(e)   The Group represents Environmentalists.  Their interest is to give the technology free to benefit the World.

This sounds like a far-fetched impossibility.  However, there are multibillionaires in this World who no longer seek joy in earning more money.  There are already over 50 multi-billionaires who can come up with US$1 billion.  One of the late lady multibillionaires in Hong Kong rumored to donate her more than US$20 billion to a fortuneteller.

The chance of a multibillionaire wanting to do good to the World and not to benefit himself is there.  If Bill Gates reads this forum, he may consider buying the Wang technology for the under 10KW market and donate it free to benefit the World.  (Just another impossible dream.  But that is the beauty of an academic exercise.)

Other possible candidates may be Countries.  Many Countries have US$1 billion to spend.  Many may have learned mutual credits and modern wealth.  Many have the manufacturing capabilities.  They can almost guarantee that their less-than-10KW electricity generators have eager markets with the many mutual credit agreements.  The meaningful economic activities for their country and their allies will be guaranteed.  They earn both the good will and the financial benefits.

China may be one of these Countries.  Or China may allow such a sale or technology transfer.  Wang may prefer this solution.  He will gain both fortune and fame.  He will never die like Nikola Tesla ? friendless and penniless in a cheap motel.

Students ? continue this dream or line of thought.  I like this scenario best.

Mr. Tseung:

Just to keep your thread 'alive' without your multiple personalities having to talk to each other. Must be pretty lonely for an old retiree who can't get anyone to pay attention because he can't get past his 'O' level physics and is too proud to enroll in the local technical college?

May I suggest you help in the old folks home where there are plenty of older folks who may need your physical help more than your limited Physics knowledge?

cheers
chrisC

Explaining the Bessler Wheel

Many people asked: "Is the Bessler Wheel theoretically possible?"
 
My answer is a definite yes.  In the figure below, we show a pendulum on the LHS; an unbalanced wheel in the middle and a possible Bessler Wheel on the RHS.

We know that the pulsed (or Lee-Tseung Pulled) pendulum can lead out gravitational energy.  Refer to the hundreds of posts in this thread.

The unbalanced wheel can be viewed as a pulsed pendulum.  If we rotate it slightly clockwise and let go, it will swing back anti-clockwise just like a pendulum.  It we give it a complete clockwise rotation, the rotational speed will slow down when the extra weight moves up.  The rotational speed will speed up when the extra weight moves down.  This deceleration and acceleration simulates a pulsed motion.  It can lead out gravitational energy.  However something is missing.

The Bessler Wheel type arrangement on the RHS is an unbalanced wheel.  The black ball at the top can be heavier than the red ball on the bottom.  This would represent an unbalanced wheel.  It has the balls moving in a tube with padding on one side.  In a clockwise motion, the force of the ball on the top hitting the unpadded side will be greater than that of the ball on the bottom falling on the padded side.  This unbalanced force is the equivalent of the Lee-Tseung Push.  If the rotational speed and the falling weight pulse were timed appropriately, the lead-out energy will be able to do work (light some LEDs as an example) and overcome friction and air resistance.  Thus the ?Bessler Wheel? can theoretically rotate forever ? lighting some LEDs)

However, if the rotational speed and the falling weight pulse were not timed properly, the rotation will slow down or stop.   

Explaining the Bessler Wheel

Many people asked: "Is the Bessler Wheel theoretically possible?"
 
My answer is a definite yes.  In the figure below, we show a pendulum on the LHS; an unbalanced wheel in the middle and a possible Bessler Wheel on the RHS.

We know that the pulsed (or Lee-Tseung Pulled) pendulum can lead out gravitational energy.  Refer to the hundreds of posts in this thread.

....

That's why you're still looping in your head. NO, no one EXCEPT YOU AND YOUR MULTIPLE PERSONA believes this nonsense. You have never once provided conclusive proof. All we have in these hundreds of posts are statements from you as if they were Gospel! Sorry Lawrence, time to take some medicine again!

cheers
chrisC

Let me focus on the figure Bessler.jpg on reply 2958.

Most people who attempted to reproduce the Bessler wheel suffered from the following:

(1)   Produce a symmetric balanced wheel.  Note the two balls on the RHS.  They are of unequal weight.  This will make the wheel unbalanced.

(2)   Do not realize the importance of producing the pulses.  The middle simple unbalanced wheel will accelerate and decelerate.  But a mechanism is required to produce the sharply defined pulses.

(3)   The actual pulsing mechanism.  The RHS figure uses falling balls with unequal weight and padding.  Other examples use hammers and weight shifting configurations.  There are many possibilities.

