Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 83799
  • *Latest: creatix9

  • *Total Posts: 520185
  • *Total Topics: 15502
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 4
  • *Guests: 10
  • *Total: 14

Author Topic: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory  (Read 1689417 times)

Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5310 on: February 19, 2010, 08:46:40 AM »
The Prayer with God in my heart

Tseung: “Dear God, now the Lead-Out Energy is a certainty.  The Yu Oscillator can gain energy from the Howard Johnson type magnetic actuator.  If the oscillator is changed to a large wheel, there is no need to flick the magnets around.  Energy will be gained every time via passing the stationary magnetic actuator.  There is no violating the Laws of Physics if we accept that the extra energy can be lead-out  from the electron motion of the surrounding.”

God in Heart: “The coming conference in Hangzhou will have a few working overunity devices.  You have the Tong wheel that can be shown to the World now.  Instead of the Howard Johnson Actuator, you have the Pulsing Coil.  You have already shown that the energy gained by the Wheel is more than that supplied by the Pulse.  There will be the Bedini 10 Coil device which you can improve with ease.  There is a Witts.ws type fuelless motor.  You may even have the Chinese Government funded Wang Generator.  If the Chao Car were there with the Liang engine, scientific acceptance will be 100%.”

Tseung: “Is the World ready for non-polluting, inexhaustible and virtually free energy?”

God in Heart: “Are you ready to introduce Lead-Out Energy to the World?  Are there any doubts in your mind?”

Tseung: “Lead-Out Energy is an ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY.   It is derived from the Law of Parallelogram of Forces.  Horizontal energy = horizontal force x horizontal displacement.  That is the supplied energy.  Vertical energy = vertical force x vertical displacement.  That is the lead-out gravitational energy via the tension in the pendulum string.”

God in Heart: “The World may change for the better or for the worse.  Newton introduced his Laws of Motion.  Science and Engineering had a solid foundation.  England used that to its advantage and expanded its Empire.  To the English, it was good.  To the conquered nations, it was bad.”

Tseung: “If I introduce the Lead-Out Energy technology to the entire World, will that prevent one nation dominating others?  Can I prevent the sad history of colonization from happening again?  Can every poor nation be wealthy because of this technology?”

God in Heart: “You will have to give up personal greed, pride, pleasure of the flesh and all things the average human being long for.  You will be insulted.  You will be ridiculed.  Scientific facts will be twisted to show that you are an idiot.  You will lose your financial security.  Your family will suffer.  You will be treated as a crack pot similar to Nikola Tesla.  Are you ready for that?”

Tseung: “The spirit is willing.  The flesh is weak.”

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5310 on: February 19, 2010, 08:46:40 AM »

Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5311 on: February 20, 2010, 12:25:00 AM »
Quote

Greetings,                   

I am a student studying Green Tech at the Scottish Agricultural University. In my field I deal with communicating between zero fossil energy development companies and entrepreneurs who have the means to distribute them in Baltic countries.

A week ago I was invited by the French ambassador, who is in charge of organizing an annual Science conference in Estonia, to make a presentation about new and improved ways of enhancing energy production. I accepted the challenge and am going to present my studies on HHO, fuel cells and a potential for full magnetic motors to an audience that I believe is of great benefit to your company.

I have asked for permission from various directors to introduce their companies to the Franco-Estonian community. And I would be honored to present your company as well, for I share the same vision that your company is built on.

I am of Estonian origin, lived in France for five years, and after having completed my bachelors at the Estonian Business School I moved to Scotland to continue my research.  By the end of this academic year I will return to Estonia to work for the main Estonian Energy provider to promote Alt. energies.

I have attached a program the ambassador has put together, and if you find the audience to be of interest to you then please contact me. I will have to send an outline of my presentation by March and include which companies I will be introducing.

Thank you for your consideration,

May this be the will of the Almighty to spread Lead-Out Energy to the World.  A small Country like Estonia posts no threat to the World. 

Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5312 on: February 21, 2010, 12:09:16 AM »
From Estonian Student

Quote
Thank you for such an immediate response.
 
I must tell you that although I do not intensively pursue the study of perpetual motion and magnet motors, I do not disregard the possibility. Mainly because we do not live in a closed system and because progress to understanding comes through experimentation and collective thought.
 
Most people that I know who talk about alternative energies, are limited by their imagination to think of anything else than solar, wind, geothermal, and nuclear energies. Yet again they do not let themselves study what the physics behind all this. It is accepted as common knowledge that perpetual motion is impossible for it is advertised so. I understand this point of view, but I do not admire it. The way of thought that I do admire is the collective one. To take the effort to bring out-of-the-frame ideas and knowledge so that those who wish may learn to grow towards free energy systems shows leadership in the right direction.
 
