Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Talking about phase...  (Read 69510 times)

HumblePie

  • TPU-Elite
  • Jr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 59
Re: Talking about phase...
« Reply #45 on: July 11, 2007, 04:07:36 AM »
Hmmm.     About Phase means about phase... and coil config's that relate to phase... and pulsing strategy.     

Bob. B's words here and on page 67 of Succ'TPU-Replicat' thread were very carefully written so read them well. 

Please post photos here of things created from his advice.  Nothing not stemming from his words.  You've all suffered reading bla bla in other threads to understand why.

This is not Poker, this is about mentoring each other.  If someone takes time to PM you, help them.  If they need to 'step off', tell them.  They are asking for your help offline so as not to mess up and dilute these threads!  Point to the info if it is in thread somewhere when you speak about it.

Show how you accomplish phase control, show your edge speeds, show your waveforms.  Briefly share results here born out of Bob B's advice so Bob will come and see how the garden is growing.  If you've read his words you should now be 100% motivated to begin building a coil... any coil.  If he comes back here and sees 250 pages of bla bla lost sheep, this may be it folks!   Show the fruit!   

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: Talking about phase...
« Reply #46 on: July 11, 2007, 04:41:52 AM »
Rich:
you are correct - Bob did state FET's.

Will edit my post, but I do not see why a lot of power should be required.  Should be able to run it off a battery.  Maybe Bob is running a house from it.



wcernuska:
point taken.  Let's keep this thread clean.

All:
I'm going to rewind my primaries and will take pictures this time.

Bob Boyce

  • TPU-Elite
  • Full Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 139
    • Water is Life
Re: Talking about phase...
« Reply #47 on: July 11, 2007, 05:15:10 AM »
@all

I'm sorry that I have not been on. I was staying with my daughter at the hospital as she was going through a surgery, and no internet there. It will take me a day or two to rest up, go through the posts, and post responses.

Bob Boyce

Bruce_TPU

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1437
Re: Talking about phase...
« Reply #48 on: July 11, 2007, 05:21:43 AM »
Hi Bob,

I hope that all is well with your daughter.  I too have a 5yr old.  The joy of my life.  I will keep ya'll in my prayers.

Thank you again for your time.

Warm regards,
Bruce

gn0stik

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 302
Re: Talking about phase...
« Reply #49 on: July 11, 2007, 09:56:37 PM »
@all

I'm sorry that I have not been on. I was staying with my daughter at the hospital as she was going through a surgery, and no internet there. It will take me a day or two to rest up, go through the posts, and post responses.

Bob Boyce

No problem at all Bob, health and family first man. Time will come. Till then do what you have to.

Regards,
Rich

@Grumpy, NP man.

@all, are you guys using cores or a wire core like SM? If you are using cores like Bob's, where are you getting them?

Regards,
Rich

Bob Boyce

  • TPU-Elite
  • Full Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 139
    • Water is Life
Re: Talking about phase...
« Reply #50 on: July 12, 2007, 01:42:43 AM »
Let's get back to the discussion of "phase":

@Bob B:

How close to ideal phase separation (as in 120 degrees separation for three poles, 90 degrees for four, etc.) should or shouldn't it be?  I can use a ring counter or shift register to get the phased signals and then adjust them at each coil to make up for differences in winding/position, etc. - this sounds like the best approach.

Are you reversing the signal polarity like a 3-phase motor or just positive pulses?

--------------------------

I got the parts, just need to wire them up.  Pretty simple actually.  Earl posted a circuit on another thread that would be good for experimenting.  Build that and adjust the clock for freq, tune the phases, and hold on to your hat.

EDIT: (Earl's circuits - http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2582.0.html )

Pictures?  This is so simple to wind - why would you need a picture?

EDIT:  I did not count the windings.  I did not take pictures while winding.  It is easy enough to disassemble when and if the time comes.

