Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: EMdevices' TPU with batteries in it  (Read 41924 times)

gn0stik

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 302
Re: EMdevices' TPU with batteries in it
« Reply #45 on: July 17, 2007, 03:30:57 AM »
@EM

You?ve lost whatever small amount of credibility you had left. People should not be making excuses for you. We should just accept your situation as it truly is and continue on with our research without you.


You should reserve judgement here, really, you have no idea what you speak of, in regards to EMs character. It was  a low blow, admittedly, but he's come clean and that takes some serious cojones.

Now @EM, make with the diagrams, and hows, and with whats and all the goodies.


Justdoit

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: EMdevices' TPU with batteries in it
« Reply #46 on: July 17, 2007, 03:42:43 AM »
 ::)  Hi to all. I am new to this site. Concerning the toroid coil I have read that the US government dip the coil into liqiud Nitrogen. Has anyone here tried this??? Has anyone here done a toroid coil that's close to working?? ;D

Super God

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 419
Re: EMdevices' TPU with batteries in it
« Reply #47 on: July 17, 2007, 03:46:33 AM »
::)  Hi to all. I am new to this site. Concerning the toroid coil I have read that the US government dip the coil into liqiud Nitrogen. Has anyone here tried this??? Has anyone here done a toroid coil that's close to working?? ;D

As a matter of fact, I don't believe anyone has tried the nitrogen.  But others have come close to getting some working dvices!  Quite an accomplishment!!  There are sticky threads in this forum for your reading leisure.

BEP

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1289
Re: EMdevices' TPU with batteries in it
« Reply #48 on: July 17, 2007, 05:48:26 AM »
@Mark

Point taken on the precision control. At my current point in this exercise I am looking for a way to repeat the process with a method leaning toward mechanical design instead of controls to make up for mechanical design. While it is not easy to produce rotation by any means it appears to be far more difficult to do it with a minimum of electronics in a safe, controllable, usable and repeatable fashion, as I believe SM did with the open TPU.

I have been working a great deal on reverse engineering that one simply because it appears to use the simplest electronics and highest level of physical design. All the others seemed to require sophisticated timing and sequencing of pulses. The open TPU is a thing of beauty on the apparent methods used in layout and the simplicity of the controls I believe it used.

This is the direction I?m taking now. Most should stick with exacting controls as that will allow for adjustments to more unknowns. Also folks here have more total talent in the control side than I. I still keep a hammer on my work bench  ;)

brnbrade

  • elite_member
  • Full Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 126
Re: EMdevices' TPU with batteries in it
« Reply #49 on: July 17, 2007, 05:54:59 AM »
 8)

chrisC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
Re: EMdevices' TPU with batteries in it
« Reply #50 on: July 17, 2007, 06:02:33 AM »
Hi brnbrade:

What's that smile? Any messages for us?

Thanks
chrisC

archon79

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 60
Re: EMdevices' TPU with batteries in it
« Reply #51 on: July 17, 2007, 06:48:09 AM »
I believe that SM's original TPU is a legit device, but you just can not trust any video source even if there are no wires.

You only have to go to youtube and watch some videos by David Blaine and Cris Angel to see what can be done with illusionist tricks

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRMHmnr4b60&mode=related&search=

wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: EMdevices' TPU with batteries in it
« Reply #52 on: July 17, 2007, 07:02:58 AM »
@Brnbrade

How are you? We are trying hard. But we also like to fool around.

@EMdevices

EM - Incredible!!!

I posted the following on July 09, 2007, 03:32:01 PM

and here it already is. Like I was rubbing a genie bottle or something.

And six days after, abracadabra, poof.  My wish is granted.

Just incredible!

Here is maybe a very dumb question but for me it will help in seeing the future.

OK, Otto and Ronotte are testing using three mosfet/driver combos. What I would like to know is where in SM's devices do you think he had such components, the heat sinks, the  power supply to the mosfets, the heat generated, the noise, etc. Or can the mosfets/driver combos be made much much smaller in the future. But then how was it possible in 1997. Or is this question taboo? Or we are all right to agree Otto's device is not a TPU but a new power generator called the ECD?