You are doing a valuable thing that affects people on a global scale and this is priceless. I will stand by these values for only through this kind of a mind frame will there be true peace.
 
I will most definably follow your web site and am honored to work alongside the values you represent, Sir.
 
I will be looking forward to seeing what your presentation at Hangzou will bring.
 
Respectfully,

Dear Estonian Student,


I took the liberty of correcting some typos and other mistakes in your email before posting.  I would like to suggest a simple experiment that you can perform before your conference.  (We shall do the same before Hangzhou).


Please examine the Yu Oscillator in this forum.  Mr. Yu sent a magnet through a Howard Johnson type actuator or magnetic array to gain kinetic energy.  His technique was via oscillation and to rotate the magnets at the end of each swing.  It should be a simple task to have a rod pivoted in the middle and have two magnets at the end.  The two magnets can pass through the magnetic array to gain kinetic energy with simple rotation of the rod.  There will be no need to rotate and change direction of the magnets.


This experiment can result in a rod rotating after an initial turn and gaining energy by passing through the magnetic array.  The rotational speed will pick up until some balance with frictional force and air resistance is achieved.  You may then have a perpetually rotating rod.  Since there is a gain of external energy, no Physics Laws are violated.


This may be a standard experiment for understanding Lead-Out Energy.


Good Luck.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5312 on: February 21, 2010, 12:09:16 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5313 on: February 22, 2010, 05:18:02 AM »
TWM Technology
They have a motor that uses both poles of a Magnet.  That is similar to the Bill Muller approach.  The next Tong Wheel is likely to have a similar approach.  Our Pulsing technique is different from theirs.  I believe that they did not have the Lead-Out Energy Theory to guide them.  Much of research was directed at high speed rotation similar to Bedini.  We can definitely help to improve that.  They said that they have an overunity prototype.  The information is available at:
http://peswiki.com/index.php/News:TWM_Technology:February_2010_Correspondence
Quote

We've (TWM Techonolgy) basically combined all the greats: Perendev, Morey, Bearden, Bedini. We've been successful in spinning a device that uses the vacuum to our benefit, but we've also combined the torque from a mechanical shaft as well. This is an improvement, A significant improvement that offers the best of both sides: mechanical torque, and Free Space Electrons.

The potential is still yet to be revealed.

Last week a group told us that the money would be in providing a low RPM generator. So we (Timmy and group), combined our efforts and designed and started producing our motor as a generator – just a generator – and we accomplished that. The generator could be spun a very low rpms (e.g. 5 rpms) producing DC current. The same generator could be spun at high rpms to produce massive AC current. The design and details have been completed, and we will have this generator ready within the next 2 months.

All that was accomplished by our group in one week. (Just imagine what we could do with the proper backing!!).

Also, the generator will be ten times lighter than conventional wind turbine generators. Our device will not need a gear-box, and will have great worth to the wind / energy industries.

Thanks for always being there for groups like us. If you don't mind the comment, I would like point out that it's great that you do what you do. I was just telling a friend yesterday how cool it is that you are the medium or the middle-man so to speak when It comes to helping companies like ours that have great ideas that could potentially change the world for the better. It's cool that you get people excited about this type of tech.

However, it would be even better if we could organize a group of VC's or maybe our government could implement a program that lays down a foundation in each state. That would provide small businesses the needed helping hand to generate interest or capital, they would decide what is worth the effort. But we as small corps, struggle to get somewhere. And that is why a lot of groups either give up, or don't make their dreams a reality.

I found that there are a lot against groups like ours. We have the professionals telling us that overunity is impossible. STRIKE ONE. That is why I was trying to back peddle because the ones I thought I needed to convince were the big VC guys. They are clueless. They give you two minutes to describe everything in a room of other struggling entrepreneurs. Then they critique you like it's an episode of shark tank. Then they say "I talked with someone [who says that the laws of] thermodynamics say that, "that is impossible". End of story, They don't even give us the time of day after an engineer or some respected professional says It cant be done.

Then STRIKE TWO would be the controlling interests that don't want a device like this to cut into there profits (e.g. oil industry, political corrupts, etc.). I don't like to dwell on the negative. however it's part of our struggle.

We as private individuals have dropped over $250,000 into this development over a five year period, and that is just the beginning. We knew that we might never make it, and that our efforts may be in vain, but we kept on because of the belief in what were doing. When doing something new or when pioneering new technology, there is a sense of unknown, and that is scary to us as well as to investors. And that somewhat prohibits the advancement. On the other hand, sometimes that's what sets you apart from the rest.