Phase is everything, so accuracy of primary coil mounting is important. As I said before, minor errors can be compensated for by timing at the controller, at the expense of overall efficiency of coarse. In my controllers, each power MOSFET switches the negative side of the primary circuit. The positive is fed to the primaries common via a choke to minimize HF EMI to the power supply. Pulses applied to the primaries are uni-polar, as there is no H-Bridge used.

Bob

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: Talking about phase...
« Reply #51 on: July 12, 2007, 01:58:47 AM »
@Bob B,

Thanks much.  Confirming my assumptions.

----------------

This "dominant energy", would this be a scalar energy that is non-cancelling? Is it perpendicular to both the electric and magnetic fields?

Anything else you can tell me about dominant energy?

Bob Boyce

  • TPU-Elite
  • Full Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 139
    • Water is Life
Re: Talking about phase...
« Reply #52 on: July 12, 2007, 03:01:48 AM »
@Bob B.,

Please tell us how do we 'focus the field inward' for safety as you describe. 

I assume the DB Bias is preferred for battery charging as well.  Does this help in containing or focusing the field? 

Can you tell us more about calculating efficient windings needed for a particular core size and intended load as you mentioned?  Thank you very much for time and patience.

Ward

By the use of a full toroid shape and a powder iron core, the field is focused inwards more than outwards. This is inherent in toroidal transformer design. The permeability of the core helps ensure high flux density where it is desired, but not so high of a permeability as to saturate easy.

The DC bias is two-fold in my system. Primary function is to provide a relatively high voltage dipole charge seperation between the core and earth/ground. The RMF which occurs during 3 phase drive of the toroid takes place while contained within the electrostatic field of this DC bias. Secondary function is specifically related to the application of this system as a power source for the hydroxy gas system. It provides a source of free electrons for cancelling charge, which is required by my resonance drive system.

Since this was designed for a particular application, I had worked out a way of calculating the secondary to primary ratio based on operational parameters of the load cell stack. The load impedance of the water in a cell stack is a bit strange in that regard, because there is no real load unless potential is high enough. Potential below that threshold results in a very high impedance. I really don't want to get into details of hydroxy gas technology here, but suffice it to say that the formula I use would not translate well to other types of loads. For most other applications, a capacitor would probably be required to isolate the load from the DC bias potential, while passing the energy to drive the load.

Bob

Bob Boyce

  • TPU-Elite
  • Full Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 139
    • Water is Life
Re: Talking about phase...
« Reply #53 on: July 12, 2007, 03:34:15 AM »
Rich:
you are correct - Bob did state FET's.

Will edit my post, but I do not see why a lot of power should be required.  Should be able to run it off a battery.  Maybe Bob is running a house from it.

wcernuska:
point taken.  Let's keep this thread clean.

All:
I'm going to rewind my primaries and will take pictures this time.

The power to switch the power MOSFETs is so that they turn on ultra fast and clean. Enough load at the gate should be provided to get an ultra fast and clean turn of as well. It takes a good fast FET driver with plenty of power available at its input to do this.

Bob

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: Talking about phase...
« Reply #54 on: July 12, 2007, 03:59:22 AM »
@Bob,

Yes, the field around a toroid (outside) would be more dense inside than outside the ring based on the geometry and hence surface areas of the inside and outside of the ring.  A thin ring would have less of a difference compared to a very thick ring. 

Have you been able to relate dimensions to performance and controllability?  Like, would a thin ring require more bias to get the same effect as a thick section.  Isa thin ring more controllable do to the closer field densities inside and outside the ring?

Might have missed this in the other posts, but how much voltage/current are you switching across the MOSFETS?  I have several IFR types and a few STP9NK90Z's (900 volts 8 amps - low ns - see attached).

EDIT: In an effort to try to understand the dynamics of phase and the rotating field - at higher frequencies of operation and, hence, rotation, does phase error become better, worse, or just limit the upper field to some level?  You know, like with 5 degree phase accuracy you get 100%, 200% with 3 degrees, 500% with 1 degree, etc.  Not looking for these specifics, just general rules of thumb to help understand the dynamics of the field based on how I think it works.  I think that the phase error would limit the field and you may have referered to this when you spoke about 200% VS 1000%.

