Dear Top Gun,

Thank you for explaining using the many figures.

I am no experimental scientist.  I look forward to others doing the prototype.

Can you do it or can you recommend someone else?

Wow this is one straaaaaange thread. At one hand you have this group of insulters trying to ridicule tseung after every post he makes. And then you have tseung and his weird posts seemingly ignoring every one of those comments as if he's talking to noone .

Btw tsueng I doubt you'll respond to this but I don't think bessler used such a delicate method on his wheel. His wheel was big and rough (compared to machining of today).For it to somehow use your theory it needed to be very fine tuned and like mentioned earlier every small influence would have made it stop spinning. Your theory, on a real build, would also predict variable rotation speed as friction and what not influences the resonance it wants to attain, while besslers ran at pretty much constant speed.

Extracts from the coming book
Chapter on designing the Magneto Propulsion Unit (MPU)

In the above figure,

(1) The 4 rectangles represented by a are programmable electromagnetic coils.  They are stationary in the inner cylinder b.

(2) The magnetic ball c can move within the cylindrical grove d powered by magnetic attractive forces from the electromagnetic coils a.  Such movement and set up is effectively a lead-out-energy device.  Some of the lead-out-energy can be extracted via the programmable electromagnetic coils a. 

(3) The magnetic ball c essentially glides or rotates on the surface of the stationary inner cylinder b.  The speed can be very high.

(4) When the magnetic attraction force is cut (or turned into repulsion), the magnetic ball c will fly away in the tangential direction along the angle shaped e.  It will hit the surface of e providing an effective force to move the unit downwards in this case.  If the angle shaped e is moved to a different position, the effective force can be in a different direction.

(5) The magnetic ball can be attracted back to repeat its circular motion.

(6) Two of these MPUs can work in unison to provide smooth motion to the vehicle.

Extracts from the coming book
Chapter on designing the Magneto Propulsion Unit (MPU)

In the above figure,

(1) The 4 rectangles represented by a are programmable electromagnetic coils.  They are stationary in the inner cylinder b.

(2) The magnetic ball c can move within the cylindrical grove d powered by magnetic attractive forces from the electromagnetic coils a.  Such movement and set up is effectively a lead-out-energy device.  Some of the lead-out-energy can be extracted via the programmable electromagnetic coils a. 

(3) The magnetic ball c essentially glides or rotates on the surface of the stationary inner cylinder b.  The speed can be very high.

(4) When the magnetic attraction force is cut (or turned into repulsion), the magnetic ball c will fly away in the tangential direction along the angle shaped e.  It will hit the surface of e providing an effective force to move the unit downwards in this case.  If the angle shaped e is moved to a different position, the effective force can be in a different direction.

(5) The magnetic ball can be attracted back to repeat its circular motion.

(6) Two of these MPUs can work in unison to provide smooth motion to the vehicle.


When the ball is rolling around the lower half-circle, the centripetal force acting on the ball lead to a reaction force onto the cylinder via the coils and magnetic forces. The resulting force on the cylinder is in average in the direction of the arrow. 
When the ball is rolling around the upper half-circle, there is an equal force acting onto the cylinder in average in the opposite direction of the arrow.
Thus for each turn, the resulting forces along the arrow are perfectly balanced and we have not to account for their work.

But when the ball is released and hits e, its last half-turn was upper and not balanced by the lower one, thus the average force acting onto the cylinder was in the opposite direction of the arrow, counter-balancing the work of c hitting e.

No motion can be expected from such vehicle.

It is well known that in a closed system, circular motion can't be converted into linear motion. Either you have to prove our models of physics laws are wrong or you have to show us new and unknown phenomenon in physics. You can't expect for revolutionary phenomenon using only basic and simplistic designs with conventional objects and forces which are modelizable with lagrangians or hamiltonians.