(4)   The matching of the rotational speed and the pulsing mechanism.  This is the most difficult  part of the experiment.  Hunting for resonance by repeated experiments is a painful process.  A configuration may seem promising.  Then rusts or other factors come in and changed the conditions.  The result is no longer reproducible. 

(5)   Many inventors do not trust simulation software, as they believe that the software would just apply the Law of Conservation of Energy blindly.  Such software did not consider lead-out-energy.  If such software were modified to take lead-out-energy into account, the result will be different.  

(6) Without the guidance of aimulation software, the process becomes a game of hit and miss.  Some claimed that they produced a working prototype.  Others could not reproduce it.  The hammering mechanism is a good example.  It is almost impossible to have two spring hammers behaving exactly enen though they are made from the same long spring.  Some produced the unbalanced wheel by accident as their crude methods could not produce a perfectly balanced wheel.

I am confident that the Bessler Wheel (or the unbalanced wheel using lead-out gravitational energy) can be reproduced if the experimenters understand the above theory.

Personally, I would not waste time because the Wang or Bedini type systems are much easier to reproduce.  It is like producing man-powered flight.  It is possible but the plane with an engine is much easier to produce.

Hey, I just figured out that my Grandfather clock is an overunity device as defined by Lawrence's theory.  You see, the spring, when you wind it up, through the gearing and detent devices, applies the perfect Lee-Tseung pulses to the pendulum at exactly the correct time. (no pun intended)  This is a perfect example of a pendulum leading out gravitational energy.  I don't know why I am the first to discover this.  This should at least earn me an honorable mention at the Nobel Prize ceremonies.  Of course, we have to ignore any energy imparted from the winding of the spring by our hand, and the spring to the pendulum, and the weights we have to lift against gravity, but hey, other than that, it is pure overunity with gravity being lead out. At least I am now on the record for this amazing discovery.


Bill

Hey Bill. Wait a moment. My grandpa also had a wound up pendulum like your grandpa! Now that makes two of us to co-discover this magic Lee-Tseung Push (or was it Pull?) . Now can I also go to the Noble Prize ceremony or at least gain another honorable mention?

Anyone else out there whose grandpa owns one of there perpetual motion machines utilizing the Lee-Tseung hocus pocus mechanism? Hurry.....

cheers
chrisC

Let me focus on the figure Bessler.jpg on reply 2958.

Most people who attempted to reproduce the Bessler wheel suffered from the following:

(1)   Produce a symmetric balanced wheel.  Note the two balls on the RHS.  They are of unequal weight.  This will make the wheel unbalanced.

(2)   Do not realize the importance of producing the pulses.  The middle simple unbalanced wheel will accelerate and decelerate.  But a mechanism is required to produce the sharply defined pulses.

(3)   The actual pulsing mechanism.  The RHS figure uses falling balls with unequal weight and padding.  Other examples use hammers and weight shifting configurations.  There are many possibilities.

(4)   The matching of the rotational speed and the pulsing mechanism.  This is the most difficult  part of the experiment.  Hunting for resonance by repeated experiments is a painful process.  A configuration may seem promising.  Then rusts or other factors come in and changed the conditions.  The result is no longer reproducible. 

(5)   Many inventors do not trust simulation software, as they believe that the software would just apply the Law of Conservation of Energy blindly.  Such software did not consider lead-out-energy.  If such software were modified to take lead-out-energy into account, the result will be different.  

(6) Without the guidance of aimulation software, the process becomes a game of hit and miss.  Some claimed that they produced a working prototype.  Others could not reproduce it.  The hammering mechanism is a good example.  It is almost impossible to have two spring hammers behaving exactly enen though they are made from the same long spring.  Some produced the unbalanced wheel by accident as their crude methods could not produce a perfectly balanced wheel.

I am confident that the Bessler Wheel (or the unbalanced wheel using lead-out gravitational energy) can be reproduced if the experimenters understand the above theory.

Personally, I would not waste time because the Wang or Bedini type systems are much easier to reproduce.  It is like producing man-powered flight.  It is possible but the plane with an engine is much easier to produce.

Technically, there is something missing.  This something is the external load.  Many inventors try to make the rotation of the wheel as smooth as possible - lowest possible friction.  This will make tuning extremely difficult.

The better strategy is to introduce a braking or energy consuming mechanism that can be tuned.  This calls for larger wheel and/or higher rotational speed.

Paid a visit to Sun et al yesterday.  Took pictures and video of the Wang electricity generator and the seawater+oil projects.

We now have four additional presenters.  More are being trained.

Oh man! four young females old Tseung picked up from Hainan island on his R&R?

Do other people wonder why such earth shattering free energy discoveries need little girls to do PP presentations? I must have forgotten to take my medicine!

cheers

chrisC