Does the current output heat like regular current does?
« Last Edit: July 12, 2007, 06:33:36 AM by Grumpy »

Bruce_TPU

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1437
Re: Talking about phase...
« Reply #55 on: July 12, 2007, 04:10:05 AM »
Hello Bob,

S.M. talked about counter rotational fields in his TPU.  Of course, his mechanics are slightly different from yours.  He had his collectors wrapped around the circumference of the toroid.  He had three of them.  Into each of these he placed primary frequency into the first, harmonic into the second and then the third freq. into the third collector.  I also believe he had three segments, that he called control wires and you call phase windings.  His collectors were stranded lamp chord (two conductor).  It vibrated at 7.3 Hz. when operating.

Based on you experience and knowledge, does it sound like perhaps he used a 7.3 Hz phase in the three control wire segments for the RMF, used a DC Bias in one of the two conductors of the collectors and placed the frequencies in the other collector conductors.  Both the frequencies and this DC bias would be rotating in the opposite direction of the RMF established by the phases.  What are your thoughts on this, and this part of the SM device?  Have you had any success with other configurations of your mechanics?

Thank you,
Bruce

gn0stik

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 302
Re: Talking about phase...
« Reply #56 on: July 12, 2007, 06:59:44 PM »
Hello Bob,

S.M. talked about counter rotational fields in his TPU.  Of course, his mechanics are slightly different from yours.  He had his collectors wrapped around the circumference of the toroid.  He had three of them.  Into each of these he placed primary frequency into the first, harmonic into the second and then the third freq. into the third collector.  I also believe he had three segments, that he called control wires and you call phase windings.  His collectors were stranded lamp chord (two conductor).  It vibrated at 7.3 Hz. when operating.

Based on you experience and knowledge, does it sound like perhaps he used a 7.3 Hz phase in the three control wire segments for the RMF, used a DC Bias in one of the two conductors of the collectors and placed the frequencies in the other collector conductors.  Both the frequencies and this DC bias would be rotating in the opposite direction of the RMF established by the phases.  What are your thoughts on this, and this part of the SM device?  Have you had any success with other configurations of your mechanics?

Thank you,
Bruce

Let me take a stab at this, in that video, the 7.3 hz he speaks about is the physical vibration of the unit. He's talking about the inertial effect. Of course, we don't have enough information from SM directly to determine the cause of the inertial effect or why it happens at that frequency, so we have to do some interpretation. Marco did some experiments a while back he called his "dancing magnets" experiments. In some he had a small toroidal transformer which he pulsed with a square wave at a decent amplitude in the direct vicinity of some ring magnets that he got from some pc speakers. At very close to that frequency, the magnets began to dance violently. It was 7.83hz to be exact. He stepped through the frequencies and watched the effect rise and fall in relation to them. Marco said that the effect also worked with sine waves, but was far more pronounced with square waves(dc pulses). In marco's experiments the coil was fixed and the magnets were free to move, however if the magnets had been fixed and the coil free to move, it would have been the coil vibrating. So what can we determine from this? Either the coil is interacting, at that specific frequency, directly with a local magnetic field, from a magnet, or perhaps the earth's field. SM's coils are much larger of course, so could be much more sensitive to a weak local field. Magnetometers are obviously sensitive enough, since that is what they are designed to do. Now, how is SM's device producing this frequency? Is it a resultant beat frequency? Is he actually feeding the device with this frequency? Nobody knows. There is another problem here, that is what Marco's experiments would imply. Contrary to currently accepted physics, this would imply that Magnetism itself, has a frequency component. This in turn would imply that magnetism is an energy (not a force), and part of the em spectrum, independent of, but tied to electricity. Unfortunately, Marco did not perform these experiments with larger magnets to see if it was resonating with the mass of the object, rather than the magnetism, at least not to my recollection. However, I still believe that it was probably the single most important experiment anyone has done since all this started.