I am also thinking that to build a TPU, maybe it is best to start building a fake one, same look, same performance but with any type of internal power source exciting any form of coil system possible to achieve the end result, that is to light or half light one, two or more bulbs for the same time as on the demos, that could be officially determined. Once this is achieved, then work backwards to work out the autonomous features.  You can put a limit on the internal battery to output ratio or only have the limitation of weight and practical size/shape and see what type of ideas can be hatched. I am sure there are some others here that would be interested in taking up such a challenge and it would be helpful to the builders. Maybe start a new craze. Maybe even launch a new contest. Who can build the best working replica, regardless of power source? Maybe even outsource it to China. They are so good at copying things fast and cheap.

innovation_station

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5134
Re: EMdevices' TPU with batteries in it
« Reply #53 on: July 17, 2007, 07:06:22 AM »
hello all if in fact this tpu does work as in the vidieos i will find out i am just collecting the rest of the tools to test this properly just got my scope today finally and a freq gen soon but it will be tubes and i will see what i can do with all of this and with some luck i think i can make it work so off i will go to play and stock up on materials

i truly beleave this works verry well and safe

steven marks if you read this  -------------we will get it all figured out yet and i plan on helping

the best to all

ist

xilusma

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Re: EMdevices' TPU with batteries in it
« Reply #54 on: July 17, 2007, 07:44:11 AM »
@EM,

Good to see your bulb light up.  ;) . Looking forward for more. Any recipe that you could shared with me (if the others don't want it). Because mine still don't go to the Ampere as yet. Mine only mil Ampere. But let me say this, it is one worth of knowledge/technology to be shared off (if you permitted so).

@ALL,

A note to wonder - Just imagine, if a device (light,small and portable)  - even if we still uses battery (or any other type of power source) and could produce 100% or more of real workable output, that would mean something. The achievement is very big.

I think, before we could get the OU running (someday) , the above knowledge shouldn't be throw away just like that.

Regards,


MarkSnoswell

  • TPU-Elite
  • Full Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 197
Re: EMdevices' TPU with batteries in it
« Reply #55 on: July 18, 2007, 03:49:09 AM »
This is a copy of a post I just added to my thread here  http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2764.30.html

I am posting it here in support of EMdevices enthusiasm and work but also as a warning ? trust takes time to build but is easily broken. EMdevices said it himself ?what was I thinking? ? the point is that you should think before you act...




This is in response to a PM which reflects the feeling of a lot of people ? Is this all a fake and a waste of time?


Is there something really out there to be discovered ? yes. No question. We really don?t know everything yet!


A side note before I continue  --------------------------------------------------------------------
I think this area is full of people who desperately want to believe. Most of the time they are honest but delude themselves into believing far more than they should. A few become dishonest ? and they get noticed the most.

Unbounded optimism and belief are fine ? in fact they are great motivators!  However, in equal measure, they require honesty and respect, for others and yourself. You must be aware not to create unreasonably false hopes. Regrettably the whole history of ?Free energy? is littered with people who allowed their desires and passion to delude themselves and then others into false belief. Most of the time this leads to disappointment and a feeling of betrayal as time goes on and magical results do not happen. For some the temptation is too great and they slip into knowingly deceiving themselves and others into something that is not true. They then get cast in the same light as the rare con artist that deliberately preys on others.

Don?t think scientists are beyond this behavior ? even in peer reviewed journals overzealous enthusiasm leads to distortion, and sometimes outright fraud. A case in point is the charge of an electron. This was first determined in the famous Robert Millikan and Harvey Fletcher's oil-drop experiment in 1909. The exact electron charge has been refined ever since then with better and better experiments. If you plotted the published results you would expect to see a random distribution of figures that get closer to the true value with time? you don?t. What you see is the published values start with Millikan and Fletchers published figure and gradually get closer to the true value. What was happening was that scientists rejected values too far away from previously published results and biased their own data ? a very unscientific, by very human thing to do.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


It is my opinion that the evidence for various new energy technologies is overwhelming. If you are in doubt just take some time to read the technical papers on Randal Mills Blacklight Power www.blachlightpower.com Many of Randal?s papers are published in peer review journals. Although his theories may be hotly debated I believe his core finding is well proven -- that you can drop the electron in a hydrogen atom to below the previously accepted ?zero? level. Dropping the electron to this new ?below zero? level releases lots of energy ? orders of magnitude more than chemical reactions by orders of magnitude lower than atomic fusion. This result alone ads credibility (but doesn?t make them all true) to all of the water based energy technologies.

Things I have seen that add credibility to TPU class of device?

I visited a group in Mexico last year. They have some very advanced technology which is a result of over 20 years research and a lot of funding  ? I saw demonstrations that were very impressive. They have got to the stage of miniaturizing their devices such that 400w power can be delivered from a 3mm cube device ? small enough to mount in a 8 pin dip package.  I can?t tell you if it was real or fake as I didn?t get the opportunity to test it myself. It appears to have all of the characteristics, artifacts, failure modes and inspirations as SM TPU. They are the same but they appear to share many common characteristics.

