Author Topic: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory (Read 2181216 times)

ltseung888 · « **Reply #5250 on:** February 03, 2010, 04:16:22 AM »

Quote from: Paul-R on February 03, 2010, 01:17:11 AM

Well, Lawrence, you are a sly old dog.

I've just discovered a working drawing of the Tong wheel, from the thrice blessÃ¨d Patrick:
http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/Chapter2.pdf

Yes, its there; Chapter 2, page 56. (with stuff on pages 54 and 55).

Yes, you do have a "A of All Control Problems".

I think one way would be a cam wheel with 15 lumps bearing down on to 15 switches such that when the lump is half A, the switch switches to "drive" and when it is full A, it switches to "collect". The switches would be single throw double pole, I think. Tricky to source the perfect switch, but it will be in the catalogues somewhere.

Come on, fellas. Lets build up some wheels and get Lawrence's problems solved. I am wondering if the coils that can be obtained by angle grinding through the 8:1 mains transformers in microwave ovens would do. Not really ideal, but nice coils. Some transformer company that makes these might deliver a few cheaply if their name is put on the side of the device in the YouTube video. these coils are 3 inch x 4 inch (outside), and some nice big slab ferrite magnets from www.e-magnetsuk.com

I do think we need to reclame some BEMF, circuitry possibly copied off the Robert Adams motor or the SSG. But this could be stage 2.

Off we go.

Patrick Kelly is a very good writer. He can organize the information in a very clear and understandable way.

The researcher should read the beginning of Chapter 2 where he discussed the Adams Motor. One technique used by Adams was the use of magnetic attraction to rotate the wheel. It is similar to the Steorn Orbo.

Lead-Out Energy is a reality. It is a matter of engineering to make a Lead-Out Energy Machine more efficient.

ltseung888 · « **Reply #5251 on:** February 04, 2010, 11:47:26 PM »

Meeting with Brother Rasaviharii (rasaviharii@hotmail.com

Rasa is associated with the AMURT (International Development, Disaster Services, Community Assistance) headquarter in India and with branches worldwide. Website is SMURT.NET.

He had a telephone interview with the Potomac Sustainable Communities Initiative (altenergy2012@gmail.com) group while he was in China working with a Local Government funded Group to set up an OU device development center. His task is to help to bring OU device inventors Worldwide to China. The goal is to speed up the development and marketing of OU devices to benefit the Human Race.
http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2010/02feb/RIR-100203.php

In the interview, he predicted confidently that an OU device will be marketed in the year 2010!

He learned about the Lead-Out Energy Theory and Machines from the Internet and came to Hong Kong. He tested the Tong Wheel himself. He tested the tuning aspects. The Proximity Switch on the Tong Wheel was deliberately wrongly set and NO overunity effect was shown. He then adjusted the Proximity Switch and varied the number of Drive Coils to get overunity effect again.

We plan to work together to benefit the World.

Paul-R · « **Reply #5252 on:** February 05, 2010, 02:11:24 AM »

Lawrence:

How did you arrive at the numbers 16 for the air coils and
15 for the magnets?

Paul-R.

ltseung888 · « **Reply #5253 on:** February 05, 2010, 03:18:47 AM »

Quote from: Paul-R on February 05, 2010, 02:11:24 AM

Lawrence:

How did you arrive at the numbers 16 for the air A and
15 for the magnets?

Paul-R.

The 60 cm diameter Wheel allowed easy spacing for 16 magnet positions. We used one of the corresponding positions for the Proximity Switch. Thus we have space for 15 coils that can be configured either as Drive or as Collector Coils.

The above arrangement automatically satisfied the unbalanced wheel condition needed for the Lead-out energy operation.

ltseung888 · « **Reply #5254 on:** February 05, 2010, 03:50:19 AM »

Watched the video â€“ a machine to die for
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6UgV3gVmd0

The video could be much convincing if the Lead-Out Energy Theory and the mathematics of the pulled pendulum were explained first. The large gravity wheel etc will then be much easier to explain.

Looks like the video we plan to do will have to go in that direction.
Promote the Lead-Out Energy Theory. The many Lead-Out Energy Machines will fall into place.

chrisC · « **Reply #5255 on:** February 05, 2010, 05:47:48 AM »

Quote from: ltseung888 on February 05, 2010, 03:50:19 AM

Watched the video â€“ a machine to die for
http://www.youtube.com/?v=c6UgV3gVmd0

The video could be much convincing if the Lead-Out Energy Theory and the mathematics of the pulled pendulum were explained first. The large gravity wheel etc will then be much easier to explain.