As to the other parts of your post. I don't recall SM saying counter-rotating fields, so I cannot comment on that. He did say rotate a ball in two directions at the same time. See GK's avatar for the currently accepted idea as to what SM meant by this. Imagine those balls moving at different speeds and what that would do to those collisions the resultant direction of rotation of field would be such that it moves in one direction. Now consider the polarity of those pulses, and what happens when you put a positive and negative together at the same point in a wire. Now think of the "jumper cable" experiment. SM's first suggestion of how to see the kick.

Also your interpretation of the operation and construction are off a bit, or your terminology is. From everything that is posted by SM through mannix, it can be easily ascertained the that collectors in SM's device are not directly fed a frequency, or a harmonic. However it can be said that this is where the frequencies combine. This would be where the resultant beat frequency would come in. This is where the vibration would come from. Also, in Bob's device, the longitudinal bias winding would be analogous to the collector, and the transverse controls are analogous the phase windings. In Mag-Amp theory, the transverse windings are called control windings. And that's what these devices are in operation. Very special Mag amps. The biggest difference between Bob's device, and Stevens, is the addition of a core in Bob's. However, if we go back and look at all of SM's devices, we can see that it's quite possible that some of his smaller units used core's as Bob's device does. And we all know Bob's story about his air-core unit, and how it induced a lightning strike that injured him. That sounds very familiar. The other big difference is that Bob's output is via his secondary, which would be analogous to SM's secondary control, that is all encompassing. However the arrangment is different so this can be a simple logical transformation, or, we could be misinterpreting those build instructions from SM.

I'm not sure what you mean, by "7.3hz phase" Phase is phase, it's the relationship between the peaks and valleys in two different signals. Usually indicated by degrees. Also the rotating bias thing kinda confused me a bit. The dc bias does not "rotate", however it would be perturbed by the rotating fields being generated around it. "Squeezed" so to speak. That might sound familiar as well.

Rich

tao

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 378
Re: Talking about phase...
« Reply #57 on: July 12, 2007, 08:39:50 PM »
Let me take a stab at this, in that video, the 7.3 hz he speaks about is the physical vibration of the unit. He's talking about the inertial effect. Of course, we don't have enough information from SM directly to determine the cause of the inertial effect or why it happens at that frequency, so we have to do some interpretation. Marco did some experiments a while back he called his "dancing magnets" experiments. In some he had a small toroidal transformer which he pulsed with a square wave at a decent amplitude in the direct vicinity of some ring magnets that he got from some pc speakers. At very close to that frequency, the magnets began to dance violently. It was 7.83hz to be exact. He stepped through the frequencies and watched the effect rise and fall in relation to them. Marco said that the effect also worked with sine waves, but was far more pronounced with square waves(dc pulses). In marco's experiments the coil was fixed and the magnets were free to move, however if the magnets had been fixed and the coil free to move, it would have been the coil vibrating. So what can we determine from this? Either the coil is interacting, at that specific frequency, directly with a local magnetic field, from a magnet, or perhaps the earth's field. SM's coils are much larger of course, so could be much more sensitive to a weak local field. Magnetometers are obviously sensitive enough, since that is what they are designed to do. Now, how is SM's device producing this frequency? Is it a resultant beat frequency? Is he actually feeding the device with this frequency? Nobody knows. There is another problem here, that is what Marco's experiments would imply. Contrary to currently accepted physics, this would imply that Magnetism itself, has a frequency component. This in turn would imply that magnetism is an energy (not a force), and part of the em spectrum, independent of, but tied to electricity. Unfortunately, Marco did not perform these experiments with larger magnets to see if it was resonating with the mass of the object, rather than the magnetism, at least not to my recollection. However, I still believe that it was probably the single most important experiment anyone has done since all this started.

............

Rich


About your whole post Rich,  I agree 100%.

In addition, Marco's dancing magnets and even his 7.8Hz magnet motor that he had made, very impressive stuff, and I don't just mean because it LOOKS cool, lol.