China will win the “overunity race” if such inventors in USA were not supported.  Our Lead-Out Theory already pointed out the practicality of such devices.  Our 2-3 watt Tong overunity wheel is available for verification.  The inventors of the 225 HP Pulse Motor was at one time not supported by the USA Venture Capitalists.  They should be the leader in this field.  Now, who knows?


Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5314 on: February 22, 2010, 03:32:27 PM »
Waiting for Official approval before release.

























« Last Edit: February 23, 2010, 01:50:53 AM by ltseung888 »

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5314 on: February 22, 2010, 03:32:27 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Paul-R

  • without_ads
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1802
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5315 on: February 22, 2010, 05:03:50 PM »
Ir. Jimmy Fung is a Director of Energy Saving Solutions Limited. 

He is a Consultant to many Hong Kong Government Projects and very well respected.

He is willing to have his photo shown on the Internet with his findings.
Your findings stand if the input and output were to be steady values. If they are
pulses, then the readings may not be not reliable.

In the latter case, maybe you should start with a full battery on the input side
and a discharged battery on the output side, and after a few hours running, measure
the change in the batteries charge by measuring how much more current is needed to restore them to a predetermined standardised level. Not that easy.

Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5316 on: February 22, 2010, 08:25:35 PM »
Your findings stand if the input and output were to be steady values. If they are
pulses, then the readings may not be not reliable.

In the latter case, maybe you should start with a full battery on the input side
and a discharged battery on the output side, and after a few hours running, measure
the change in the batteries charge by measuring how much more current is needed to restore them to a predetermined standardised level. Not that easy.

You are right.  Our readings will be indisputable if the values were steady.   With Pulse values, the meters provide rms (root mean square) values.  There will be debate on whether a cheap meter can provide the correct rms value.  One way is to examine the waveform using the oscilloscope.  We have done that and provided such waveforms in this thread.  However, the average non-trained engineer may not be able to interpret the waveforms correctly.

The most convincing to even “the housewife type with no physics background” is to produce 5KW or some significant output.  The 225 HP Pulse Motor did that.  It then became top-secret in USA.  The Wang generator did that.  It then became top-secret in China.

Now I got word from Mr. Wang ShenHe that he may be allowed to attend the Hangzhou conference with one of his machines.  I also got some hints that a replicated? 225 HP Pulse Motor built in China may also be shown.  (If we can built the Tong Wheel with a part-time engineer, a top university in China believing in Lead-Out Energy can easily built the 225 HP Pulse Motor.) My gut feel is that the Chinese Government or at least some Senior Officials are in favor of allowing some top-secret devices to be revealed.

There are already the undisputable Lead-Out Energy Theory.  The Tong Wheel is only a small demonstration.  It is extremely easy to modify the Yu Oscillator so that a rotating rod with magnets at the tips passing magnetic actuator will demonstrate continuous rotation due to the energy gained.  We have teams reproducing the simple wheel with two tubes containing steel balls hitting soft and hard surfaces.  I shall disclose another extremely simple and easy to replicate experiment that can demonstrate overunity in a motionless device.

There is no way to suppress the Parallelogram of Forces.  There cannot be any scientific questioning of the formula of
Horizontal energy = horizontal force x horizontal displacement and
Vertical energy = vertical force x vertical displacement.
If the two above formula are correct, the Lead-Out energy theory MUST be correct.


The Hangzhou City Government can easily fund the Conference.  When the top overunity researchers like Bedini, Wang, Chao, our team etc. meet with working prototypes, the synergy will be unstoppable.  There will be undreamed of improvements.  If we have the 225 HP Pulse Motor (or even one slice of it) available for demonstration, all doubts will vaporize.

USA may elect to play the catch-up game similar to the Space Program.  Let the Russians lead the way first.  Then pour resources to catch up.  But in this overunity field, the resources required would not be that huge.  The sum is much less than building a single nuclear fission reactor.  Many Countries will be able to participate.   Ireland (via Steorn) is a contestant.  India (notified by AMURT) will participate.  An Estonian Student is learning.  Australia has many OU inventors.  Germany (via Stefan) will not be left behind.....  It should be fun.

The race to Lead-Out Energy (zero point?) is on.  Who will win???

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5316 on: February 22, 2010, 08:25:35 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline chrisC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5317 on: February 22, 2010, 08:33:20 PM »
...

The race to Lead-Out Energy (zero point?) is on.  ???

It has already been won by the clown of the one one-man circus act!
Oh, btw, since your machine is 100% O.U, did Stephan give you the O.U prize money? I didn't see that on the O.U website. Or maybe you declined it?

cheers
chrisC

Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5318 on: February 22, 2010, 08:59:02 PM »
Motionless Lead-Out Energy Devices

Proof of concept experiment – Electron Motion energy (magnetic) can be Lead-Out via flux changes.  Use Oscilloscope to check waveform for best results.