Marcus Hollingshead appeared to have something also ? I also noticed a lot of consistency in everything Marcus reported.

And then there is all of the hydrogen work ? Stanley Meyers and Bob Boyce are amongst prominent ones here. Again I am impressed by not just their reported results but by lots of little things that suggest they have the right ingredients for novel effects to exhibit themselves.

I chose to mention the above devices because I think they all have a common mechanism at work. Put it all together and there is something worth investigating? and I think I have a conceptual framework that shows simply why all of the technologies may work. However a conceptual framework is a long way from engineering   -- eg. E=mc^2 is a brilliant concept but doesn?t not tell you how to engineer atomic energy devices!

Initially I dismissed SM TPU as a fake or at least a distortion of fact. However the hints from various people make me think there is something real here ? pulse signals at three different periods, 3 drive coils, DC bias, the 1x and 2x components (plus others)? all of these things make sense. I think I know why they would be *required* in a device that taps spin energy of electrons. What I don?t know is how much truth or fabrication there is to any of the reports of success from anyone at present?. With all due respect there isn?t any really rigorously credible evidence from anyone.

As I said previously ? I was also seduced several times into attempts to copy reported devices ? and failed. I am not interested in this. The way forward is to come up with reasonable theories that are testable and could explain the devices? and then to methodically explore them. At the very least this will result in new understanding and discoveries ? the hope is that it will lead to breakthrough new technologies in many areas.

Cheers

Mark Snoswell.

EMdevices

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1146
Re: EMdevices' TPU with batteries in it
« Reply #56 on: July 18, 2007, 04:05:20 AM »
Hi Guys,

As some of you know I've been involved with the TPU close to a year.

I'm working as an electrical engineer in RF right now, and I was grabed by the videos shown on google and other places.  I gave the man the benefit of doubt.

So I labored and labored and theorized and experimented, and it's been fun.

Then I got fed up with it.  It's summer time, I live in Florida where its nice and warm and have I been to the beach yet?  have I enjoyed my weekends?  have I gone on a cruise?   NO and No and NO

So I said forget this obsession.  We need first of all to make sure it's not a fake.  Why don't I try to fake it I thought.  

So I said to myself, let me call SM's statement a bluff  ("..... there are no batteries that can supply the amout of power you see here....")  and see what happens.

As I was in the store, I saw a sale  (no hurricanes yet so lots of batteries on sale   :)  )

So I bought lots and lots of batteries !!!!

I hope this has helped you in some way.  It has helped me a lot.  

There are no patents to be found (as claimed in the video), no action on anybody who owns the so called "rights" only gov conspiracy excuses.  I'm tired of it.  It's all bull.

Oh and you want me to fake the TV setup too, did you happen to see the INVERTER AND HOW BIG IT WAS?  If he outputs DC what's up with all that white box?  I can stick a batteri in there and run my TV for a whole DAY !!!!

EVERYTHING IN THE VIDEOS CAN BE FAKED, EVEN THE SOUNDS AND VIBRATIONS (does anybody have a cell phone)

Anyway,  I'M NOT SAYING SM IS BOGUS, I'm just saying THE VIDEOS CAN BE FAKED.

EM  

P.S.  Oh and all that other stuff , wires, toroids, etc.. were to make it look authentic, you loved it didn't you.  :)

Super God

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 419
Re: EMdevices' TPU with batteries in it
« Reply #57 on: July 18, 2007, 04:21:36 AM »
Anyone can put 15 nine volt batteries into a toroidial shape and call it a TPU.  What most people can't do is use the earth's magnetic field to generate electricity, even if the videos were fake, is there any point to faking those videos?  I duno, I just have a really strong gut feeling that this thing is real!

EMdevices

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1146
Re: EMdevices' TPU with batteries in it
« Reply #58 on: July 18, 2007, 04:25:53 AM »
I'm with you Super God,  SM strikes me as a genuine guy,  I work with a lot of folks like him.  But then you never know how twisted some people can get.  Money and the power .... power and the money     Ha Ha   :D :)

EM

HopeForHumanity

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 295
Re: EMdevices' TPU with batteries in it
« Reply #59 on: July 18, 2007, 04:28:57 AM »
EMdevices,

Before you attempt to fake a video like this, please take into account all the effects, magnets starting it up, doesn't work upside down. I understand you trying to show us it can be faked, but you only showed us the power can be faked. To me, an eduacational video of faking this device, must be faked entirely. No if's and's or but's. I think the title should be EMdevice's ring with batteries in it, it technicaly wasn't a TPU.