Listen folks, in all of our searches for OU, the one constant thing we should all be looking for is ASYMMETRY, for it provides a basis for all OU devices' 'mechanisms of energy gain'. We should strive to recognize and look for instances where we can find such asymmetries, for these are 'sign-posts' on our way to finding viable OU devices.

Let me give you a 'for instance' in regard to asymmetry so you know what I am talking about, I will use Marco's dancing magnets as an example.

You can clearly see in Marco's dancing magnets experiment that at 1Hz, the magnet's are hardly moving, but as Marco approaches 7.83Hz the magnet's start violently moving about, hence we are seeing an INCREASE IN MOVEMENT(ENERGY OUTPUT). Now, what isn't shown in the video explicitly is that for each of those frequencies at which Marco is doing the pulsing, THE INPUT ENERGY to his kick coil IS THE SAME.

So, we SEE a STEADY INPUT POWER, and an INCREASING ENERGY OUTPUT(in the form of more magnet movement). The ratio of input power to output power is changing as Marco changes the frequencies. That is called an asymmetry!

So, two questions you know have to ask yourself, after finding any asymmetry, is:
How can we MAXIMIZE this asymmetry?
and
Once we do maximize it, will the output energy ever exceed the input energy?

This applies to all OU devices...


PS - The above was not written as an effort to 'talk down to' or belittle anyone here, I merely wrote it for those in the majority that might not know exactly how to go about looking for or qualifying an OU device...

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: Talking about phase...
« Reply #58 on: July 12, 2007, 09:28:04 PM »
Anything and everything relating to 7.xx Hz would be interesting if the Shaumann REsonance frequency had not shift to somewhere around 10 or 11 Hz.  Also Bob mentioend in an early post that he doubted that SM tuned to this low freq and that the discharge was more representative of a mugh higher frequency.  Also, SM has mentioned RF burns on several occasions as well as precise frequency control.

As for "ASYMMETRY" I don't agree 100%.

It is a little known fact that a rotating magnetic field will change a curled vector potential into a divergence - a dipole.  It is also little known that the inside and outside may not be pointing the same direction as the field rotates.

As has been posted about several times before, magnets do have a frequency and it is on the order of about 175 khz - far above 7 Hz.  I read somewhere that Tesla used this freq in some of his devises, but have not confirmed this.  There are something like 5 different classifications of magnetism and they all have a frequency - ferromagnetic is around 175 khz.  Find the others and you got something to talk about.

Then there is the newly explored world of "spintronics" where scientist hope to harness the a known aspect of electrons - they spin and this spin creates a "spin current" - which is very hard to control.  An elxtric field will produce a transverse force on a spin field - similar to the Hall effect.  Also, spin currents do not interact with the environment like charge current does - spin currents produce little heat.  One could also surmise that a spin field will produce a transverse force on a magnetic field - which would induce a current...

Go further and we see that everything has the primal element of spin - everything.  Neutrons have spin but no charge (neutrinos - ala Tesla's RE also have no charge), protons spin and have positive charge, electrons spin with negative charge.  When an electric charge is applied to a wire and the electrons rotate to align their axis to the potential - before they drift and create a current, what are the neutrons and protons doing?  The proton should also rotate since it is charged.  What is the neutron doing?

So, harness the spin and you got the keys to the universe. 

Bruce_TPU

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1437
Re: Talking about phase...
« Reply #59 on: July 12, 2007, 09:35:59 PM »
I have enjoyed reading all three of the last posts.  The part I wish to comment on is where I talked about the three collectors, each receiving a frequency.

SM:
"There need to be three of them all the way around.
start them up one at a time each.
First frequency then second harmonic component into the second,
then the third.
when you eventually strike the cord look out.
you will know what has happened at that point.
In the mean time you can measure a slight output even if you do not
strike the exact cord."

Now, it has always been an assumption, one that I made also, that of course the three frequencies need to mix.  But based on Bob's information I no longer believe that.  He uses a frequency and harmonic in each of the three phases, and they never mix, except when going to ground.

Warm regards,
Bruce