Looks like the video we plan to do will have to go in that direction.
Promote the Lead-Out Energy Theory. The many Lead-Out Energy Machines will fall into place.

@Tseung

Hahha! Saddam Hussein hiding in the Pyramids and the flying saucers hiding in your thick skull has a lot of similarities indeed. It's no wonder you're a DORK!

cheers
chrisC

Paul-R · « **Reply #5256 on:** February 05, 2010, 04:35:18 PM »

Quote from: ltseung888 on February 05, 2010, 03:18:47 AM

The 60 cm diameter Wheel allowed easy spacing for 16 magnet positions. We used one of the corresponding positions for the Proximity Switch. Thus we have space for 15 coils that can be configured either as Drive or as Collector Coils.

The above arrangement automatically satisfied the unbalanced wheel condition needed for the Lead-out energy operation.

Yes, but, in order to reduce manufacturing and purchase costs, what is the smallest number of components that should work?

ltseung888 · « **Reply #5257 on:** February 05, 2010, 11:44:46 PM »

Quote from: Paul-R on February 05, 2010, 04:35:18 PM

Yes, but, in order to reduce manufacturing and purchase costs, what is the smallest number of components that should A?

At this moment in time, every small prototype from our team failed to show overunity. The 60 cm Wheel is the only one that can demonstrate overunity. Another 300 cm Wheel done by another group in China was shown on Shenzhen TV.

The working 225 HP Pulse Motor from USA has a diameter of 100 cm.

My personal belief is that - we are at the comparible "computer infancy" stage. The early computers were large, expensive and had low functionality. The focus was on making them work. Our focus at present is making the Tong Wheel work better. There are many improvements to be done. Reducing size and lowering costs are NOT the high priority at present. The high priority is to get a 300 watt unit and then a 5 KW unit out.

ltseung888 · « **Reply #5258 on:** February 06, 2010, 11:58:13 PM »

http://www.youtube.com/user/mattimber#p/a/u/0/4c4xEblGqRg

The pulse motor by TWM technology is interesting. It is different from the Tong Pulse Motor in the following ways:

1.   There were 3 discs to hold permanent magnets in the rotor.
2.   The Drive Coils on the Stator did not match the number of magnets (2 magnets on each disc and 5 coils on the two stators)
3.   The voltage could vary from 12 Volts to 48 volts.
4.   Two banks of batteries were used. One to power each Stator Coils.
5.   Source of Extra Energy can be explained by the Lead-Out Energy Theory.

No overunity claims were made. However, they claimed that the Pulse was short and thus the Input Power was very low. The Output Power could be drawn from the rotating shaft. The Coils could have different type of core â€“ iron, wood or combination.

This already helps to support the improvements on the Tong Wheel.

ltseung888 · « **Reply #5259 on:** February 07, 2010, 12:26:49 AM »

Quote from: ltseung888 link=topic=2794.msg226635#msg226635 A=1265323646

Meeting with Brother Rasaviharii (rasaviharii@hotmail.com

Rasa is associated with the AMURT (International Development, Disaster Services, Community Assistance) headquarter in India and with branches worldwide. Website is SMURT.NET.

He had a telephone interview with the Potomac Sustainable Communities Initiative (altenergy2012@gmail.com) group while he was in China working with a Local Government funded Group to set up an OU device development center. His task is to help to bring OU device inventors Worldwide to China. The goal is to speed up the development and marketing of OU devices to benefit the Human Race.
http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2010/02feb/RIR-100203.php

In the interview, he predicted confidently that an OU device will be marketed in the year 2010!

He learned about the Lead-Out Energy Theory and Machines from the Internet and came to Hong Kong. He tested the Tong Wheel himself. He tested the tuning aspects. The Proximity Switch on the Tong Wheel was deliberately wrongly set and NO overunity effect was shown. He then adjusted the Proximity Switch and varied the number of Drive Coils to get overunity effect again.

We plan to work together to benefit the World.

Four possible OU technologies that may be funded by the Local Government in China.

