Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Essential parts and operating theory  (Read 4774 times)

Dingus Mungus

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 859
Essential parts and operating theory
« on: July 16, 2007, 07:33:20 AM »
So you claim to know something absolute about the TPU???

I'm so replulsed by some of the threads in this heading.
So many members claiming to KNOW something with no proof.
Untill someone here has a working and replicated device they
can't tell anyone about requirements or esential parts at all!!!

People need to start representing their claims better.
All of this conjecture listed as fact only weakens our odds.

Just my 2 cents,
~Dingus Mungus

Those who chose to flame me now need to show some
sort of proof of independent varification by another member.
Untill then you can not be sure of anything...

Hopefully this will help me seperate the real facts from the crap.

Super God

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 419
Re: Essential parts and operating theory
« Reply #1 on: July 16, 2007, 03:09:03 PM »
I agree.  There's too many theories to keep track of!!  :-\

Dingus Mungus

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 859
Re: Essential parts and operating theory
« Reply #2 on: July 18, 2007, 11:49:35 AM »
Seriously though...
This isn't a useless jab, its a call to arms.
A way to put all the teachers and fibbers to the same test.
No guidelines or definitions, just a request for indirrect advice.

I'm hoping for two or more regular members to come foreward and clearly state exactly what they've observed and the specs on the device they've built. With that little piece of info we'll know at least one factual effect observed in one known method of TPU design. This will help me know what to build and further document...

I'm spending money as we speak on HF-RF function and pulse generators, scope, all the equipment I'll need, but with all this talk of whats TPU and not TPU, I just want to know who here has something real? Some effect that others have also observed in thier own units. Far too many unvalidated claims for me to assume anything. So someone please pipe up if you have the best answer on the forum.

In the mean time I'm going to play with they floating ground feedback coil I saw on google video. I plan to first replicate the stacking wave reflection effect, and then use 3 phase to get a genuine rotating magnetic field as I imagine it. (image attached)

So obviously I'm not some skeptical "blind to the truth" asshole here. I just want a straight answer that require less than 100 pages of speculation. I know for a fact there are members on this forum who are involved in team based replication of a device. I was hoping for a more compelling case by now.

~Dingus Mungus
« Last Edit: August 06, 2007, 09:38:27 AM by Dingus Mungus »

Dingus Mungus

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 859
Re: Essential parts and operating theory
« Reply #3 on: August 06, 2007, 07:54:47 AM »
Better simulated example... 4 phase was easier to plot and it shows the B value oscillations clearly. This simulation does not account for the feedback that is caused when a coil aproaches 0V, but anyone familiar with induction can clearly see the field drag across the unenergized coils.

Click on image to animate.

Dingus Mungus

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 859
Re: Essential parts and operating theory
« Reply #4 on: August 06, 2007, 09:20:55 AM »
The most significant difference between this 3 or more phase electromagnetic simulation and an actual spinning magnet would be the presence of three dipole fields not one. This makes the poles run in the same direction inside and outside of the ring all springing from central points between the opposing EM fields.