007, 07:01:09 PM »
Lawrence...

I think you might have misunderstood Charles' email to Patrick Kelly.  You see, Charles only mentioned the wobbling flywheel and overheated bearings so that he would have an excuse in case anyone wanted to come over and see his "self-running" machine in action.  It is broken and no longer works, of course, so Charles cannot demonstrate it.  Such a pity.....

Dear Linda,

I am in direct email contact with Chas Campbell.  We are replicating his device in multiple locations in China.  One is within 20 minutes bus ride from my home. 

I can wait until the device is replicated successfully before posting.  However, the purpose of my posts are:

(1) To share information with the World so that if something happens to me in the next hour, the World still have something.  (Something is already happening to Lee Cheung Kin.)

(2) To keep the CIA or the Like off my back.  They know that they will have the information if they just wait and read my posts.  They do not need to "infiltrate our team" and cause personal conflicts.

(3) Let the Chinese Officials know what I am doing.  At one time, they used an unqualified person to contact me.  (Unfortunately, the Cultural Revolution in China produced many "society-university graduates" who never studied Physics but gained the position of technical energy advisors.)  I upset him in discussing Physics and Mathematics with him.

(4) Let the many academics, especially the professors and students at Tsing Hua University (whom I presented to) follow the latest development. (I am sure some of them read my posts.)

(5) Help the many existing Cosmic Energy Developers (such as Chas Campbell) to understand the source of energy of their devices and improve them.  Chas opened the door for "unbalanced rotation" research with the simple experiment.  Many developers will now "spin their unbalanced devices" to high speed first before extracting (or leading out) energy.

(6) Follow the "sow seed" teaching in the Bible.  Some might fall on rock.  Some might be on fertile soil and bear fruit.  (Some already have.)

Lawrence Tseung
Know-it-all debunkers Lead Out misinformation to the World.

 

OneLink