Basic Principle (1)  the transformer:
1.   A transformer is mainly used in AC circuits
2.   A varying current in primary winding creates a varying magnetic flux in the transformer core
3.   Thus create a varying magnetic field through the secondary winding.
4.   If a load is connected to the secondary, an electric current will flow in the secondary winding
5.   Electrical energy will be transferred from the primary circuit through the transformer to the load.

Basic Principle (2)  the use of Pulsed DC instead of AC
1.   The key element is the varying current producing the varying magnetic flux.
2.   We can use Pulse DC as the varying current.
3.   If we put a magnet in the core of the transformer
a.   Pulsed DC in one direction will be enhanced
b.   Pulsed DC in the other direction will be hindered
4.   The enhanced direction Leads-Out electromagnetic energy! 
5.   This is the basic theory behind the motionless lead-out energy machine.

Basic Principle (3)  See the attached diagram

Comments

•   May need to tune
1.   Core material (try standard transformer material first)
2.   Number of Turns (start with 100 on both)
3.   Current (Half rectification of mains AC)
4.   Frequency (50 or 60 Hertz to start)
5.   Magnet (try market available, can stack)

Lawrence Tseung
Director
Help Seedlings Innovate Foundation Limited

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5318 on: February 22, 2010, 08:59:02 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Paul-R

  • without_ads
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1802
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5319 on: February 22, 2010, 11:54:50 PM »
There cannot be any scientific questioning of the formula of
Horizontal energy = horizontal force x horizontal displacement and
Vertical energy = vertical force x vertical displacement.
This is a re-writing of the familiar
Energy = MxGxH
equation, isn't it? What an unusual way of putting it. Interesting.

Offline utilitarian

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 816
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5320 on: February 23, 2010, 12:44:52 AM »
This is a re-writing of the familiar
Energy = MxGxH
equation, isn't it? What an unusual way of putting it. Interesting.

He is defining work, not energy.  I am guessing he meant to say:

horizontal work = horizontal force x horizontal displacement
vertical work = vertical force x vertical displacement

I do not think Tseung knows difference between work and energy.

He also does not know the difference between force and energy, as he keeps referring nonsensically to "gravitational energy."

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5320 on: February 23, 2010, 12:44:52 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5321 on: February 23, 2010, 02:09:25 AM »
This is a re-writing of the familiar
Energy = MxGxH
equation, isn't it? What an unusual way of putting it. Interesting.
Dear Paul-R,
In Physics, the more general equation for Work is
Work = Force x Displacement

Force is a vector quantity.  Displacement is also a vector quantity.  By vector quantity, we mean that there is direction associated.  When there is direction associated, we have to use vector arithmetic to do the calculations.  When these quantities are in a 2 dimensional situation, we can use the Law of Parallelogram of Forces to resolve them into vertical and horizontal directions.

Your formula of potential energy = MGH is a special case related to a weight of MG raised to a height H.

Energy has the same unit as Work.  Thus
Horizontal Work Done = Horizontal Energy Supplied = Horizontal Force x Horizontal Displacement
Vertical Work Done = Vertical Energy Supplied = Vertical Force x Vertical Displacement

Do not be fooled by non-physicist posting rubbish in this thread. 

Gravitational Energy refers to the energy supplied or work done by the Gravitational Force of the Earth which is always in the vertical direction.  Many of those in my ignore list do not understand that.  They may be paid to post non-sense.  Who cares now?  The real scientists will want to see the working Tong Wheel in Hong Kong now and other prototypes in Hangzhou later.

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5322 on: February 23, 2010, 02:19:55 AM »
It has already been won by the clown of the one one-man circus act!
Oh, btw, since your machine is 100% O.U, did Stephan give you the O.U prize money? I didn't see that on the O.U website. Or maybe you declined it?

cheers
chrisC
and there you are, right on time... the one man circus, staring pavlov's dog.  ::)

Offline chrisC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5323 on: February 23, 2010, 04:26:52 AM »
and there you are, right on time... the  , staring pavlov's dog.  ::)

And I supposed you're the clown's dog that he urinates on when he's deluded? Old Tseung must love his faithful dog!

cheers
chrisC

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory
« Reply #5324 on: February 23, 2010, 07:10:57 PM »
And I supposed you're the clown's dog that he urinates on when he's deluded? Old Tseung must love his faithful dog!

cheers
chrisC
you won't respond when i ask you point blank questions like 'what purpose does your continual insulting of larry serve?' but when you have a chance to engage in logical fallacy as an insult you have no problem responding... ::)

shoo pavlov's doggie, shoo. go shit in your own yard.

 

OneLink