1.   The Wang ShenHe wheel. This is the coupling of ferro liquid rotation with unbalanced permanent magnet rotation. No batteries were needed. This is one of the best examples to illustrate the Lead-Out Energy Theory.
2.   The Dr. Liang IC car. The engine consisted of two cylinders with hundreds of Hall-effect ICs. Since no permanent magnets were used, the Lead-Out Energy is mainly gravitational. This meant that the car could not climb up steep slopes. However, improvement such the Chao battery enhancement could be added.
3.   The combined motor-generator. A motor was used to drive a generator via belts, cylinders, flywheels etc. The goal was to extract gravitational and electron motion energy via Pulsing. This is another good example of Lead-Out Energy.
4.   The Lead-Out Energy Pulse Motor. China was made aware of the 225 HP Pulse Motor developed in USA by us in 2006. The chance of them mastering that technology is 100%. If Mr. Tong Po Chi and I could build a working model with little resources, China could easily build the real thing with their top research facilities.

Rasa predicted that an OU device would be available in the year 2010. I am sure that he is correct. We can already sell our Tong Wheel as an educational prototype NOW.

jisatsy · « **Reply #5260 on:** February 07, 2010, 05:50:54 PM »

Quote

We can already sell our Tong Wheel as an educational prototype NOW.

Do you mean this one? :http://www.youtube.com/user/ltseung888#p/u/10/qFktrKzGAvc
How much does one Tong Wheel cost?

ltseung888 · « **Reply #5261 on:** February 07, 2010, 10:56:58 PM »

Quote from: jisatsy link=topic=2794.msg227050#msg227050 A=1265561454

Do you mean this one? :http://www.youtube.com/user/ltseung888#p/u/10/qFktrKzGAvc
How much does one Tong Wheel cost?

The present price is a bundled price for manufacturing companies - one week course plus a working prototype. The manufacturing company can then produce the educational product paying 10% royalty to Help Seedlings Innovate Foundation limited and 10% to a charitable organization of their choice. The present price is HK$150,000.

One manufacturing company has signed up and a prototype has been delivered to them. More are on the way. Some are waiting for the 300 watt version.

When mass produced, the cost of the Education Product is likely to drop to the material, the manufacturing cost plus profit. The material cost should be less than HK$2,000. The other two items will be Country and Company dependent.

The material cost for the 300 watt version is likely to be more or less the same. There are a number of technical issues to resolve. The biggest one is loopback. If that technical problem is resolved, building the 5KW version will be a certainty. The material cost may rise to less than HK$3,000 only.

However, the 5 KW version will be a commercial reality. Huge investments will pour in and the profit motive will dominate. The price of the machine is no longer an issue. The political issues will take over. There is talk that China may then give a working 5 KW unit as a gift to every nation on Earth with all the instructions on how to built it. Many Countries may treat it as a chance to become great and give it freely to its citizens. Some developing countries already expressed that intention.

The cost will then be zero.

In Hong Kong, some developers intend to include that in their new buildings. The cost will be lumped into the selling price of the building. It will be advertised as a free facility.

chrisC · « **Reply #5262 on:** February 07, 2010, 11:08:45 PM »

Quote from: ltseung888 on February 07, 2010, 10:56:58 PM

The price is a bundled price for manufacturing companies - one week course plus a working prototype. The manufacturing company can then produce the educational product paying 10% royalty to Help Seedlings Innovate Foundation limited and 10% to a charitable organization of their choice. The present price is HK$150,000.

...

However, the 5 KW version will be a commercial reality. ...

@Tseung

3 years plus and you're still leading out crap! Sigh....
You must have a memory of a goldfish!

http://www.steorn.com/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=38371

cheers
chrisC

happyfunball · « **Reply #5263 on:** February 08, 2010, 12:07:18 AM »

Quote from: chrisC on February 07, 2010, 11:08:45 PM

@Tseung

3 years plus and you're still leading out crap! Sigh....
You must have a memory of a goldfish!

http://www.steorn.com/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=38371

cheers
chrisC

That is rather damning

chrisC · « **Reply #5264 on:** February 08, 2010, 03:00:13 AM »

Quote from: happyfunball on February 08, 2010, 12:07:18 AM

That is rather damning

@happyfunball

Just a gentle reminder for the naive sheep that follows con man and snake oil vendors. These people often leave a legacy of promises of great cures and major scientific discoveries but eventually end up asking for money!

cheers
chrisC

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory (Read 2181216 times)

ltseung888

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

ltseung888

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

Paul-R

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

ltseung888

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

ltseung888

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

chrisC

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

Paul-R

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

ltseung888

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

ltseung888

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

ltseung888

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

jisatsy

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

ltseung888

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

chrisC

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

happyfunball

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory

chrisC

Re: The Lee-Tseung Lead Out Theory